
There was an Argentinian (I think) comic I read when I was young that had a strip saying something like “Why can’t we have government by the people?” “Because then government would be full of sandwich wrappers and sausage casings.”
I found this hilarious, because the fight to get people to stop littering is still ongoing in Portugal. (Partly due to a lack of adequate trash service, partly because Portuguese have a problem understanding laws apply to each of them. They tend to think of laws as things that happen to other people.)
However this is the sneering attitude towards “the people” that we’re finding from our “elites.”
Look, sure, you don’t need to talk to me about the “dangers of populism” viewed as “of large masses of people wound up and thrown at someone.” I remind you I grew up with crowds of people with raised fists and screaming “the people united shall never be defeated.” Weirdly our elites approve of that kind of thing, as well as of “direct democracy.”
Or actually, not weird at all, since what they want is the APPEARANCE of having the people with them. That’s not, apparently, “populism” not in the sense that populism is bad.
And here I’m sure I’m going to piss off some of my libertarian friends who’ve become used to sneering at Trump as “populist” as though that were a bad thing.
Get a grip, okay? First, Trump is not “populist” except as understood as “the people want him.” Because the people obviously do. Is he saying things to be liked? Are you for real now? Give me the name of a politician who doesn’t. And at that, Trump is the one who does it least in my memory.
As far as that goes, Trump is less likely to use “populist” rethoric, as it always was understood than practically anyone else in politics in the last hundred years. Think about it, please. Does he get on a podium and talk about crushing the Russians, the Chinese, minorities, or whoever the grand pubbahs view people as hating?
If you’re going to talk “says what the people want to hear” Ron DeSantis is far more populist than Trump. (I mentioned long ago that it struck me wrong that all the things DeSantis preened about where “socon goals.” And I say this as someone who agrees with a lot of those, like “keep pron out kids’ hands” and “Parental rights trump state’s rights.” BUT the fact those were the achievements he touted above any others struck me as profoundly wrong in the sense of “what government thinks the people want.”)
Trump has principles. They’re bizarre as you’d expect of a NYC real estate developer. But they are his, and he’s not selling them to anyone. He hasn’t touted a big religious conversion — and every politician thinks the way to appeal to people is to be hyper-religious. Particularly if they’re not — and his own rather muddled views come through. He hasn’t scrupled from having gay friends, and he had gay appointees. He refused to stomp down on the BLM unrest because he didn’t want to usurp states rights. (Same with lockdowns. He asked governors to lift them, but respected states’ rights too much to ORDER it.) Just about the only thing he promises that people really really really want — okay, two things — is a stop to unending open borders, and drill, baby drill. And if you really are against those, I would like a cogent explanation. Because the people on the ground, facing the consequences of untrammeled immigration with no assimilation (in a welfare state) and of very expensive fuel are for them for a REASON. It’s not unthinking.
If he’s a “populist” he’s a very weird definition of one. Or not one at all. The truth is that “populism” is now being used as “Someone the majority of the people like.” And using populism in that sense is the equivalent of our elites saying “We know we stole the election and no one wants us here. So we will demonize the will of the people, and make it seem like people getting to vote for their representatives is WRONG.”
Look at Nancy Pelosi railing against the “Populism” that prevents people from giving up their guns, and has them too blinded by G-d and “gays” to see how the progressives want to do good things for them.
Look, her opponent is an idiot — and not an American — by saying that Trump should have “Accepted” the election results. I’ll assume he doesn’t understand mathematics or didn’t watch the results come in. NO ONE should accept impossible results that almost guarantee an election was tampered with. That’s known as disenfranchising the people, and any American should be revolted at the idea. There’s nothing sacred against election results. If there’s sufficient reason to SUSPECT let alone prove tampering, they should be examined, investigated and dissected. Which always happened till 2020. In 2020 the results were untouchable because they couldn’t stand examination. In the same way her opponent seems to only know the “made for TV” bs about January 6th. Taking a guided tour of the capitol is no insurrection, and no one should feel they have to bow to little Nancy’s insanity on that. Between the grey goose and the botox her two brain cells might be addled enough she believes it was an insurrection, but we don’t have to indulge her.
However, he’s right on populism. What is wrong with populism, or with listening to the people? What right do people like Grey Goose Nancy have to determine what’s best for us and cram it down our throats?
Sure, I’m religious. I do not however have a problem with either gay people or atheists. Do other people? I’m sure there are some. In the vast expanse of the US there are probably some benighted communities that dislike gays and atheists. Are there many that dislike them enough to violate their rights? Well…. We do have some majority Muslim communities I wouldn’t encourage Queers for Palestine to invade. But other than that? By and large, with the exception — always — of running into outright crazy people, no matter what TV delights in making up about flyover country, the biggest danger gay people or atheists or even gun grabbers run in flyover country is having someone be very rude to them. Or more likely — as someone else who tends to ping isolated communities as an outsider — have someone be VERY NICE TO THEM with a PATRONIZING undertone. (Please for the love of Bob, don’t shout at me. While I’m deaf, and I have an accent, I DO in fact understand English. Because of the quality of my deafness shouting actually makes it less likely I’ll understand you. And don’t for the love of Bob try to explain words like “warning” to me. Okay? I know this is all because you’re trying to be nice, so I’ll grin and bear it, but really.)
Americans by and large, possibly because of pioneer background, but more likely because of immigration in the 20th century, tend to be more live and let live than any of these would-be-elites understand.
The truth is the entire “anti-populism” movement is that of the “educated” trying to distinguish themselves from the masses they consider too stupid to know their own good. In its kind, it is an explicitly anti-representative-government movement. And as such it should be despised by all thinking human beings.
I don’t care if Nancy disapproves of my religious faith. It is none of her business. I don’t care if Nancy thinks she wants to do something good for my gay friends, who I’m sure would far prefer to be armed and left alone. (My gay friends are mostly sane. Also libertarian.)
In fact, I don’t care what any experts say about what I believe or how I should be living my life. I don’t even care if they sneer at me and call me stupid. I’ve been called stupid by FAR better people than they are. (And in a couple of instances, I actually was being stupid.)
I’ve also been sneered at and called stupid by mental midgets because I refused to follow the crowd and parrot back “the smart thing” of the moment. Like, say, most of the traditional publishing establishment. I was outright told my books would be pushed, if I wrote as I was instructed, and I refused to do it. How can that be anything other than stupidity?
And that’s part of it. The “elites” have no principles and no morals. They move only by the rule of “what’s good for me” and “what will give me power.” Therefore they’re curiously blind to anyone following higher principles. And they class those as stupidity. So to them the vast majority of the West is filled with “stupid people.” (And this is before we get to the rest of the world, of which they know nothing.)
Their use of ‘populism’ means “what those stupid people want.” And therefore they feel entitled to override it, because after all they want to do what’s “best for them.”
But PERSONALLY? I’m not going to tell anyone they can’t want to live in fifteen minute cities or eat the bugs, but I don’t want it.
I want to live as I want to, and not have “elites” try to force me into doing it their way.
Is my way better? I don’t know. But it’s mine, arrived at using my own mind, my own circumstances and my own beliefs.
And if most of the people happen to agree with me — looks like they do, in the US at least — and the elites don’t like that, they can call me populist all they want to.
If “Populism” means “what the majority of people in a polity wants that disagrees with the trained-elites” I’ll proudly call myself populist.
Because if there’s something that the last four years — not to mention the bloody slog of the 20th century — have proven is that never, ever, ever should we give power to a self-proclaimed elite, educated in the “best” establishments and residing in some central point to control our every day lives.
That way lie mass graves, grinding poverty, or at the very least people treated as cattle.
The people — unless propagandized — aren’t united, and heaven knows the bureaucrats can yet again manage to defeat us.
But while they can suspect the mass of the people are idiots, we know the “elites” are idiots. The mask fell off these last four years.
We know them for idiotic, petty, and toddler-like in their tantrums.
And what’s once seen can never be unseen.
Ahoy the people. Let’s hear it for refusing to bow to the experts and massive passive resistance.
Let’s make them really hate us.



















































































































































































































