
Since I’m writing about a re-barbarized culture (yes, in the cursed book. Deal) I have been thinking a lot about barbarism and civilization.
The culture in the book is one that went into barbarism with a hammer, being the result of genetic and cultural manipulation, which robbed them even of the legacy of languages evolved on earth and made to serve mankind With the language, they lost the final tools to keep a high-level (or any level) of technology when the ship crashed and all adults but two died. Those adults were bizarrely or perhaps desperately trying to gestate all the embryos in artificial wombs, to leave the planet with a viable population. This allowed them not to scuttle their grand design, and to have their off-shoot of humanity survive. But it left them no time to teach the children. Which might be better and worse than if they had.
Worse, because the children could live with the stuff left to them, but were in essence primitives. Better because the crazy assumptions of the grand experiment weren’t imposed on them and allowed them, after very dark times to rebuild a civilization of sorts, even if not really a civilization.
There is an underlayment of barbarism to the culture, that I don’t know (quite) how to depict without making the people unsympathetic. The environment is hell on the very young and the very old, due to the cold equations of maintaining the lives of those who can’t contribute to their own care. True barbarians don’t care, but nascent civilizations, while still barbaric, have to come up with justifications for what they do. they might not even fool their own members, but they are, nonetheless, necessary for sanity.
But there is more, because of the nature of the world — yes, the damn hermaphrodite world — it is to some extent every hand against every other hand. They’ve had to band together to an extent, hence the nascent civilization, simply to survive, but there’s not the hard lesson humans had to learn about caring for pregnant females (they’re mostly self-sufficient on that, though at the risk of tremendous infant mortality that almost destroys the sub-species) and there is marginal advantage to that sharp-edged competition of women in the seraglio. To put it it bluntly, more or your children is fewer resources for mine.
Even in nascent or at least attempted civilization, millennia in, the best of them are what we’d consider unholy prickly and capable of sudden and horrifying violence. I have to write such a scene, and still don’t know how to make it both startling and horrifying to my civilized-world visitor/dropped-in unfortunate, and yet justifiable enough that the character doesn’t lose all sympathy. Because he (yes, way back in the eighties I was told I could sell it if I referred to them as “she” but that’s the entirely wrong image for the civilization I created) IS a good person and surprising gentle for their culture and time, and its exigencies. And yet, he has to commit violence at the drop of an insult, or risk being killed.
Now to an extent it’s a very fun civilization to write: Connan the Barbarian meets Jane Austen, with something approaching magic. The response to someone outside very specific conditions (Which have edge cases) calling you by your given name, for instance, is to threaten to cut their tongue out. And to try to make good on the thread if they succeed.
Barbarism is fun, in the same sense adventure is fun: if it happens to someone else far away.
Humans in a state of barbarism are subjected to pressures and imperatives that make the rest of us blench. And the exigencies and impulses of a barbaric culture make them very bad neighbors indeed, so note that barbarism is only fun far away from us.
And barbarism is not only the default nature of humans, when our carefully indoctrinated civilized imperatives are forgotten or stripped away from us by circumstances, but it remains in some part even in the most civilized of us.
It is nature, red in tooth and claw, inside our brains, against the best imperatives of our brains. And it hides itself in myriad ways. See women in offices and corporations often recreating the behavior of the seraglio, with “death of career” substituting for “death.” And “cancelling” for “throwing to the outer darkness to die with her children” (Or his.) See men who haven’t been socialized to harness and husband (I speak advisedly) their greater strength becoming “toxic” and abusive to those weaker.
The best civilization can do is NOT banish the barbarism in each of us, but harness it, in the service of greater humanity.
And greater humanity is the point here. The tribalism of the savage does not serve civilization. It allows some very ancient and barbaric impulses to survive.
Because, despite the appearance, this is not a writer nattering about her cursed book, but serves a purpose, let me start by telling a “joke” in very poor taste.
All of those screaming that Israeli response to the Einsatzgruppen LARPing by the Palestinian barbarians MUST be proportionate are out of luck. No one can convince the IDF to run around raping women and children, beheading babies and setting fire to children.
In fact, they are at risk, rather, as all civilized people are, of having their best impulses used against them. Already, in Twitter, there are idiot Hamas Bots demanding if I’m as horrified by Israelis “killing Palestian babies” for however long. I don’t answer them. Because I don’t answer questions with made-up premises. I might as well ask them when they stopped honor-killing their wives.
Yes, Israelis have killed some children and babies of Palestinians, over the years trying to defend themselves from a relentless enemy, but never on purpose. In that they take more care than these children’s parents. For the record, it’s not a war crime to bomb a weapons depot or missile launching station placed atop a nursery school or a hospital. It is a war crime, and despicable to a horrible extent to place such installations in places where you will use the children of your own tribe as shields.
It’s also a learned behavior. The Palestinians and other modern day barbarians wouldn’t do that if it weren’t for the fact that they’ve learned their scrupulous and civilized enemy hesitates to hurt innocents. The fact that they value winning against the civilized enemy over their own children is more a demonstration of how sick their barbaric culture has gotten, and how much it sees itself as inevitably defeated. Otherwise, they would value the future. If they thought they had one.
So, should we feel sorry for them because of their lack of future? We can’t afford to. When a culture reaches that level, there’s only one thing that can save it. And “save it” only in a very general sense, that their genetics have a shot at the future: Take every child under three away and raise them in civilization, with a different language, different parents, and never tell them they were adopted.
No, we won’t do that. Civilized people have learned to be wary of that sort of impulse, which in a way is too bad.
The myths and idiocies of the “noble savage” have caused us to allow generations of children to be raised in barbarism crossed with a sort of welfare state where everything material is provided for them, but they are taught only the impulses and practices of barbarians.
It is actually no wonder they hate us. It’s just that they hate us — and in the Palestinian case, both us and the Israelis — for all the wrong reasons. They also have an internal myth that goes something like: “Commit horrible acts of barbarism — ?????? — Victory.”
But they can’t have victory. If, unlikely as it is, they were to “win” against civilization, their barbarism would just consume them. And their lack of interest in their own tribe’s future would end them.
Not to pick on Palestinians, only. You see the same behavior among the lost and broken “ante-fa” and the other barbarians of our left. It’s all “Commit horrible acts of barbarism — ?????? — Victory.”
It’s all based on the idea that civilized people will behave as the barbarians will. That they will fight at the same level, but impaired by being “civilized” which for the barbarians translates as “weak.”
They miss the mechanism of civilization. The thing that kicks in, when all of us feel threatened with extinction.
Civilization allows individuals to be fat and sassy, and consider themselves secure enough we are horrified by violence, and don’t respond with the same level of violence, or not close enough for barbarians to understand.
The Einsatzgruppen LARPing was typical barbarian aggression. When tribe of human meets tribe of human in the wild, one of them will commit the worst atrocity they can think of, to cause the other to run away. This saves lives on both sides because it spares the tribes endless war.
However it works very, very badly when tribal humans meet civilization, where all humans are considered part of one’s “tribe”.
Oh, a lot of attacks are ignored, because civilization removes the knife from the civilized throats. We have lives to live. We are momentarily horrified, then move on.
Until an invisible mark is hit, one that is hard to quantify, so it’s always a surprise for the barbarians, but that mark does get hit in every confrontation between civilization and barbarism. Some atrocity so horrible, some outrage so immense is perpetrated by the barbarians, that the civilized cannot forgive, forget or even conceptualize. At that point, the switch in civilized society’s brain gets flipped, and they go utterly destructive. They turn against barbarism with a fury that can only be described as “exterminate them root and branch.”
The nuclear conflagrations in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were the response of a very, very civilized culture. I’ll just remind everyone of that. As was the bombing of Dresden. (The Nazis, themselves, were bizarrely an advanced civilization which, under various pressures, had decided to embrace the worst features of barbarism. Let that rest under “humans are weird.” They were weaponized barbarism, though, once again showing there’s nothing as dangerous as civilization choosing barbarism.)
How close is that switch? It might already have tripped, though I suspect the barbarians are going to try for a coda, because, heaven help them (we won’t) they think they’re winning and that it’s business as usual.
Those barbarians in the Middle East, and our own rebarbarized left, for that matter, so in thrawl of the noble savage that they achieve savagery with no nobility whatsoever.
In the end, civilization always wins. But civilization can be shocked and left harder and harsher and closer to barbarism than it should be.
Which leads to very dangerous times indeed.
We’re sailing very perilous waters. For us, for our would be enemies, for humanity itself.
Be not afraid. Hold on to what civilization you can. And stand by to defend it and rebuild it.



















































































































