According To Hoyt

Tomorrow evening.  It might become a normal thing on Fridays.  Reason — I spend Thursday doing my normal writing.  Trying to cram the chapter in the evening leads to my forgetting plot points and will make it a b*tch to edit.  And, you know, part of the conceit is that I’m writing this just before I post.  So… late afternoon my time, which is evening most of y’alls.

The other reason is that I’m battling the flu or whatever this is, which means it takes me forever to do anything.  For instance, I’ve spent now a week editing a 20 page story.

But You Have To Send A SASE

Most writers don’t have problems coming up with ideas.

Correction.  Most working writers, who have trained themselves to come up with ideas and write them don’t have problems coming up with ideas.

Some of us are unusually blessed – if you can call it that – living with (three – groan) other writers and/or being friends with a bunch of them.  There is just something that happens when writers are shooting the breeze over dinner or coffee – or in this house sometimes breakfast –  and someone says something and the other one says “Oh, yeah, that would be a great story.”

But even writers not thoroughly steeped in a writing community usually have no problem whatsoever coming up with ideas that fit their simple needs.

In my entire writing life I’ve met exactly one working author who said that she only had so many ideas.  I can’t remember her name – we were on a panel at Fencon two years ago – and she clearly disregarded my instructions that she call me for an idea a day. … People are so odd.

However, in the bad old days which – SOPA and PIPA permitting – are passing from this world, there were reasons you sometimes had to come up with an idea suddenly.  One of these reasons were the DAW anthologies edited by the late Marty Greenberg.  If – like me – you’d cultivated a reputation for delivering a story fast and well, you would periodically get a phone call that went something like this “Sarah, I have a hole in my newest antho about X, when can you get a story to me?”  The time allotted ranged from two weeks to two hours – and for the two hours one, yes, I was aware I was the third-string, another rapid-writer having failed.  OTOH they paid well and the check cleared, so my pride could at least be well fed while being wounded.

The problem with these phone calls, of course, is that you don’t always have the right idea on command.  Even calling all your buddies might fail to give you a story about … oh, intelligent mice.  (No, to my knowledge they never did that.  But they could have.)

Yes, there are techniques to call up ideas.  However half of you are shaking your heads and going “Why are you bothering us with that, you foolish woman?  Don’t you know we now don’t need to write on command?”

Well, children, listen up – from what I can tell from mine and other experiences in indie publishing, there definitely is a premium on writing fast and well.  Volume of production, volume of things on line, increases the chances that EVERYTHING you have up will sell more.  So, say you are a novel a year, no deviation, gal.  Each of those novels will make more, if you write two a year.  More than that though, you’ll make more if you write a novel and ten short stories, say.  (Come on, a short story a month, with two months off?  Why can’t you do that?)

And while, like everyone else, I prefer the “organic” means of dreaming the story, which in my case usually involve some long, very boring bit of house work, like washing dishes or ironing piles of clothing (you knew there was a reason my guys wear button-downs, right?) or taking long walks (weirdly this works best with long walks under the rain.  Given I live in Colorado, in the new age of indie pubs, it might pay to move.) there is the fact that ideas don’t always come on command.  In fact, sometimes you go through a dry spell and they don’t want to come at all.

This is when you have to do something to spark them.  Now, mind you, these methods are all for the “spark” not the idea itself.  And if you’re a beginner writer chances are about half of these won’t be anything you can use.  Not your type of thing, in other words.  BUT they’ve all worked for me at a time or another.

First there are the traditional ones: go over, in your mind, some classical movies or stories.  You know, there have been several writers who’ve done versions of the Odyssey in Space.  More than that, consider taking, say, Gone With The Wind, boil the plot down and make it a science fiction story.  Or a ghost story.  Or…  I know one of the best SF shorts I ever read, the author credited the idea on A Man With No Name.  Having watched the movies, I don’t see it, but hey!  Same can be done for one of your favorite songs, particularly a song you liked when you were young.  Consider how those lyrics could hint at a story if they were written by someone living in a space habitat or in the asteroids or in fairyland or…  Try it.  What do you have to lose?

Then there are more artificial means.  My favorite one of these was the “come up with a sentence to start the story.”  It works best if you get a friend to do this, as the sentence is likely to be outrageous.  One of the ones in our writers’ group was “Step away from the feather boa.”  Another was “The best part is the dragon spit.”  (Though that one was from someone mishearing the REAL challenge.)

A variant of this are the words that aren’t necessarily the first sentence, like “Venusian Hooker Shoes.”

This one usually works pretty well for me, I think, because it leaves me a free rein otherwise.

The next one to work for me is the dictionary and three words.  You open the dictionary, pick three words randomly, and integrate those three words in a story as themes or characters or problems.  You’re allowed to discard two, because sometimes your subconscious has a sense of humor.  Like the day I got rubber stroke and whip.  No, don’t go there.  It just wasn’t fit for the type of things I DO write.

The last one doesn’t really work well for me – this is where you have lists either randomly generated or – as Rebecca Lickiss and I (who are probably less than sane) spent a week doing in little slips of paper.  We went over the dictionary and divided every word that would fit as Protagonist Setting or Problem.  Then we printed them.  Cut in slips of paper about the size of a fortune cookie fortune.  Put a set into each gallon-size ziploc: Character, Setting and Problem.  A person needing a story would draw a slip from each (well shaken) bag.  I wonder where those bags have gone to?  Probably in the boxes in the attic.  Anyway, I’m sure given some time any of you computer people could also create a program to do this automatically.

This one doesn’t work really well for me, even given the chance to fudge like, if your problem is “hunger” it can be “hunger for travel” or if your character is “flea” it might just be his nickname.  I think it doesn’t work as well because it’s harder to force the character to talk in my own head.  Though it’s been known to happen, so don’t count it out.

I regret to inform you that the method I joke about at cons “I get my ideas from Hays, Kansas, but I have to send a SASE” is not true.

Next up – take the germ and grow it.

  When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, “This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,” the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything — you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert A. Heinlein

The Pushback

If you’ve never heard of SOPA or PIPA, I’m jealous of you.  And if you’ve never heard of SOPA or PIPA – two very bad ideas making their way through the US Senate, you’re asleep even as the people in power try to strip your rights from you.  And I can’t let you sleep anymore.  So, pardon me, this is going to edge into politics.  Live with it.

So, what are SOPA and PIPA?  Over the last two/three election cycles, not to mention over the last fifteen to eighteen years it has become clear that the mainstream media has competition and they can no longer have everything the way they wish.  I have greeted the fact that people have other sources of news with relief, but I knew the pushback would come.  Politicians – and the main stream media – have a lot invested in shaping narrative.  I expected something like SOPA and PIPA.

Unfortunately these two bad ideas walking are far worse than that.  Not only do they strike at my right – at your right – to post presidential goofs or speeches that show the larcenous nature of representatives, but they also strike at my right to make a living with no reference to gatekeepers and people who will certify that I’m allowed to speak.  … or write.  If these two bills pass, your right to post your own work on Amazon (or anywhere else) is done for.

Don’t believe me?  Read here: http://pjmedia.com/blog/sopa-and-protect-ip-a-line-by-line-analysis-of-the-bills-we-must-kill/ This was written by a friend of mine, who read the bill so others didn’t have to.  It is not as bad as I thought.  It is, in fact, FAR WORSE.

Note that being ACCUSED of having copyright material in your book is enough to shut down the SITE offering it.  Can Amazon certify that no one who posts there has stolen anything?  Of course not.  And we’ve already heard of people who put up – without permission – compilations of other people’s work.  Under SOPA or PIPA that would be enough to shut Amazon down, instead of – as should be – going after the culprits.  Worse, I (and every other writer alive) have been accused at times of plagiarizing, or even “copying” other works.  The accusations are usually just stupid and made by people who don’t realize you can use the same title, a similar plot line, or even terms used by another author without plagiarizing (yes, if you use them all at the same time, there MIGHT be a problem, but I mean one or the other per work.)  One of these people setting up a complaint would be enough to shut up a site carrying indie work, while it’s “investigated” (and when are these investigations, done?  Particularly as there would be thousands if not millions) by our benevolent regulators.

You know what that means – it means that before you put anything up, you’d have to have it “certified” as not infringing copyright by some sort of gatekeeper – say, publishers.  Who could also, of course, “ensure” that you had the “right” quality and opinions and … everything they’ve been doing for decades.  This would give them the chance to “educate” the reading public again – and aren’t you readers looking forward to this?

Yes, there’s been – remarkably bipartisan – complaints about this, but, as Bill Reader posts in the linked article above, it’s perfectly possible that the intention was ALWAYS for SOPA to fail and PIPA to go through, doing essentially the same.  Also, Lamar Smith, whom Glenn Reynolds pithily identifies as R-Hollywood, has vowed to get PIPA through.

Guys, make no mistake.  First, our representatives are too disconnected from the online world to fully know what they’re doing.  Frankly, almost anyone over forty who is not actively involved in  a field that calls for net-savvy is.  So, they have this vague idea that “people need protection” and are blundering where angels fear to tread.  Second, they are receiving donations from Hollywood and I WOULD BET the publishing industry too, and being told they have to do something.  Third, these bills give them maximum power over what you see, what you read and ultimately what you think.

Making them understand they can’t get away with this is like making sure an alcoholic won’t drink from a bottle in front of him.  It can be done, but it will take a lot of effort and possibly force.  Oh, yeah, and eternal vigilance.

You shouldn’t even be surprised.  Dave Freer and I told you for months that the pushback would come.  And it has come.  Why should you be surprised?

I’ll add only – to those of you who’ve read my space opera – that something like this – in case you didn’t notice that the internet as such doesn’t exist in that future – was predicated into the future history that creates the regime of the Good Men, with their manipulation of the truth.  I won’t claim any particular foresight, because it didn’t take any.  For tyranny to survive, the ability of people to speak MUST be abridged if not outright stopped.

This is not a partisan issue, it is an issue of the future and its enemies.  Contact your representative and stop the enemies of the future.  And then vote out anyone who sponsors or in other ways supports this monstrosity.

*Guys sorry I didn’t post till now.  I seem to have caught the flu. (argh).  Hopefully the post makes sense.  I’m now going to nap.*

Very Big, Very Small

When I was a kid, the part of Alice In Wonderland that both fascinated me and disturbed me was the eat this to get big, eat this to get small thing.

Little did I know that when I grew up and became a writer, I would run into the same idea.  Almost as soon as I broke in, agents and editors started telling me that I needed to make my books “big”.  The bible on making books big was Writing The Blockbuster by Albert Zuckerman, the iconic founder of Writers House Agency.  Perhaps it still is.  If you are trying to sell to the big houses and go the traditional route, the book is definitely worth reading, re-reading and taking notes on.

Others have written variants on these books, of course, and they all read to me like diluted versions, but then I’m a well known intellectual snob when it comes to studying difficult material.  At any rate, the entire concept of writing “the big book” and “writing the blockbuster” became massive in the oughts.

This is not a coincidence since the oughts is when the publishing houses and the bookstores perfected their control over what the public got to see and, therefore, got to buy.  To put it bluntly, the only route to a bestseller was to do exactly what the publishers thought would make a bestseller.  Then you got push and it would do well.

Theoretically, of course.  A lot of things were “big” and still didn’t get push.

I’m doing the book a disservice, but what it boils down to is a “big” book contains big ideas, ideas beyond the story it encompasses.

If you’re scratching your head and saying practically any book contains that, even if the idea is “love conquers all”, you’re absolutely right.  BUT and this is important, the ideas had to be those the publishers viewed as “big.”  For instance, in my third Shakespeare book, whose ideas I’d define, if anything as “a man may smile and smile and be a villain” critics detected the “big” idea that I despised racism.  (Rolls eyes.)  True, as far as that goes, but it is an incidental and small point of world building – it is however the “big idea” they could identify… i.e. the one that tied in with their own ideas.

This obsession with the “big book” which eventually became a condition of the agents sending the d*mn thing out at all, gave us romances in which every regency female is a proto-feminist.  It gave us mysteries in which an important person’s life ALWAYS has to be at stake.  It gave us… nonsense.

Did this help the books sell?  Well, it helped them sell to the publisher, and – insofar as the publisher decided to put push behind it – could help it sell to the public.  Now, all these variables are questionable, since, after all, your book could become a stealth hit on Amazon even if your publisher doesn’t put it on shelves – even in traditional format.

So, if you’re going indie, does the story “size” matter?  Do you have to put what NYC publishers recognize as big ideas in it?  Does it have to involve people of importance, historic or otherwise?

I don’t know.  I’m one of those people who reads anything, “big” and “small.”  OTOH would Da Vinci’s Code have sold as well if it were “The Code of Guido, the renaissance accountant?”  Probably not.  The fact that Da Vinci name recognition called people’s attention should not be underestimated.  So, if you’re selling something with an historic tie, making it have some relation even if peripheral to a famous person – famous enough to be recognized by most of the public – might help.

Considerations of this nature help if you have a formless idea.  Say I wanted to write a book about someone usurping the throne.  I could use a king in Portugal, but no one in the States knows or cares enough about Portugal (In fact I’m using a dynastic Portuguese squabble as the basis for the partly finished fantasy book To The Dragons.  Yeah, yeah, hey, let me kick the flu and resume writing.  I will try to get to it this year, I promise.)  But if I use the war of the roses, I clue in the vast majority of the historical-story-reading public in the US.  If you have a choice with your idea, please take that in account.  I’m not saying you shouldn’t.

OTOH let’s say the story you WANT to write, the one that’s pounding down the doors, is a small, private story: a cozy mystery with murder in a family circle or a house party.  Should you force your idea to become bigger so it will sell better?

If you’re going indie, please don’t do that.  (If you’re not, I’m not informed of the benefits of playing to the audience, right now.)  There is nothing more infuriating than a tightly woven mystery with understandable private motives and suddenly, out of the blue, the government did it, or the mafia did it, or… There is nothing worse than a romance that becomes social commentary halfway through.

Keep things plausible.  Stick to the scale you do have.  And if people don’t like it because it’s too small or too big, well, that’s life.  Some people prefer one or the other.  (I have a slight preference for small, since I have a slight preference for internal moves, as a reader.)  But if they don’t like it because the “big idea” is shoveled in with a trowel and doesn’t fit – that is your problem!  Don’t let it be your problem.  Suit your idea to the story you’re telling and beware making it really big or really small when in fact it’s just proper sized.

*This is the Fantasy novel I’m posting here for free, one chapter every Friday.   If your conscience troubles you getting something for free, do hit the donate button on the right side and down.  Anyone donating more than $6 will get a non-drm electronic copy of Witchfinder in its final version, when it’s published.
There is a compilation of previous chapters here and I will compile each new chapter there, a week after I post.  When the novel is completed and about to be edited the compilation page will probably be deleted.

Oh, this is in pre-arc format, meaning you’ll find the occasional spelling mistake and sentence that makes no sense.  It’s not exactly first draft, but it’s not at the level I’d send to a publisher, yet.*

For previous chapters, look here:  https://accordingtohoyt.com/witchfinder/
Trapped

“Antoine,” Seraphim heard, as he approached Miss Felix’s room.  He heard it clear as day, sounding through the closed door, and he stopped, swaying a little as he balanced on his feet and his silver headed cane, and looking at the door in puzzlement.

She’d said the same word – ad used the same tone – when she’d seen the corpse.  Seraphim wrinkled his forehead.  Was she talking about the corpse?

The next words “Oh, Antoine, no,” made him wonder if she was lamenting the corpse’s death.  Stupid if so.  Well, perhaps he was not in the position to judge.  He’d never been in love.  At least, he didn’t think so.  There had been that cook’s assistant when he was twelve, but he rather thought that his interest in her had been predicated more on the currants that she had it within her power to dispense than on her own, very young and charmless, person.

However, he’d seen in his time, how men – and possibly women too – could become utter fools over love, or what they believed was love.  Even Gabriel Penn, one of the people Seraphim knew best in all the world, had thrown over his academic career and the possibility of making his independent way in magic or law for the sake of love.

But at that moment words echoed through the thick oak door which might be related to love, but were not related to mourning a dead lover, “No, Antoine.  Stop.  You cannot do that.”  The last words were a scream, and there was real terror behind them.

Seraphim didn’t think he could use enough magic to unlock the door.  Not in his present weakened condition.  And he didn’t think he could put his shoulder to the door, either.  He opened his mouth to call for help, but – this far, in the guest area of the house – he doubted anyone would hear him.  Oh, of course when they had a house party they staffed this part of the house, but not when it was merely a guest and an unexpected one at that.  There would be a bell in the room, but–

He put a hand to the doorknob.  To his surprise, it opened at his touch.  He threw it open, and stepped into the room before he realized he was staring at the back of a man, who loomed large, standing up, and cornering Miss Felix, who, in the corner of the room, held her fingers crossed in a gesture of aversion.

“Step away from the lady,” he yelled, even as he thought that corpses were not supposed to be wandering the house in the night.  The man was dead.  Seraphim had made sure of that.  The magical bolt he’d thrown at the creature would have felled anyone with even a particle of magical talent.  And the man had magical talent.  Had to have it, else he’d not have been able to attack Seraphim.

So, this man, Antoine, had to be dead.  And dead men didn’t walk, except in the fantasies of sickly old maiden aunts.  Or unless, of course someone had used the resurrection spell.  And that would mean someone in Seraphim’s house.  And it would mean, of course, that Antoine, whoever he was, would still be dead, just an animated corpse.

The idea made Seraphim’s hair stand on end.  The man? Corpse? Hadn’t reacted to his shout.  Animated corpses were notoriously hard to deter.  As Seraphim watched, the creature took one step closer to Miss Felix, whose whole face had drained of color, and whose eyes looked too wide as she looked up, in sheer terror.

Seraphim grabbed the nearest object – one of the decorative vases atop a nearby table – and threw it with force at the creature’s head.  The creature started to turn and Miss Felix ducked under its arm, and ran towards Seraphim.  “I’m so glad,” she said.  It was almost a scream.  “Oh, thank you,” as she grasped his arm and almost toppled him with the force of her terror.  “He’s dead, you know.  Quick.  Let us–”

Before she could say what he should let them do, the creature who’d been threatening her had spun around, and Seraphim grabbed for his cane, and took in breath, horrified.  There was no doubt that Antoine was dead.  He looked exactly the same as he had while lying on the pallet which the gardeners had carried up from near the lake.  His face was pale and immobile, his lips drained of color.  His eyes, as far as they were open, showed only a sliver of white.  There was no expression to the slack features.

Seraphim pushed Miss Felix behind him, with barely a qualm as he remembered she seemed to have objections to being protected.  “Stay,” he said.  “What was he– it doing to make you scream?”

“Chasing me,” she said.  She must be mad with terror, because she made no effort to assert her ability to care for herself.  “Trying to corner me.  He should not be alive.  Why is he alive?”

“Someone must have made a resurrection spell,” Seraphim said, as the creature shambled towards them.  “Someone in the house.”  The idea was alien and obscene.  “Stay behind me,” he said.  “I won’t let it hurt you.  You must remember he is not your friend.”  He had no idea how he would not let it hurt her, considering that he felt as week as a newborn kitten.  But, he thought, though it was true that only the man who’d done the resurrection spell could undo it, it was also true he should be able to set a small magical restraining spell and stop this creature from coming closer.  Once enclosed in a magical cocoon, it would be unable to follow Helena Felix, and Seraphim should be able to question her about how this situation came about.  More, he should be able to find out who, in his house, had dared use an illegal spell to rewaken someone who’d tried to kill Seraphim.  And if Seraphim couldn’t, Penny could for sure.

The thought of the circumstances under which Penny had last been involved with resurrection spells made Seraphim hesitate, but he shook his head at his own foolishness.  Gabriel Penn might have been a fool for love.  Gabriel Penn might be an idiot when it came to loyalty and friendship, even, but the one thing Gabriel Penn wasn’t was a traitor to Seraphim.  Half elf, perhaps, capable of his own designs and his opinions that would shock the polite world, almost certainly.  Too smart for his own good, assuredly.  But Gabriel Penn would not betray the Darkwaters.

The creature shambled towards them, and Seraphim put out his left arm, to keep Helena Felix behind him, while he raised his right hand that held the silver-tipped cane, and, using it as a magical wand to concentrate his power said the first words of the cocoon spell, “Miras, enax–”

He got no further.  The animated corpse facing him stopped at the first wound of the words, the first feeling of the power leaving Seraphim’s body and flying forth.  But that was only in the first second.  A breath later, there was a feeling as though a line that linked Seraphim to the corpse had gone taunt.

Later, neither he nor Helena could decide exactly what had happened.  Each of them had different accounts, and both accounts were impossible.  Seraphim remembered – he doubted he could ever forget – the thing’s eyes opening fully and sparkling as though there were a fire lit behind them.  Its mouth too opened, wide, wide, wider, impossibly wide, till they’d fallen into it, he and Helena both.

And that made no sense at all, because in his memory, either the corpse had grown very large, or they’d grown very small, both of which were impossible, and then he and Helena had stumbled together, falling into that dark vortex of a mouth, falling, falling, head over heels, like flying leaves or tumbling sticks, falling, falling, falling, falling, in darkness and cold.

He was so shocked it took him a moment to recognize the in-betweener and by that time they were past it, and dropped, head first into light and music and sound flailing and screaming.

As they landed on the ground, hard, he was aware of people all around and something ahead of him.  He blinked… an elephant?

It was all the time he had before someone screamed, pointing at them.  He was not sure where they were, or what had happened, but he knew one thing: in nine out of ten worlds, what they’d just done, falling out of seeming nothing, in a public place, was enough to warrant their death.

Barely able to stand, feeling as though the entire world had fallen on him, he stood.  His mind in turmoil, not knowing where they were or how they come to be there, he reached back and grabbed Helena Felix’s wrist, and pulled.

He ran away from the elephant, away from the press of people, and into the first dark space his blurry and stinging eyes could find.    In Darkness And Despair

Gabriel Penn sat up at the feeling that his spell had been disrupted.  He’d left an alarm spell in Seraphim’s room, and it was supposed to trip and wake him if Seraphim left the room.

What he felt instead was the sensation that the spell had been tampered with, and that muffled and distant.  Which meant whoever had interfered with his magic alarms had done it in such a way, and with such sure knowledge of how Gabriel set spells that he could disable it and delay Gabriel sensing it had been disabled.

Because Gabriel’s magic was an amalgam of the human magic he’d learned in Cambridge and that elven magic he’d learned when very young at his mother’s knee, only one of the human magicians in this house knew it well enough to disable it and to muffle the realization it had been disabled.  Seraphim.

Cursing under his breath, Gabriel reached for his dressing gown, which he’d flung across the foot of the bed before laying down.  He slipped it on by touch, then said the one word that brought the magelight on the bedside to full glow.  It illuminated the full extent of his room – a tiny servant’s room containing a narrow single bed, the trunk he’d taken to Cambridge and brought back again, and which contained all of his clothes, and a desk, pushed up against the wall and piled high with papers.  From the mess on the desk he extracted his magic wand.  He rarely used it these days, but he had a bad feeling over this whole situation – a persentiment of disaster, he thought, and he didn’t like these feelings.  Given his origin and avocation they tended to be all too accurate.

Holding the mage light – fully lit – in one hand, and the magic wand in the other, he opened his room door and, not bothering to close it, pelted down the hallway and up the stairs towards Seraphim’s room.  He muttered under his breath, continuously, a word that would have shocked the ladies of the house very much if they’d heard it.  It would to be honest, probably have shocked them, too, to see him running down the hallway in an ill-tied dressing gown over his underwear, which was all he’d worn to bed.

It didn’t matter.  He’d rather shock them, or them the female servants, than have the feeling of dread in his mind be justified.

He ran up the stairs, two steps at a time, and down the hallway.  But Seraphim’s room was empty, the door open, the magic spell broken.

Gabriel stood in the hallway, his heart beating so loudly he could barely hear himself think.  And then he felt it, coming from the guest wing, where they’d lodged Miss Felix: magic. A big discharge of magic.

He started running again, mindlessly, pleading with some nameless divinity to let him be wrong.  Just this once, please let him be wrong.

But before he reached the room, he knew he wasn’t.  He felt the magical discharge of a trap going off, the pull and suck of a vortex opening between worlds – a portal not activated by the people thrown into it.

And turning a corner, he saw Seraphim and Helena Felix being sucked into a maw of darkness.

As the magical fog and darkness dissipated, he realized what was left behind was perhaps even worse than having lost your legitimate brother, the duke, to a magical trap that had taken him who knew where.

In the middle of the guest room stood an animated corpse.

“Shit,” Gabriel Penn said, loudly and emphatically.  And raised his wand.

I’m trying to write the next chapter of Witchfinder — actually edit — and though I know what is happening, it’s just not gelling.  Nor is anything else.

I think between the writing pace, the very busy holiday season AND the major cleanup, I’m a bit scorched, if not burned out.

I am therefore taking a leave of absence from this blog till Monday, when I’ll be back.  I’ll make it up to you re: the free fiction.  However, not today and not tomorrow.  I’m going to convince my husband to take me to molest dinos and maybe a long walk in the park where he threatens ducks with roasting them. (It’s a hobby.)

Since I’m not really “burned out” just tired, a day and a half away should be enough.

Wish me luck and decompression.

will post tomorrow.  we had friends for dinner, which was fun. :)  But, you know me, last minute trying recipes, because I’m… insane… so….  Yeah.  witchfinder and Darcy in fairyland tomorrow. :)

For various reasons, including that after eight years in the house we thought we should unpack.  So, I’ve been organizing the house from the basement up & decluttering the downstairs, as well as trying to finish three books.  (You’re going to ask.  I know.  Please don’t.)

So I intend to sleep late and post late.  Live with it.  Witchfinder might not be out till Sunday…

Making It Your Very Own

Unless you’re a pure pantser – and if you are you should read my friend Kate Paulk’s Pantser’s Guide over at Mad Genius Club – and even if you are (in which case, sure as shooting you’ll need to face this when you come around to revising), sometime between first glimmer of an idea and writing that story you’ll have to admit that it’s a tale told many times.

I usually get my ideas from a character who intrudes into my mind with enough force and determination that I can’t banish him or her.  And yet as individual as that character is, it’s impossible for me, as much as I read, not to see the character’s pedigree.  Lucius in A Few Good Men obviously has a good dose of genetic material from The Count of Montecristo.  In fact, I make an allusion to it in the first chapter or so.

And it’s impossible for me to send Athena into space without knowing she has a good dose of Friday who, in turn, had a good dose of Candide, of course.

It happens with other people’s work, too.  I can’t really watch Fiddler On The Roof without thinking of Pride and Prejudice.

I’m not saying any of these books have the same plot, or even the same theme.  (I tried years ago to write a book with the revenge-plot.  It didn’t come off well.  But Lucius, like the main character of Count [I’m blanking on the name.  Live with it.  Not enough Caffeine] had years in prison to discover his true self.  And he was educated while in prison.  And while Athena finds out she’s human in the end, she didn’t know she wasn’t human at the beginning – the theme of the book being a ‘yes, but’ to Heinlein’s idea that someone raised to think of herself as not human would be flawed and need to learn the natural human.  Thena was just very badly raised, which had the effect of making her, to some extent truly not human.)

So, sooner or later you’ll find that either your character, your theme or your plot has echoes of other books.  You might be choosing a story Or you might have finished a book that looks vaguely like a cabbage – since lately I’ve done a bit of pantsing, this has happened more than once – with leaves going off in all directions, and be trying to figure out a pattern to superimpose on it in rewrite.  In which case you’ll run across the disturbing truth (A truth universally acknowledged, you might say) that there are only so many patterns.

How do you make a millionth time told tale your own?  Don’t say “you don’t” because of course people do.

Well, remember when I commented on “being yourself outloud?”   There is a post on that somewhere around here, but I can never find anything in this here place.

Taking a pattern and making it your own involves looking at the story – or the pattern – dispassionately and deciding what parts of it you like and which you don’t.  This is useful for people who get their inspiration from stories.  By which I don’t mean you read the latest short story by Big Name Author and go “I’ll write one just like it” – though you might do.  I’d think it’s silly, but you might.  It’s more taking, say, a legend or a fairytale, and saying “how could I write this as a contemporary romance with underwater adventurers?”  Or listening to a song about heartbreak and thinking “How could I write this as a story about robots?”  Or…  You see what I mean?

So, let’s say you just found a character, a story or a plot wandering about the street, lonely and forlorn.  You’ve checked the tags and it is yours to adopt.  How do you go about house breaking it, feeding it, petting it and making it your very own?

1- Take a dispassionate look at the material that your material has the DNA of.  This is kind of like looking at the parents of the puppy you want to adopt.  And you do it more or less for the same reasons.  Which characteristics do you want to keep and which do you want to change?  (If you want to keep everything, we submit you might be a copyist not a writer.  Take calligraphy lessons.)

2 – At a first cut, see which parts are yours to write.  Which parts could you write convincingly, with or without a lot of research.  Take Starship Troopers.  I could never write that book because my head doesn’t work in a military fashion.  I can write war but from the POV of a “lay” character pulled into it, only.  So, while I love the book, if I were to write something about a war against a ruthless enemy… Oh, wait, I intend to.  It’s called – dang it, it won’t let me change it – Winter Prince, and my main character, Lucky, is a prince’s bodyguard and therefore outside the chain of command.  Also, her work is more with getting the guy who CAN defend the world in place than with going out and fighting the aliens herself.  Because much as I like the other story, it’s nor mine to write.

3 – Second cut – look, really look at the story or pattern or theme or character.  Do you agree with the underlying assumptions that went into creating it?  Don’t assume you do just because you like the author or the author’s view on the world.  For instance, as much as I love Heinlein, was raised by him and feel completely weird admitting this, I have a major source of disagreement with Heinlein’s way of viewing human population as inevitably expanding.  (Looks up.  Sees no thunderbolt, lets breath out.)  Part of this si because I grew up seeing those predictions fail.  Part of it is because I don’t think that’s how HUMANS work.  Part of it is that I think an expanding population would be PREFERABLE but that’s something else.

The thing is that if you take that assumption out of his world building, you realize a lot of his future topples down, leaving a place to build a different future history.  I’m sure there are other “assumptions” built into the stories you love that you know ain’t so, not in the cool light of day.  Once you remove those and substitute your own, you’ll find things are already quite different.

4 – Third cut – if you’re going to admit to your story’s DNA you can either choose to make it as different as possible (i.e. change names, change place names, etc) or leave in allusions in names, place names and/or a reference to trained rats in the first chapter.  I find readers prefer the second approach.  IF you are taking it from a recent story, though, I’d remove anything that might be considered too close.  Partly because of course you might get sued, but more importantly because if you are too explicit, you’re comparing yourself to this author.  I don’t know about you, brother, but I ain’t no Jane Austen.

5 – Now that you’ve cut all the things you don’t agree with/can’t fit in/don’t like/aren’t yours/are too proprietary, you can start building.
The first step of the build is “what does your story necessitate by virtue of its peculiarities?”  For instance, Pride and Prejudice underwater where Mr. Darcy is the king of an underwater realm would have to overcome the fact that Lizzy can’t breathe water.  This will necessitate at least a mention, if not a whole subplot.  For them to be together, there has to be a way for her to breathe underwater.  What does achieving that entail?

6 – You meant to say something with this story.  By which I don’t mean send a “message” because then there’s Western Union.  But, just like a painting captures a certain fall of light, a story captures some element of your view/thought about the world, even if it’s just exploring True Love (and explaining that it’s Mostly Dead.)  Make sure that’s in, either in the outline or in your editing of the book.  If an important part of your theme is that kindness is a good thing, make sure your character doesn’t pull wings off flies for no reason, even if this was part of the theme you stol– used.

7 – If you’re already published and you have fans, make sure you include things you know they’ll like.  These are called in the trade “reader cookies” and they can be a certain character, or the way a character behaves (Thena and ballet, for instance.)  Or even a certain place (at this point my readers get very happy if anything is set in Goldport and the characters eat at the George, for instance.)  Sprinkle those liberally, then adjust the plot to fit.

8 – Do the final polish, either on the novel or on the outline.  Make sure that the way you altered the theme/story is still functional.  Make sure it all works together.  Call this the dress rehearsal.

9 – Proof that pudding – pass it to betas, and see if they say “I see where you got THIS.”  (A lot of my betas know when I’m walking in Heinlein’s footsteps, but they don’t accuse me of stealing, which is good as most of the time, his DNA in my stories is not conscious.)  If they don’t come back and tell you it’s too close for comfort, or even “I’ve read this somewhere before” congratulations, you’ve succeeded.  That story is now your own.

Tomorrow: Very Big And Very Small (Also Witchfinder.)

You Don’t Know Where That Idea Has Been

We come at ideas many ways.  Probably the least likely, the least useful, is the person who accosts us and says something like “I’ve always had an idea for a story, you can have my idea for free.”

These ideas usually fall into three categories:

The concepts, which have been done so many times that they will induce sleep on any editor at first glimpse.

The more developed concept plus pattern which are still fairly familiar, and would take more effort than most of us are willing to expend to turn into something worth reading.

And finally the fully completed story idea which would take a certain turn of mind to make moving or interesting or whatever the aim of it might be.

For instance, the last time it happened to me was a lady a little older than I, on finding I was a writer of science fiction and fantasy telling me that she’d always had this idea for a story and I could use it, for free, (this offered with a big, magnanimous smile, by the way.)  It’s about this woman, you see, whose daughter has died.  And this weird shop opens in the neighborhood, and on the window is a doll like her daughter used to have, and so the woman goes in, and there, behind the counter is… her daughter all grown up.

Not only was this proffered with the generous “for free” stipulation, but with the sort of smile of a queen conferring a boon on a peasant.  She was sure, you see, this idea would make a brilliant story, a story so fantastic, in fact, that it would make my name forever.

What she was in fact giving me, though – supposing I was fool enough to pick it up, which, thank you, I’m not – was an episode of Twilight Zone, complete with shock unexplained ending.  And at that, to make a decent episode it would need some hint of an explanation in the leadup to the end and, to make it emotionally satisfying, the woman would have had to have something to do with her daughter’s death either or purpose or accidentally (which would make the ending either terrifying or redeeming.)

Look, I’m not disputing that Ray Bradbury could take that bare skeleton, add very little, and make you sob like a baby at the end.  I’m not Ray Bradbury.  I can’t even imitate him with any degree of consistency.  The roads of science fiction are strewn with the literary corpses of those who thought they were Ray Bradbury.  Also, if it comes to that, even supposing I did it perfectly, it would be just a short story.  Even if it should win the Hugo (unlikely, as there’s a lot more that goes into that than “a good story”) it would not make my career.

However, my experience with this lady is neither unusual nor to be honest that different from what goes on in the minds of beginner writers.  I think, frankly, that these people who maniacally try to give us ideas whenever we turn around, are just would-be writers who are to scared to write the story, or who have tried and failed.

Which means, if you’re a beginner writer and you get this fully formed idea, examine it.  Try to figure out where it came from.  There is a chance what you’re remembering (as I’m sure the lady above was) is a confused hodge podge of a television show or a story you read long ago.

Does this mean that this is a bad idea?  Or that you’re plagearizing?

No.  Under the “there are no new ideas” when you reduce an idea to pattern/concept you’re pretty close to the universal. And when you don’t even remember where you saw the thing, it is likely to be like that.

I have a friend who lives in fear of being inspired by anyone’s stories.  He’s convinced this is plagiarism.  In fact one of his best short stories was written based on a song, and he’s convinced that this is plagiarism.  It’s not.  Well, not unless it is a story-song and you use every event in the song.  Then it’s a little close for comfort.  But if it’s just that you were inspired by a verse, or you interpreted the song as meaning a story, well, go on with you and write it.

We do get inspiration from other stories, which doesn’t make ours unoriginal.  It is a good thing to be aware of those stories.  To be aware in fact of where our idea has been.

I’ll confess I don’t try very hard for short stories.  As long as I’m sure I’m not echoing another person’s story point by point, I don’t care.  I rarely get fully fledged ideas.  When I get them, they’re usually so odd, and based on a dream or something like it, that it’s unlikely anyone ever thought of them.  And if I DO get a story idea I know it’s based on a story I read it’s usually a dialogue thing, where my story is going “Oh, no.  You’ve got it all wrong.”  Or “Yes, but” to another’s.  I.e., I normally know where it’s been.

But if you’re doing a novel, you might as well research where the idea has been so you know what you want to avoid and what you want to emphasize.  I’ve grown resigned to the idea, for instance, that my science fiction will echo Heinlein to some extent.  This is not on purpose most of the time, it’s just the result of having been raised IN his books.  You form an idea of what the future is going to be when you’re very young, and no matter how irrational it seems as an adult, bits of it leak into writing.  (Irrational?  Vibro.  Freshers… that sort of thing.)  This is why I must read Heinlein regularly, to overlay rational interpretation in what my subconscious spews up as “futuristic.”  This way if I steal, I steal with malice aforethought and not blindly and whatever happens to be laying around.  Look at it this way, to quote Heinlein “If you’re going to steal, steal from the best” and not just that, but steal the best from the best.  If you’re going to break into the palace, steal the chandelier, not the light bulbs.

And lest it be thought I am advising plagiarism, I’m not.

My friend above who is afraid that he’ll commit plagiarism unwittingly is also very fond of doing the sort of critique that starts with “You can’t possibly send this out.  Everyone will know you stole it from the 1928 play by I Iz Unknown.  You plagiarized it!”
Of course, nine times out of ten (and often iffy on the tenth) I’ve never read I Iz Unknown and never heard of his “famous” play from 1920.  Leaving that aside, when I manage to pry the “why it’s plagiarism” out of my friend (this normally involves plyers) what I get is “It’s also about a man who lost something essential to himself and is looking for it in a senseless universe.”

In other words, what he thinks I stole is one of those universal, fleshless patterns which can fit a thousand stories, and no one would ever attach to a particular one, unless they have convinced themselves that any resemblance between stories is plagiarism.  In which case they’ve paralyzed themselves and can’t write at all.

We’re again up against that “All ideas have been used a million times and are therefore free” (not true) and “I must avoid all resemblance with another creative work or I’m a dirty rotten plagiarist” (also not true.)

Confused?  Don’t be.

Most ideas, even complete ideas, reduced to their bare bones have indeed been done countless times.  If you want to play you have to admit you’re not so startlingly original that you’re going to come up with one that’s completely new.  That said, in most cases you should avoid stepping into someone else’s world too much, because then you murky up (shut up.  I’m a writer.  I can make up expressions) your legal position.

Look, take my series of short stories in which I recreate either mythological stories or mythological beings in science fiction in the future, with bio-engineering and technology.  Has this been done in the past?  Sure it has.  But I made it mine by fitting it into my future history.  The stories: Ariadne’s Skein, Castor, Neptune’s Orphans, and Ganymede fit into the time before and up to the turmoils.  Most of them deal with “What’s human” and what should we do with biological creatures who are humans except for having extra abilities and being grown in vats.  Of course they also deal with slavery, chattel, human perception of the extraordinary outliers, etc.

Let’s say you read Neptune’s Orphans (boys bioengineered to be mermen, who were created for use in war and are then almost killed by their creators, who want to hide that they were made at all) and you think “Oh, no, they should have been killed.  That’s how it should be.  Keep the human genome pure.”

Well, it’s your option to do a story that’s “yes, but.” Or even “hell, no, you got it wrong.”  The thing is in doing that story you’ll have to have some elements of mine, obviously.  For instance, you’ll need bioengineered humans.  Wait, that’s all you need.  You really don’t need that they be aquatic, though I suppose that’s an option you could use.  What you couldn’t/shouldn’t use are the other elements of future history: the war between the seacities and the land states, for instance, as a framing device.  The entire mule issue.  (Weirdly, despite the name, I was not in fact making an allusion to Asimov’s mule.  For whatever reason Foundation is one of those works I’ve read a hundred times and can never remember anything from.  “Mule” came from the fact that they look human but can’t reproduce.  I grew up in a farming village.  The word came naturally as a derogatory term, though I suppose to be exact they should have been cross-bred with another species.  So, clearly I’m not saying you can’t write the word.  I’m saying you can’t have mules be what they are in my world.)

If I were writing it, I’d boil it to the essentials: should humans created by humans in labs, with some special innate power other humans don’t have be allowed to survive?  And if I were doing it as an “answer” I’d do it deliberately as different in set up from the one I was “answering” as possible.

And that would be fine.

Now, say you read my story and you go off and write a story about mythological creatures, created in a lab and living through one of the Greek myths…  Is that plagiarism?  Probably not, unless you steal the specific story and framing device.  Is it a new idea?  Well, hell no.  And, particularly if you’re submitting to an editor who’s read me (I know, I know.  But there are a few) it will leave a bad taste in the mouth.

At worst, you’ll get rejected because the editor won’t be sure how much you took and will be leery of getting in the middle of it.  At best, you’ll become known as a “derivative” writer.

And, of course, if you publish on your own, if you’re in the habit of doing this, the best you can hope for is a “Yeah, he’s pleasant, but never had an original idea in his life.”

So, in these indie days more than ever – know where that idea has been.  And wipe its little nose before you love it and make it your own.

Next up: Making It Your Very Own.