Isn’t It Funny?

Posted on by Sarah A. Hoyt

This is not a real post. I woke up late, and we had overnight guests, so there was breakfast talk, which we all needed… and well….

But yesterday night, just before going to bed and related to yesterday’s post, I was thinking “Isn’t it weird? We’re not just living in strange times, but hilariously funny ones.” Granted, you need to have a bit of a black sense of humor, and also it will probably be funnier in 100 years, but really.

Isn’t it funny that they tried to start a “misinformation” czar and got ratioed to hell and back and had to walk it back?

Isn’t it funny that they keep screaming the economy is great and not even crazy people believe them, and they can’t figure out why?

Isn’t it funny they’ve now tried to restart the panic about an unknown disease… five? times and it doesn’t take and they can’t figure out why not?

Isn’t it funny that both here and in France, the people spontaneously have come up with “Wife of political leader is really a man” to the point of driving the politician nuts? I mean what do Michelle Obama and Madame Macron even have in common? And why is this the annoying thing people latched on?

Isn’t it funny that all over the world, people who used to scream about the Will of the People and sometimes still do are raging and frothing at the mouth about “populism”? (The word doesn’t mean what they think it means.)

Isn’t it funny that most of the “populist” leaders have the most absurd hairstyles? Even Boris Johnson while he was worth spit couldn’t control his hair. Is that where the alien probe/G-d/the author injects sanity? It leaves the hair in a mess?

I’m sure there’s a lot more funny things, that I can’t think of right now, because I came up with like a dozen more last night but don’t remember them. Feel free to add.

Yes, we’re going through very strange times, and it’s still possible a number of us might die. But at least we’ll die laughing!

120 thoughts on “Isn’t It Funny?”

      1. There’s a music genre called “electro swing.” Pretty much what it says on the box. One early example has the chorus: “This Roaring Twenties is the Boring Twenties.”

        Boring 20s

        Like

    3. This decade: The Howling Twenties. (Compare “the Roaring Twenties” of a century ago.)

      Like

  2. 🍵

    Don’t know if I should cry or laugh. One of the lawyers sitting in on President Trump’s NY trial said this of the sitting judge’s rulings. The rulings for the defense (for anything) have been few and far between. The one time there were two in a row, the lawyer analyst said he was so shocked that he was sure the rapture was on us, but realized his wife was still sitting in the court with him, so not that. Then there is CNN where their legal analyst is saying NY attorney has lost (not President Trump won). They are definitely going down. Never bet against the American people.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. That “judge” is going to deliver a conviction if he has to order/threaten/coerce/compel/all-of-the-above the jury to do so. If they still do not return “guilty”, he will throw out their verdict and apply a directed “guilty” on his own, and if he cant -quite- get away with something that blatant, a post not-guilty verdict “mistrial” will be declared for “reasons”.

      Ultimately, they do not care if it is eventually overturned. They must 1) obtain some “guilty” verdict, somehow anyhow, even one blatantly illegal. 2) incarcerate Trump, with all the pictures and presstitute blather, 3) keep him too busy in litigation/jail to campaign, and I suspect 4) their dream shot – leave Trump to the mercies of the other jailbirds, sans bodyguards. (and you can bet your last TetraDrachma that at least one thug will be quietly offered a nice get-out-of-jail if anything “happens”.)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. You know, at this point I’d like to see someone shoot the Judge and the DA. That’s how egregiously bad this is. Probably relates to my lack of sympathy for the death of the Iranian President in a helicopter “accident”. Funny thing about those helicopters, eh?

        Like

        1. Not shoot.

          Pine tar. Feathers. Some assembly required. Don’t turn them into martyrs. Make them look ridiculous.

          Like

      2. I’m sure Trump isn’t untouchable… but honestly, I can’t see most thugs being eager to beat him up. He’s the kind of non-criminal guy who would be liked by hoods, because he’s an aspirational figure and because he tends to come across as a guy from the neighborhood.

        And since he’s actually would be put in jail, if put in jail, by a crooked judge and crooked DA for a crime he didn’t commit and which seems to be made up, he’s even a sympathetic figure.

        I don’t even think most psychopaths or sociopaths would want to hurt him. They’d probably gamble more on protecting him, so as to be getting a job or a favor from him in the future.

        It would pretty much have to be someone who’s a hitman, and probably only because forced to do it. Or a really cray-cray leftist activist.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. In prison? Plenty of thugs for rent. For “out” or even enough Ramen packets.

          Like

            1. We appear to have very different understandings of cons. I get my info from folks who live or work there.

              Like

        2. They will get guards who are “friends of the program” to do it if the thugs won’t. It just came out today that the FBI was authorized to use deadly force during the Mar-a-Lago raid for DOCUMENTS.

          https://nypost.com/2024/05/21/us-news/fbi-was-authorized-to-use-deadly-force-in-mar-a-lago-classified-docs-search/

          Meanwhile Biden had classified documents sitting in a garage that anyone could access and NEVER had the authority to declassify anything the way Trump had due to being President.

          Anyone who doesn’t believe that they would resort to outright murder to prevent Trump from being President again hasn’t been paying attention.

          Liked by 2 people

        3. Not to mention the fact that I could absolutely see Trump hiring a bunch to watch his back and paying them a large chunk of money. And the media trying to turn THAT into a scandal, which could then be pointed at as “well, I had people looking to attack me, and I didn’t have any bodyguards, so what else was I supposed to do?”

          I mean. I wouldn’t look askance at a wealthy man wrongfully imprisoned using said wealth to hire protection from the inside. Only makes sense.

          Like

        1. My first thought for “engage” had more to do with an X-ring than a diamond or a “hey buddy”, and I see that I was right.

          The agent in charge? Sleep well, dearie. Secret Service agents are the forgive and forget type. Bwahahaha!

          I’m dreaming of a Romanian Christmas, Just like the one for Ceaușescu…

          Liked by 1 person

      4. As much as this Judge is trying to get a conviction, I’ll be shocked if he succeeds. Remember there are attorneys on the Jury. The only testimony connecting Trump to actual knowledge of how the payments were accounted for (that accounting being the supposed crime) was from Cohen and on cross he was forced to admit that what he had said didn’t match the call records.

        How would any attorney get trusted by clients if they voted guilty on a case with no evidence of a crime?

        I wouldn’t be surprised by a hung jury rather than an acquittal, though given the jury pool.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. The jury’s name being kept secret is a pipe dream. The lawyers on the jury that convicts better be willing to give up law practice.

          I am most afraid of option #4 listed above, that President Trump will be assassinated. OTOH the comment that he might be protected because of the method is hopeful.

          Like

        2. It is a NYC jury that was selected in a manner to screen out anyone who might vote to acquit Trump. Trials are never held on Fridays. This trial had trial proceedings on Friday. Why? Because it removed all the Orthodox views, who are one of the only pro-Trump voting blocks in NYC, from consideration for the jury, because they could not stay for the full day of trial.

          It is a kangaroo court/Soviet show trial all the way up to the NY Court of Appeals, which ensured they would get people on it who would let them impose the Hochulmander and essentially eliminate almost the entirety of NY states’ Republican congressmembers and membership in the state legislature.

          Likewise the initial appellate level, which is why they upheld the patently unconstitutional gag order.

          The Judge refused to allow witnesses for Trump who could refute the prosecutions false claim that Trump “violated federal campaign finance law”, which he absolutely did not.

          At this point I am thinking trial by combat is looking better and better, and far fairer.

          Liked by 1 person

        3. I have a minor fantasy, wherein the jury foreman comes out and says

          “We the jury find that the defendant has not been accused of a crime, nor has it been demonstrated that he committed one. As such, we find the defendant not guilty of everything he has not been charged with, and recommend that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

          “We also find that the prosecuting attorneys are incompetent and a disgrace to the legal profession. As such we recommend that they be immediately disbarred in all states in which they are licensed to practice.

          “Further, we find that the judge has no understanding of American jurisprudence or jurisdiction, and is also incompetent. As such, we recommend that he be removed from the bench, disbarred in all states in which he is licensed to practice, and forbidden from ever seeking or obtaining any position whatsoever in the legal system.

          “We further find – in case his honor is tempted to hold us in contempt of court – that this court and all its officers are worthy of the greatest amount of contempt that can be heaped upon them. You disgrace the robes you wear, the chairs you sit in, and the room you occupy.”

          Wouldn’t get through the first sentence before the judge ordered the bailiff to tackle him, but dang if it wouldn’t be satisfying.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. You disgrace the atoms you breathe, the lunch ladies who fed you, the poor teachers who taught you to read, and the nurses who changed your nappies in the hospital nursery.,

            Liked by 1 person

      5. While extremely illegal, the gag order on President Trump is a gift. Dials back the rhetoric. Doesn’t eliminate but dials it back. Also campaigning? Being limited to NY means the areas who can’t get rallies (because that is the way it works) can’t feel slighted by President Trump. They know who is at fault: NY State Lawfare.

        Liked by 1 person

      6. I think the judge, and the left in general, are starting to realize they put themselves into a no win situation. As much as they want that conviction and have him sitting in jail, they are starting to see how much that plays into his campaigning. And if he’s found not guilty it plays well for his campaign. They thought if he’s convicted that people would abandon him, but it’s looking more and more likely that if it sways the undecided it’s going to be a very small number to their side, if it doesn’t end up being a net negative for them.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. If the Donkuloids have a moment of clarity, the “judge” will be told by his handlers to issue a directed “not guilty” verdict and avoid the jury. Else they chance either watching Trump get acquitted/hung-juried in Sith Blue NYC to their utter humiliation, or getting a bul(HONK!) and soon-overturned “conviction”, gaining him the bad-boy approval vote and the YGBFSM-this-was-a-crock vote, more than making up for any “Never Felon” losses, and essentially annointing him “47”.

          They cannot undo the damage to the Donk cause. There are few options that limit the splash. But they have several easy options to make it -much- worse.

          I am expecting -much-, and soon.

          Liked by 1 person

        2. if it doesn’t end up being a net negative for them.

          I think that ship has sailed. What is the saying? If you find yourself deep in a hole, quit digging! The left keeps digging.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. The trial is such a joke that the judge and prosecution lawyers have blown any chance of being take seriously anywhere. Would anyone here hire any of these lawyers? The only reason we haven’t seen any of this on the comedy rounds is because the comedy players fear PTB will take it out on Trump. Even CNN is crying (really are) that they blew it. MSN hasn’t, yet, their heads are so far up their, um, assets … But hopefully they are about to have those assets kicked, hard.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Speaking of such things — what have the 3 ass-clowns that persecuted Kyle Rittenhouse been up to since their show-trial bombed? Especially the one that picked up an AR-15 from the exhibit table, did not check if it was loaded, pointed it at the jury and put a finger on the trigger?

              Like

              1. Disappeared into absurdity? (Sorry couldn’t resist. Spelled obscurity wrong, and absurdity popped up. Absurdity works better.) Kind of my point. A gift really.

                Remember Kyle Rittenhouse. Have no idea who the clowns were, or what they are doing now. (Probably should. The one that handles firearms so casually is a menace to himself and everyone around him.)

                Like

      7. It sure looks like he’s angling for it. Dershowitz reported that the judge was so blatantly ruling against Trump’s attorneys that Costello (Cohen’s former lawyer, and a defense witness) was openly rolling his eyes, and saying, “Jeeze…,” while in the witness box. This enraged the judge enough that he temporarily threw out the press (but not Dershowitz) so that he could yell at Costello about “behaving” while in the courtroom.

        Dershowitz stated that Costello is an intelligent and respected lawyer, so it wasn’t as if some clueless shyster was the one getting exasperated with the judge.

        Liked by 2 people

  3. From the Epigraph of C. S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters

    The best way to drive out the devil, if he will not yield to texts of Scripture, is to jeer and flout him, for he cannot bear scorn.
    LUTHER

    The devil…the prowde spirite…cannot endure to be mocked.
    THOMAS MORE

    End Quote.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. And if laughter doesn’t work, there are very few things that can resist the proper application of kinetic energy.

      I’m found of the Wallachian push.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Hillfrigginlarious, some people still actually believe Joe Biden won the election. They won’t defend him, his policies or anything the democrats are doing, but that delusion hangs on. They have to believe it, are forced to believe it, if they don’t they will go mad. They were bad enough before. May you live well and stop voting until the end of time you deluded mind numbed leftard robots.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. And in a few more months, the sheeple will all magically be saying “Trump actually -did- win a second term in 2020, so he is ineligible!!! in 2024!!!”

      Liked by 1 person

        1. Even considering how crazy/stupid as I know the Democrats are, I can’t see them seriously playing that card.

          Playing that card means several things.

          One, they are admitting that some of them committed Fraud.

          Two, they are admitting that they lied to the public and the News Media.

          Three, they are admitting that Biden was illegally President and thus everything he did was illegal.

          Four, they are admitting that THEY SUPPORTED A MAJOR CRIME.

          If they are admitting everything above, then there will be a Major Blow-Back toward them and I can’t not see them knowingly accepting such a Blow-Back toward them individually and toward their Party.

          Now, I could see them attempting to murder Trump and attempt a coup to prevent Trump from taking over (To Defend Democracy).

          Admitting that they committed Fraud to prevent Trump’s re-election is a Step Too Far IMO.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Oh, I can just imagine the idiots standing before the Supreme Court trying to pull that stunt only to hear the following:

            “You’re telling us that because you illegally prevented Trump from becoming President that we should prevent Trump from become President now. You must really think we’re as stupid as you. Case Dismissed! Oh, we look forward to seeing how Trump deals with you. Get Out Of Here.”

            Liked by 1 person

            1. “No, we think that you’ll remember that we’ve had mobs outside your houses since the Dobbs decision leaked, and no one (Federal or state) has stopped them in spite of laws against that (Federal and State). You established an excellent track record for ignoring obvious fraud in 2020 and 2022; why change?”

              Like

          2. It will likely start with a “comedian”.

            They will blame Trump and Republicans for the fraud.

            It wont make any more sense than Marxism. Not making sense never stopped a Marxist.

            Panic/Desperation usually produces -epic- stupid.

            Like

            1. You assuming that there are enough Marxists in the Democratic Party and the News Media to give them a ghost of a chance.

              Like

                1. Different situation.

                  This thread is about the Democrats claiming Trump really won in 2020 so Trump can’t be President in 2025. [Wink]

                  Like

          3. granted, committing, or attempting, violence is more in their wheelhouse.

            but five years ago could you forsee them funding and releasing a bio weapon to facilitate stealing an election?

            there is no idea so crazy or so stupid that dems are unwilling to consider it.

            Liked by 1 person

        2. In the very unlikely event that they tried that, it shouldn’t work. The actual election is the tabulating of the Electoral Votes in the House of Representatives. Biden won that, regardless of whether his electoral votes were gathered in an illegal fashion.

          Like

          1. But if the creating of the “Electoral College Votes” by some of the State was fraudulent, then the tabulating of the Electoral Votes by the House of Representatives would be badly flawed. [Twisted Grin]

            Seriously, as I said before, there would be too big of blow-back for the Dems for them to attempt that.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Doesn’t matter. The states are responsible for sending electors. The states sent electors. The new president was selected based on those electors. The Constitution only allows the states to decide how electors are selected, aside from only allowing citizens to vote for them. If the state sends an elector list, then the House is required to work with that list.

              Liked by 1 person

              1. Correct, there’s nothing in the Constitution concerning fraudulent Electoral College Votes.

                But ironically, I could see idiotic Democrats attempting say that “we committed fraud, so the House of Representative’s tabulation was flawed.

                But as I said, I doubt that their case would “reach first base”.

                Too many other Democrats would see the problems with the “success” of that attempt so would stop it.

                Like

                1. Yes. It would be incredibly stupid to try and pull something like this. Though given that Hunter Biden’s lawyer really did tell a judge, “We’re not saying that the laptop belongs to my client, but he would like it back,” who knows? 😅😅

                  Regardless, I’m of the opinion that there is a solid constitutional basis why any such attempt should fail.

                  Like

                  1. Besides your valid point, there are other reasons that sane people/judges would stop that garbage.

                    To say that Trump was legally elected President in 2020 means that Biden is not the legal President.

                    Thus, every action done by Biden in the White House would be null-and-void.

                    Which includes Signing Bills into Law especially Budget Bills, Judicial Appointments, other government appointments, etc.

                    How valid are Federal Prosecutions since the Attorney General is illegally appointed?

                    How valid are Federal Court cases where the presiding Judge was illegally appointed by Biden?

                    Besides the above (and I’m sure I missed problems), there’s going to be an “interesting” reaction by the general public and the News Media.

                    I include the News Media because I think they’d have to “prove” that they were “fooled as well”.

                    Like

                    1. If the actual goal is Marxist destruction of what is, to produce Revolution…..

                      Like

                    2. Regarding “produce Revolution”, I’d think that they’d be more likely to go “In the Name of Democracy we must not allow Trump to take office again” (ie go the coup route) rather than “Trump can’t take office because he actually won in 2020” route.

                      Like

                    3. Agreed. There have already been suggestions by outside voices that perhaps if Trump really does win in 2024, the military should step in and keep him from taking office.

                      Like

                    4. Ah, yes; subvert the expressed will of the voters in the name of Saving Our Democracy (TM). And they fail to see how that idiocy is coming to be seen by those same voters. Hell, they probably don’t even realize it themselves; they’re nothing if not clueless.

                      Like

      2. [sigh]

        You just had to go and give them ideas, didn’t you? I’ve seen this Kafkaesque possibility for months, but kept quiet about it so I wouldn’t give them ideas. They cannot make a move without cribbing from 1984 or Fahrenheit 451 or Atlas Shrugged, so we had a decent chance of this not happening as long as they couldn’t read about it somewhere and steal the concept.

        I wanted to join the general laughter, lift my spirits with some good mockery of The Gang That Couldn’t Oppress Straight, but now I just want to crawl into a corner and … actually, I hadn’t gotten that far in my planning. What’s a good activity to pursue once I’ve crawled into a corner? (No alcohol-related suggestions, please, as there isn’t enough booze in the known universe to set things right.)

        Republica restituendae, et, Hamas delenda est.

        P.S. And if you mention how the Democrats will win the Presidential election in January, no matter how the vote went, if they hold both chambers of Congress, so help me …

        Like

        1. Part of me actually giggles at the possibilities for epic donkuloid stupid. Watching them wreck themselves for a century would be -epic- justice.

          Think about how fast the Federalists wrote themselves out of US politics, having -founded- US politics.

          Think about where the Whigs went, refusing to get with the times and the shifting views on Abolition.

          “Oh PLEASE Brer Fox! Oh PLEASE Brer Bear! Don thro me in dat der briar patch! Oh PLEASE no!”

          (giggle)

          Like

          1. Aye, another Big Cheat and Steal will SUCK, but it might be the very last “Democrat” anything for ages. I can dream, can’t I? Even if the first part is a nightmare…

            Like

        2. You’re looking at this wrong. Put $50 in popcorn stocks, buy some fireworks and a lawn chair.

          The “free” show promises to be epic.

          Like

      4. He would only be ineligible because of the two-term limitation if he had actually served as president during the 2021-2025 term. Since he didn’t, he remains eligible to serve if he beats the margin of fraud and all the other coup efforts by the Democrats in 2024.

        Like

  7. My nominee for the list is: If you don’t support a movement dedicated to killing all the Jews … then you’re a Nazi and a fascist.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Considering the way that the Left mangles language, perhaps they were taking lessons from Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty.
    “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean–neither more nor less.”
    “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean different things–that’s all.”
    “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master–that’s all.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Crazy Years are upon us… and the religion is progressivism. Each believer has their own view of the tenants, and they are all accepted.

      Infidels need not apply.

      Like

  9. Some things in life are bad,
    they can really make you mad.
    Other things just make your swear and curse.
    When you’re chewing on life’s gristle,
    don’t grumble, give a whistle,
    and this’ll help things turn out for the best.
    Aaaaaaand…

    Like

    1. I keep my hair short for professional reasons.

      (both hands grabbing at hair above ears)

      “You deleted the -what- system?!??”

      (short hair prevents IT pattern baldness)

      Like

      1. It’s not short hair, it’s “tactical hair”.

        Your hair should be short enough that it’s not easy to grab in a fight. This includes beards.

        The added benefits include easy to dry, easy to spot lice and stays out of eyes.

        Like

          1. Either internal fighting (so Kahameni’s son will succeed him instead of the late and unlamented president), or mechanical failure in bad weather. Those would be my guesses. Helicopters and high elevations don’t do well, and trying to autorotate (make a forced landing) in fog in the mountains might not go well.

            Like

            1. Helicopters are legendarily prolific maintenance and spare parts consumers, and the Bell 212 in this case was acquired during the Shah’s reign waaaay back when and has been flying in Iranian government service ever since. The trade embargo covers spare parts, so they had to get what they needed on the black market, just like the parts they use to keep their F-14s flying.

              As a data point on how strict that is, all the decommissioned museum and gate-guard F-14s are under Federal surveillance, and the Navy has sent out crews to make sure none of the unique parts are still installed in case of any midnight B&E parts withdrawal attempts.

              There were lots of users of Vietnam-era Hueys out there around the world, so the black market is softer for the Bell 212 helicopter parts, but still, they are harder to get and more expensive than they would be for a non-embargoed country.

              Add to that similarly-ancient avionics unless retrofitted with more black market stuff by Kamran and his soldering gun, plus pilots who appear to have been told that bad visibility over mountains will be divinely waived for the Iranian President so get in the helicopter and fly!, and you get either bang-uhoh-autorotation into a hillside, or what’s commonly known as “Controlled Flight Into Terrain”. From the crash site photos it could be either.

              Like

              1. What surprises me is that they were using the ancient Bell instead of a more modern Russian or Chinese helicopter. I mean, I know the Russian and Chinese stuff is crap. But still, that Bell was at least 45 years old.

                It’s a rather interesting data point, when you think about it.

                Like

              1. One of my characters confronts 0bama: “You recite words given to you by other people; you sign papers written by other people; you spend money taken from other people. Have you ever done anything of your own?”

                Liked by 1 person

          2. Helicopter: A collection of parts flying in loose formation around an oil leak.

            Add “middle eastern” ideas of maintenance…. and it’s more amazing the thing got even got off the ground.

            Like

        3. Provided you are in a situation where you can keep it that short. If there is any risk you will be unable to — like wilderness — actually long works better. It can be tied back to keep from getting into eyes and tucked down the back of your shirt to make it hard to grab. Because long enough to get into your eyes and too short to be tied back is the real disaster.

          Like

        2. Sacrifice a duck first. You are, after all, using duct tape.

          But there are SOUND TECHNICAL REASONS why you have to sacrifice white goat every new moon.

          Like

  11. I’ve never seen Michelle Obama naked, or seen a DNA test on her. I’m assuming someone actually saw her give birth to their two daughters, and could testify that she’s actually a woman.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Obama and spouse are Marxist creations of the CIA. So I doubt any “Official Fact” about them before the birth of “their” children.

      Liked by 1 person

    3. I’ve seen the clip of Big Mike dancing on Ellen Degeneres’s show (works hard to avoid the obvious slur….). Something down there was moving where Michelle shouldn’t have any bits, but Mike would.

      Like

      1. Phillip Jose Farmer’s “Image of the Beast”, or “Blown” had some really strange aliens with odd sexual apparatus. IIRC the Joan of Arc character had combined with Giles de Raas? in a rather disturbing fashion that might mimic what was occurring with Ms. Obama. Nah, that would just support the rumor that she’s really an alien.

        Like

  12. It’s hilarious that we have discovered that the term Conspiracy Theory was invented by the CIA to discredit plot spoilers and foreshadowing.

    Do it enough, you guys, and the readers do catch on to your tricks!

    Liked by 2 people

  13. It’s funny, yet most of our so-called comedians and satirists are leaving heaps of comedic gold just lying on the table rather than having a laugh at the expense of our so-called superiors.

    Like

  14. Boris Johnson deliberately tousled his hair as part of his image. There are witnesses and may even be video clips of him doing so. A large part of Boris was acting like a clown, but in such a way that you thought the japes were deliberate overacting and could see underneath them to be serious person within. Which was probably also an act.

    Boris is incredibly smart but he tends to think with “little Boris” and his choice in wives/mistresses has not been good politically

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Isn’t it funny that Trump has turned out to be the Road Runner, while the establishment is Wile E. Coyote?

    Isn’t it funny that even with 100% institutional capture of the government and courts in New York State, the case against Trump is so empty that even left wingers can’t pretend it’s substantive any more?

    Isn’t it funny that communist China’s imperial ambitions are falling apart not due to resistance or sabotage, but apparently from their own ineptitude?

    Isn’t it funny that the Very Very Smart People, who are convinced that they are infinitely more intelligent than you and I, cannot withstand even the mildest pushback or correction on anything?

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.