
I don’t want to talk about fraud. Heaven knows it starts feeling stupid to say “but it was fraud.” And some of you out there are saying “Oh, yeah, when the left wins Sarah always says it was fraud.”
Which is true. What you’re missing in that calculation is that I also think there’s massive fraud when the right wins. I just think the right beat the fraud in those cases.
I think there’s massive fraud because, even when machines aren’t used, it’s insecure by design.
Motor Voter prioritized getting everyone in the States registered to vote whether they could prove they were citizens, whether they were here on a visitor visa, whether they even WANTED to vote. If you go to get a driver’s license, which is absolutely necessary because driver’s licenses or non-driver ID gets used as a national ID card, you get registered to vote. This happens even if you present as your ID a foreign passport with a temporary Visa. And even if you can’t speak a word of English.
Why on Earth would any country do that? Well, because the law requires them to do that. After all, you might be a dual citizen of another country. Or you might have grown up in a foreign language enclave. Wouldn’t want to upset those poor lambkins, would you? No siree bob. No discriminating against people who sure as heck look like they aren’t even vaguely acquainted to the US.
“But Sarah,” you say “Most of those people won’t vote. Ever.” Yeah. Most won’t, but it doesn’t mean their registration doesn’t get voted. Like the 130 some year old woman in Colorado Springs who is still reliably voting.
Like most — right? — Americans, and because I grew up reading American fiction, I viewed this as “our little flaw” which mostly happened in Chicago and was funny ah ah. And it might have been, mostly, without the added floodgates of Motor Voter. I mean, we know at least one presidential election was stolen before that: JFK’s. But it was the occasional election, not endemic, right?
I thought that until 2012 when I volunteered to poll watch. 1/3 of the people who came in were told that they had already voted. ONE THIRD. I was told in Denver it was 2/3. At least in some precincts. I don’t know if it’s true. I wasn’t there. And people were sent away happy because they were allowed to “provisionally vote.”
They didn’t know the provisional votes aren’t counted unless the election is close enough for them to matter. And the bad votes CANNOT BE GOTTEN OUT.
Fraud? Dear Lord. In 2012 we were already choking on fraud.
There was hope in this though. With all the fraud, the left BARELY squeaked a victory in Colorado. BARELY. And they knew how much fraud was in it, because then they — AGAINST THE RESULTS OF AN ELECTORAL REFERENDUM — instituted “vote by mail” as the default system. The most easily fraudable system. On the excuse of “saving money” which as we all know is the left’s main worry, isn’t it? Fiscal responsibility. Right.
Then came twenty twenty, aka the hokey stick election. And every election more states go vote by mail, which ends up putting more and more states in the “taken over by the puppet masters” camp.
I’m still surprised we got in 2024 and I THINK the only reason we did is that we’d figured out what the fraud was in 2020 and obviated that.
BUT THE ELECTION WAS STILL CROOKED FOR THE DEMS.
Sarah, you whine, why do you think only the dems do it?
First of all, I don’t. It’s the dems and the controlled opposition. But IF THE RIGHT WERE FRAUDING to any significant amount, the press would be on it like flies on sh*t. You know it, I know it, my cat, Havey knows it, and he was never that smart and is now dead.
So the left is mostly fraud. They know it. As hard as they fight against even minor clean ups of elections THEY KNOW IT. Without the fraud, they’re done.
So. There was fraud. Of course there was fraud. There always is. But fraud enough for the results? Becuause it wasn’t done the usual ways 2024 is clearly a new animal. So, I’m going to tell you what the reasons I have to suspect the fraud was NEXT LEVEL.
First of all, the numbers — if they are true. The caveat here is that we’re not on lockdown, husband is not off work, and I can’t get him to make a program to pull numbers as he did with Covid — are impossible. There is no way in fricking heck the Dems pulled a new 10 million voters out of Marx’s dead ass. That’s fricking impossible. Particularly since there have been a number of self-deportations, etc.
Also if true, there is this: The 15% band. Is it true? I don’t know. but one of my friends on the night said that there appeared to be a 15% swing everywhere he was looking.
Because a lot of you aren’t mathematical, let me explain: for the 15% to be a steady band across the country? it would take a miracle. Like, a pigs are flying overhead to winter in FL type of miracle. It’s not possible. Particularly in elections that are local by nature. It’s never that steady. Some places the swing would be 5% or 10% or 2%.
It is however indicative of a PROGRAMMATICAL fraud. I.e. something programmed in.
I don’t think I’ve confessed this — have I — but my husband decided he wanted our weekends back, and therefore one evening wrote two programs: one to post the memes (I still harvest them manually) and another to post the promo post. To those looking to exploit this: give it up. It creates a draft and I still go over it. And the promo one is buggy, so I usually still enter half of them by hand. It just took my time to post memes and books from all morning Saturday ad all my time after church on Sunday to a couple of hours divided between the days.
Why I’m telling you this: for the programs to work, I had to alter my workflow. Like I put coffee memes, non political memes and political memes in different folders. And the program seems to gag if you don’t have the link to Amazon on the first line of your promo email. (I don’t know why, no. And that’s a bug to be fixed.)
Programs are stupid. In the sense they don’t think. They’re a mechanical process, even if software. So they tend to produce uniform results.
This 15% thing if true is the thumprints of a computer program all over it, and prima-facie evidence of tampering.
But wait, there’s more. Two very weird things happened in these elections, one of which is “uh” and would cause Sherlock Holmes to go poke the dog till it barked night and day. The other is just impossible. Like, bloody insane impossible.
The highly unlikely one: the cities reported first. The big machine cities, where they’re finding votes in car trunks for two weeks after? They reported first. That’s enough to make you go “Uh, I wonder”…. Of course, if the fraud was already baked in, they COULD.
The absolutely utterly impossible: the left outperformed the polls. As skewed to the left as the polls are that’s … unlikely. As incapable of shutting up with their incessant signaling as every leftist everyone knows is, that’s impossible.
Those are the number reasons to think there was significant — hellishly difficult to prove — fraud.
Outside the number reasons… I’m not good with numbers, actually. I’m good with patterns. It’s a ’tisms thing and you wouldn’t understand I mean most of you understand completely at an inner, personal level.
The reason I stopped sleeping running up to the elections were the patterns, some of which I didn’t fully understand.
One, the dems were stealing signs again. I don’t mean retail stealing opponent signs. I mean stealing signs as a coordinated campaign from above.
This is stupid if you’re doing it to influence people. I don’t think that’s how people decide whom to vote for. HOWEVER it is a masterful way to do battle space preparation for fraud. When your guys wins by ONE BAZILLION VOTES people go “Well, I didn’t see any signs for opponents” and it quiets them down.
So I was expecting fraud, fraud, fraud, delicious fraudy fraud.
The other thing was the “plans” that DataRepublican revealed for the “color revolution” i.e. to strike back at Trump if he declared the results fraudulent AND the revolts and destruction in Europe.
Look, I recognize patterns when I see them. In 2020 it was the BLM peaceful yet fiery protests. They were never big enough or widespread enough to threaten the country. BUT THEY WERE ENOUGH TO SCARE JUDGES. So that when the blatant fraud was brought before them, they found reasons to refuse the cases.
In 2026, it was the protests in the rest of the west, the attempted coup in Poland, and the threat of doing the same here. And no, I’m not blaming DataRepublican. I do think she got a “leak”. I’m just not convinced the leak was not deliberate on the other side. (She’s amazing and almost magical with data, duh. But this is people things.)
Which means Trump feels his hands are tied on revealing/persecuting the fraud unless it’s in your face obvious. Which it is, but not in ways that are easy to explain to the man on the street who thought 2020 was too opaque to be obvious fraud.
I’ll add to this that my repost of the 15% twix above brought someone self-idenfying as part of the “intel community” and telling me there was no fraud, because some weird hacking convention created by a guy who used to write for the Nation “proved” it. He came in calling me names, and ended by snarling “prove it.” which is so movie villain it’s impossible to explain.
So — my conclusion is that there was fraud. Massive fraud.
Massive, hard to prove fraud, which members of our government are afraid to contest for fear of a revolution/civil war. I think that’s nuts, btw. The left can’t. They don’t have the numbers nor the weapons. Their only weapon is the threat and the “look at what we’re doing to Europe.” But Europe isn’t the US. They don’t have our guns. They don’t have our veterans and they don’t have our widespread spaced out population. But they wanted to do project the impression they could and I think succeeded.
Now, before all of you threaten suicide or doom hard: No, I don’t think we can prove fraud. Or at least not right now in a way that the dear little LIVs will get it through their heads. The normalcy bias holds.
But I’m not without hope. In fact, it’s almost impossible for us to lose this in the long run. AND as a side effect this might manage the purge of the rest of the quislings in the party, or a major portion of them.
Yes, yes, I know they’re proclaiming that MAGA is dead. Same as the last fifty times. This is mostly the establishment republicans who still expect us to come home.
But the fundamental mistake is thinking that Trump has MAGA. It’s the other way around. MAGA — aka revenge of the tea party — has Trump. And if this goes on, we’ll have someone far more like Bukele. Now, I don’t want that here. BUT the left should want it even less. And that’s what they’re bringing about.
Anyway, tomorrow let me go over reasons for hope, and also why you should beef up (eh) your canned and your brass. And make all your emergency plans.
And shut your trap and sit tight for at least a month. My gut feeling is a month. (Though it could be longer.)
And not to doom. No dooming here.
In the end we win, they lose. But buckle in. It’s going to get mighty choppy and rough for a little while.
Unless we get luckier than I think possible. (Which has happened before. See 2024.)