
Many years ago, when Dan and I were young and hopeful — let’s see, carry the nine and make faces at the calendar… it was well before older son was born, so probably around 37 years ago? — Dan had a job interview near his parents. Since at the time we lived more than 12 hour drive away, we stayed with them. And since Dan hadn’t got a new suit in something like six years (and the suit got actual wear back then. Also he’d got it before we were married, and he hadn’t trained his taste, really) we went out and blew our meager budget on a very nice suit for him.
His mother was furious at this. She insisted we should have spent half the price on the suit for him, the other half in a similarly upscale outfit for me. Now, part of this was feminist rats in her head. But part was that she was obsessively worried about what would happen if, when they were seriously considering him, they invited us out somewhere so they could meet me too.
The idea that this was a thing baffled both Dan and I. This was the eighties. Most of our friends were working various temporary and makeshift jobs, and even those like Dan who worked in a tech avocation weren’t exactly socializing with the boss.
Because I don’t like things I can’t understand, I thought about it. A lot. And I realized that there were a lot of plots in old sitcoms about bringing the boss to dinner. And even homespun humor by housewives books talked about the anxiety of meeting the bosses, etc. This for positions that weren’t exactly VIP.
I was therefore forced to believe that at some point this was a thing. And the point had to be in the twenty year window after WWII when my MIL’s ideas of the world were being set in stone.
This also made it very clear why our attempts at making headway in life made no sense whatsoever to her generation. Both his parents and mine (with the added flip that mine were in a completely different culture) kept giving us advice that amounted to “Well, just tell the boss you want a 200% raise, and then sit back and spend the money” and then being incredibly upset we didn’t do it. (This wasn’t literally their advice, but a lot was d*mn close.) The fact that if we’d done that we’d have ended up fired or worse referred to mental health professionals didn’t make a dent, because they KNEW what we should do.
Of course, we came into the job market in the early eighties when not only were things falling apart and not fully recovered from the Carter plague years, but new tech was already starting to upend the market. And the boomers having decided to cut their hair and go to work had taken most of the positions we might have gotten, and–
Look, I’m not going to compare misery with the current generation. We’d lose. We came into a market with expensive houses, but not ludicrously expensive. We had trouble finding jobs, but at least temp work… worked. it wasn’t retail. And retail, as it was, (I did it as my first job) wasn’t being run by people too stupid to realize they’re shooting themselves in the foot with the hours they set for employees and the way they run the work schedules.
But that said, there was no clear path to get where we wanted to go. There was no path for me, of course, because I was told again and again publishing was no longer viable. No one read. You couldn’t make a living in it. And every way to break in was now moot. Write short stories first? It was harder to break into short stories than into novels. Submit cold? No one was reading it. Go through agent? Most agents now had the slush pile of publishers of old, so if not impossible, it was almost impossible. People kept telling me to attend cons, which was correct, except for the fact that we were broke and had no access to the con circuit (as in, we had no clue where to find out if they were happening) because neither of us grew up in the culture.
Then there was Dan, with his degree in number theory, working at the thing he learned on the side for grins and giggles: Programing. In the eighties and early nineties. It was part insanity, part scam, and bosses expected you to live to work. The idea of having a life, much less a marriage seemed to not occur to them. (True fact, Christmas eve 1993 Dan’s supervisor was confused he was leaving work early. When Dan pointed out he had to buy a gift for his 2 year old kid, because HE’D WORKED STRAIGHT THROUGH THE LAST FOUR WEEKENDS, his boss seemed puzzled. After all…. wait? Kid? When did codemonkeys start having kids?) And we again saw no “path” to go anywhere.
There was no road. And yet…. We kept doing, finding, and since there was no plausible road, we tried the implausible, the crazy, sometimes the absurd. We still are, honestly.
I’m not holding us up as a pattern. We are too risk averse, and only jump when the fire is starting to choke us. Which means by the time we jump we’re out of resources and end up in absurdly tight situations monetarily speaking. And I value security far more than I should.
BUT we still had to jump, because there was no road, and the bridge was out. And some of those jumps worked, and we could get a little ahead.
Everyone I know my age to about 5 to 6 years older to two years younger, the weird micro generation wedged between boomers and x who certainly aren’t boomers though some have some characteristics (look, if Zillenials get a name, can we be BooX? Let’s socialize it.) took the weirdest approach to career. Very few of us work in the field we majored in, where we thought our career would be. And even fewer work in the field where were started out. Or even the second of those. Our “careers” so called resemble a drunkard’s walk more than anything else. And yet, for all that, we didn’t do badly, as a group. Most of us are okay.
And as invidious as the situation the young people of today find themselves in, I think they’ll be okay too. At least if we can get over the effects of the Autopen-plague.
Look… It’s like this — the biggest thing holding them back right now is the illusion that there is or there should be a road to success. That there is a path that, if you follow it, will deliver rewards like clockwork. If you only do what you’re supposed to.
As my assistant pointed out, when I was talking to her about it, there used to be paths. The paths, traditionally, through history, were to apprentice with your dad, and eventually get into the same job. Some people were even very happy this way, and families developed high influence in certain fields.
If you were less affluent, or you know, like Leonardo DaVinci, a bastard and therefore couldn’t be say a lawyer, like Leonardo couldn’t, then you were more or less indentured to a master in some trade. It then was supposed to work like following your dad’s footpath. You learned from the master and eventually became a master yourself, and you had all the contacts and knew how things were done.
This worked for centuries, until the renaissance and the industrial revolution, and accelerating technological innovation made it non-viable.
But note it worked for values of working. It lent a certain rigidity to the advance of society, since anyone with any knowledge “knew how things had always been done” and also … well. I wouldn’t have liked my mom’s job. Utterly unqualified for it. Or my dad’s. My mind wouldn’t bend to the math, and who the heck is that interested in textiles, even?
For a moment, briefly, there was a path again after WWII. When the GI bill allowed people to go to college and fill positions in a crazily revving up economy, in ever-growing top heavy associations, both government and corporations, there was that path. “Go to college and work hard” And you’d end up with the key to the executive bathroom and eventually a secure retirement.
By the time we entered the work force THAT was dissolving. A college degree was slightly more useful than today, but not nearly a guarantee of “A good job.” So we had to improvise.
And the things that we improvised (let alone the people before us) accelerated tech yet more, causing upheaval where I never thought to see it. If I’d stuck with my original profession I’d now be out of a job. AI can do scientific translation much faster than I could at my peak, and frankly, the person who needs to check it over doesn’t have to be a senior translator paid a bazillion. You can have a relatively young and underpaid person doing it…. And I have to tell you, honestly, that is the one job I never thought would be affected. Yet, here we are.
So the kids are trying to get a foothold while the traditional job market as such as hit an iceberg and is listing dangerously. The orchestra still plays on, but there is no room in the lifeboats.
The metaphor is the one I used when all of my contemporaries (seemed like) got fired in 2003 partly as the aftershock of the horrible post 9/11 quarter (because bad sales are always the author’s fault, of course!) My first career also foundered, but I rapid fired enough proposals that, while there was no room for me in the lifeboat, I was floating on the grand piano. (For the record, one of the cooks of the Titanic survived that way. Apparently he had drunk so much alcohol that despite having swam to the grand piano, he didn’t die of hypothermia. There is a metaphor in that too. Like most things that worked in my path to my present career, being a little drunk (or in my case just desperate. I don’t really drink much. Maybe three times a year and not enough to register) helps.)
But first, if you’re a young one (At this point for me that’s anyone under 50) you must rid yourself of the idea that there is a road. Or in the metaphor, the idea the voyage will go on, as promised. Or even that you’ll fall into a relatively secure path like a lifeboat.
There are no roads. There are no paths. If you keep insisting on staying on the path and doing what should work, you’ll either stagnate or worse.
I’m very sorry if you’re as risk averse as I am. Yes, your immune system will hate you. (We’re now trying to solve damage of decades!) BUT you must scout out a new way to get where you want. You must think of all the wild ways to get there, and be ever alert for an opportunity, no matter how small. And always, always, be aware of where innovation is, and try to go with it, to find what new step has just formed in the every protean situation and take advantage of it.
The Titanic metaphor fails in that — unlike traditional publishing’s slow but inevitable journey — technology and economics haven’t suffered a fatal disaster. The turmoil is caused by catastrophic innovation.
When you’re trying to find your way amid shards of opportunity and rumors of prosperity, it might seem like a distinction without a difference. But there is a difference.
Unless things go really really wrong in a political sense in the next ten years (And honestly I think it can’t happen. It might happen for two or even four, but not all ten.) and politics throttles economics aborning, we are on the verge of an explosion of opportunity and innovation.
Which means things are opening up, not closing down. It’s just they’re opening up in ways no one was trained to see.
First you need to read yourselves of the idea that there is a path, an order, a way to get where you want to go. Or even that where you want to go will be there when you get there.
Instead, do what you can, what you’re good at, what you can learn to be good at, and do it unreservedly, with gusto, all the while scouting out the next step, the next opportunity.
Where we’re going, we don’t need roads. Which is good, because there aren’t any.
Which is why Americans are uniquely qualified to survive and thrive in this. Chaos is our native state.
Pull up your bootstraps, keep your eyes peeled. Go!
2026 Blog Fundraiser!
Hi. This blog doesn’t have ads (you might have noticed.) And unfortunately no one gives me a grant to write here, seven days a week, give or take (for values of “write.” Mechanically and time-wise the meme post is brutal.) Never did. Probably because I’m not the sort of blogger that USAID would fund. I like the USA too much.
Also, like most bloggers to the right of Lenin, I have paid a steep price (as has my whole family) because I stepped out of the shadows. Yes, even I, in this little blog.
This is not a complaint, and it’s not your fault. I chose to do it. (Though I’ll say I never thought things would get this crazy.) It is however a fact of life. Just as the blog is a third career, competing with the paying one (writing) the the unpaid one (cleaning and handywoman.)
Which is why after resisting it for years, I do an annual fundraiser. (I have so much psychological trouble with this, that if it were only for me, I wouldn’t bother, but frankly Dan and even the boys deserve some compensation for the years they’ve shared me with the blog.) This is not an emergency. I won’t say we’re swimming in dough, but we do know where the next meal and mortgage payment are coming from. SO PLEASE DON’T HURT YOURSELF TO CONTRIBUTE. And I’m not threatening to quit blogging. I will quit when and if I feel I can, but this year is not even the eve of that time. So, not demanding you give.
However, anything you can give without hurting yourself, is much appreciated.
If you wish to donate: There is a Give Send Go fundraiser for this specific fundraiser set up. Here is a Paypal Me Link if you prefer that. (Yes, I know. Paypal, but for now, they’re behaving.) If you have a monthly donation setup to the permanent Give Send Go, that is still working and thank you! There are also two substacks you can subscribe to. One is on the side bar of the blog, the other is supposed to be a newsletter, as well as giving you chapters of the current work in progress if you become a paid subscriber. It takes cards. For snail mail: Sarah Hoyt 304 S Jones Blvd #6771 Las Vegas, NV 89107
And if you want to read the whole appeal, it’s here: Toss A Coin To Your Blogger, Oh Readers of Plenty.
















































































































