
We need some way to study culture that isn’t as silly, corrupted by Marxism and outright faddish as our current anthropology field.
No, hear me out, okay? Studying what a culture even IS and how much it influences the group it works with; what happens when the culture is broken or occupied; signs of a culture under attack; a culture under natural decay; a culture that’s gone toxic.
Because humans are social apes, it’s always a question what’s nature and what’s nurture, and because cultures as they exist currently are just a static thing, you have to look at cultural perspective, which in turn involves bias in reporting.
However, it’s possible to break through that, as through all bias in reporting issues, by having many historical reports, with many biases, and not assuming our current one is more right than the rest.
But Sarah, you’ll say, why do we need cultures to be studied? What’s with wanting all these fluffy irreproducible social science stuff? Don’t we spend enough money on those? Let’s study STEM.
Okay, you do you. And note, I’m not 100% sure these should be founded by government. In fact, I’m fairly sure they shouldn’t because wellll the inherent biases of a corrupt bureaucratic structure don’t help anything. BUT–
The other day at insty I shared this: Tough Question, Simple Answer.
Yes, I do realize it’s an old post, but I thought it was still relevant. And I wanted to point out that I agree with him on South Africa in general and on apartheid in general, but not on the whole “The population might be genetically predisposed to short-time preference and inability to plan.” Not because “racissss” (And not Kim doesn’t say “IS” because we can’t, because studies on it are all muddled, partly by being done by the apartheid regime to justify itself.) But because as far as I can determine it isn’t true.
Sure, Africa is a total mess, and Africa in general exhibits a lot of of the same pathologies (though part of this is the European export of communism which is is the worst colonialism.) But there’s really no proof they’re due to a common genetic heritage OR lack.
First of all because Africa has the most genetically diverse populations in the world, and second because African people who immigrate and make a point of acculturation often do quite well. Also a lot of African countries did well under colonial rule, and it wasn’t despite it’s native populations, but they were full contributors. Also when people bring this up, they inevitably bring up the black population of the US, which is a laugh, since 90% of them are technically what’s known in the rest of the world as “Caucasians” and Americans go on the slightest facial hints to say “that person is black.” (We recently watched American fiction, and I was baffled because I’d heard it was about a black author. I kept waiting for the black author to come in, until the character meets his family and they’re obviously black. Until then he read “Mediterranean” to me. Dan says he’s obviously black. GO FIGURE.)
Also, though this is deliberately hidden, despite all the things stacked against them, black people in America were doing quite well and were perhaps more “bourgeois” in values than white people, until the welfare state came and socked them down again. And as far as black misbehavior, it’s more or less standard “white trash” misbehavior, probably proceeding from people brought in in small groups or individually (slaves came from all over Africa) and having lost their moorings acculturating to the culture of other field hands and supervisors. So, you know “Lower class British/Irish in the 18th and early 19th century.” Like the speech. Anyway, the white underclass is going on the welfare ride along with black people in America, and both need to be freed from the degradation of low expectations.
Now, I’m not saying that there isn’t a genetic component to some human behaviors. We’re still, after all, mammals and have bodies. Oh, and an evolutionary history. It’s just that it’s not that simple. Even short/long time preference isn’t — probably — based on a single genetic trait. And all genetic traits can be employed various ways.
When I went to older son’s sweeping of every award for chemistry on his final undergrad year (not seriously. They told him “Don’t bother getting off the stage.” as they called in each new award for this and that) I will confess I felt a little uncomfortable. In the sense that every kid there but son and another kid had a German last name. And it turned out kid had a German immigrant mother, and son has a Amish great grandmother. Add it all together with the fact that chemistry — which I cordially detest — is a fussy, exacting, button counting system, and you start getting the slightest bit squirmy and going “Well, now…”
But historically that’s complete BS. First because the Germans were considered “wild and unorganized” well into the eighteenth century. Second because the communists managed to make the East Germans slovenly and short-time-preference incapable of maintaining anything.
So do I have a bad sample, or is there a correlation, and it’s just how the culture uses the “fussy, obsessive on details” genetic trait?
I’d be inclined to the latter, because, well…. because. I mean, if the entire culture is “wild” then the fussy obsessive on details gets spent on…. I don’t know. Better traps for house breakers? And the communists turned that trait into obsessive spying on everyone, till there was no energy for anything else.
In the same way, I often refer to Portugal as ADHD with borders. And it is that. It’s weird, the level of ADD that’s considered completely normal there. (And I was off the charts even for there. Oh, well.) But it took me till this last visit, when I’m almost — to the extent I’m fully acculturated here, or as much as it’s possible to be — to realize how much of Portugal’s inability to organize its way out of a wet paperbag OR maintain anything less durable than a Roman aqueduct (and even those!) is reinforced and driven to eleventy by a culture that goes “The highest virtue is doing things fast, no matter how BADLY they’re done.” And that’s pushed everywhere and by every possible means. And yes, I grew up with it (Anyone making a comment about my books gets put in the corner. Actually they’re worse if I take very long. Yes, I have an explanation, but it doesn’t matter. It is what it is) and internalized it to such an extent it took almost forty years to SEE it was there and it was bad.
And these traits can be recoverable from, if one acculturates elsewhere. I know that, because when I first moved here — I tell this story often, because it’s now hilarious — my entire family was shocked and dismayed to find out that as I was sending things over the transom, the manuscript would get rejected if I had a typo or punctuation error in the first page (Or others, but particularly the first.)
It wasn’t so much that they found I was being asked to do something impossible, but also because they couldn’t understand why I was expected — as a creative — to punctuate my manuscripts at all. “Surely the houses have people for that.”
You’ll be shocked — because I know what this blog looks like, yes, but it’s fitted in around things — that my manuscripts are actually cleaner and more grammatical than 90% of the writers’ out there. Because I spent so many years in slush, I trained myself to correctness and obsession with details. Though looking at Portugal no one would expect that.
And there’s Portugal, of course. Let’s say that to talk of innate Portuguese characteristics is …. kind of like talking about the innate genetic characteristics of street cats. My kids’ characterization of Portugal as “the reservoir tip of Europe” is mean. It’s also accurate. Genetically Portuguese are…. a little bit of this, a little bit of that, a dollop of the other thing. However they are all for real ADD AF. Even if I’m more so than most of them. And they all exhibit short-time-preference.
I suspect — to revisit the vexed question of “Africa always wins” which is not the point of this post, but needs a sort of exclamation point at the end — that Africa’s true tragedy is an overall (with exceptions, yes, I’m not stupid) climate that makes living easy for humans, and a fact that tribalism was never broken there, and tribalism is a curse on humanity. Like communism, it penalizes saving or planning for the future, in favor of short term “being in good with the group.” And it’s about as pleasant to live under as communism. Don’t be fooled by the “country borders.” Sure, countries exist in Africa, but as far as I can understand, they’re just a nifty mask for the same old tribal wars and clashes.
Which brings us back to cultures. It doesn’t matter if tribes in Africa have different cultures or genetics, their cultures are all varieties of tribal culture, and that penalizes individual action and innovation in favor of almost nihilistic obedience to and supremacy of the group. (The same nonsense our wokies want to impose here.)
And our problem is that we don’t GET cultures. The Gramscian thing of all cultures are alike, except the cultures of the oppressed which are extra nifty and should be let run rampant is killing us all.
We don’t understand cultures, or how to modify them, or how to help them eliminate bad characteristics before they damage another generation.
I know cultures aren’t sentient, but they behave as if they were. Because they embed in people’s brains when they’re so young they can’t even think, they behave as a sort of collective subconscious. And while they change and evolve over time, they are excruciatingly slow to do so.
All of this is a problem in a world of rapid innovation and deliberately open borders. If we don’t study cultures and figure out how to make the better ones prevail — those more useful to human civilization and happiness, on the individual side, because that’s the only measure we CAN use — what we end up with is hordes of locusts roaming the earth, eating out each slightly better off country. Or if you prefer, tribalism on a global scale.
Take a lot of the things we considered once upon a time problems of “overpopulation”. It turns out what they actually are is problems of a culture that has been conquered and is occupied. The women become whores (to survive the occupation by the enemy, because if your kids are of the enemy, well…) and the men become effeminate, and no one works, and– ALL of these are signs of a culture that has lost a war and been occupied. NOT of overpopulation. It is also the signs of a culture taken over by Marxists, which the culture obviously interprets as “foreign occupiers” — and if you see what they do, it’s typical colonizer stuff, from taking over the schools to punishing everyone who doesn’t display allegiance.
But no one is paying attention to that, because no one is studying the “mechanisms of culture” qua culture, and what cultures do and how they change and use humans almost as their instruments to survive/replicate/conquer/die.
It is necessary. It is urgent. And I don’t know what to do about it.
I do know it’s needed because we don’t have the …. ruthlessness to use the old methods, let alone thinking the old methods were horrible. (They were.)
In the old method, either all men over the age of three were killed (that had mixed success as women often managed to pass on enough of the conquered culture, anyway) or everyone but “the babe at the breast” was killed. That effectively destroyed the culture, and let the conquering culture — often simply more ruthless, but often also better organized and more capable of overcoming tribalism (see Rome) — become THE culture.
The history of civilization is made of such encounters, but we can’t do it. As we are, we simply can’t. And faster travel has made the world one large neighborhood.
So, we need sane, non-fluffy people to study: What cultures are (They’re not food and clothes. And they’re not race. To what extent those influence culture is debatable, but they’re not what culture IS); how cultures clash; how to make cultures that are objectively bad/destructive/useless go away without putting everyone to the sword; the symptoms that a culture is in trouble and how to fix it.
I don’t know how to do any of that, though I suspect a lot of my ponderings on it is coming out in the current headache of a book/series. (Yes, published soonish. But so weird, most of you will run screaming into the night. Never mind.)
There is an entire field of knowledge it’s urgent to study. Our culture ignores it because it’s decided culture means race.
And I have no idea how to fix it. These things always fix themselves eventually, but usually by those old, er…. ruthless methods.
If we don’t want to end up there, we’d best figure it out now.
*Because these are my two weeks of fundraising, I’m obligated to add the following:
This blog is reader funded. I don’t have a grant or a patron. You’re my patrons and only you can compensate for the toil of keeping the blog going day after day, year after year. For the full explanation of why a funding drive, and what I intend to use it for, if you’re interested, go here.
There are several ways of supporting me.
GiveSendGo, for which I make no promises meaning I’m not giving you anything for your contribution; Chapterhouse, for which I will give you my fiction that is in process and yes there will be typos, backtracking, characters who change names suddenly and other mishaps; and Patreon, for which I give you cat pspsps posts. For the more exotic ways to donate: email me for paypal address. The book promo email will do for that: bookpimping at outlook dot com. And there is the snail mail address at: Sarah A. Hoyt, 304 S Jones Blvd #6771, Las Vegas, NV 89107.
I know times are tough — for all of us — and I don’t hold it against anyone who can’t contribute. But all contributions are greatly appreciated. – SAH*




















































































































































