Okay, to begin with, this post is not picking on anyone. It might seem like I am, but I’m not really. There are just certain concepts that I need to perhaps make you think through, and consider, because technology has changed, but people haven’t thought through the implications of it. And for some reason the right side of the isle has REALLY PECULIAR feelings about work and about what it respects. And look, here I’m saying I have those issues too, and I had to THINK through them.
We all of us — or most of us. If you’re over 90 it’s only 50/50 it applies to you — were raised in an intellectual environment filled with Marxism, and it comes through.
Yesterday on twitter I came across a post by someone I like and whose opinions — with some occasional croissant flakiness, but who doesn’t have that? — I generally respect. Or at least understand. But her twitter said she’d read Instapundit since 9/11, but now was done. I was taken aback, and because I work for the site, I read her post.
What egregious crime had Glenn committed? Well, he asked people consider donating to instapundit on Giving Tuesday. And because he takes expensive vacations (!) has a day job, etc, he shouldn’t ask, and therefore she wouldn’t read him again.
To be fair to her, later, in an exchange with me — well, you know. Mom always said the beggar might go without alms, but not without a reply — she clarified that what offended her is that Giving Tuesday is for charities, and Glenn doesn’t need the money, and is taking bread from the mouths of widows and orphans BLM and the UNICEF.
Okay, I’m being mean. She’s a nice lady, and I’m sure she donates to children in need, and her parish’s charities. And that’s fine. But those organizations I mentioned? Well, it turns out Giving Tuesday is a UN organized thing, (yeah, there’s an official story, but it’s big because the UN piled on) so absolutely that’s what they mean you to give to.
However, let’s assume that Giving Tuesday is “for people in need.” Yeah, I also don’t think the boss is. I don’t know. I’m not privy to his paychecks and bank account. Yeah, I’ve seen his vacation photos. Yeah, his lifestyle looks nice. That’s fine. He’s not in need.
You know though, he pays a technical team to keep the site running (and I swear guys, I break it every month. It’s a gift.) and unhacked. And even now that he’s not the only poster, he herds cats with all of us, and — judging by my own work load between this blog and instapundit, where all I do is “Night DJ” — I’d be shocked if he takes less than 2 or 3 hours A DAY. And probably more. So yeah, he has a day job. And at night, while his colleagues are chilling, or getting drunk or whatever, he’s at the keyboard. Because I am. Those who’ve visited know. Evenings/early nights, Dan is watching something, and I’m sitting at the laptop, writing tomorrow’s post, culling/looking over comments, instaposting.
So, he does it for fun. Why should you donate to him? Doesn’t he have enough?
The Marx coming through stuck in my craw. HARD. I’m not going to say I’m without sin. I mean, guys, I didn’t ask for money for a long time, because I was afraid of that type of reaction, and after all we were surviving.
Then we weren’t and I needed to ask. And my family had an odd condition. “Okay, but if you’re going to ask for money, you must promise to do an annual fundraiser. Because if you had been doing that, we’d not be in this situation. And it’s not like you don’t do the work, or have the traffic.”
So, I do a fundraiser, in July. But I still edge it around with “This is not a need-fundraiser.” Partly because I hate to beg. Partly because I’m terrified of the reaction above. And partly because I’m even more terrified that people in worse shape than I are going to hurt themselves trying to give me money.
All of this amounts to rats in the head. MY HEAD. Big, stinking Marxist rats. Begging — I’m not begging. I’m reminding people that time and effort go into the work you see on the page. The reaction above — Yeah? I’m not responsible for the rats in other people’s heads. People hurting themselves — they are adults, right? I’m not holding a gun to their heads. I’m not asking for your entire life savings, either. Objectively, I’m pretty happy when people give me $10 once a year. (And if everyone who reads here at least twice a week did that, I’d have more than made my goal. And yeah “if everyone” is bs. NOT saying everyone should, just that I’m not asking for an unreasonable amount. Or any amount. Just saying “if you find value…”)
Now, does Glenn Reynolds need the money? Do I? I don’t know about Glenn. Nor should I. This is one of the classical problems of a communist regime. How do you know what anyone needs? During my highest grossing years, we’d made the mistake of buying a house that was a money pit and were bleeding out more than I made for two half college tuitions, not counting books and maintenance on what the two young men couldn’t cover with catch as can work. (Which was all their schedules allowed.) Also during that time we took a vacation in the South of France. I don’t know that I posted pictures. But as it happens, I paid for none of it. It was covered. Or we couldn’t have done it. Do I know the boss’s vacations aren’t paid? Nope. One of the weird perks of our job is that people give us stuff.
But let’s say he’s as well off as he seems to be, okay? Does that mean he doesn’t deserve to be paid? Why?
Let’s put this another way: say someone came to your front door, rang the doorbell and asked if you needed the lawn mowed. It sure is looking scruffy, so you say sure and how much. He says $50. Cool then. He mows the lawn. You like his work. Then he comes for payment and you ask him: “Do you need the money? Do you have savings in the bank? Do you have another job? Are you taking vacations?”
What would you think of someone who did that?
I can see the stomp stomp stomp “it’s not the same thing!” You’re d*mn right, it’s not. It’s more like someone comes to your front door every week and says “Okay if I mow the lawn?” And you go, “Sure.” I mean, you were paying someone to do it, but weren’t too thrilled with this work, and this guy is just…. doing it.
Okay, so, every time he rings the doorbell, he has a little note he leaves behind that says “If you feel my services were worth something, donate at–” Kind of like the donate link on the side of instapundit — or most other blogs. But he doesn’t say “pay up or I stop” so you don’t. And then one day he grins and says “Hey, it’s Giving Tuesday. Would you care to kick in some cash?”
Then you are offended. Look, he has a top of the line riding mower. He wears brand name sneakers, and look at that jacket. His jacket is better than yours. You’ll never let him mow your lawn again!
THAT is what it actually is like.
Was it silly of Glenn tying his request to Giving Tuesday? Well, I have official funding days. He doesn’t. I ask on those days. But before, when I wasn’t asking for money openly, I had silly occasions. Like Feb. 29 being blogger tipping day.
And yeah, I can see Glenn finding it hilarious to ask for money on a day for UN approved charities.
But does it deserve a “Stomp, stomp, stomp, I’ll never read him again!”? Does it really? WHY?
Well, because he doesn’t NEED it. So, how dare he ask?
Because he does the work. That’s it. He does the work. And by your own admission, you use his service regularly. Do you pay for a newspaper subscription? Did you, once upon a time? Or did you go and investigate the newspaper’s assets, and how much they got from subscriptions, then go “Well, they don’t need it. How dare they ask?”
BUT SARAH! you say, and go back to the analogy. “He came and mowed the lawn. I didn’t make him. I just used what was being freely offered.”
Sure. Because that’s the model. How did you know your digital lawn needed mowing, when it was new as paint? Or that any one blog would provide something you wanted?
So bloggers set up their site, and gave things for free. This is not so much the model anymore. A lot of people set it up in substack from day one. Though if they’re smart, they do some for free too.
But it is work. Glenn, even with co-authors, is one of the few blogs still continuing from the post 9/11 days. And this very humble blog is now — dear LORD — 15 years old in daily posting. 3 hours a day or so. Sometimes 4. (I need to teach my assistant to work the comments. But I have one because I fundraise. And you trade money for time, you know?) Nearly every day. While on vacation or sick, or when we went away a week for my son’s wedding, I might skip Glenn. I rarely skip here, without lining guest posts up.
And work deserves payment. If I were mowing someone’s lawn, I would expect payment. And providing thoughtful opinion pieces, I grant you, is done inside, and in the warm. And I might have killed the sensitivity on my fingertips, but I don’t have calluses. It is still work.
The time I spend on this, day in and day out means I’m paying someone to weed my scruffy garden no one has cared for until we bought it. Means I clean once every two weeks, even though I hate messes. Means time taken from novels. (I AM doing the overdue chapters, I swear.) This and the time spent on Insty means I go to bed late, get up early, and have a list of things to do in my head.
Do I do it anyway? I enjoy it. And I can do it. And it’s, in a way, fun. Also, it funds. (Yeah, this year very slowly, but I anticipate hitting fully funded between all the sources by July.) So I can pay people to do the other stuff.
But if it’s not funding at all…. well. I’m putting 3 or 4 hours up the spout, every day. What do you think I’d do?
Well, I’d shutter the blog, say thank you for all the fish. Maybe start that craft business on the side. Maybe write moar novels. Maybe start that “sex with an alien” sex line I keep threatening every time we’re pinched. (It’s a joke. But we I do deploy it every time we’re pinched.)
The thing is, you see, time is money. I couldn’t really afford to do this for free for many years, but I did it, because to begin with I hoped it would be publicity. That’s sort of mixed, though instapundit IS publicity. And that came from having this blog and being known. So in a round about way it worked. But enough for the work I put in? Ah, no. And the time I spent here I didn’t spend on anything else. And my family was DEFINITELY so tight we squeaked for most of that time. I felt it had to be done. So I did it. But I was stupid doing it for free.
The family were right to say I should ask. My Marxist notions of “but I don’t need it” were wrong. I hurt my family by not fundraising; by being too scared.
And now we get into being scared. Every time I fund-raise, and when I post this at instapundit tonight, there will a commenter of many sock puppets (or perhaps an office that works at trolling. There are indications that way) who will come in the comments under many, many personas to talk about how greedy I am, and how I am all about the money, (like being on the right is lucrative or something) and how I want the money for purposes that he/she/it/them imagines will disgust my “right wing” readers. Hence why his “ex-marine” (sic) persona claims I want the money for my sex game room (something that ANYONE who met me in person probably giggles about. I mean, even if I had the money, who has the energy? Who has the head space? Who doesn’t have the arthritis?)
It’s stupid. It’s silly. It’s an organized operation (fairly sure from what I see in the back panel) dedicated to demoralizing the right.
And it works. Every time I mention fundraising, or link a friend in trouble (I always donate, too, but normally anonymously) I cringe. Because all that bilge is going to be thrown at me, and some people are soft-headed enough to buy at least part of it. I’ve never seen it, but I can imagine it “Well, she and her husband are well off. He has a job. She writes novels. They go to conferences. They visit friends. Her sons have jobs.”
All of which is true. (You’d be amazed though how little novels pay. Though Indie pays better than Trad. And conferences are a net drain.)
But not the point. In fact, utterly beside the point. I do this. I do the work. No one is either forcing you to read or to pay. But if you read, if you read for reasons other than to find something to be offended by, if you’re a regular… well…. I bought many magazines at $50 a year back in the day for one columnist who wrote a column a month. And as for instapundit, have you checked what your local or national newspaper subscription is?
It’s a service. Sane people who expect a service to continue don’t ask if the people doing it need the money, but only “Are they doing it to my satisfaction?” And give, if they can what they can, so the people performing the service don’t have to abandon it and oh, I don’t know, I keep joking my retirement plan is being a walmart greeter. (More likely than an alien sex line. I don’t have the voice for it. And who is that inventive?)
Here’s the thing, though, the trolls shame us for fundraising because it works. Because a lot of you have forgotten the bad years, when you subscribed to a magazine for that one, precious column. Because you’ve forgotten the cost of a newspaper subscription. It’s on line. It’s free. HOW DARE THEY ASK FOR MONEY FOR THE WORK THEY DO?
The right doesn’t have the big pockets. We’re not astroturf. Some of you sent very generous donations (you know I’m grateful, right?) But most of the donations we subsist on? $10 here. $5 there. $20 now and then. What people can afford right then. And we do all right. Because we have the numbers.
But if the trolls, or the people who don’t think about what they’re saying, succeed, and we stop asking for money? Well, when the pinch comes, we go do something that pays. And another dissenting voice is silenced. At remarkably little cost to the left. Just some trolls who probably work for cheap, and the Marxist rats in the head of the right wingers planted there sixty years ago, in elementary school.
Look, I get it, okay? Money is tight for everyone these days. The only reason I’m not crying in the grocery checkout line, which happened often during the summer of recovery years is that well, the boys are out. And the blog by and large funds. And indie pays better than trad. And–
Money is still tight for everyone right now, even those of us who are a little more than okay. As I confessed on the post on Monday, I am having to husband our resources. We have a budget for charity, and over the last 3 years it’s grown to be more than our eating out budget (which is at any rate laughable. We’re really cheap dates, unless it’s someone’s birthday) it’s grown to be more than our vacation budget. Heck, it’s more than our grocery budget. That all said, all of those are tiny. So, it’s not only not infinite, it’s not huge. It used to get hit with a GSG or a gofundme by someone in need…. once a month? so it would all go to one person. Now I get three or four dire-needs a month. And we don’t have much room in the budget. So I’m giving less to each person. I’m sure you’re doing the same.
Plus fixed income people, which the original poster is, well… yeah. Groceries are horrendous, and getting anyone to fix the gutters/paint the wall has become prohibitive.
So, they might not give where before they would have. And that’s fine. When a lot of you said “Sarah, I’d give but–” What did I tell you? “First, don’t hurt yourself.” If the time comes I can’t afford to do this, I’ll cut back to two or three days a week. Regular. And do something else, the rest of the time.
I’ve never held it against anyone for not giving. And in fact, when some of you ran aground, I offered to give them free subscriptions to the serialization or the others (Yes, chapters. Yes, they’re coming) and have them stop paying. A bunch of you who comment here know this. And some of you whose finances I know, I yelled at for subscribing, and you got very insulted “Hey, my money. I want to.” Which…. they’re right, you know?
And I keep books on KU because I know some of you, it’s the only way you can read. Because idiots are hitting the economy with a hammer.
And I give free advice on writing on Madgeniusclub, which heaven help me, doesn’t pull its weight in publicity. And yeah, I intend to do more workshops and stuff. Let me get myself in gear.
And if any of you regulars want my books and can’t afford them, ping me. I’ll send them. (Ebook. Look, some cases I’ve sent paper copies, but the problem isn’t even the expense, though it’s expensive. It’s that I’m scatty. It’s easier to forget.)
I do the charity I can outside giving money, too. Not because I must, or owe it, but because I’m a decent human being who’s needed help and had you all come to the rescue more than once. It’s called paying it forward.
I also get “subscription creep”. I subscribe to three blogs because I love the content. I subscribe to two others because they need encouragement. That’s a lot of money per year. And I’m careful. It’s easy to spend much more and not notice. (I do annual, too. Because it’s easier to reconsider every December.)
I get it, okay? Time and money are both tight, and the world in general has its hand out. And if you don’t want to give/can’t give/are sick and tired of subsidizing blogs? No one thinks you’re a horrible human being. It’s your prerogative. Heck, most of us won’t even know.
But saying you’ll never read someone because he dared — dared! — ask for money for a service you admit you used for years? That’s staggeringly rude. And stupid. And probably evil, since it’s all based on envy of his PERCEIVED lifestyle.
You’re aiding the leftists to demoralize and demonetize the right. And you’re shocked and surprised when I wait for you behind the bike sheds and pounce. Because you didn’t think any of this through. You didn’t think anything through beyond “being nice” (what they used to imprison us during Covidiocy) and “he’s taking money from the mouths of–“
Is asking on Giving Tuesday crass? Well, it might be, if it weren’t a UN instituted thing. But even then, please note we pile on these occasions, not because we’re crass or brazen, but because we’re used to people thinking our work should be free. And we’re embarrassed as heck to ask. So we try to pile on some public thing, and smile, and try to slide it through.
But being paid for your work shouldn’t be means tested. There are things in the Bible about paying the laborer. There are things in the Bible about not binding the mouth of the kine that tread the grain.
There isn’t, that I know, anything in the Bible that says “You should not buy into Marxist arguments and neatly demonetize the people on your side, doing work for which they are often penalized in their careers” (No? FIGHT ME. I can tell you times, and not just for me.) “For which their families are penalized. For which they are often, yes, even now, even here, at risk of various sorts.”
That is because the Bible didn’t, as such, deal with the online world of blogs on the right and the finer line between “of course I’m asking, but you’re not obligated to give.” And even the Almighty probably scratches His head at the right’s cult of never asking for money, even if you’ve done the work, let alone the right’s cult of “POOR but honest.” (Ah, don’t jump me! I know He’s omniscient.)
The point of this overlong blog: Not jumping the original poster. She’s probably already blocked me on twitter, convinced I’m being mean and will probably never see this, but listen, if I wanted to jump her, I’d give you a link.
I don’t. She’s a good person. She’s simply not thinking. And she let her baser instincts take over. Which heaven knows, all of us do now and then. Because asking for money used to be only for beggars. The others? They negotiated price up front.
It’s not like that. Not in the online world. I mean, it can be, but then no one will stumble on this blog by accident and start thinking. I’d prefer not going paid-only. And I know for a fact Glenn also doesn’t want to do that.
So people’s heads get stuck in “if you’re asking, it must be for need.” But ah…. there’s no other way to get paid for this work, in this model.
Note we don’t shake people down for money. We don’t say pay or else. Yeah, yeah, if you don’t pay the thing might/will eventually go away. But that’s not a threat. That’s life and economics, and hey, it is what it is.
And the model has give, so we don’t need people to hurt themselves to keep going.
But don’t take offense because the worker expects to be paid. And don’t call people greedy who work above the required to survive, and expect to be paid for that too.
Don’t demonetize your own side to be a “nice” person.
We already know the left is trying to shut us down. Trust me, they don’t need your help.