According To Hoyt

I was mildly amused by Ed Driscoll’s article on truly bizarre commercials.  For those not inclined to click through to PJM, the commercials in question are these:

(And is that a creepy name or what?)

I’m happy to say that I missed both of these due to my habit of not watching TV save on rare and odd occasions (like when I’m doing ironing.  Incidentally, I need recommendations for good tv series or documentaries on the Terror.  At least if you guys want me to write Through Fire [second book of the Earth Revolution.] I don’t need it for research. The shelves devoted to the French Revolution are second only in length to the shelves devoted to Shakespeare, but when a book is in the last stages of being born – or when my subconscious is in the process of laying an egg – I sometimes need visual stimulus for a touch-feel sense.)

Commercials fascinate me ever since I came to the states as an exchange student at seventeen, and realized in shock and fascination that the TV commercials were VERY careful to have at least two races together.  No group of friends was ever mono-racial.  This was completely different from what I saw around me in Stow Ohio, and after a while it occurred to me that commercials were like the fairytales the culture told itself.  For some reason, somewhere, someone believed it would appeal to most people if it wrapped it in this cultural illusion that didn’t exist anywhere in reality.

In the same way, right now, the hyper competent female and truly stupid bumbling male is a fairytale that companies think will sell things – partly because it’s part of a lie that everyone, including their husbands, is telling American women.  No?  Okay.  Raise your hand if you’ve ever heard in a public situation, a highly accomplished man say something about his wife that runs like this “She’s way smarter/more accomplished/more capable than I am.”?  Number of times you’ve seen the reverse?  Why not?  Because nine times out of ten these women are very average women married to high power men and the man is trying to be chivalrous.  (Right here I want to point out I’m aware my husband is smarter than I.  That’s why I married him.  Okay, one of the reasons.  Of course, I didn’t take in account the difficulties of raising his sons.  Never mind.)

In that way, commercials are sort of a fun house mirror, exaggerating and reflecting back at us the weirdest and most distorted parts of our culture or of the stories we tell ourselves about our culture.

Ed Driscoll doesn’t really push the point that this is a slippery slope, though he does mention it.  This is good, because I don’t think it is.  I don’t think any woman in her right mind, or even not in her right mind is dying to kiss a sea lion, and as for autocannibalism, well…  It takes special for that.

I sort of chuckled over the article and went on – and woke in the morning with a different view on it.

To wit, what came to mind was that it’s not a slippery slope, but it sort of is, and we’re sort of at the end of it.  Not a slippery slope of making us accept bestiality or self-eating, but a slippery slope of entertainment and the tales we tell ourselves about our culture, both through entertainment and through commercials being completely divorced from reality.

And then I realized this is the anti-human-wave.  It’s not even the (old) New Wave either.  They had the redeeming factor that they were telling people things no one wanted to hear.  (They missed the commercial disaster this foretold once the novelty wore off, but never mind.)  They were, for a brief moment at least, until the culture caved, telling truth to power.

The current Anti-Human wave in power isn’t even doing that.  They are the power.  And part of the problem is that like any ideological dictatorship or Marxist theocracy, they’re not content with taking over the material part of things.  (That’s because Marxism promises paradise on Earth once man himself is transformed.) Instead, they want to control what words can be said and what thoughts can be thought.

This causes problems, because they won’t allow through the gate anything that is “double plus ungood” according to them.  So there will be no commercials that reflect at least fifty percent of the couples we see in real life (and often more since it’s still a good strategy to attract a mate for a woman to act dumber than a hen) where the woman is a total dolt and the man is competent.  We’ll never see a tv series in which a young black man is a victim of the culture he was raised in, and a victim of people never being able to tell him the truth about his accomplishments, and therefore he gets in a position where he fails hard.  (And btw, those young men are victims of racism.  Both the racist culture that convinces them that to be “authentic” they need to be anti-social, and the white racism that treats them as a mother treats a two year old child, praising his drawing as though it were Da Vinci and Michaelangelo rolled into one.  I never did this to my kids and I don’t do it to anyone else, either.  I believe melanin has zero to do with intelligence and I disapprove of cultural trends that set some groups up to fail.)  We’ll never see Arab terrorists in TV or movie or book.  You’ll see white supremacists, and splinter groups of nationalist movements that never existed.  You’ll never see Marxist terrorists either – most of the people in power feel kinship with communism and think this time we can do it right – instead you’ll see – again – Nazis, which in this version are NEVER socialists.

There is a problem with that.

I’ve said before I’m not an artist.  To be honest I don’t know if I am or not.  I don’t even seem to plan/approach my writing like anyone else I know.  The books tend to more or less overmaster me and force me to write them.  I use craft to make them saleable.  The craft is what I control so I call myself a craftswoman.

But I am at least at the edges of artistic creation.  So let me tell you the problem from this side, when the gatekeepers (and no, I’m not ignoring they are on the way out – but trust me, we’re on the very beginning of THAT revolution.)

The problem is that when you establish no-go areas in your own mind, areas you see around you every day (no?  Are the lines in security in response to Basque nationalist terrorists?) your mind has to find other ways to express itself.

One of the things that seems to happen is that art becomes mannered, repetitive, and the expression of a world that doesn’t exist.  See the French plays of Shakespeare’s contemporaries.  Not allowed to talk about anything real, they had these mannered, formulaic plays in which messengers brought you word of anything too shocking to be seen on stage.  (I was highly amused by finding as a runner for truly being Shakespeare Antonio Jose da Silva, the Jew, who was supposed to have faked his death and gone on to become William Shakespeare.  Let alone this would require a time machine, we studied da Silva’s plays in school.  They were very good of their kind, but definitely in the French school.)

We have that to an extent.  I mean, when is the last time you opened a fantasy book from a big publisher and found something truly shocking or new, or even a violation of a minor politically correct piety that is not and has never been true?  Perhaps I don’t read enough, but part of the reason I don’t, is the tendency of modern fantasy to put me to sleep, so that I ended up restricted to Terry Pratchett and Diana Wynne Jones.

Then there is the reverse side of this because our culture has enshrined the idea that “speaking truth to power” is a duty of the artist…  Except the artist can’t, because well, most people QUITE FRANKLY are not the stuff gadflies and revolutionaries are made of.  (And thank heavens for that.  My son did a whole skit on the subject of a pre-historic tribe composed of people like me, and how short a survival time it would have.  “We need to go hunt mammoth, we are starving.  You, come hunt mammoth.”  “No.  Don’t feel like it.  Will learn to weave baskets.”  Or “You can’t eat purple berry, it kills you.”  “Oh, yeah, you and whose army?  I’ll eat purple berry if I want toggggggggggahhhhhhhh.”)

So we have, of course, the endless tourettes like violation of taboos that haven’t been that for at least sixty years: in your face sex and violence, which are supposed to shock… the proper people of the fifties.

When that fails, we get the other side of it – the violation of taboos that aren’t taboos because no one in their right mind would do this.  Hence, girls making out with sea lions.  (I mean, classical myth records bulls and – weirdly – swans, but sea lions?  Have you ever smelled the things?  EW.)  And ice-cream men eating themselves.

And if you’re saying “But that doesn’t happen in entertainment” I direct you to the movie Crash – the first one, in which people get turned on by being in car crashes and having hideous injuries.  It was supposed to symbolize something or other, but mostly it was the glorification of a sexual fetish no one had.  (Though they might now, I mean, you know, once you mention it.)

Because that’s shocking (mostly because people will sit there saying “how can you think that’s hot?  She looks like an industrial clothes rack) and speaking truth to power (we’re free to be as kinky as we wanna be, so there.)

Also, there was this mystery series I fell prey to (it happens every ten years or so) medium.  I liked medium because the way she assembled clues is often how I put books together.  Not really, but sort of.  And because, of course, she did something other people would think crazy.  And then – I think it was the fifty season – it went nuts.  The “normal” reasons for murder were no longer enough.  You had odd fetishes and “he just went insane” and went insane in a bizarrely convoluted manner that led to killing children and packaging them like dolls.  That’s the episode where I stopped watching.  My husband watched on a little longer and said it became like a cross between its old self and Criminal Minds.  I guess the ratings were falling and because the series could not – gatekeepers – reflect reality, it went further and further away from reality in a shocking and bizarre way.

Part of me is vaguely amused by those commercials and wonders how far things will go before the corrective of indie comes in.  Also, how fast indie will act.

I think the establishment is engaged in preference falsification and we’re do for a preference cascade.  Things like Fifty Shades of Grey – don’t scream – are signs of it, as is, to an extent, Twilight.  Both hark to older romances/erotica in which women were allowed to be submissive.  Most women, by nature, seem to want to be overmastered (I say seem because I never felt the need myself – but then I’m odd.)  However, entertainment has refused for years to give them what they want.  As traditionally published romances employed more and more feminized heroes, there was nothing for these women (though many were devotees of old stuff.)  Hence, these break through best sellers with FFOG now outselling Harry Potter.  (Haven’t read it, don’t intend to.  The only stronger turn off for me than BD or SM is submissive females.  Don’t misunderstand me, I like strong male love interests.  As strong as the woman.  I just believe in marriages of equals – See Kit and Athena.)

So, even though indie is in its infancy, we should be engaging in another Human Wave activity: writing books that are not afraid to kick sacred cows – real ones – on their fat sides.  I think there’s a public waiting for them.

Now stop staring at the woman making out with a sea lion to advertise skittles and go read and write.  We’re going to turn the world upside down.

Long May It Wave.

Recently in my Facebook page, the matter of retirement came up.  I will admit as far as I’m concerned it’s ALWAYS been a moot point.

I love the way they assure us there will be social security money for my generation when – since the seventies – we’ve known there wouldn’t be almost all our lives.  And the economy being what it is and our investments having shrunk like an ice-cube in summer, well!  It’s not like it ever appeared a likely thing.  Sure, I might find myself around sixty five or so with the wherewithal to retire.  I also might find myself with the capacity to fly if aliens invaded the Earth and…

But it goes deeper than that.  The money thing is why I never gave it much thought, or if I did it was to shrug and go “Whatever.”

I realized retirement didn’t apply to me anyway when – a few years ago – daydreaming about winning the lottery I found myself thinking “And then I’d have SO MUCH time to write.”

My dears, when you reach that point, that all you can think of to do with money is to sweep out of your way all the dross of the workaday world – shopping, cooking, cleaning – so you can work more, you might as well face it: you’re not retirement material.

And then I started wondering if I was really that different from the average person of my age and education.  The people who chimed in on the conference all said something like “the only thing I would want to do in my retirement is what I do now!”

There are exceptions.  I know a lot of you intend to retire or are already retired: those of you who served in the military; those who have professions – like truck driving – that require a certain amount of visual acuity, strength and coordination, and others.

But the way I’m looking at it is historically, and I think we might be entering the early days of the demise of retirement as a concept.  Bear with me.

Retirement as an idea is actually quite young, a product of the late industrial revolution (in the early industrial revolution there really wasn’t time to retire, as the technology itself killed you off early – though there are indications they still lived longer than field hands.)  The jobs the industrial revolution produced and which created a middle class out of thin air, were not exactly things to sing about.  They produced a lot of wealth, mind, but no one could get particularly excited about spending his life tending some machine or other.  So this idea formed that when you were too old to tend the machines, you’d get paid for two or five or ten years to actually do what you wanted to do.

I think the heyday of this concept was around the fifties, when retired people would finally drive around and see the country.  

It was affordable, of course, because people didn’t live that long, the next generation was larger and could support them in style and… all things that don’t apply.  Let us not worry our heads about that, shall we?

Instead, let’s look at how things were before the industrial revolution – beyond the fact that lives were a lot shorter – a grandmother might do less and less of the work and take on a more supervisory capacity as daughter or daughter in law took over the actual house work.  A grandfather might sit at home repairing the tools used in the fields, or go out with the younger guys to tell them “this is where you dig.”  Or “In my grandfather’s time, when there was a drought like this, we did–”

Mind, this is semi idyllic and it depends on who you believe.  Some authors say most of the Middle Ages were like that.  Others say there were vast numbers of orphan children, some as young as five, roaming the countryside, because most people died around thirty.

Do I know who’s right?  I suspect both are, depending on WHEN in the 1000 year span of the Middle ages – and where too.  On the other hand, I have an instinctive disbelief in happy pastoralists, having grown up in a village and all.

Let’s leave that aside and admit that no one – no one – expected to have five years of weekends – let alone twenty – at the end of life.  For one, the society didn’t have that kind of wealth.

Well, to an extent we’re starting to transition out of the industrial age.  It’s just the very beginning, but a lot of us have jobs that require us to use our mind – or even our hands – in creative ways.  There are intimations and whispers of robots taking over those sectors where we need mass production (there will always be sectors like that) and having the machines supervised by one man, remotely, a work that will be more mental than not.

(As a side note, let me point out those who look at that and say “but what about the people not suited to mind work?” – stop wringing your hands.  What if they stuck that way? – Stop underestimating people whose minds don’t work like yours.  Given time and space and a wealthy enough society, yeah, you’ll find people who do absolutely nothing – the listless you’ll always have with you – but there will also be a lot of other things people discover to do, up to and including some old skills like cabinet making.  If you think there’s no difference between mass produced and the work of a master carpenter, you haven’t grown up in the workshop of the latter.  (I did.)  And if you think lack of verbal or abstract thought ability means people will find nothing to do in the new economy, you’re by far underestimating humans.)

And when you’re looking at that, and at work getting unpegged from a central location, too, and becoming something that’s more than likely done out of the home at least part of the time – what does retirement mean?

Besides, we’re all living longer.  I come from a long lived line anyway.  My grandmother and great grandmother lived into their late eighties with little better than medieval health care.  So I’m looking at at least twenty five years after sixty five and likely more.  You know, a month off now and then to laze about and read would be great, but … twenty five years?  What would I do about the ideas that came crowding?

I doubt Dan will ever retire, either.  Our ideal would be to reach a state where he’s working from home, so we can rearrange our hours better and he has time to write, but that’s about it.  I mean, there are programs he’d like to try writing, there are books to work on, but retire?  What would he do with himself?

The truth is for most of my generation and those a little older than I – now hitting their early sixties – the idea of retirement is a confusing concept.  It’s not even “with what” or “how?” but “Why?”  

Even those who are forced to retire or have the type of profession that comes with a full retirement pension are more likely to just take on another job, instead of retiring.  A lot of the previous generation is already doing this.  (Both my parents started new careers around 45, though I doubt my mother thought of it that way.  My dad finally retired at 80, not because he couldn’t do the job, but because he was required to drive an hour each way.  For all I know mom is still working – her work being managing the family’s finances.)

There are two factors in this: we’re living very long PRODUCTIVE lives.  Remember when people got a watch and a letter of recognition at 25 years.  Suppose you do that.  You started working at 25, at 50 you get your gold watch… and you’re easily looking at another 25, 35 years (depending on the stock you come from) of productive life.  Retirement?  Why squander all that time?

The other factor is that a lot of us – granted not most, not all of us – don’t live working lives of quiet desperation.  I could wish for the publishing establishment to get its head out of its nether regions.  I could.  I could wish for publishers to get a clue now and then.  I could wish publicists at houses actually publicized.  BUT – but – I could not wish to enjoy writing more than I already do.  Or to live without doing it.

I would bet most of us in skilled professions are the same.

This doesn’t mean we don’t need money “for a rainy day.”  Heaven knows there will be those and sometimes it will pour.  But saving for a five, ten or twenty five year vacation is a strange endeavor.

It hit me that this is just one of the transformations underway.  Like ebooks, like computer tech, like the changes to come to education and medicine and law (even as our legislative critters are trying to pull all of them backwards into the industrial age.  Never mind.  The future will defeat them) the future will be different in ways most of us can’t even think through.

We live in interesting times – but it is not all bad.

This week I had to do something very difficult.  There was one of those occasions which should – by right, by tradition, by all that is proper – be observed publically and in which someone should be honored for choices made and promises kept.

Not being able to go to Portugal for it, I was contacted by my parents and asked to write something in honor of the day.

And then I discovered that – let alone the difficulties of writing in a language whose syntax and spelling become more faltering with each passing day – there is something that embarrasses and paralyzes me more profoundly than writing sex.  You see, the person being honored was responsible in large measure for my religious formation and as such I owed him recognition for what has gone right in that.  Given my natural bend and my dislike of authority, a lot more has gone right than anyone could expect.

Pick your jaw off the floor, please.  It never ceases to amaze me when I get emails that start with “given that you’re pagan” or even better “since you’re an atheist.”

Once for all and for all time, let’s establish I’m not only religious, I’m what my friends often reproach as a “pious bore.”  In private.  In situations to which it applies.  And frankly I think my friends are drinking their own ink.  To be a pious bore I’d need to have a way better prayer life and to be a generally better person.  I’m a struggling human being – struggling with eternity.

Stay.  Put down your pens and take a deep breath.  I don’t hold my tongue on religious matters because it’s scary, or because I’m afraid, but because a) It’s intensely private.  My strongest religious convictions, even those that are ultimately “conventional” for my faith were arrived at through struggle and fall and near-miracle.  Things that if I talked about would get me committed.  Yes, even worse than my talk about writing.  Besides the circumstances are, nearly all of them, extremely private and involving other lives than mine.  And besides, my writing is not religious, and as such it is no business of my public persona or of this blog.  b) You don’t convince anyone by screaming Bible verses.  Sorry, you don’t.  To do so is to play into the hands of the cultural Marxists who want nothing better than for religious people to be believed incapable of thought.  c) I know history.  I know history to a depth and breadth most Americans don’t.  I don’t/can’t buy the excuses for a lot of medieval excesses that it is just, somehow, the Catholic church that went bad.  Or that Catholicism is uniquely bad.  I have to look at what happens when one forgets to give Cesar that which is Cesar’s and a religion becomes a ruling system.  (Which is not the same as religious people being heard and weighed in the political system, note, but taking religious principles wholesale and making them law.)

I don’t particularly hide it, either, except by not naming my religion here.  I certainly don’t hide it in my books, and more than one of my fans have pinpointed not only my religion, but the particular flavor of it and the fact that it is woven in my mind to such an extent it comes out in my decidedly non-religious books in symbolism, in character behavior and in resonance.

The thing is, when discussing laws and social issues, I don’t think religion has a right to dictate laws “because we say so” anymore than any of the secular religions currently doing it does.  No, we shouldn’t accept extreme environmentalism wholesale, but the only reason it got in as far as it did was because it came in under the cloak of rationality.  Now that it’s reduced to shouting what amounts to religious principles “Bow down to the Earth, it is your mother” “Humans evil” it is losing cred, and will be swept out of the public life.

You’re going to tell me the founders were religious men.  I believe you.  However, note they exerted the same general caution I do.  The principles they argued they argued from other reasons than G-d and certainly for other reasons than a specific G-d.  (Endowed by their creator is not the same as endowed by G-d the Father.  It covered a multitude of beliefs.  And while that lent force to their pronouncement, note too that there were other, rational, good reasons for those principles)  Note, too, that they enshrined freedom of religion in public life.

This is not the same as freedom FROM religion.  I get as incensed as anyone else when creches are swept from public parks, when crosses are struck from city seals, and when kids are told they’re not allowed to pray or read the Bible in school.  People should be allowed to visibly practice their religion.  They should be allowed to practice it in civic ways too.  If it comes to a showdown between the Catholic church and the state over contraception and abortion, I will startle all sides of the debate by landing in jail.

But at the same time I don’t think you can just continuously shout things like “Marriage is between one man and one woman” and carry the day.  This is true, for those who believe in it.   Religious marriage is just so.  But a lot of marriages aren’t religious.  To reduce marriage to only its religious dimension is to make it something it is not right now.  No?  What principle animates the marriage of atheists?  Are they forbidden to marry?  How about Hollywood marriages?  How about the cults and – legally and historically – religions currently int his country that permit polygamy?  You know they exist, right?  Because periodically they come up in the news on social security fraud.

Would you like to live in a society where another religion’s beliefs are enshrined in law?  Where you have to keep a strict separation between dairy and meat, for instance, because it’s ancient religious law and there must have been a reason?  And besides, other people believe it’s essential for the proper ordering of human life on Earth?

No, of course you don’t.  For one if we applied everyone’s essential religious laws, it would be a complete salad, let alone the interpretations of them.

And don’t come back and tell me it’s a Judeo-Christian society. Yes, and?  Let alone the first of that pair (do you wish to separate meat and dairy?) The interpretations of the New Testament by the various Christian denominations and applying them to daily life could lead to wars.  It HAS led to wars.

The business of religion is souls.  This doesn’t mean staying out of the world and of politics.  You must vote as informed by your religion, and if you can find a convincing way to argue for your religious beliefs as law, one that is not just screaming a verse at someone, you should do so, of course.  And you should – of COURSE – by example and word lead others to the faith.  If you believe your faith is the way – or helps on the way – to eternity, then it’s your duty. (Me, I believe the doors of hell are locked from the inside.)

But a lot of the “arguing from religion” I see is sort of like the left outsourcing charity by getting the state to redistribute money for them, so they can feel virtuous.  Instead of taking the long, hard road of talking to the disbelievers or – much, much harder – of showing by your life the advantages of religion, people want to legislate moral matters, so that everyone has to behave as if they were religious.

It won’t work.  What you’re actually doing is playing into the hands of those who would rule you by dividing you (and making you look ridiculous.)  Supposing one could unite every Christian sect in America (something that would take the advent of Heinlein’s first prophet – and that’s a horrifying prospect) and take over secular power… what then?

First of all, what do you do with the people you can’t convert?  Will you, like the Marxists, make plans to eliminate them?  (If you say something about omelets and eggs, or the end justifying the means, we can’t be friends anymore.)

Second, let’s suppose you establish your society.  Let’s imagine that every one of the organizing principles of your religion is just, fair and well thought out (and there’s no Liberation Theology or laws against usury to spoil the soup.)  It will still end in tears.  It will end in tears because once ANY set of beliefs has temporal power, it attracts the wrong sort of people: people who are in it for the money and the power and not to serve the greater principle.  Studying the middle ages will help in this, and any smugness about how that’s just the Catholic church is unjustified.  It happens EVERY TIME a set of principles acquires power.  Unless the principles are self limiting.  Religion isn’t.  By it’s very nature it’s all encompassing.  By its very nature it allows the power-greedy to tell everyone what to do, everywhere.  That’s a terrifying thing for a government.

So while I think we should let belief inform our public actions, I don’t think we have the right to dictate our belief to others, or to argue PURELY from faith.  The conversion of souls is not done in public and with fanfare but often in tears and so privately that only the person and G-d know about it (no matter how many people contributed to it through the years.)

And if you’re wailing that it’s a difficult line to walk, yes it is, but not mine.  The instruction is to be in the world but not of the world.  And I didn’t come up with it.

I admire the cunning of the social Marxists who, having turned envy into a Cardinal virtue have now managed to convince the religious that religious wars are their religious duty: instead of quiet proselytizing and even quieter living of holy lives.  But again I remind you they got there by pretending – at least – to be rational and to reason with others.

I say, use their weapon against them.

Meanwhile on my quandary – I wrote the tribute I owed the gentleman who helped form my religious conscience.  It took me an entire day, and I cringe to think of its being read in public.

I expect this will be misunderstood and I will be screamed at.  At least try to do it without JUST quoting bible verses at me.  It gets very tiring.  I don’t expect to get any traction either.  People are now convinced screaming is a virtue and yelling their belief is proof of their worthiness.

This was almost as hard to write as that tribute, because again, it details intimate choices and carefully-thought-out beliefs which shouldn’t be anyone’s business and shouldn’t need to be talked about.  But I’m getting very tired of the various sects of believers and the various groups of would-be free men shouting over each other, while those who divided them rule, gloating, over them.

This is the only time I intend to talk of this.  If it affects one decibel of the yelling, my discomfort will be worth it.

Those of you who think this is about to become a lecture on unusual sexual practices may leave.
Okay, now that the ten thousand or so are gone, the twenty of us left here can talk about the real point: private versus public.

When I was growing up in the seventies, under an increasingly leftist regime in Portugal (mitigated only by the fact that Portugal is so unorganized that any central planning is so only in name) I heard over and over, at school, at speeches and just about everywhere at all that your right to swing your fist ends where another’s nose starts.

As a statement it is irreproachable.  It’s also empty of meaning.  Like saying “we’re all naked under our clothes” or “people weren’t born with clothes, man” which were what the (older) hippie guys used to try to get me out of mine, they are indisputably true but to our purpose, nothing.

Or to put it another way – it depends on how many fists, how many noses and how they’re arranged.  Given enough will, it is possible to hem a potential fist swinger all around with noses so that he can’t breathe let alone swing his fist.

More importantly, when arguing hypothetical noses and fists, it’s all too easy to say “but you could hit a nose – if someone moved suddenly or a kid came running.”  Eventually it comes down to no fist swinging unless you have wrapped your fist in a feather pillow and after that, the appearance of swinging your fist can be perceived as a hatred of nose, and you must control your speech so you don’t even mention fists.

Yes, this is about chicken sandwiches, again.  Sort of.  What hit me, as I was watching it, was that the whole thing arose because we’ve got completely confused about what is public and what is private.  So a man’s private opinions which in no way affect how his business is run (they both serve and employ everyone regardless of sexuality) become part of public debate and discourse – and his private donations, from his profit, which is what he gets out of his work running his business are taken as evidence of corporate malfeasance.

All of which is nonsense, but it’s a type of nonsense we’re used to at this point.  The right of property supposedly secured to us by our constitution has become hemmed in with so many takings that are considered legitimate and for the common good, that sometimes it’s only by poetic license that we can say we own anything.

No?  Then explain to me why, when replacing a century-old railing on a century-old porch (a tree had felled it) I had to make sure the slats were no further apart than those in a crib?  Because a baby MIGHT crawl on the porch and get his head wedged between them.  Let alone that I didn’t have a baby at the time – we did sell the house, so that wasn’t so far an hypothetical – why would anyone in their right mind let a baby crawl unsupervised on a porch floor?  And ignore the baby long enough for it to wedge its head between slats?  You’ll say “it could happen” and undoubtedly it could, but look here, if a baby is being raised like that, you have WAY bigger problems than porch slats.  If in a hundred years, during which time the house was often an apartment house or a rooming house, used by various transients and what was once quaintly called “the under class” no baby had managed to wedge its head between the slats, what is the rational to have the city tell me what the distance between the slats must be.  No, it wasn’t that difficult to adjust, though it required a redesign so it didn’t look completely stupid, but it was a great piece of nonsense, and an unwarranted taking, which required me to submit plans to the authorities and delay and spend more before I was allowed to rebuild my railing.

This is a minor thing, you’ll say, and why am I so exercised?  Because we’re hemmed in with “little things” that all but paralyze life and the market place.  Say you find yourself unemployed and you decide, instead of taking unemployment, to open a business using your sainted grandmother’s cookie recipe, your very own kitchen oven, and your car.  You’ll make cookies, then take a license (well, it is a public space) to sell them near that park where all the school kids hang out in the summer.

Do I need to tell you all of this is a pipe dream?  You’ll need your kitchen inspected, certified, licensed and it’s so hard to pass the certification you might as well rent a commercial kitchen, for which you of course don’t have money.

“But Sarah,” you say.  “That’s different.  That’s food safety.  Upton Sinclair.”  Upton Sinclair was a socialist, writing apologetics for government control.  His book is filled with the type of “reality” that underlies all the blades put in apples given to kids on Halloween, and all the poisoned candy, too – it might have happened once, somewhere, but it was for reasons specific to that place, and it had bloody nothing, or less than that, to do with conditions most places.

Were food preparation areas less sanitary in the nineteenth century or even early twentieth than now?  Arguably EVERYTHING was less sanitary.  If you want to find what your great grandmother was up against, turn off the electricity and the running water, then try to clean the house.  (I’ve found myself in this situation several times, in the aftermath of a disaster.)  Add to that the lack or difficulty of refrigeration and you’re going to have food conditions that would make us go “ew.”  And probably the food of the time would sicken any of us.  BUT on the other hand, our ancestors had a level of resistence we don’t have.  (And less asthma and fewer other auto-immune diseases.  Our species didn’t evolve to be sparkling clean.)

HOWEVER food companies that wanted to stay in business COULDN’T logically make it a point to kill their customers with tainted food.  Yes, I do know what I’m talking about here.  I have no idea if there was the equivalent of an FDA in Portugal when I was growing up, but if there was it worked with the efficiency of other Portuguese institutions at the time.  And in the seventies, when the economy was in a state of semi-collapse (or slow-mo collapse) people could – and did – out of need for survival take the cookie route outline above.  In an economy where the price of bread was hard set by the government, and the bakers went on strike every other week, it was possible to knock at certain doors and buy fresh baked bread that the housewife had just baked and would give you for a consideration.  It’s how most of us got bread.  And while the price of meat went through the roof, everyone had a backyard chicken coop and a flock of goats, and for a little more, you could buy your meal ready prepared, again, by knocking at the back door and saying “so and so sent me.”  Unless you were already a customer.  In the same way, if you were handy with a sewing machine, you could sell not just clothes but handicrafts at the flea market.  Most of my jewelry at that time was made by unemployed recent college graduates, with no license, no supervision, no formal training.  The same sort of people would sell pastries in street corners.

Were there cases of food poisoning?  Of tainted jewelry?  Undoubtedly, though the only time I got food poisoning was from an established, licensed deli.  Most people – PARTICULARLY those working on a slim margin – were terribly careful not to do something that might give them a bad rep.  Because people talk.  Heck, if a pastry vendor where I normally shopped was coughing in the morning, I was likely to tell my friends “not today.  I think he has a cold and I don’t want it.”

In the same way, farmers who routinely watered the milk got known for it, and people didn’t buy from them.  And that was enough.  The general public had to pay a little more attention, and be aware of what they were doing.  On the other hand, frankly, don’t you have to do that now?  Do you really trust the government seal?  Do you think someone followed the piece of food from harvest to store?  You’ve never heard of tainted peanut butter, then?

Tell me, how many people have you heard of, recently, poisoned by the tamales sold out of the back of their car by some of our more enterprising citizen-aspirants?  You think they have licenses and their kitchens underwent inspections?  Guys, those people don’t even want the police near them in case it’s la migra.  (And by the way I have nothing against them.  They’re showing spirit and a desire to fend for themselves.  I say we put everyone with an illegal tamale and roasted chilli stand a fast path to citizenship.  We’ll call it the Dream-Tamale act.)  There was one station wagon near my older son’s highschool, there through summer and winter and they were always mobbed with customers.  The chances of this if their stuff was tainted is zero.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is in food safety, the place where we “self evidently” need government supervision.  That is, we need to pay government to imagine all the circumstances in which an hypothetical nose might be in the path of an hypothetical fist.

Are there places where the public, legitimately has a right to stick its long nose?  Yes, of course there is.  I’m partial to “providing for the common defense.”  Also, it probably should intervene in private wars among citizens (that is, at least if the bodies aren’t properly buried and are left to pose a public health hazard.)  And it could be argued, though we’re on treacherous ground, that the community has an interest in protecting the defenseless: minor children and impaired people who lack other means of supervision and defense.  After all, taking care of the widows and orphans has often been judged beneficial by older cultures than ours.

However, that does not include the right to poke one’s nose into every home, to make sure children are being treated according to government regulations.  (No?  My kids had meetings at the schools where they were specifically asked how they got punished at home, among other things.  Fishing expeditions.  Fortunately my kids, being my kids, wouldn’t admit the sky was blue if it were a school official asking them.)  I’ll also note that even our over regulated society has spectacular cases of child abuse and neglect, often serial and often by STATE LICENSED CARE PROVIDERS.  Because once the government seal is on something people stop inspecting.

Look, it’s got so insane that I’m not allowed to drive my own car without wearing a seat belt.  It’s MY car, it’s my seatbelt, it’s my LIFE.  (For the record, yes, I do wear it – because I talked to an EMT once and he said they’d never cut a single dead man out of seatbelt.  BUT it should be my decision.)  I’m not allowed to buy the lightbulb I d*mn well please to put in my own light socket in my own house.  It’s been deemed that the Earth’s nose is burning up (or is it freezing this week?) and therefore I should not be allowed to spend whatever I deem I should spend on electricity.

I say it’s time to step back and take a deep breath.  Someone wants to build a house that’s not up to code?  LET THEM.  At most advise them, but they have the right to roll their own eyes at you.  (As we’ve all talked about even to-code houses have massive safety failures.  They’re human-built.  They’re imperfect.  Deal.  you pays your dollar, you takes your bet.)  NONE of the houses we grew up in passed current code, and most of them are still standing and our parents still live in them with no ill-effects.  Someone wants to sell food and someone else wants to buy it?  What exactly is the government’s interest in interfering in a lawful transaction.  Yes, the food might be tainted.  So might licensed food.  Sellers who willfully taint their food for short term profit don’t last.  Neither do customers who buy from fly by night here today gone tomorrow outfits.  You can’t save people from their own folly.  Not forever.

It’s time to admit that somewhere, somewhen, a swinging fist might meet a nose.  That’s fine.  It happens.  We live in an imperfect world.

Meanwhile let the owners of the fists and the noses look to their own safety and liberty and do what they want with their private property.  The main consequences of their actions should fall on them.  No third party with no skin in the game can judge as well as they can.

Let people decide what to do with what they have.  Get the government’s long nose out of my fist.

Let a million fists swing.

*crossposted at Classical Values*

I was supposed to do this yesterday, but in the excitement (shut up you) of cleaning the grease left all over the kitchen by the time the vent hood wasn’t working (no, it shouldn’t be that hard, but see, we don’t eat pre-prepared  (for one it’s expensive, when feeding an entire family) so cooking is a messy process and grease gets in every nook.  Yes, it’s almost done now, thank you) I completely forgot other considerations (also my name.)

So, I’ll do it now before the post for the day goes up.  Kim du Toit has asked me to announce the release of his book Prime Target.  Unlike his other books, this one is not an historical but set in the modern day and involves the US government illegally spying on its citizens.

The link to his website is here.

And yes, I’m perfectly agreeable to do this for the rest of you when you bring new stuff out, so long as you don’t require me to read it, because beyond my own reading schedule, research and mentoring — not to mention my own writing — I can never be sure I can read something in time.

I don’t know if it helps, but it costs me nothing, and it might.  If a lot of you indies start sending it to me, I might do these posts once a week as “ATH reader books.”  At any rate, I probably should announce mine too, so I can do it all at once.

*This is the Fantasy novel I’m posting here for free, one chapter every Friday.   If your conscience troubles you getting something for free, do hit the donate button on the right side.  Anyone donating more than $6 will get a non-drm electronic copy of Witchfinder in its final version, when it’s published.
There is a compilation of previous chapters here  all in one big lump, which makes it easier to read and I will compile each new chapter there, a week after I post.  When the novel is completed and about to be edited the compilation page will probably be deleted.

Oh, this is in pre-arc format, meaning you’ll find the occasional spelling mistake and sentence that makes no sense.  It’s not exactly first draft, but it’s not at the level I’d send to a publisher, yet. *

 

The Knot

    Seraphim didn’t know precisely what he expected from a Necromancer’s hideout.  If there had been an image in his mind, it must have come from the dark illustrations in some children’s book – supposing his mother would have let something that insalubrious near her children.  Which she wouldn’t have.  

His mind insisted there should have been less light, cobwebs, and perhaps a smell of rot to go with the army of undead servants coming to bow to their master and tend his every desire.  There shouldn’t have been, he was sure of it, shelves lined with books he would have liked to read, a pleasantly untidy desk, covered in papers and notebooks that gave the impression of someone furiously working on something he enjoyed, and there certainly shouldn’t have been comfortable sofas in faded, cheerful floral print.  But most of all, he thought, there shouldn’t have been, on one of the bookshelves next to the desk, at eye level, a misshapen porcelain dog, with a lopsided grin and mismatched eyes.  There particularly shouldn’t be that, because Seraphim knew where it had come from.

Fearing at any minute to come face to face with what remained of the unfortunate Gypson, not sure how to react to such a thing, and fairly sure that – in the end – he was being a moral if not a physical accomplice to necromancy, he concentrated on that dog, on that shelf.  “That,” he said, in the terrible voice one might use to impart news of dread catastrophe.  “Is Gabriel’s.”

As he turned to look at Marlon, he’d swear that, for just a moment, unholy amusement danced in the man’s eyes.  And for just that moment, Seraphim’s hand started to curl into a fist, but then dismay succeeded amusement on Marlon’s gaze, and he nodded, once.  “Yes.  He gave it to me, years ago.  He said he’d had it from a child.  It’s all… I expect to keep of him.  Won’t you sit down?  I’ll fetch tea.”

Jonathan looked dismayed at this.  “Tea?  Have you no brandy.”

Saying in one voice, “If you’ll pardon me, I believe you’ve had enough brandy,” Seraphim and Marlon looked startled and grimaced at each other.  Then Marlon left the room, and Seraphim was left with the enviable task of trying to lead Jonathan to one of the cheerful sofas.  This was easier said than done, because Jonathan had reached that point of his intoxication or the recovery from it, where every detail of a room or landscape is riveting and must be narrated as loudly as possible for the edification of oneself, as well as that of those around us.

Which was how, having pulled away from Seraphim, and towards a dark corner of the room, Jonathan said, “Good God.  Is that him?  His…” and probably under the impression that he had lowered his voice, “lover?  The one he keeps as an undead catamite?”

And suddenly it all surged at Seraphim.  The first thing that happened too fast is that Seraphim realized that in the corner he’d ignored, what he’d taken for unidentifiable clutter was, in fact a human being, or what remained of one.

Aiden Gypson didn’t look like a corpse, exactly.  But neither did he look like a living human.  More like someone had taken a human and replaced his skin and flesh with dried clay.  Taking a deep breath, Seraphim could smell no decay, but all the same, it wasn’t even a good necromancy job.

In proper necromancy, from what Seraphim had read, the corpse was preserved to look exactly as it had at the moment of death.  Aiden’s eyes were dry and lusterless, and his lips had receded, exposing teeth.  He didn’t react to their presence either.  He was shuffling in place, little more than a flutter, which – Seraphim thought – was a permanent thing, and again a result of bad necromancy.  Good necromancy could command the corpse so that it was at repose or moved in the same way as a human.

All this was instant, as was the realization that Aiden Gypson’s soul – whatever remained of his individual spark – was pinned somewhere behind the body, and could feel what happened to the body.  And then Seraphim felt ill.  He had to swallow fast, so as not to be sick.  Not good necromancy at all and how could Marlon?

All the sympathy he’d felt for the man when he’d unwillingly realized how much he cared for Gabriel dissipated.  All the fellow feeling of realizing he was, perhaps, not a monster, vanished.  Instead, there was leaden dread and nausea.

Realizing that Aiden Gypson looked like Gabriel Penn – or at least that they were both the same type – only added to the dread.

The thought “Good God, had he meant to do this to Gabriel too?” crossed his mind at the same time that he realized that all this had been very fast and Jonathan was just now drawing breath to continue his narration.

It came at the same time that a flutter of silver and china, like someone trembling while holding a tea set on a tray, and he turned to look towards the door to the interior of the house, where Marlon stood, holding the tea tray.  And at that moment, Seraphim felt his anger evaporate, and the dread with it, and, against his own will, sympathy rush in.  Marlon had washed his face and changed, and should have looked more presentable.  Instead, he looked as white and dead as his dead lover.  Perhaps more so.  His mouth moved, though no words emerged, and the lips seemed to Seraphim to form, “Not catamite.”

Jonathan looked towards Marlon too, and chuckled, a chuckle of high amusement and said, “Far be it from me to say it is a terrible thing, if I’ve never tried it.  It is illegal of course, but tell me–”

In that flash, Seraphim felt as though the real division in this room was not between himself and Marlon, though their tastes in bed companions might be very different, and though Seraphim could not possibly imagine taking a lover and making him a living-dead object.  

But he understood the way Marlon both wanted to defend himself against the charge of keeping what remained of his lover for sexual purposes, and his dreadful horror of speaking of his private life to near-strangers.  In an insane world in which Seraphim’s life was more like Marlon’s, he could imagine feeling that dread, that conflict of pressing needs.

On the other hand, Jonathan was something quite, quite different.  He was, unlike Marlon or Seraphim, an uncomplicated man, who enjoyed carnal pleasures and took the world with hedonistic innocence.  If he’d done something like what Marlon had done – or was accused of doing – he’d have done it for the simplest of all motives: to see what it felt like.  And he might be pursued by the law, but he would not feel guilty.

Seraphim found that he had clamped his hand over the honorable Jonathan Blythe’s mouth.  “Not another word,” he hissed at the brother of his earstwhile – was she earstwhile? – fiancé, in defense of his the man he didn’t even like, the man whom he, for years, had suspected of corrupting Gabriel.  “Not another word, Jon, or so help me, you’ll have to do with me.”

“Why?  I only want to know how it feels to–” Jonathan said, as Seraphim’s hand lifted.  The hand clamped down again.  

“You’re disguised, Jonathan.  What’s more, you’re taking liberties.  We are in Mr. Elfborne’s home and it’s not for us to do him the gross injustice of accusing him of the worst.”

“For heaven’s sake,” the irrepressible Jonathan said as soon as Seraphim let go, knowing it was impossible to cover Jonathan’s mouth forever and, faith, wringing his neck was probably one step too far.  And besides Seraphim liked him, even though he disapproved of him.

“For heaven’s sake,” Jonathan repeated.  “How can I accuse him of anything worse than necromancy?”

“Just so,” Marlon’s voice said, from the sitting area.  “How could you?  So let’s establish that I’m a necromancer.  I don’t think that is a great insult, since I was proven to be so on a court of law, which is why there is a price on my head.  Will you sit down gentlemen?”

Feeling his back prickle, as he turned away from the corpse, Seraphim did so, as did Jonathan following him.  They sat, side by side, with Marlon sitting on a chair facing them.  Marlon poured, asking civil questions about cream and sugar with the equanimity of any gentleman receiving friends.  

“All very well,” Jonathan said, as he held the cup of tea in both hands.  “But I only wanted to know what it is like to tup–”

“Jon,” Seraphim said.  “Do you want to face me with pistols?”

Something like a suppressed cackle escaped Marlon, and Jonathan stared at Seraphim dismayed.  “What?  No.  Good God man.  I’m no match for you.”

“Good.  Then please let’s keep our talk to matters of the coil I and my family find ourselves in.  And let’s try to be civil to our host.”

Jonathan looked baffled, but Marlon was giving Seraphim a long, appraising look.  “Pardon me, your Grace,” he said, at long last.  “I think I’ve misjudged you all these years.  I never realized you were kind.”  He was still pale, and his face had a sort of rigid immobility that signaled, to Seraphim at least, that he was pushing himself beyond the boundaries of his comfort as he said.  “And, for what it’s worth Mr. Blythe, I could not answer you in any way.  I know as much about, how did you put it?  Ah, tupping the undead as you do.”  His eyes crinkled at the corners, as though amusement crept through despite everything.  “Perhaps less.”

Jonathan looked astonished.  He shook his head.  “They said–” he started, then shook his head.  “Well, then, it’s very strange, when you’re already under sentence for necromancy, what else could they do to you.”

Despairing of explaining to Jonathan that there could be restraints on a man other than external, Seraphim looked at Marlon and said, “Pardon Jonathan.  He’s one of nature’s own pagans.”

“I see that,” Marlon said, and something to his eyes told Seraphim that he did.  He wasn’t horrified or reproving of Jonathan.  He was worried about where Jonathan’s careening mind might lead, and also vaguely amused by such disregard for conventions and society, and perhaps a little jealous.  

Marlon took a sip of his tea, set the cup down still mostly filled and said, “Now, for the matter at hand.  We knew you and Gabriel – your whole family – were in a serious coil of trouble.”

“You can say that again,” Jonathan said.

“And you said…”  Marlon hesitated.  “That my fa– That Sydell is half dragon?  How do you mean that?”

Jonathan blinked at him.  “Why, I suppose in the usual why.  His father slept with a dragon.  Not that I blame him.  It is said dragons are–”

“Eminently tuppable, yes,” Seraphim said, antecipating what Jonathan would say, and feeling like he’d fallen into a mad dream.  He didn’t say these things.  He didn’t discuss these things with other people.  But then partly that was because dukes didn’t do that.  And if he was no longer a duke, then he need no longer exercise restraint.  But he was called to reality, as Elfborn said, “I didn’t know that,” in a strained, sober voice.  “How could I not know that?  I didn’t know he was raised in a foundling home, and how could I not, when I was raised in one?”

Jonathan made a dismissive gesture, drank down all his tea, noisily and then extended his cup for more.  Marlon poured, without looking, as though he did it automatically.

“Why should you?  Unless you made a study of Sydell.  And even then, you might not know it.  He’s taken great care to cover his tracks.  I only know it, because my father has known him from the time–” a hiccup broke Jonathan’s talk, and he put the back of his hand against his mouth.  “Pardon me.”  He took a sip of his new cup of tea.  “Has known him from when Sydell was claimed by his grandparents, on his father’s death, and so he remembers the scandal.  M’ father is maybe three years older than Sydell, but enough to remember, because Sydell was twelve or thirteen or some such when his father hanged himself.”

Marlon’s cup rattled in the saucer.  His eyes were huge.  Seraphim remembered, or thought he remembered, hearing that Sydell was Marlon Elfborne’s father.  It seemed an impossible thing, for one because Sydell was a perpetual bachelor, and it was rumored that he shared Marlon’s – and Gabriel’s – interests.  But there had been that half started, “My fa–” and looking at him, now, Seraphim detected some resemblances to the king’s left hand.

“Hanged–?” Marlon said.

“Oh, yes.”  Jonathan drank his tea, quite oblivious to the discomfort he was causing.  “It’s all the grand tragedy, you know.  Worthy of an opera.  My father says that old Marcus Sydell found out that his son was… That is, that he had, somehow, commandeered a dragon maiden out of fairyland and that they were–” He hiccuped again.  “That they were involved, and he was furious, because he was trying to arrange his son’s marriage, so he arranged for a banishing spell, restricting the creature to fairyland.  Costing the Earth, of course, but it worked.”  He frowned.  “Or at least, Sydell had already been born, and his grandfather hushed it up and put him in a foundling home for magic children.  Saint Patrick’s, I believe, because they handle–”

“Half dragons, yes.  And then,” Marlon took a deep breath.  “Sydell’s father?”

“They don’t handle half dragons well,” Jonathan said, frowning.  “Damme, what I mean is, no one but dragons handles them well.  The discipline needed–”

“Yes?  Trust me, well aware.  But what happened to my– To Sydell’s father?”

“What?  Andrew Sydell? The father of the current Lord?  He hanged himself.”

Marlon blinked.  “How?”

“In the usual way, I imagine.  No, wait, I heard of it.  With his belt from the entrance chandelier.  Devilish thing, and his father was hard put to hush the scandal because, of course, all the servants saw it, what?  But it can’t be denied that all who… who get involved with fairyland in that way lose their mind a little, and there it is.”

“There what is?”  This was Seraphim.

“Though he married his heiress he was not happy, never had children, was taken with melancholy, and then hanged himself.  I don’t see what you want me to explain more.”

Marlon was rubbing his upper lip with his index finger as though lost in a world of his own.  At Jonathan’s explosion, he looked up.  “Nothing.  You’ve explained things I’ve longed to understand my whole life.”  Then he looked towards the corner where Gypson stood.  “And why some disasters…  But that’s neither here nor there.  Tell us,” he leaned forward.  “Tell us in detail what my dear papa has been doing in this whole coil, for it’s a knot we must uncoil.”

“Your… papa?” Jonathan frowned.

“Sydell.”

He managed to stop Jonathan’s mouth.  He looked at Elfborn in shock.  “Sydell?  You are…”

“The result of a spell gone horribly wrong?  Yes, I believe so.  But let’s move to relevant matters.”

“It is a relevant matter,” Jonathan said, aghast.  “If you are…  Then what…  Then that was how he got access to–”

Seraphim’s mind had put together things that he wasn’t even aware of knowing.  “That was how he got access to fairyland magic, and managed to send the royal princess to another world, as well as use that magic, behind the king’s back to… what?  What does he aspire to, Jonathan?  The throne of fairyland or of Avalon?”

Jonathan frowned.  “Why,” he said.  “Both, I imagine.”

Do you know that point in your life, where you’ve been going along and suddenly find you’re not you at all?

No, I’m not talking about possession, mind swapping or even multiple personality disorder.  (It has another name, mind – one my son keeps insisting I use, but bah.  He’s asleep.  Besides, they’re all coming up with new fangled names for the same madness.)  I’ve written that type of thing excessively, mind, and in all genres which betrays perhaps a morbid fear or perhaps my subconscious screaming in your ears.

What I’m talking about, though, is something different.  One of the heartbreaking segments of Dandellion Wine is about the old lady who keeps everything from her childhood, so she can remember it, until the kids taunt her, and tell her she stole it from some little girl.  At one point she describes the experience as having got into a train, and then gets out on the other side and there are none of the people who knew her before, and she’s someone quite different, and she can’t prove she was the person who got on the train.

It’s something like that, only not.

To an extent we expect to get old, and few of us really get that much of a shock at it.  Well, perhaps me.  Because so much of my twenties was consumed with trying to have kids, and I finally had them late, and that brings with it its own variety of time warping, I find myself in my late forties going “waitaminute.  I was young just a minute ago.”

On the other hand, because – like Miss Marple – I grew up in a village where “sixty” was old, I’m aware of having both more vitality, more options and probably greater life expectancy than anyone I knew growing up had at fifty.  Or, for that matter, at forty.  And heck, I’m only eight short years from Shakespeare’s death age, and look what he accomplished.  Or flip it the other way, I’m twenty some years than Marlowe when we died, and though you can see the lack of maturity in some of his work, we sure know his name.  (No, I don’t want to hear about population densities and incidence of talent.  Shud up, you.)

Though I was pretty at one time, I never knew I was, so I haven’t put my “me” in my looks, so aging matters perhaps less to me than to most women.

At any rate, gradual decline is something that’s built into us.  We’re dying the minute we’re born and all that Jazz.  (A platitude as obvious as being naked under one’s clothes, but less chortle worthy.)

What I’m talking about is something different.  In one of those moments you sometimes have while reading books, I remember coming across Terry Pratchett’s reference to Vimes’ youth as “miles and miles of twerpitude” which you have to cross to become the person you’re supposed to be.

Unlike the faux revelation of us all being naked under our clothes, Pratchett’s line is a revolutionary insight in a society where we’re all obsessed with youth.  (I think this is a left over reflex from when they expected each generation to be larger: blend in, so they accept you.)  And frankly, I think the only reason I accepted it is that I first read it in my thirties.  (Maybe not.  Older son loved it.)

What I mean is, whatever your job is or your profession, particularly in writing for the last twenty years (and maybe longer) where establishing yourself to where more than a handful of people know you (unless the publisher pushed like mad and sometimes even then) would take most of your actual writing life, you start out as an apprentice, with idols and people who are like living gods to you.  And then you end, at the end of that train ride, if you’re prolific and hard working and somewhat lucky, as someone’s living god.

Does one ever adjust to that?

I’ll admit my bar for living idols is low.  When I was little, growing up in the village, far from the US, where the future – and therefore science fiction – comes from, all writers were gods in the Roman sense – mythical creatures, more than humans.

So for the longest time, I coped with being published by telling myself I wasn’t really a writer.  After my very first story got published and I had a panic attack over it, I started making excuses “I’m only published in short stories.  I’m not a real writer.  I’m only published in short stories.”  Getting over the novel was more difficult, but hey, it tanked, so…  I wasn’t a real writer.  Then the other novels, well, I was a midlister.  Hack, not real writer.

Conventions could throw me into a complete panic attack.  I was an impostor.  What if they found out I wasn’t a real writer?

I don’t know when that changed.  I realized talking to a friend the other day that it had, that I have accepted I am a writer and a semi-competent one.  Perhaps accepting it is essential to getting your voice right, since so much of the voice seems to hang on self-confidence.

My friend is just starting to publish, and she’s going through the panics I had “These people treat me as a real writer and I’m not.  I feel like such an impostor.”  She’s not, of course.  She is a beginning writer and – I have it on the opinion of another friend who read her (I haven’t got around to it, yet, being the world’s worst mentor) a damn fine one.

It’s just that her mental perception of herself hasn’t caught up with her yet.

I’m starting to suspect mine hasn’t either.  This is not a humble brag.  I’m not Heinlein, or Pratchett.      In skill I’m definitely not Dave Freer.  And in popularity, at some cons, I’m not even Kate Paulk.  (Several people at a local con were heartbroken she was not there to sign the stories we wrote together. Apparently a rumor had gone around. It left me feeling like chopped liver.)

But I’m starting to run into fans I not only don’t know but “fans in weird places” – like my plumber.  or my neighbor.  People who didn’t know I was “that Sarah Hoyt” and whose day is made when they find out.

I’m not anyone’s living idol (I hope.  Man, that would be weird.)  I don’t think anyone would wait in the rain for me to sign their book.  But for some people I’m “more than usually good writer” and someone to look up to.  And that’s weird.

I wonder – not that I’m ever likely to know – should I ever scale the heights others have, should luck smile on me, should skill align, should I write a few books that deserve to be classics in the field, if I’ll find myself at eighty like the engineer character on Galaxy Quest, mumbling distractedly at an adoring fan “I’m not that guy.”  (Well, in my case, girl.)

It’s already weird to find that when I critique someone, or hug an online friend at a con, this is accorded way more importance because I’m a semi-known author.

I imagine being on the other side – being “famous so and so we invited to draw guests” – would be even more so.  Weird, isolating and startling.  Like finding yourself in someone else’s skin.

We used to have protocols to deal with all this stuff.  Now we don’t.  What is it like?  What does it feel like?  My mom says I never knew how to act like I was important.  Which I think just makes me American.  But it might be disconcerting to people, should I ever find myself famous/admired.  Again, that’s not likely to happen, but I’m sure it’s happened to people with my makeup before.  (Well, a lipstick has gone missing.)

I remember that people like Heinlein, Asimov, Pournelle, were once people like me.  Starting out.  Diffident.  (Well, maybe not Asimov.)  Heinlein’s bio captures Bradbury as a raw beginner.  What was it like, then, when at the end of his life – ten? Years ago – he had a line for his signing going back eight LA blocks.  (I gave up and went home.  At any rate we have two signed Bradbury’s, which we traded for some furniture.)

I suspect there are equivalents in other professions.

To my friend, as well as to everyone else, who finds him/herself thrust into a public (however small the circle) position where they’re supposed to be the admired/in charge/knowledgeable ones, I give this advice: Keep public and private strictly separate.  Even if you have a blog, show only what you want to show.  Remember a blog is your public face.  You can joke about your kids or mention them, but don’t violate their privacy with anything you wouldn’t tell at a party.  Ditto your other relatives.  And then be very careful who you let into the inner circle.  You’ll make mistakes at first.  We all do.  Hopefully no fatal ones.

Establish that habit when you’re just breaking in, even if the precautions seem exaggerated and the whole thing blown out of proportion.  That will stand you in good stead when “well knowningness” creeps up on you.  I have this theory you won’t know you’ve hit actual fame until you have done it some time ago.  You don’t see yourself from the outside.

As for the feeling of being an impostor – chances are you’re not.  Yes, some poseurs make it into the various fields, but look, that’s more work than breaking in normally.  You’re not an impostor.  You’re not THAT good.  You’d know if you were.

You are that guy/gal.  Accept it graciously and study your betters to know how to act when you are in their position.

Keep your protest to yourself, and BE that guy.

Amanda’s article at MGC yesterday linked to an article by some intellect-critter who referred to himself as having “made culture” for the last twenty years.

On reading that infelicitous phrase, I had two reactions.  The first was what my mom says, rather crudely, when someone is proud of something but the something is an actual mess.  It is meant as crudely as it sounds: “You may as well wipe your hands to the walls, then.”  The second was “And like making sausage, it’s a process that would do best remaining hidden.”

Shortly after that, I remembered a phrase that was popular among my ninth grade class (look, it was the times, but we were also precocious) “Hang all intellectuals.”

However, stepping back from the fact that I have a tiny little problem – almost unnoticeable, really – with authority, let’s consider the boast and what it meant, as well as the fact that this person thought it was not only something worth doing, but worth bragging about.

First, can you create culture?  Yeah.  You can.  It has been done at several times throughout history, sometimes better than others.  Shakespeare can be said to have created worldwide culture, to an extent, and various communists theocracies have created culture.  (what, you were under the impression it WASN’T a religion?  Let me see… prescribes what to believe on every case – check.  Has a completely coherent system that has no reference to reality and must be taken on faith – check.  When its prescriptions fail, time and again, the fault is of the imperfect humans who carry them out – check.  Has a myth of perfection “before the fall” – check.  And oh, yeah, aspires to creating a paradise with perfect people.  [Something only religions can aspire to.] The fact that paradise is in the ever-unobtainable future and that they don’t believe in personal immortality is truly no different than other historical religions.) Usually they didn’t create the culture they said they were creating, but well… that’s on a par with everything else.

To create culture you need only take over channels of information and entertainment as completely as possible.  This is, of course, more conveniently done via a totalitarian regime.  However, since humans are social creatures and want to stand “well” with their contemporaries and “embrace the tide of history” and all that, it can also be done in the way other social things are done: infiltration, bullying, but, above all the creation of a “cool” culture that everyone else wants to be part of.

It takes more time, mind, than simply commanding that people from now on will only believe this and thus – though we have that too.  No?  Try writing a government document without being thoroughly versed in “politically correct” language – or at least express this and thus.  However, it works just as well.  If you have a highly concentrated “mass” culture and you take over the critical and conceptual channels and start blasting at full bore that to believe anything but what you believe is uncouth, artists and other purveyors of entertainment and information will fall in line.  No, trust me on this.  I know my people.  Like any group that sticks out – no, really?  How many people do you know, other than writers, who are obsessed with getting “right” events that never happened? – we try to fit in in every way we can.  (Well, they do.  I don’t know.  Maybe in hopes of being killed last?  Me I live by the Heinlein dictum.  Better to be a live LION.)  And educators and other such?  Please.  Those aren’t even a challenge.  Any kid who goes to public school and can’t wait to return to it – unless he’s a very odd duck with a naturally subversive bent, and let’s remember subversives are of necessity few in any group – is by nature a conformist, forever trying to fit with the “right” group.

And there you have how we arrived at the culture of the last twenty years.  Ever since radio and TV became the main means of dissemination there’s been the “reality” that “everybody knew.”  Everybody knew it, not because they experienced it in their lives but because it was what came at them through schools, colleges, textbooks, tv, radio, newspapers and, oh, yeah, stuff read for entertainment too.

Everybody also knew that what they experienced in their real life was often at odds with what everybody knew.  No?  Come on.  You know it.  There are things that have been “true” in all those channels for years.  Things like “every religious person is an hypocritical criminal” – even though any of us knows religious people who live as close to their ideal as they can come.  And frankly, I’d rather entrust my kid to an evangelical Christian than to a homeless person in the park.  What?  Well, come on.  In movies, tv, entertainment and the news if they can slant it, it would be the other way around.

There are a hundred such things I don’t plan to list (it would take days.)  We all saw them, we all shook our heads over them, but we didn’t say anything because if we did people would think we were crazy.  You see, culture is in large part the stories we tell ourselves.  And the stories for the last… oh, eighty years, have been spinning increasingly loose from reality.

They always do to some extent, only the ability to broadcast them wide and have people go “well, it’s not that way for me, but maybe it is in the majority of the country” broke it free from “verification.”

And because in the way of the modern era professions – including those devoted to (gag) “creating culture” – tended to form their own echo chambers where they all went to the same colleges – or aspired to – and all knew what the “good places” to work were and followed people who worked there, the stories they told each other spun ever freer from reality.

In the heyday of this nonsense (if that bastard, Hegel, was right about something it was that when a system is at the top of its dominance, it is ripe to fall) in the early nineties, what ‘everybody knew’ actually proclaimed that any ninety pound woman could take out any man in a fight; that women enjoyed sex in exactly the same way as men and for the same reasons; that victims were always right; that “noble savages” (and therefore savages) were the most advanced form of humanity.

I wonder what would have happened if technology hadn’t shattered the unified means of distribution of “culture.”  I suspect that changing in the distribution of culture was inevitable, but there are several other outcomes that one can posit as an intellectual exercise: revolt, perhaps violent; revolt, non violent, just a moving of the posts of “cool” so they are the polar opposite of what they were then; or, more likely, increasing gazing past “culture” and eventually civilizational collapse.  Actually, civilizational collapse would be the result of the path we were on if people had continued on it, simply because the stories that made the culture were anti-survival.  If you go around afraid to entrust your child to your Christian friend and thinking that every muttering vagrant is not only a heart of gold but a moral authority, your life will be short (but interesting.)  The same, writ large, goes for the culture.

At any rate, that is neither here nor there, since the technology changed.  Which is either a sign of someone driving this gig or of the fact that something in us knew the culture was going bad and we needed ways to change it.

It started with talk radio – and please remember the vilification of it.  Then with blogs.  And now it’s moved on to entertainment with music and books and, if we’re all lucky and there’s another technological step, soon it will be movies.

In every one of these small overturns, the pattern is the same.  The Lords of Entrenched culture, those who sold their soul for someone else’s cool are first shocked.  “What?  Someone is creating culture outside our channels?  Inconceivable.”  Then comes the mockery, “Those grubby people, in their pajamas.”  Then come outright attacks “the tone of blogs causes murders.  Eeeevil.”  Or “only idiots listen to talk radio” or…  Then comes the soft sobbing appeals “Can’t you see you’re destroying the true professionals?”

Along the way come dirty tricks, personal destruction of those they view as their enemies and often counterproductive attempts at countering what they view as wanton destruction.  They will never, ever, ever understand why talk radio that echoed the rest of the “culture making” apparatus didn’t succeed, for instance.  Nor will they ever GET why their “carefully vetted” newsites attract fewer readers than someone’s blog.  And they will NEVER understand why writers would rather go indie than jump through the hoops of political corrected.  Nor why readers would prefer to read stuff that hasn’t been made “politically correct.”  Why, why, “everybody knows” their world vision is right.

Being insulated from reality by their professional associations, their colleagues and peers and – often – by companies in which performance has become totally divorced from reality – as in publishing where numbers were more or less a function of what you put into them – they have no clue how different the stories have become from reality out here, in what the rest of us know as the real world.

I wonder if the dinosaurs looked up at the approaching meteor and simply denied it was there.  It was just a fad, that glowing thing in the sky.  They didn’t need to do anything differently.  It would all go back to normal soon?  Or if they raged that their rich culture was passing?

In either case, the result was the same.

And when I read intellectuals lament the “death of culture” I see dinosaurs lumbering around moaning that life on Earth is extinct forever.  Because they ARE life on earth.

Meanwhile, us mammals have work to do.  Those ecological niches aren’t going to fill themselves.

*crossposted at Mad Genius Club*

A few of you have asked me to write about Human Wave, and I know I have to – having come up with this harebrained idea, I have to continue with it and give it some shape.  Like a cat or a kid, it followed me home and now it’s my job to look after it.

Leave aside for a moment the fact that I think each of us, Human Wave writers can do more for writing and for the culture in general by writing fiction than by prattling on about what our fiction is or isn’t.  Humans are curious beasties, sometimes when faced with the Rocharsh stain they need to be told if they’re looking at the hideous crone or the beautiful woman in the hat.

While I agree with Charlie that the guiding principle of Human Wave is “You may” we all know there are things that we read that are HW and things that aren’t.  Even if sometimes we come down to “I know it when I see it.”

Well, let me bring a flashlight down and point it at the picture so you can see more clearly.

Part of this is Scott McGlasson’s fault, with his inferiority complex vis a vis his characters.  (It’s all his fault mommy.)  And partly it’s the way we’ve joked about loving/hating humans and how much butter exactly it takes to love them.

It is also at the heart of Darkship Renegades and if you squint intently, at the heart of my future history.

My future history starts with nations expropriating all those embryos resulting from in-vitro and making a bunch more and having them gestated in bio-engineered large animals (kind of like the mice who grow human ears) in an attempt to make up a massive short fall of people.  (Yes, I do think world population is already falling, or if it’s not it’s because older people are living much longer.  The problem is the modern state depends for its structure on having more young people than old.  At any rate this is supposed to be 50 to 100 years from now.  Shut up.  Making predictions is hard, particularly about the future.  You lays down your money and you makes your bet.  That is mine.)

These people are by and large not quite normal.  Part of it might be the timing of hormone baths and enzymes, which would be impossible to get right, no matter how modified the animal.  It could also be the environment, since they’re raised in batch lots.

And eventually people get funny and decide, instead, to create supermen and to “improve” their own children.  And then it all goes wrong because humans can’t be perfect, and being perfect can be the biggest flaw of all.

I was about to say we humans are a crazy animal, when it occurred to me that of course I don’t know how other animals are, not really.  We have reason to believe – now – that cats and dogs have some form of memory and ideation.

Perhaps all animals can dream of an idealized version of themselves.  Who am I to say?
I do know humans do.  I am – on a good day and with enough caffeine – human, or at least a reasonable facsimile thereof.

And we humans can see an idealized version of ourselves – a perfect version, without any of those flaws and imperfections that mar the human body and soul.

It has run throughout all of human history: the thought of super-humans, or of angels, without flaw.  For some of us those humans existed in Eden, seemingly perfect, until the flaw was revealed in the taste for forbidden fruit.  For others, there was a perfect civilization where a mother goddess was worshiped and everyone was happy, until the unhappy ones – what?  What’s that you say?  No, no, I read the books, that seems to be the gist of it – subverted the whole thing.  For others – Rousseau will never be dead enough – humans were noble and perfect before civilization.

We can ideate perfect humans.  We can ideate a perfect life.  And then we turn to our workaday world, chockablock with briars (and blockheads.)  

This used to be disease prevalent in adolescence, particularly for well-off people.  (By historical standards, we’re all well-off, which is why adolescence is actually a recent concept.  Okay, Romans had it, but it was a… er… different thing.)  The “Why does it have to be that way?”  And the “But I hate humans” always sound, inherently, as though they were said by a sixteen year old.  (And fresh from parenting a sixteen year old, the whine-that-can-cut-through-glass is loud and clear in my memory.)

It used to be for most people, though, wealthy or not, after adolescence, some form of integration was achieved.  People came to see the ideal for what it was – something to strive towards, not something to demand.  And sometimes, in special circumstances, they came to see their flaws for… well… good things.  (Sometimes they are.  Sometimes what causes people to do best are their worst traits.)

The reason people mostly came to terms with reality is that, well… what is there besides reality?

And that’s where we got tripped, starting around the fifties or so.  I think, honestly, the issue was television.  It looks real, but it is or can be flawless.  I’ve often wondered how much of our divorce rate is based on the flawless, effortless families of the fifties sitcoms during the formative years of most now-adults.  It seems as though study after study has shown we can’t tell the difference between TV and reality.  Weirdly, no, I don’t think the down-glare on married life and what I’d call the “all relationships are sh*t” view of humanity prevalent now helps.  Neither is actually reality like.

Anyway, the problem is we now have – all of us – both wealth (you don’t usually worry where your next meal is coming from.  Heck, I don’t, though there have been times in my life I did, they were brief and limited) and a vivid, collective fantasy life.

This has the result of a sort of extended adolescence.  Our arts, the collective expression of our collective soul – or our culture for lack of a better word – have got stuck in the adolescent whine of  “I hate people.”  Which means the “moral” behind just about every novel, painting, story is “Humans are bad and we should all die.”

So, what’s wrong with hating humans, you say.

Nothing.  Nothing if you could choose between humans as are and your idealized humans that can exist only in syrupy shows.

The problem is those humans don’t exist.  And the problem is the reaction of culture to realizing this was to go into a prolonged tantrum that amounts to “If we can’t be perfect we should all die.”

This is a problem because it’s starting to have an effect.  It’s become controversial to say “I love people.”  It’s become controversial to say “Humans have achieved great things.”

All of which would be fine, again, if you could choose to be something else.  But you can’t.  For good or ill, we’re humans and humans are all we have.

Did humanity produce Stalin and Mao?  Sure.  But humanity also produced DaVinci and innumerable saints.  Were any of the last without flaw?  Well, no.  They were human.  All humans have flaws.  Sometimes the reason humans strive to be good is that they see themselves as worse than they are.  That’s one of those flaws that’s good for you.

But seeing yourself – or your species – as unredeemable is as blinkered, as pathetic, as seeing your species – or yourself – as angel-like, with no flaws.  Neither of them have reality and frankly both of them lack internal tension.  Both of them are therefore just plain bad art.

So, can Human Wave be dystopian?  Sure it can.  You don’t really need to scratch very deeply into the world of Darkship Thieves to see that Earth is a dystopia and Eden is a barely balanced near-utopia, but one that crumbles on contact.  Humans are still humans.  Unspeakable things can happen (contemplate Max’s fate, or for that matter Nat’s revenge.)

BUT through it all, humans are still humans.  The ones who are good can be very very good.  The ones who are broken are broken in interesting ways.  The villains are – to borrow from Shakespeare – punishe’d.  And the good, if not rewarded, have a chance to reward themselves to a measure.  And the mixed can redeem themselves in future books.

Human Wave: it might be very dark, but a ray of light is allowed in.  We don’t hate humanity, because if we do we can’t love anything.  And there is always the option for a sequel.

You heard it here first.

This is my attempt at writing about time management.  Which is to say, what follows is largely – though not entirely – fiction.

Not entirely because there have been times when my method – brute force, aka ductaping writer to chair – actually works.  Those are usually my most productive times.  When I manage to sit down and write and work on only one work, and not stray, I can do a book in a week… though my record is three days.

So, why don’t I work like that all the time?  Mostly because I fall under my own influence.

When I was a brand new writer, knee high to a thesaurus, I wanted to give myself the impression that I had a “real job.”  Coming from being in college and working almost full time on the side, the concept that I got to set my own hours made it feel like I was really unemployed and lying to myself.  The fact that back then I was not making a cent off writing made things worse.

The touch-feel of work was needed for me to take writing seriously.

One thing I’ve learned which worked, from that time was that I should get up early – preferably get up when my husband got up to go to work.  If I didn’t do that, it was all too easy to tell myself I’d take just one day off, lounge in bed till noon, then next day take just one day off – the way to h*ll on the installment plan.

So at this phase of my so called career, I got up early, dressed at least as well as I’d dress to go to a business-casual job, and set hours.  “I’m writing from nine to five” worked when I didn’t have kids, when the hours shifted to match school hours.  (On the other hand, getting up early wasn’t a problem, since I needed to wake up an hour before the kids, to have an hour to collect my thoughts before I had to deal with bathing/dressing/taking to school.)

Did it work?  – Waggles hand. –  About half the time.  The problem in that time was the lack of a goal.  I didn’t have a reason to get up and work.  I had ambition, but that’s not how humans work.  Like a novel, a life needs short term achievable goals on the way to the next one.  Not knowing when or how of if I’d ever sell would send me into months and months of depressive silence and I fell in traps I later learned to avoid.  The two years lost to Tetris are the reason I don’t game.  The only exception I allow myself for that is this: if I’m ill – really ill, as in the doctor has me under prescription – I allow myself to take a week off and play mah jong on line.  That’s it.

Next came my realization that I needed short time goals.  This was the phase of the planners.  Dan had just started using Covey planners, and he bought me one.  Every morning I’d write my goal for the day.  I’d give myself deadlines for each story/book.

Did it work?  Surprisingly, yes.  I don’t know how much of it was that it coincided with:

A writer’s group.  I am right now on the verge of starting two of those with friends: one local, to provide support and encouragement to those of us planning to do indie publishing.  One wherever, online, providing critique too.

What I’m trying to do is split the two functions of a writer’s group.  I don’t know how that will work.  However, here’s the thing, the local one can only meet once a month – it is a fact of life that both the friend starting it and I are busier than a one armed one-man-band in a sinking boat – which is too far away for critique, particularly if you’re working on novels.  I would like, however, to work into it a goal-setting and reporting segment.  Whether that will work on its own, I don’t know.  It doesn’t online.  I’m hoping it works in person.  Of course, the other part of this is to make the indie writing seem as important as the traditional.  We’ll see.

The critique group, on the other hand, is well…  A critique group.  I’m hoping to attract enough of my close friends, who frankly have no respect or awe whatsoever for my skills, to get honest critiques.  The last local critique group I had didn’t work at all because I found myself in the uncomfortable position of sacred cow.  In fact, unless the people in the group really know you well, or unless you’re all at about the same level, when you have what we’d call “success” however you define it, you’re going to find people taking one of two tacs with your writing.  It’s like being on a panel with newby writers.  They either shut up in awe of you, or they come at you and rip everything to shreds, in an attempt to PROVE they’re just as good.

Neither of these is useful.  Look, at this point I know d*mn well I can tell a story.  I don’t need you to tell me “you know how to tell a story” – conversely I also don’t need you to come at me claws out and go “this is has to be the most stupid idea I ever heard of, and do you know Michael Unknown wrote a short story with this theme in 1920″ or, my favorite “you never explain what dimatough is.  How is it manufactured?”  Or…  What I need is sort of a pre-first-reader thing.  Tell me “Sarah, I felt like you got a little lost in the infodump, here” or “uh… are you really going to make Thena grow a second head in this book?  Because that’s what this line led me to think.”  Minor crap, but crap that’s really hard for me to see by myself.

Anyway, it’s almost impossible to get a group that works like the group I had for ten years.  Because we were all beginners and all trying (very trying.  Yes, there were occasionally personalities.) And because if you didn’t write something for three weeks, without major illness, you were put on probation, it was the best production encouragement I ever had.

This is neither here nor there, as the conditions are not likely to return.

To make things worse, for the last two years my time management has gone haywire by… Freedom.  In a way, I’m back to the initial stage, where I had all this freedom and therefore nothing got done.  The difference is that now I DO get paid for my writing, and therefore that is a huge incentive to write.

However, it’s not a huge incentive to write on a specific project.

Structure used to be lent to my writing by two things – what my agent chose to green light to send to editors, so if I approached her with a project and she said “Sarah, I can’t sell that” I didn’t bother to write the proposal.  OTOH if I approached her and she said, “Yes, ASAP” I worked on that proposal – unless I had a book on deadline.  Between those two I was more or less always running (and often not doing anything I wanted to do, but that’s something else again.)

Now I do have my books under contract with Baen.  But unless a book roars out with force – and somehow, books under contract never seem to – it’s too easy to hit a snag.  And when I hit a snag, there are books I’m doing for indie publishing, or short stories to edit, or work for Naked Reader Press, or the short stories I need to write, like, you know Nuns in Space is selling like crazy, and if I do three more short stories, I can do a five story antho, and then…

Yeah.

The problem is that I can manage to be insanely busy and not get anything FINISHED while at the same time wearing myself down.

Now, I don’t know how much of that was the health issues – which are, fortunately, not fully gone but on the wane.

However, it’s becoming obvious it’s time to start a new attempt at control.  I do have a planner – virgin, since January.  And a calendar, ditto.  (Part of it being it’s too far from my desk, so I keep forgetting it exists.)  I do have a write on board which at this point is permanently etched with the November deadlines (I met the first, then I got sick.)

I won’t survive by my wits alone.

So, here is what I’m going to try: I’m going to try the timed thing again, nine to five, no deviation, start with Noah’s boy, because I could use the money.  Work on it till finished.  Start on another one.

Next: I need a planner that will work.  The problem is the planner I have is depressing because it assumes I am in a corporate job.  The writers’ planners I’ve bought seem to be for literary writers and designed to do a book every three years or so.  They have “inspirational poetry” on the side, and make me want to gag.  What I think I need is a project-based planner, with the option of setting deadlines, then setting phases of the project.  If any other writer has found something that works, I’d appreciate a tip.  If you don’t have one, I might end up designing one.  Eh.  I can then sell it, so all is not lost.

And then I’m going to try the two groups so I have someone I’m accountable to.

Will this work?  I don’t know.  But I hope so.  With no deadlines and no boundaries it’s too easy to get lost in dolce fa niente, with the twist that it’s not even sweet and it’s definitely not fa niente (do nothing) but more wasting myself in myriad little pursuits that don’t come to anything.

I shall report.  And those of you who have had the same issue and have perhaps found something that works, chime in.  We will figure this out.

If it makes you feel better, with more and more of the people who still have a job finding themselves working at home or self-defined jobs, we might be on the vanguard of the way of the future.

Poor future.