When I was little, I was routinely threatened with being sold to the gypsies. By my loving parents, of course. (Trust me, if you had raised me you too would think long and hard about selling me to… well, no. GIVING me to the first willing taker. The fact my parents resisted it goes to show you they were loving.)
This was all the more disconcerting since at the time, given the tight borders all over Europe, the only gypsies I knew of were in Enid Blyton’s books (yes, there were Portuguese gypsies, but not in that section of the country so much.) The threat went along with coming home and finding my suitcases packed and being told I was being sent to some boarding school with a name like “Ladies of punishment.” (Shuddup you.) And no, I don’t know if it worked. I know it worked on my kids. (World’s worst mother. Trust me.)
But here’s the thing, for the longest time, it was said that gypsies kidnapped children. (Though why they would, I have no clue.)
Of course, in the late twentieth century this was derided as racist. And surely none of us can understand why they WOULD kidnap children. All we know is that there are stories of children sold for adoption and children trained to rob, and that too is part of the gypsy legend.
Honestly, if 10 years days ago you’d told me that gypsies kidnapped children, I’d say you were nuts. They are strangers in the lands they live in which makes them suspected and unlike the other minority culture known to stick out, they aren’t usually industrious or productive of much of anything.
So, they are resented. (And sometimes with reason. For one, they don’t recognize land property as such and will squat in formerly productive lands, which – NOW – the EU won’t let you evict them from.)
But the last week has rocked my certainty. A blond little girl not of their stock has been found living in a Roma camp in Greece, and now another one in Ireland.
Does this prove that all Roma kidnap children – or traffic in drugs, or steal –? No, of course not. Again, remember we are the ones who do not engage in group guilt or group punishment.
This is not even race — even though “racism” has been invoked against anyone suspecting gypsies of anything – note they are DNA testing the second little girl, because she COULD have been born to those parents (even if not in the hospital they said.)
This is because though (at least this set) originating in Romania (and even there, perhaps being a culture that refused to assimilate into the settling cultures when we became agriculturalists) they have of course mixed with every population in Europe. They’ve also absorbed wholesale some groups during upheavals. In Elizabethan England, dispossessed farmers often became “counterfeit gypsies” and then joined real bands, over time.
I confess I’m not an expert on Roma, and I’m not even very well informed. Part of this is because the information available on Gypsies is wildly contradictory. (And yes, I know they object to the word gypsies. But if I don’t use it, half of you won’t know what I’m talking about. At any rate, I’m tired of the war on words.)
One of the best books I’ve read on Roma (Bury Me Standing) traces their origins to a sect from India in pre-historic times. But the article above seems fairly authoritative (as do other books) that they’re from Romania.
I’ve read books about the Roma that illustrate many of the admirable things about the culture. Yes, there are some, among them the looking after your own part. And honor and honoring tradition — both of which can be rendered bad or good in practice.
BUT I’ve also read an awful lot of books idealizing the Roma, too. Until travel became more common, they were often all that the Europeans had to do the turn of the “Noble Savage” and they did. They still do in one notable series of regency romances.
And as you can see in that article, the authorities refused to even CONSIDER that the Roma might have taken children. I can see it. These policemen went to the same European schools I did. There is the “this can’t be true, because people are prejudiced in this exact way.” There’s the “They’re reverting to their grandparents’ type.”
But look, just because people for years suspected the gypsies of stealing children, it doesn’t mean they don’t.
Yes, most of the time, historically, it was probably, again, just “the strangers in our midst.” And perhaps parents really gave difficult (or simply children they couldn’t support) to the gypsies. My parents had to have got the joke somewhere.
However, these days, any culture that’s international and peripatetic and extremely internally loyal is at risk for becoming involved in illegal stuff. When you add in their rejection of such things as the right of property of other populations (not unusual in hunting-gathering cultures. Or even early herding cultures. Ancient Celts — and modern Maasai — believe all cattle belongs to their people and therefore no other populations can legally hold it.)… you have to wonder if your blinkered grandparents were right SOMETIMES.
No, this isn’t a call for widespread racism, or even culturalism. One of the better politicians Portugal has seen had a body guard of gypsies. (It didn’t save him from his plane being sabotaged, but there it is.) They owed his family some favor way back. I very much doubt they were stealing children and dealing drugs and robbing stuff in his entourage. There have been notable athletes of Roma ancestry who are gallant and honest and whose idiosyncrasies amuse the public (the Portuguese star soccer player whose entire family camped on his lawn for his wedding – in a neighborhood filled with the equivalent of McMansions.) I don’t see any of them turning to drug dealing or child-stealing.
What I’m trying to grope for here is gypsies – and every other cultural and racial minority – are HUMANS. That means you find every type good and bad among them. Yes, culture can make them prone to some sins, but I’d bet you dollars to doughnuts some Arab fathers would rather cut off their own hands than honor-kill their teen daughters, and others use the culture/religion as an excuse to do what they wanted to do anyway.
There is this sickening tendency in political correctness to dehumanize the victims of past prejudice and make them into painted saints.
No?
You try telling anyone in the US that some black person is lazy. (This btw is a highly localized stereotype. In Portugal black people are held to be MORE industrious. Hence, in Portuguese you get “To work like a black” as an expression. Yes, you do get “to work like a Jew” too.) You’ll be lucky if you’re only accused of racism and aren’t forced to do the public apology dance.
Yet, undoubtedly some individuals who identify as black or have African features/coloration are lazy. Black people are made of the same stuff we are. (In fact, in the US most of them are what is technically known as “Caucasians” genetically speaking. We’re a very mixed people.) Some of them will be lazy, just as some of them will be industrious.
And yes – gives her Huns the beady eye – some Latinos and – particularly — Latinas are excitable. (Get over it, okay? I have a rolling pin.)
And, apparently, some bands of Roma go seriously to the bad and steal children. WHY shouldn’t you be able to say that? And why shouldn’t the police investigate those suspicions to begin with? (Saying they can’t hide a blond child is nonsense. There is hair dye.)
Isn’t it turning your ancestors prejudices on their head to hold that now, of all people in the world, these people will be exempt of what they were so long accused of? Isn’t it a form of prejudice, particularly when you attribute to some group the inability to sin? (Or to be racist, or to be annoying, or to be…)
I mean, I hate to tell you this, but any group over say ten people you care to define contains examples of just about every virtue and every vice humanity has come up with. Take science fiction writers for instance (no, really, take them. I don’t want them. For one they would eat me out of house and home, and that’s not an unmerited stereotype.) You’ll find people who are decent, kind and well behaved. And you’ll find the scum of the Earth. And sometimes, depending on the day, they’re the same people.
Political correctness is in fact a form of prejudice. It makes a group of humans into “other”. Just because you’re putting your virtue rather than your sin into the other doesn’t mean you make them any more human or care any more for them. You’re still treating a whole group of people as a) homogeneous and b) not human. You’re treating humans as things.
Worse, when you come across the bad apples – and you will. EVERY group has bad apples – you then either hysterically deny it, or, after a number of them, you turn and decide your ancestors were right after all.
Look, it won’t even take much. Take the situation above with the children and the Roma camps. Say that the second little girl also isn’t Roma. Then have a few more show up. It won’t take much. Five or six along the length and breadth of Europe will do it.
The rest of the Roma camps could be as innocent as lambs. Authorities might even continue to repeat “there is no such thing as gypsies who snatch children.” In fact, it’s worse if the authorities continue repeating that.
Five or six cases in all of Europe is all it will take for the next time a child disappears somewhere, the rest of the population to go nuts and tear up a gypsy camp and destroy everything and kill the inhabitants.
And then the authorities will talk about prejudice and clamp down harder, which will make things even more explosive.
The mechanism is akin to when you’re a kid and you fall in love with someone for the first time. If you’re like me, you don’t even know the guy. He’s just someone you see in the train, or the coffee shop, but you invent a whole set of qualities for him. In your eyes he can do no wrong, because he’s not a person but a sort of painted saint.
Then you see him do something bad. It doesn’t take much. Teasing someone. Or perhaps acting like an ass, as teen boys do, with his friends.
Because your painted saint image didn’t have any give, didn’t allow for him to be human, it shatters. You experience this as a personal betrayal, and now you attribute all bad things to him.
Integration from above, combined with a good dose of “noble savagism” to which European/Western culture has been prone since the Romantics (does any other culture in the world do this?) has left our society with entire groups of people treated like painted saints. Which is as bad as treating them as painted devils. And makes us vulnerable to the worst kind of racist/culturist outbreak.
Because one image shatters, you won’t go “Oh, they’re human after all.” No, you’ll flip to the opposite.
And which group – which individual – can live up to complete sainthood? The image will shatter. Sooner or later.
Start now to amend your thoughts, because I bet some political correctness has penetrated them. Impossible not to. Start thinking and talking of people, even cultural and racial minorities as HUMANS.
No group is composed exclusively of saints. We shouldn’t allow that dellusion to continue. Nor should we allow demonization to occur. We should think of and treat humans as humans, each different and each good or evil or yes.
Will that help?
I don’t know. Political correctness is a blight brought on by perversion of language and corruption of ideas. Language and ideas ought to correct it and hopefully save us from flipping into the opposite stereotype and into injustice and insanity.
If it’s not already too late.