
I have never been woken with a bucket of icy water to the noggin. In fact, most such I’ve seen are scenes in movies of someone pouring a bucket of ice water over the head of a drunkard.
I do, since I’m confessing, confess that I once woke my younger son by dropping a cup of ice on him. In my defense, we had an appointment and he was 13 and taller than I and impossible to wake. The result was, btw, amazing, and once I was done peeling him off the ceiling, I decided never to do that again, because eventually he might get to choose my nursing home.
Anyway…. I have seen the result of icy buckets of water in movies, and I’ve seen the result of metaphorical icy buckets of water in real life.
In movies it brings people out of the deepest unconsciousness. And in real life I’ve seen it happen a few times. You probably have too, if not in person, then at a remove through a friend of a friend. Normally it takes a good scare. Something that shakes you to the core.
There is a tendency in humans, individual or in groups, to go along to get along, which in turn gives us an inertia of the normal. “Normalcy bias.” How much normalcy bias depends, honestly on how much people’s iron rice bowl depends on their not noticing things.
That people have been red pilled at all even when it goes against interest is a sign of how out there our times are, and how horrendously insane the overculture is.
Because people are well paid not to notice malfeasance in their own in group, when noticing casts them to the out group.
A point here: while the left was never justified in assuming creativity was on the left only — since creativity is often associated with a kind of madness, whether divine or simply mad, and often descends on outcasts — it was justified in viewing the expression of non-left-wing opinions as a sign of stupidity.
No, bear with me, here. Suppose you have absolutely no principles. Or even that you have principles, but you think the left, while sometimes misguided is trying to be good and do good things for other people. Now, you’re smart enough to see that everyone who expresses one set of opinions gets promoted, fetted, called very smart, and is more or less handed gold-plated careers. This might not be true in tech (and even there open communists often got better pay for inexplicable reasons) but it was and largely still is true in just about every other field, yes, including science and research (which explains a lot) and with bells on for writing, arts, journalism, etc. Meanwhile, profess opinions that fall outside the “acceptable mainstream” which is increasingly the same as hard left, and your career is over. Ditched. If you are very very good you’ll be kept on, but regardless of the work you’re doing, you’ll be kept at a low level. You will be Cinderella, in the kitchen, working for everyone.
If you are the sort of person smart enough to notice that, but you don’t see anything wrong with what the left is doing, or see something wrong but convince yourself both sides do it, or see something wrong, but know it won’t come to that bad an ending because “it can’t happen here” or “that will never work in reality” or “insert calming phrase here” WHY wouldn’t you mouth the stuff required to make your life much easier and give you the gold plated ride to the top? And why would you not assume anyone doing otherwise was just stupid? If not stupid in their particular field (if I had a dime for everyone who said “She’s a good writer, but–“) stupid as rocks when it came to human interaction? You’d cast about for excuses. Perhaps they were uneducated and simply couldn’t guess what to say? Perhaps they were religious fanatics? Perhaps they just hated people different from themselves? Perhaps–
That is how it worked. Some of us escaped it because we had seen it play out elsewhere and because we read a lot. Some of us escaped it because of a strong religious or otherwise community. And some of us are just absolute contraries. And some of us were wide eyed idealists, who were therefore better at noticing all the contradictions early, and it bothered us extremely. Most of us needed a combination of all of those to step out of line. Because humans are social apes, and the temptation IS to conform. No, not even temptation. We all know the tale of the blue monkey. Any monkey who sticks out dies. The need therefore is to conform. For social species it is an imperative of survival to fit in.
And the left, once it had weaponized the era of mass communication — yes, it was intentional, they always in any targeted country, took over all means of mass communication, and then means of dissemination of art and literature. it was part of the subversion protocol — had that going for them. Once they had taken over that small sector of society, it was very hard for society as a whole to go up against them and/or wake up.
Hence why reading so many accounts of communist take over (or fascist. It was all Marxism, after all) is like watching a sleep walker walking towards the abyss while all attempts at waking up failed.
(I would find it hilarious that they use “woke” to symbolize the state of those who blindly parrot the lines given them without thinking and in fact with an aversion to thinking, except it’s not. Most of psychology as practiced today, save for techniques of behavior modification is bokum, but there is such a thing as a subconscious, (whatever Asimov thought) and the stuff repressed into it has a funny way of returning. And we don’t mean “funny ah ah”. This is like when in a dream you keep telling yourself you must wake up, or when you’re writing a very boring chapter and all your characters talk about how bored they are (this is a thing, btw. Known as “messages from Fred.” If you’re a writer, pay attention to it. It’s like when I get stressed and all my characters want to smoke.))
This is because humans will do practically anything, including dying, rather than stand out from the group. Because through most of our evolution, standing out from the group meant dying, and unpleasantly at that. So, humans don’t. Unless they’re Odds, Goats, Eccentrics. You know, people like us.
It’s not that most people won’t do it. It’s that most people can’t do it.
So now some of you are going: Argle bargle, Sarah, as I said, argle bargle, I told you we were doooooomed. Doomed.
Bah. Nonsense. Because societies change and revolutions happen. And some of them even short of dire. And revolutions in the era of mass communication were amazingly instructive, too. It seems that controlling everything doesn’t really allow — as to an extent people like Aldous Huxley or George Orwell thought — control of people’s minds. It allows control of what people say or show. And leaves dissenters feeling very isolated. But when due to some event people finally realize the majority feels as they do, the results are…. explosive.
But secondly, go see the verb tenses I used for having control of mass communications. You see, they HAD full control of means of communication. But they don’t now. And the ways in which it has escaped them are ways they didn’t anticipate. Some of the greatest blows to their cause have, in fact, come from what their allies or they, themselves, did trying to regain control and shove everyone back in line. Because they have put out messages they thought would rally or scare the masses, but which, instead, woke people who suddenly saw the abyss.
Arguably this started happening with Reagan’s election and his performance in office. They’d had very tight fear-control on the left: elect a “right winger” and he’ll get us in nuclear war. I mean, makes perfect sense, if you believe the only way to keep an attacker from killing you is to grovel and beg, the only way to prevent crime is to get rid of policemen, and the only way to stop war is to surrender. Since “right wingers” (None of us in the US really qualifies, but never mind) were by Marxists’ (Mostly the USSR’s, actually) definition war mongers. So, of course, they would make war immediately and it would kill little girls and daisies and stuff.
But Reagan was elected and not only didn’t we get into nuclear war, but the cold war ended peacefully.
I like to imagine what it would have been like if we’d had blogs and the internet with access to the common man then. Because it would have been amazing. You see, there was maybe these two or three years where, gloriously, everyone knew stuff like communism sucked and top down economies didn’t work.
But we didn’t have open communication. So while a lot of people actually woke up and walked away from leftism, it was quiet. It involved a lot of self-blacklisting. It involved their former colleagues thinking they’d gone mad. It wasn’t general. Not a bang, but a whimper. And in the circles where it was the rigueur, hard leftism reasserted itself via a thousand different routes: “environamentalism” “women’s issues” “Queer rights”, “Anti-colonialism” etc. While the causes themselves, in the un-Marxisted (totally a word, roll with it) version aren’t of themselves bad, these weren’t causes, but vehicles for telling everyone that the free market was terrible and that communism/socialism/leftism, while not great was still better. (With the while not great being more and more whispered as time went on.)
If you were in the know, you could see the old leftist horrors move back into top positions here and abroad, and anyone who dissented being pushed out and down, now more forcefully, since they reminded the people in power that they were in fact wrong, and that reality was in fact against them.
But the buckets of cold water continued. 9/11 was the next big one I remembered, where a lot of people woke up. Though a lot of feminists for real woke up when people they trusted and believed in said not a peep at Clinton’s abuse of a young woman over whom he stood in a position of authority.
Since then the hits keeps coming. If you manage to get in a place where people trust you, even though they are generally left, even the most “convinced” leftists will betray the cracks in their worldview, and you can see it metaphorically as a sort of a carnival mask over a face that keeps screaming silently like the painting by Edward Munch. (I always also wonder at the boomers’ love of that painting. I have wondered if it’s a message from Fred yet again.) In fact, their doubts are characterized most of all by their refusal to think. If you bring up stuff that would force them to question, examine, or apply logic, they shut down. Sometimes they shut down visibly, and sometimes they just scream and insult you to get you to go away. This is worse if they’re older.
Why do I say this betrays their doubts? Because in the sixties and seventies, when things like Freud or (eh) Margaret Mead hadn’t been debunked and exploded, they loved to discuss this stuff. They would bring up (largely made up) facts and figures, which you couldn’t counter, because your stuff wasn’t getting published. They were full of whataboutism and supposed righteous logic. Now they just want it to stop.
In the same way, they increasingly try to censor interactions and stop people talking. (The lockdowns were special in that vein and I think why they were so wedded to masks.) Because they don’t want anything to wake them up from the dream and force them to stand out from the herd. If they made a continuous sound it would be “stopthatstopthatstopthat.”
But no matter how much they suppress, repress and shout over, their very own side, their very attempts at consolidating reality, keep dumping buckets of cold water.
The terrorists filming and broadcasting themselves — gleefully — on 10/7 was one of those. It was also a genuine cross-cultural f*ck up. You see, attacking and killing lots of civilians in horrific ways is a military thing for tribal cultures. The fact that they COULD do it should be enough to make Israel surrender in fear and humiliation. They never THOUGHT of retaliation. They think we don’t kill tons of their civilians and their helpless population because we CAN’T not because we have a moral code that forbids it. (Remember Islam doesn’t believe Christ died on the cross. They think someone else was substituted for him, because dying on the cross would be humiliating. The fact we use the cross as a symbol means to them that we want to humiliate Christ. Yeah, it’s …. a very old, very tribal mind set. It can be defined as “might makes right” or “only the strong horse counts.” Whichever.)
But those images, though suppressed, woke a lot of people. And if you have feminists in need of waking, I suggest making them watch it. In fact, part of the damage control is “the Israelis faked it” which is utter bullshit and not really sticking.
And then the attempt at damage control, at making sympathy with Israel “double plus ungood” and making it stop, those ridiculous mass demonstrations, and tearing down of the hostages posters?
All of that woke more people up. I keep coming across people on twitter sadly lamenting “How has the left got this evil and irrational? We’ve never been like this before.”
These are people who are my age or a little older, and it would make me laugh, if I weren’t so busy crying.
Because they’ve been evil and stupid irrational for all of my life, and obviously so since the eighties.
There was this college professor who was earnestly asking how this could have happened, how could the left be siding with Hamass? How could all these people she loved and trusted suddenly be so eeeevile?
I actually answered that one. She might have blocked me by now, but was visible as of yesterday on Twitter/x/twix, whatever.
I pointed out her sign to leave was if no earlier, when they called a Christian-Socialist like W. a “Nazi” or when they called a squish leftist like Romney “literally Hitler” or a hundred other times. But she said nothing, because she agreed with it. Probably because she didn’t want to look too deeply. If she looked too deeply, it would show her all the evil, and then she’d have to stand out, and leave the herd. And people would rather die than that. But at some point, a bucket of water falls on you that you can’t ignore.
For her it was this, but she’ll still try to bury it. Look, she’s a college professor. If she doesn’t try to ignore it and bury it in her mind, she’ll lose her job and all her friends. I know people who are strong enough to do that, but it takes effort and well, inner strength and a devotion to the truth. Which most ordinary leftists don’t have.
However the hits keep coming. Because on one side, we’re in the end stage of “socialism/communism glorifies and rewards politically correct incompetence, which causes everything to fall apart.” This might be tolerated in China or the USSR/Russia for a while, because frankly, they have experience of neither freedom nor prosperity. But we have experience of both, even if the first was illusory at various points in the 20th century. (Also relative. We were still more free than most of the world.) So, the way things fall apart and contradict the socialist verities is unavoidable, and people tend to believe their lying eyes. (Which is, btw, how Reagan got elected in the eighties.) And the patches put on the old tired Soviet agit prop are popping faster. Hence the — giggle, point, laugh — open borders bullshit is starting to wake up even liberal bastions. As is the “let’s coddle the “homeless” because they totally just hit a hard patch” etc. And don’t get me started on the enviro insanity which now wants to forbid random things with the more or less express intent of making agriculture impossible. That will wake up a lot of people. The prospect of starving in the morning might not concentrate the mind as much as the prospect of hanging, but it’s not that far off.
The buckets of water are already lined up. They can’t help but fall. And the left’s attempts at stopping them — because they are, ultimately, at war with reality, and reality is a bitch, it always wins — just means they become extra-icy and fall extra-hard.
Yeah, it’s going to suck, because we’re not watching this from another planet, far away. But it’s not going to suck as much as it will for them. Because we can see it coming, and we’re preparing. (Right, boys and girls? Please tell me I’m right.) And because we can see reality, and therefore we can elbow them out soonish and start rebuilding.
For them? Their minds would need to be completely rebuilt. Which some people say is impossible after 45 or so (Might be later now. After all, we live healthier and longer. But still.) And they believe. Most of them actually earnestly believe the mass of contradictory shibboleths, from humanity being a plague on the Earth, to free market causing slavery and war, to… well, the entire bucket of stupidity, according to which giving up agriculture and living in grass huts would make all of us healthier, more enlightened and possibly give us psi-powers. And no one would attack us, because EVERY ONE, every single person in the world will of course do this.
So when they see their vision failing, there is nothing after. Just unending abyss.
But be not afraid. It won’t be long. (Which still can exceed my remaining life span, because history doesn’t move on human life scale.) And in case it is tomorrow (could be. Unlikely, but it could be) that everything falls apart and simultaneously implodes and explodes, do keep your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.
Illegitimi non carborundum!









































































