The Problem of Hindsight

Events in the rearview mirror appear clearer than they are.

It is important to remember that though we are the victims of a 20th century “conspiracy” it wasn’t really a conspiracy. More of a prospiracy. A loose group of people blundering around doing things because they seemed right, who didn’t actually foresee the disastrous and terrifying consequences of their behavior, their ideological allegiance, or their corruption of what their profession should be.

Take war for instance.

A lot of us are quietly revolted at what the Trump presidency and those who oppose it revealed. We thought Trump was nuts when he spoke of withdrawing our support from things like NATO, or at least making the other nations pay their fair share.

And then– Well, the Trump presidency happened, with its twin revelations that the war in the Middle East, and our involvement in it, including our dependency on foreign oil was optional, and that the military industrial complex would do anything — ANYTHING — rather than let the permanent state of war end.

This has hit me very hard, coming from an Academia background (look, not my fault, okay? I got pushed into it) and having heard the left natter forever about the Military-industrial-complex. I don’t want to think they were right, including the hippie paranoia that young men were sent to die so old men could keep power.

But in the light of how hard the brass fought to keep us from withdrawing from the Middle East, and how strangely they seem to be cheering for a world war, it’s hard to keep from agreeing.

This has hit me very hard. It’s hit my military veteran friends harder.

However, it helps if you realize that no, you didn’t fight for a lie. You fought for what seemed from facts available as the best thing to do, at the time, for us and for our country.

First, let’s dispose of the sappy, bizarre idea of our er… friends on the left, who think the US military is a sort of charitable organization, which should be deployed abroad, whenever someone is being mistreated or even to enforce the left’s rather weird beliefs and gospel. (Hence trying to push transgender notions on Afghanistanis that give laughter belly aches to Iowa farm boys.)

That’s not the purpose of a military. That was never the purpose of a military. No matter how much you would like the military to be sort of missionaries of wokeness, that’s not what an armed force is for. An armed force is either to protect the homeland (which our current administration is singularly determined in refusing to do) or to invade other nations (which they want to do, but only if our boys can die to prove … I don’t know what. Maybe to protect 10% for the big guy.)

At least the American right’s use of the military is seemingly saner. Seemingly, because it tries to fit into those two uses. To be fair, into the first one. It’s just that over time it too has gotten corrupted and slid away from what is needed and into pie in the sky.

And then there is the tendency for any human institution to perpetuate itself, no matter how stupid or harmful its purpose, because it is the job of the persons running it.
Suppose tomorrow there was a plague that rotted infants from the toes up, so that if you didn’t immediately cut an infants’ toes off, they would die sometime before five. An organization would be formed to cut infants’ toes off, and develop all sorts of branches and sub-organizations. Then twenty years later, someone discovered that a simple antibiotic stopped the death. Do you think the infant-toes-cutting-off bureaucracy would go away? Really? Why?

I bet you they would come up with a million reasons why cutting off day-olds’ toes was better for the baby, and stridently refuse to disband and/or change policy.

This is sort of how we got here.

No one meant to create a bureaucracy that would overshadow the elected branches, only… well, the future was self-obviously more organized and centralized. Look at how much better centralized production worked. And how more efficient it was. And educated people had a clear vision of what the future brought — dinned into their heads by statist and increasingly more Marxian professors — that they could make true, no matter what goobers were elected.

No one meant to create a self-perpetuating military that would hobble itself in order to lose wars to the world’s most liliputian militaries and be about as useful as a chocolate hammer, but less tasty.

But the US really despises foreign entanglements, as a culture. We want to live in our land and tend our garden. And we can. But WWI and WWII and the cold war were viewed as “they just won’t live us alone.”

Our intelligence services are even less useful than a chocolate hammer. Perhaps as useful as Kleenex soaked in piss. Part of this is that Americans born and bred are curiously blind to the uniqueness of America and incapable of understanding totalitarian regimes. So they took Moscow — and Beijing — at their own word. Which made them seem like a formidable enemy indeed.

So…. well, peace through superior firepower. We’ll finally get them to leave us alone. Which means we grew, and grew, and grew. And the industry and commerce associated with war grew along with the military. And all of it tended toward use. Not helped by the “threats” our intelligence agencies keep finding or manufacturing.

It wasn’t so much a fine tuned conspiracy. Back then with what we knew — and remember agencies and governments relied on the exact same corrupt prospiracy we call the Main Stream Media — we did what seemed right. We, both as a country and as individuals.

It is acceptable to sigh at how deluded we were. It’s not acceptable to think the delusion was carefully created.

It was the result of bad education, bad media, and people’s natural tendency to want their job to be important.

That it’s now revealed to be a tissue of lies is important too.

The human tendency is to lie to ourselves, to unify our fractured understanding by telling ourselves no, it’s all right, we were right all along. I think that’s why the left is chivvying us along to world war, and it will be through no fault of their own if we’re not at war in our territory by March 2024. At some level they want the dissonance to go away. They want “unity” inside and out.

But we can’t afford it. Either the war, or the false plastering over the truths we now know.

The world has changed. We see very clearly what’s been going on. After the crash everyone can feel, it’s important to remember this is above all the result of centralization and bureaucratization of government.

It’s important to go small, go local, go as specific as possible.

Because no matter how evil or temporary their purpose, bureaucracies will self-perpetuate and destroy the republic.

Let’s build the republic and prune back bureaucracy.

The Machinery Of Grief

I will stop being a drip about the kitten, and go on with life. Not that it’s going to pass or I’m going to forget, mind you — it unfortunately doesn’t work that way — but because it’s not your fault, and you shouldn’t have to put up with it.

Somewhere mentally I’m still locked in… It’s not denial, because I know it’s happened. It’s more …. I want it undone. My subconscious is stomping its feet and screaming that it wants to go back a week and two days, to happy, healthy running around kitten.

The “stages of grief” are… interesting tools, but not quite…. right.

And I don’t see a difference between mourning for humans and for cats but then I have a hole in my head, where cats read as “people”. Not all animals. Just cats and some dogs. When we had mice or guinea pigs of of course Derpy fish, I was very sad they died, but it wasn’t the gutting grief of losing what reads as “people.”

No. I don’t know why. Hole in the head. Possibly because I was raised with cats from very young.

Anyway, for me the process is the same, and this is the third of three deaths this year, (One expected, two unexpected) which is why it hit especially hard. The other two were human.

For some reason grief always gives me nausea too. Which means I only want to eat bland vaguely sweet things like potatoes or popcorn. Not great for me, but since I don’t eat much, not terrible.

Anyway, there is a point to this post, and it is this: There are coping strategies to deal with grief. There are even official ones, but I don’t know any. I know what works for me.

So, in the past, what works is…. being nice to myself. Yes, I’ll allow myself that piece of chocolate. (Not large, because, well.) And short of stopping work (this is bad for reasons) I allow myself to take it a little easier. (JUST a little. Like knock off an hour earlier.)

And yes, I will go for that little walk, or spend fifteen minutes outside reading.

I won’t beat myself up when I feel the need to cry twice or four times a day.

I try to hug my current living kitties and husband.

And I try to work. Though today as is, this blog post and the one at Mad Genius Club, and having gotten showered and dressed might count as work.

I’ll do more tomorrow. Including a real blog post.

Thank you for bearing with me. I know some of you think I’m being silly. And perhaps I am. I know people have suffered bigger (recent) losses and that people have much bigger problems.

But between the surprise and the second shock in a short time….. well, it is what it is. I can’t argue that having a knife cut to the hand is better than one to the chest. But it still hurts and has to be dealt with.

I will build from this, step by step.

I’m not there yet, but I can kind of see the time I don’t cry every day.

Loving is worth it, even if we know we’ll lose the beloved, whether a kitten, a human or a republic.

And we should fight as hard as we can not to lose them as is.

I’ll be better tomorrow. This too shall pass. And eventually the pain will become a dull ache. And eventually a faint reminiscent twinge.

Today is not that day. Better tomorrow.

This is a Post I hoped Never To Write

Helena of Troy Hoyt, Jan. 2023, Jun 2023.

Helena died in her sleep last night, before we could get home to cuddle her once more. The doctor still has no idea why, and I’ve authorized an autopsy, to spare someone else this heartbreak; to maybe save another kitten.

I shouldn’t have had her spayed so young; I shouldn’t have boarded her; I shouldn’t have removed her from my shoulder when she was happy and purring; I shouldn’t have moved her from her patch of sunlight when she was sleeping, just so we could go outside.

I have toys and treats I was saving for when we got back home, so we could celebrate getting her back. We bought her a brand new carrier she only got to use in that last trip.

Indy will be alone now, poor thing.

I didn’t deserve her. And she has left, to be petted by angels where the sun never sets.

Two Truths and a Lie – by The Baloonatic

Two Truths and a Lie – by the Baloonatic

I attended a Bible Study a few weeks ago where the topic was Truth. As part of the introduction, they had us play that icebreaker I have played many times in the past  – Two Truths and a Lie. It’s played in many ways, sometimes people write the two truths and a lie on a sheet of paper and people not only have to guess which is the lie, but to which person it applies; and sometimes, as this time, it was just writing them down and reading them out. One of the ladies in our group didn’t realize until after listing hers that she had given us three truths, because she couldn’t think of a lie.

I’ve discovered that I’ve lived an adventurous life compared to the average person. I always felt that if life gave you an opportunity you should seize the day and go for it – jump in the deep end and figure out how to swim. So whenever I have had a chance to try something, whether it is an exotic food item ranging from camel to mutton bird or Haggis, to an opportunity to live in another country or learn a new skill, I’ve almost always gone for it. So my stock answers for this game are, “I’ve gone bungee-jumping; I’ve jumped from a plane; I’ve performed as a fire-eater.”

As we were going through everyone’s responses, trying to figure out what was the lie, and then completing the Bible study, it got me to thinking about how this game was reflected in society today. Oftentimes we hear something or read it or watch it on the news, and what we are absorbing are often truths, but truths embedded with lies, and no real way to discern what is the truth and what is the lie. That came up again when Tucker Carlson released his first tweet in a few weeks where he promoted his new show that will be available on Twitter. He talked about the media and how what we are told is often part of the truth, but not always the whole truth (https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1656037032538390530). There are many types of lies. From personal experience, I have found that lies of omission can be as devastating as lies of commission – neglecting to tell someone the important bits they need to know to make a balanced decision. What we have now from the media and from our political leaders are both. They leave out the important bits, and then outright lie about others – “My family didn’t get money from foreign companies;” “The border is secure;” “Men can get pregnant.”

So where do we go from here? Who can we believe? Who can we trust? America is a high trust society, but there is an element that is working on breaking that trust down, leaving us questioning everything and everyone; pulling us apart instead of joining us together; tearing things down instead of building them up; isolating people so that they are easier to pick off, one by one. Is there an answer? The best answer that I have found is to band with those who are asking the same questions, who are working together to discover the truth. And, as a Christian, to remember that there is only One who is the Truth. If the path that you are on doesn’t lead to that Truth, then it’s time to turn around and find another and to work on creating, on building, on discovering the positives and lending a helping hand to the person next to you, the person behind you. To be the block that stops the person in front of you from sliding down.

We need to channel our childhood, grasp wrists with the person on either side of us and form a strong line for the modern day version of Red Rover, ready not just to stop our opponents from separating us and breaking us down, but also to catch them and add them to our number. We also need to be prepared to tell the truth and admit to our own lies. I had to stop eating fire because it gave me horrible heart burn. ;-)  And the worst part about bungee-jumping was that you were falling, falling, falling – and then, all of a sudden, you were falling again. And bouncing there wondering, how the heck do they get you down? Someday, maybe next year, I will join the Leap Year club once again and jump out of that plane.

Helena Update Almost nothing New

Helena, two weeks ago.

So, nothing really new, though they either gave us more hope or– Anyway, she’s largely unresponsive.

Apparently it wasn’t a suggestion to euthanize. The doctor is happy we’re not. Tests for Toxoplasmosis (Sp?) are delayed. If it’s not Toxoplasmosis, the doctor is going to assume some form of brain event and put her on steroids to reduce swelling, etc. If it is positive, then it’s just going take a while on antibiotics. Just… patience.

She’s not getting worse, and her internal organs are fine, so they’ve ruled out poisoning. We’ll just visit her and pet her a lot in the next few days.

The good, though not particularly exciting news are that son and future daughter in law went to visit with a cell phone and put us on speaker near her, and she opened her eyes, and twitched her ears, and ALMOST fully woke up.

Dan and I are fine and on the road home, where we hope to reach before tomorrow.

Please pray for our tiny little fuzzy girl.

Not Good News On Tiny Helena

Helena at work supervising my writing two weeks ago.

I’m afraid the news this morning isn’t good at all. It’s not terrible, mind you. Not the worst it could be.

But Helena hasn’t made any progress from yesterday. She’s scooting around, but won’t get up on her legs, not to stand. She swallows the tablet, but won’t eat on her own. She is aware of the nurse, but won’t really interact. though she responds to touch.

Right now the speculation is leaning to something neurological, though not all tests are in, and the vet won’t have the full picture till tomorrow.

It was clear, however, from the nurse’s tone, she thinks Helena has improved as much as she will improve and they’re going to recommend euthanasia tomorrow.

I don’t know what to do, and I’m sitting here crying. Please, pray this is just a minor stall, and she improves majorly the rest of the day.

I want to go home and take my little kitten girl home with me.

UPDATE: We’re going home early, and barring her actually getting worse, we’re going to fight for her. She’s young and she should heal.

Common Ground by maryh10000

Common Ground by Maryh10000

One of the main problems conservatives have in getting the word out about our actual beliefs is that the legacy media refuses to portray us fairly. And the media that do portray us fairly are automatically assumed to be lying by people who don’t actually know us. One of the problems with this is that certain groups are sure they have to stay with the left, because “everyone knows” that the right is worse. People run into actual racism or homophobia on the left, and since “everyone knows” the right is even worse, they’re stuck.

This came up in a discussion where someone mentioned the video of an interview with a number of queer shooters, including Chris Cheng of Top Shot. They all agreed it was much riskier, socially, to come out as gun owners to their queer friends, than to come out as queer to their gun friends.

This shows an important difference between left and right. Conservatives who disagree with your lifestyle choices are safer than leftists who agree with it. Tolerance means the ability to actively disagree with someone else’s choices without needing to make those choices matters for legal action, disrespect, or shunning. A conservative’s reaction to finding out a fellow gun lover is gay is likely to be “sure, whatever.” Or even “me, too.” After all, some conservatives are gay, we have gay friends and family members.

But the interesting thing about the refusal of leftist governments to protect their citizenry is that more people are buying guns, because they are unsafe and they know it. 2020-2022 saw a huge influx of new gun owners, many of them from the left politically. They mostly bought their guns at shops that were run by conservatives. They are mostly being trained by instructors who are conservative. And these are conservatives of every racial group, both sexes, and various sexualities.

Which means that finally, some leftists are coming into contact with real conservatives. And finding out that no, we don’t want to kill gay people or beat them up. We might think you’re wrong or weird, but mostly we figure people are people and adults are adults. Don’t make us bake the darn cake, or perform your weddings in our churches, or make out in front of us, and we’re good. Really.

On the other hand, there’s an increasing list of things you can’t disagree with on the left, because there is no tolerance on the left. Look at the attacks on any high profile racial minority who disagrees with any part of the left agenda. Look at the attacks on Andy Ngo, a gay man, for covering Antifa. Look at the very term TERF. Even being a radical feminist doesn’t protect you if you deviate at all.

The left is scaring more and more people. I believe that the only thing that’s keeping many of the rank and file in line is believing that if their side has bad people, we must be worse. When it clicks in that they’re wrong, that could be a tipping point.

Maybe gun rights is the common ground that could help save us. Because the less safe people feel, the more they buy guns. And the more people buy guns, the more contact they have with real conservatives, not the leftist media version. And the more contact people have with real conservatives, not the leftist media version, the more they realize that there are real alternatives to the left.

Tiny Helena Daily Update

The picture is from a week and a half ago. We won’t have new ones till we return on the 1st or so. That expression is because I called her name, while she was asleep (trying to get her to look at the camera.)

We had a phone call at about nine thirty from the veterinarian ICU nurse (and yes, again I passed out and slept since. Sorry to be so late letting you know.)

Tiny Helena is improving, still by tiny little bits. Improved enough she’d pulled out her catheter overnight, and also sitting up and holding up her own head most of the time. Her eyes are clear, and she’s aware people are there. She is still not eating, so they’re still feeding her.

So, the anti-viral is working and she is improving. Not fully out of danger (till she’s eating on her own) but almost there.

Thank you for the prayers and please keep them up. I promise to send pics and video of her when she’s okay and we’re home. (Which at this rate will probably be at the same time.)

It’s going to hurt money wise, but I don’t care. There is a chance I get my tiny pretty back.

Dominion Voting Machines, Insecure by Design – by Francis Turner

Dominion Voting Machines, Insecure by Design – by Francis Turner

Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice

Required reading for all Dominion engineers and product managers

I have, from time to time, been interested in the question of trust in voting machines and processes. That goes all the way back to the early 2000s and the sloppy Diebold machines in use then. At that time it was notable that Diebold, who also made (make?) ATMs, seemed to have invested a lot more time and effort into making their ATMs secure than making their voting machines secure.

Well anyway there’s only so many hours in a day and only so much outrage I can summon up for sloppy work so I moved on to other things like glowball worming. Anyway given the US 2020 elections and now the 2022 elections have been rife with allegations of vote rigging and other shenanigans I’ve started to renew my interest in the current state of the art.

The bad news up front

Dominion’s 2020 era voting systems and infrastructure are, if anything, easier to hack than Diebold’s 2000 era ones. To that end, despite Dominion settling with Fox for $megabuck$, it seems likely that Dominion is in fact guilty of making systems that have design choices that seem to be deliberately chosen to make fraud easy and then not testing to see if there were possible problems let alone making any attempt to fix them. Then, to add insult to injury, they have created machines that implement these poor design choices that are easy to hijack. Finally, needless to say, they have relied on “security via obscurity” and what a British politician called “being economical with the acualité” to disguise these design choices.

That’s what I get from the analysis by Professor Alex Halderman into the Dominion systems used in Georgia

Your vote is this QR code. Or is it?

Let me start with the most basic. In Georgia always, in other states under certain circumstances, voters use a machine to make select their voting choices and these choices are then printed onto a paper ballot that is then sent to another machine for counting. That ballot has a QR code (the box of dots like the one above) which contains the choices the voter made and some checksum for integrity. That QR code cannot be read easily by the voter (you don’t just need a smartphone with a QR code reader, you need some special software to read it and then you need to be able to map the docoded output to your choices) so the machine also prints a human readable version. However there is no checking anywhere that the QR code corresponds to the human readable version and the QR code is what the voting tabulators use to count.

Does the QR code match the text? how can you tell?

Halderman’s report notes both that it would be easy to have the QR code be different to the human readable part because there are no audits done that check that they correspond and that it would also be easy to change the output of both the QR code and the human readable print out on the assumption that most people will not check the print out.

The first case requires special audit equipment to detect and you would need to be very sure that you could actually trust that equipment so getting it from Dominion would be contra-indicated. The latter case would make it impossible to detect vote rigging via audit if the voter failed to raise the alarm at the polling station.

If you look at the sample above the human readable printout does not seem like a model of clarity (all the extra “vote for”s which add verbiage without adding clarity for example) making it easier to hide a fraudulent entry. Of course voters are likely to check the top of the ballot (i.e. their presidential vote) so changing that might be risky, but changing the votes lower down in the more obscure county level races is much more likely to escape notice. You have to wonder why they made it hard to read.

But that’s not all. Similar QR codes seem to be generated by other voting methods too such as the vote by mail web app which voters then have to print out themselves and mail to the county. What this means is that the 2000 mules sort of vote by mail fraud is made extremely easy.

And it gets worse.

Despite claims that the QR code data is encrypted, it isn’t. Once you know the proprietary format you can decode the data and see what choices the voter made. But wait there’s more. There is a checksum created using a shared key to detect accidental tampering/misprints etc. but that shared key turns out to be very easy to obtain and each vote from a particular county (or possibly multiple counties or part of a county depending on implementation) is indistinguishable from any other vote from that county/region no matter which voting machine (or vote by mail method) was used.

The consequences of a lack of encryption or serial number

This makes printing a few thousand additional votes very, very easy and almost impossible to catch. Halderman discusses a number of ways to modify or print additional votes including sticking a raspberry pi in the printer, but these are kind of incidental, the key point is that there is a clear weakness in the vote printing process that can be exploited in all sorts of ways; these ways would be hard to detect and once detected it would be impossible to detect which ballots where illegitimate so the only recourse would be to run the election again.

Moreover, as he explains later, in the tabulator (ImageCast Precinct or ICP) the scanned images of the votes counted are stored. Gaining access to the tabulator (running an embedded linux version dating from 2007!) means you can simply edit the counts and put the correct number of images in the directory to match. Short of hand checking all the actual print outs with all of the images the machine has stored it is impossible to confirm that the machine’s tally is correct. The only way to detect that the tabulator is lying is to build your own trusted one and rescan all the ballots.

Halderman did not spend much time looking at the tabulator but he identified that the tamper evident shields to block access to USB and Ethernet ports seemed to be easy to bypass in the unit he was provided with. What he doesn’t directly point out is that if an authorized person opens up the machine and installs malware the tamper evident seal can easily be replaced by another one. Even better, if the malware install is part of a scheduled firmware update the tamper evident seal is completely pointless because there need be no detectable difference between a USB stick containing a legitimate firmware update and one containing malware.

In summary

This design choice, with a machine readable QR code that is not readable by a human, seems to be a deliberate choice to make voter self-validation hard. The lack of public/private key encryption and a unique serial number per vote makes adding or replacing votes completely untrackable once they have been inserted into the system somehow because there is no audit trail possible.

The CEO of Dominion recently whined to TIME that even though Fox settled rather than going to trial, Dominion was likely to go out of business because their brand was irredeemably tarnished. I found this quote from the article to be deeply ironic:

As for Dominion’s future, Poulos is taking it one day at a time. The company is still focused on providing trusted voting systems to clients, with Poulos emphasizing that Americans do not have to trust Dominion blindly because of its commitment to transparency and its existing capability of producing paper ballots. But that defense may come too late.

Given the design decisions it made I find it hard to read “Americans do not have to trust Dominion blindly because of its commitment to transparency ” without laughing. The QR code is anything but transparent to the voter while being exceedingly transparent to the knowledgeable fraudster and the lack of easily verifiable audit trail is disturbing if you assume that the company wanted to make a “transparent” and trustworthy system.

The interesting questions though are

  1. whether the sub-optimal design choices were made from incompetence or malice?
  2. how many other voting solutions are as bad?

So how would you fix it?

I thought about ending the post there, but then I figured that opens me up to the charge of complaining without coming up with an alternate solution.

So what would I do instead. Obviously junk the QR code. But more importantly I’d want to come up with a system that allowed for a couple of basic validation checks

First voters have to be able to read what the machine outputs and confirm that it is what they voted for. That means no QR code. It also means a form with a more easy to understand output. Something like this:

RaceChoice
President of USADonald J Trump (Rep)
US SenatorFred J Dumbo (Dem)
……
County Dog CatcherJohn X Smith(Ind)
……
Proposition 301 (open carry of bazookas)FOR
Voting Machine DetailsSilly County, Super High School, Machine 12
Pub KeyAAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQC6xg7 GxlqxAEM6z52vdPOUsdAncbaq/86Jy TO4Fk79pvTzK5pB6XSNiZyF6ny9GEH dHWTEdqcCUKxHvcwkv6FtWMlTBOr /kJux8R29G6q0zxKsFULf30axzs6m7i5ELZKkIhVnn/
Date & TimeNovember 5, 2023, 11:23 AM
Checksumqw345GRTqwjhdguyUYI098736HWOhbasdfoh

The Checksum would be the data of all the other fields encrypted using the private key that is the pair to the public key in the document. The tabulator and any auditor could use the public key to decrypt the checksum and confirm that it matched the ballot.

Since no ballot could be made at the same time from the same machine the checksums would be almost certainly unique (there is a very slight chance of a collision but it’s extremely small) and in the case of a collision it would be possible to decrypt the two checksums with the different keys to confirm that they were in fact unique.

The private/public key pair would be created on the voting machine in a secure subsystem that would never reveal the private key but would encrypt anything passed to it with that key (this is a standard piece of hardware). In order to make some attacks difficult I suspect the secure subsystem would need its own clock and it would need to print out the date / time when it made an encryption as well as, of course, using that date/time as part of the data encrypted. That would make it easy to detect anomalously fast voting.

This checksum would absolutely stop the replay and copy attacks that the Dominion system allows. The human visible table allows the voter to do verification and in fact the voter could be given a copy of the checksum (and public key) so that if desired the voter can confirm on a different machine that the votes were cast as intended.

By doing this it becomes possible to create an auditable system that is much harder to fraud. There is probably a way to make it work for mail in ballots too (a browser session or smartphone app would create the page which could then be printed off and mailed back) and in fact it might allow for remote electronic voting because all that happens in that case is that the app prints off the vote in a central precinct instead of at the voters computer.

There may well be additional lacunae that I haven’t thought of. I can see, for example, that the desire for a private confirmation number would make it possible for others to see how you had voted (great for audits, not great in terms of voting privacy/secret ballots) and I’m not entirely sure how to fix that – though I guess making keeping the number optional would do. Perhaps an abbreviated “Proof of voting” checksum could be created that didn’t include all your votes.

Update On Itty Bitty Kitty

Picture of Helena on my knees from last week. She nestles there, past my laptop.

Okay, she’s not well YET (keep up the prayers.) but they put her on an anti-viral last night, and today she was sitting up and raising her head. Not for long. She doesn’t have the strength to do it for long, but for a little bit.

And therefore they’re now leaning to a type of neurological virus that’s literally imbibed with mother’s milk. Most cats who have it, have it dormant, hers just activated suddenly. They are testing, and might also put her brother on anti-virals though he’s fine so far.

Anyway, continue praying. She MIGHT come out of this all right. Let us hope so. It’s going to be ruinously costly, but I don’t even care if I get her back okay.