
Faced with the disaster of the fall of the USSR and the multiple disasters communism and socialism have engendered across the world, since, the left had to discover something very wrong in the free market.
And as usual when they can’t find anything, they invent something. And then try to convince everyone it’s a huge issue.
I’m always puzzled by the duckies who immediately fall for it.
For the last… oh, thirty years, they’ve been screaming at the top of their lungs about “inequality.” (Oh, lack of diversity and inclusion too. But sit down and wait the turn of those craptastic concepts. We’ll get to the full DIE IED that they’re trying to bomb our culture with soon enough.)
If you think it hasn’t been that long, you ain’t thinking. Actually all the way back in the eighties, as the right (ish) started to fight back, they started howling about how we were becoming a society of the “haves and have nots.” I remember this scaring the living spit out of me, as Dan and I were both kind of hanging loose, on our own, trying to make it by the skin of our teeth, me in a country where my hard fought-for credentials meant nothing, he in a job where no one he knew or was related to could give a boost. And both of us could expect exactly no financial help from parents. (Though over time my parents did help, here and there, where they could, and particularly with things for the boys, like their first cars.)
Weirdly, the doom they forecast didn’t come upon us. Yes, there are people who are ludicrously rich and people who are very poor. But to the extent there is any injustice to that (and there is, mostly for the young because they hit a world where the ladders had been pulled up before they got here) it is not because of the free market but because of government rules, regulations, tariffs, taxation, the left’s blinkered attempts to FORCE the unwilling into unions and oh, yeah, the vast importation of cheap labor without a by your leave or any legality. If you removed all that, there would still be vast gulfs of inequality, sure, but here’s the question: WHY DO YOU CARE?
I’ll wait while you finish gesticulating and sputtering, shall I?
No, there is no obvious reasons why you should Give A Rat’s Ass (GARA.) The image the left — knowingly — conjures is something like South America, where people wallow in massive riches, while others live in abject poverty, with no running water or toilets or electricity. But the countries where that happens are inevitably under the boot of a form of socialism or another.
In America… well, we’re different, you know? I heard the media publicizing that some mean billionaire who is mean said that making only 400k a year was a shame, and he couldn’t understand how any man could endure such a thing.
Bah. We will never even come close to making that. And?
I presume someone making that leads a certain kind of lifestyle, which involves not doing a lot of things we do for ourselves, some of which we even enjoy (cleaning the house is my exercise program, for instance. And I like refinishing and repurposing old furniture. I’m finally getting a sewing area in order, to do other stuff, too.) And it involves not having the two-three hours together in the evening we have where I’m usually doing next day’s blog while semi-watching a movie Dan is watching. (It’s not a sacrifice. I fall asleep if all I do is watch a movie.) And it probably involves few walks in the park. Few home cooked meals. And a lot of travel. (I hate traveling.)
All of which boils down to, yes, he makes vastly more money than we dream of, but you know what? We have a snug house, which has the miraculous ability to keep us hot or cold depending on what’s needed, so we enjoy comfort year around. We have enough to eat and can even go out occasionally. And if it weren’t for various health issues could buy ready-prepared meals that are tasty and of decent quality pretty much all the time. We have appliances that make the house cleaning a trivial chore, instead of the monster that ate our foremothers’ days.
Lifestyle wise everyone but the utterly poorest Americans (and in those cases there is usually some impairment involved, either addiction or mental issues. Which frankly we could help with much more if so much chaff weren’t thrown into the air about equality) we live like the very rich of the early to mid twentieth century. Heck, in many things we live massively better. No money could buy things like new treatments for medical conditions, or being able to communicate around the world in the blink of an eye.
Yep there are people living massively better. But we have all the necessities and more for the amount of work and effort we’re willing to put in. And so do the vast majority of people who didn’t arrive in the country yesterday claiming to be dispossessed. (If you think those won’t be counted in “inequality” you’re an optimist.) So, why should we care about the rich?
In the nineties, I read a massively flattering bio of Eva Peron in some magazine, and one of her quotes baffled me. She apparently couldn’t rest knowing that there were rich people in the world. Her solution (like all socialists) was to rig things so only she and her cronies were allowed to be rich, of course.
Look, at the time I read that we were somewhat beyond broke. How beyond broke? Well, we were paying on two houses, having moved to where husband could actually get a job. (The wobble of 91.) But the job didn’t pay great, so we were coming up $200 short every month on fixed expenses. This didn’t, of course, include food or car repairs (both cars were terminal.) Among the fixed expenses were paying back for the emergency cesarean which happened on COBRA (And MIGHT have been cheaper with NO insurance.) The house we were renting was in Columbia SC, built in the fifties and HAD NO AIR CONDITIONING. With an infant in the house. Think on that a minute.
So, we were barely surviving; life was a miserable slog, and we didn’t know if we’d ever manage to crawl out of the hole.
…. to be fair, I still don’t know how we managed, except by very strict discipline (“You buy a paperback, we eat pancakes for a month.” (Actually rice with some spices. Rice is CHEAP by the 50lb bag, from Asian grocery stores. Yes, we gained 100 lbs each. Next?) and moving to Colorado, and working insanely hard.
That’s not important to the story. Important to the story is where we were at the time, with the black dog explaining we might never rise above that level.
Yet reading that quote BAFFLED me, because I liked thinking there were rich people in the world. And so so people, enjoying themselves, and people well off enough to enjoy beautiful things and places. Look, at the time our two major indulgences we probably shouldn’t have done but did, were when Dan blew $40 we really didn’t have to get me a large coffee-table book of Leonardo Da Vinci’s art. Why? Because looking at the pretty pictures soothed my soul, and he could see that. (I was looking at it in the store. I didn’t ask. He went back in and bought it.) And when we could scrape together money (mostly carefully husbanded birthday money sent by my parents) we would get burger king’s grilled chicken sandwich (I was dismayed recently by finding out they no longer have it. It’s been so long on low carb and never having fast food I didn’t realize) and then park our car in this beautiful neighborhood that had ornamental lakes and gorgeous houses, and eat our sandwiches while soaking in the beauty.
It’s not that I’m a saint, okay? Or don’t have any envy in me. I have sin-level envy of certain things, including but not limited to people who can take a few weeks by the sea every year. (Time mostly. Though money doesn’t help.)
It’s just that being in beautiful surroundings helped, and I liked that other people had the money to live there, so I could enjoy a little bit of it now and then.
To think everyone was as poor as myself, and the world an unending grind for everyone would make everything worse, and make me wonder why be alive.
So– Why is inequality a problem?
I can only conceive of inequality being a problem where it’s inequality before the law: The law treats you differently than everyone else. OR where it’s brought on by “Planners” from above trying to “make things equal” and screwing the vast majority of the population.
They always do screw the vast majority of the population, and it’s not surprising, because you really can’t make people equal UPWARDS. For one, where is the uncreated wealth going to come from? And why would those working very hard to create wealth going to continue doing so if they don’t get the rewards? You can’t add a foot to everyone’s legs. The best you can do is cut the legs of the tall person, and make everyone equally short, metaphorically speaking.
Because it is true that much greater wealth requires work. Even now, even when the state gives advantages to connected and “upper class” people. Oh, there are some lazy skating grifters at the higher levels, particularly the politically connected and venal (coff might or might not sound like “Biden”) because well connected and venal. But outside those circles, if you want to be rich, you pay for it.
How? Well…. the year Dan made a lot of money and we were “rich” we paid for it in his never being home (it was a traveling job) and my having the full care of two elementary school boys with no backup. And us going out to eat a lot when he was home because I didn’t want to spend time cooking when he was actually there. And us buying a lot of things I’d otherwise make/figure out because we didn’t have time. At the time he’d doubled his salary, but after all the stuff we had to do for it, we were barely 10k a year better off. It wasn’t worth it.
I will bet you even in a semi-free system, a lot of the super-rich are living what you and I would consider a crazy lifestyle, and not because they get all the wonderful stuff. Most of what you see on TV is a lie.
By and large, and despite all the efforts of those at the top to make it not so, people who are doing massively better are doing so because they work/do stuff for it. Now it might be stuff they enjoy and I consider unpalatable. (Like have meetings. GRRR. Or sell…. anything.) But that’s because we’re not the same.
And that’s the crux of the problem. If you have “vast inequality” and the system — like ours — is even minimally free? It’s because people are vastly different.
Now I do realize that our system has been changing and become increasingly more and more rigged — largely by those who claim they’re imposing “equality” from above. — and that in many ways we’re indeed becoming a society of the haves and have nots, while the vast majority strive — and FAIL — to get anywhere. But that’s not free market. That’s socialism imposed via a veritable cat’s craddle of regulations on everything from labor to how the labor is performed to who and how you can sell, etc. etc. etc.
The more regulations are imposed — regardless of the objective of the regulations, btw — the more it favors the wealthy and connected, while the poor, young and striving are left unable to do anything to improve their lot.
Take a “minor” thing of all the taxes, and how they’re calculated, and how stupid-difficult it is to calculate sales taxes, if you sell to people in multiple states.
I have this dream — for which I probably have no time, but I could carve out some — of making various fantasy stuffed animals and selling them. I have the materials, I could find the time (mostly a day a week. A change is as good as a rest) and I could figure out how to market them. What am I lacking? Well, my husband already does the taxes for my business, which eat the majority of his free time, or time he could be doing his own writing in. So– Am I willing to sacrifice more of his life on the altar of taxes? Well no. I still want to do it, but I’m holding back.
Now, for us, that money is not a necessity. And stuffed fantasy animals aren’t going to improve the world. But how many people aren’t building and selling widgets, or growing a crop of some kind in their backyard, (Shush. though it’s legal in some states. And yeah, the taxes make it impossible) or making crafts to sell, or whatever which would MARKEDLY improve their condition? And ours too.
BUT they can’t do it because of all the regulations, some of them well-intentioned, others just bloody stupid, which make it impossible to strive and work for a better position.
Then you really have a two-tiered class system, the “haves” and “have nots” and a VAST and deep gulf in between.
Every time the government tries to impose equality from above this is what happens: You get a TINY percentage at the top living very well indeed, and everyone else living in unacceptable conditions.
We’re not there yet. There are still paths to climb and strive. It’s just massively harder than it should be, and often takes a network of family and friends to get anywhere.
So, if you think inequality of results is a problem? Lobby to stop lawfaring for equality. Lobby to get rid of all possible regulations on labor and production. Lobby for much, much, much simplified tax code.
And then accept that the rich will always be with us. And the poor too. Because people aren’t alike.
It’s just in a minimally free system, everyone is richer, and even the “poor” live with endless bounty.
























































































