The most pernicious doctrine of modernity, which informs Marxism via having been in the air — thanks, Rosseau — when Marx, the synthesizing plagiarist concocted his abortion of a theory, is the idea that all evil must have causes.

The causes can’t be “because this person is broken and enjoys tormenting others.” No, because, again, thanks Rosseau, all babies are born utterly pure and wonderful, and it is only their upbringing and what we’ll call “civilization” that corrupts them and makes them evil, when someone acts in a way that destroys others or everything, it must be the fault of something done to them.

Now, if we’re going to discuss nature or nurture, we’re going to be here all day. I suspect the answer is “yes.” Like most people of my generation, I used to think that it was all mostly nurture. There have been case studies of people brought by adoptive parents where, barring mental impairment, all children mirror the parents high-IQ. Beyond statistical chance. (From something I heard from a psychologist long ago, though I think those cases are highly publicized and…. rare. So it might be luck of the draw. But never mind. We never hear of the rest.) And after all, we all know families that have certain characteristics, that would not seem to be — possibly — genetic.

Then I became a mother. Younger son is, barring small bits, like having my husband’s much more acceptable nose, my father come again. Seriously, it is to the point that if Dad weren’t still alive, or hadn’t been alive at the kid’s birth, I would fully believe he was dad’s reincarnation. It’s not just that their minds run the same way or their gestures and way of being in the world. It’s not even that they have the exact same taste in women (no, really) but that they do things that no one should do unless they’d learned it, in the precisely same way. What convinced my dad was watching my son, then three, eat an egg over easy. Both he and dad eat the white in a spiral towards the yolk, which they eat last. Son had, at that time, not seen dad since before he was eating. We can come up with some truly bizarre subconscious learning explanation, but I don’t think I’d seen dad eat an egg in years, so I even didn’t remember, much less the kid having seen it. (Like many his generation, dad fell victim to the demonization of eggs. Now in the past, fortunately, since it’s favorite food. As it’s son’s.)

Raising that kid was an education in “What is genetic.” Does he cope with the innate differently? To some extent. He’s certainly picked a different path in work, for which I’m grateful, since it seems less stressful, but then what he’s doing is something that is not viable as a career in Portugal, not unless you’re born to it. But that the base on which nurture writes is identical, and that nurture — in a different country, with a different language, with parents that were completely different than my grandparents — had so little effect blew my preconceived notions out of the water with a high depth charge. (Yes, I call him my male clone. Well, dad and I are very similar, but compared to those two I stick out like a sore thumb. Perhaps for being female. They are more like each other than either is like me.)

Anyway, I have to believe younger son is an outlier. Mostly I have to believe it, because I’ve seen people rewrite themselves from the ground up. (As much will power as that takes.) But I also have to believe it because otherwise we’re all just pre-programmed units running through the world, doing our pre-programmed stuff. Like the theory of Predestination, that’s an evil thing to think. Even if it were true, it is an evil thing. Because it robs humanity of meaning. (My apologies to those who believe predestination religiously. It is still an evil belief in a society.)

At any rate, we have proof that nurture does change us, in the movement of humanity through history. We know for a fact that people learn, and people change. That humans are a self-domesticating animal, that learned to live in close quarters with those not of their blood without instant violence.

The error of attributing too much to nature is that it causes us to fall into despair and despondence, and at society level it causes judging people not as individuals, but as units of their family. It establishes a society of castes and punishing the children for the sin of the fathers. It is the doctrine of the Eugenicists. If it were true, killing vast swathes of the population would be the path to progress. Which is why the science fiction books of the 20s are full of nattering about “racial hygiene.

The problem — besides the fact that you have to choose whom you’ll kill based on your inherent biases and what you place value on (more on that later) — is that you kill millions or billions of people. Or at least prevent them from reproducing, which seems the path the WEF would like to take. For many many reasons this is morally unacceptable.

It is also, ultimately, intellectually rock bottom stupid. Look, we don’t know enough about the human genes and what they convey to weed out people with undesirable characteristics. And if we did, we wouldn’t know what characteristics the future will require. And if we did, we would become bananas. No, literally, we would become like bananas.

Here’s the thing: We do not know nearly enough about the human genome. And the truth is we might never, because it’s like studying a novel while it’s being rewritten.

Human genes are constantly recombining and changing and mutating. We do know that. Because that’s the point of gendered reproduction. It’s not one clone reproducing himself forever, like say bananas, but a recombination of characteristics, which then recombine again the next generation.

Whether you believe we got here through evolution or not, we know evolutionary selective pressures work. We know, because we apply them artificially. Before we even became agriculturalists, by simply selecting and propagating the seeds of the plants our gatherers found most useful, we had changed most plants we ate beyond recognition. And we have evidence of species changing all out of recognition as their environment changed for long enough. (Whales. No, seriously, whales.)

So yeah, the mutations and other recombinations get selected for or not, but where’s the thing: every generation there is myriad little changes (unless you’re number two son.) Most of them are neutral. Not good, not bad. Good and bad in relation to survival. They have bloody nothing to do with our own judgements, that’s for sure.

However, an illiterate mathematical genius in the middle ages might be better at making change and calculating his own household usage of various things, but he’s not going to have the impact he’d have in the world today.

And we don’t know what will be needed in the future. Nor what “undesirable” characteristics come with it. We do know geniuses are prickly and tough to get along with — for the most part — but most people don’t know that 99% of them are also not particularly successful at working or making a mark in their chosen field. (Depending on the field.) So if we weed out for lack of agreeableness and inability to make a living, we’ll be taking out that genius in 100 that would make a difference.

Since sometimes a genius can win a war, or feed the world (no, seriously, look it up) the weeding out of such a genius is stupid and will kill millions, no matter how much he might be so annoying we want to drown him in his coffee cup. (What? I am the dumb one in the family, guys. There have been days.)

To make things worse, most of our eugenicists, like the ones of the 20th century are hung up on completely irrelevant characteristics, like the color of skin/hair/eyes. While you can make sweeping generalizations about vast portions of the world based on IQ tests, or how well those regions do, that’s poppycock, not science. IQ tests are relatively useful in a more or less homogeneous culture (even one like ours) and even then not the way most people think. (There’s a sweet spot for success. Up or down from that is bad, bad, bad.) But once you apply it to other cultures where nutrition, early learning, etc. are different, the result will be utter garbage. And yes, nutrition makes a huge difference. One of the ways in which younger son is different from dad is an additional 3 inches, bringing him to 6’4″ a height he doesn’t have any ancestors having on either side of the family. But you know, childhood nutrition, and not being victim to constant infections before the age of six make a difference.

What we do know is that there is no linkage between how dark or light your skin is and your mental prowess, ability to plan, or basic human decency. The moron (real one, though probably not genetic, since her kids are normal) in my elementary school class was blond and blue eyed.

Yes, all cultures make broad assumptions about physical characteristics associated with “smart.” The one that amuses me most, coming from a family of mathematicians and scholars who are built like the hulk, is that all geniuses are tiny and skinny. Every year at the beginning of school, my teachers would ask me how many years I’d been held back, and proceeded to treat me like a dunce until the first test. After which they were very confused.

Is there a relationship? I don’t know. It would seem to be small and slim would select for high functioning intellect, because… well, you have to survive. And I confess that through their schooling career, my kids looked like four of their high-achieving friends glued together. But is the relationship unbreakable? Uh. Obviously not. (And my school friend who coined the “For the love of heaven, just copy my answers. Don’t think. When you think you ruin everything.” Was tiny and very smart looking. Note LOOKING.)

At any rate the human race is not as genetically diverse as you think. I don’t remember right now if we’re more or less inbred than house cats (why, yes, reading someone with ADHD is like micro-dosing wikipedia. Deal.) but we are inbred enough not to have crazy genetic variety. And genetic variety is important because some people will have a natural immunity or ability to survive a pathogen or a cataclism. We take those people away and we become bananas: a species so inbred it can be completely wiped out by any shock.

Which would seem to be the opposite of eugenicist aims.

But I’ve spent too much time on nature — I need coffee — perhaps because antisemitism is rearing its ugly head and giving me 1930s vibes all over again.

The major danger of our age is nurture. If you believe everything is nature and MORE IMPORTANTLY that you can trace defects in character or breaks with civilization to this or that specific action, you’ll distort society beyond belief. Which is what we’ve been doing.

I confess to having believed it at one time. I think most of us did. It was drunk with mother’s milk. To an extent, the Puritans were already trying that, though their belief was that we were broken by trifling too much with the world and being too easy on ourselves. After that came Rosseau and his belief that people were born perfect, and if we just let them be they’d grow to be noble savages. (A creature, that, like the successful communist society has never appeared in the real world.)

This influenced a lot of the way the West developed. And frankly, since their (deranged) revival in the sixties, the Rosseaunians are now the dominant intellectual/political/moral force in the world and what they are imposing on the rest of us is destroying civilization and can destroy humanity. (The fact that they are also eugenicists, often the other way than they claim to be just makes them extra poisonous.)

Right now, partly through being “anti-capitalist” the left believes that our society — capitalism, the demand for civilized behavior, etc — is responsible for everything an individual does wrong.

And therefore “It’s a fair cop, but society is to blame.”

And therefore, no one should be punished for crimes they couldn’t help committing. Hence, the lawlessness in our big cities, but that’s not all.

This belief also feeds our welfare programs, because, you know, if people steal and rob, it’s because they’re poor. If we stop them being poor, there shall be no lawlessness. This is btw impossible to falsify. If they’re not as rich as the richest, this might be what causes them to commit crimes. (Look, seriously, no. It has no correlation. And where it has it it’s the other way. Those who are by nature lawless tend to have other problems that get in the way of staying relatively prosperous. I’m not going to say our legal system treats the poor well. At this point our legal system needs a kick upside its behind, as it doesn’t treat anyone well, but simply that to the extent there’s a covalence, it goes the other way more often than not.)

And this applies internationally. All that foreign aid is 80% “If we give them money, they’ll be as wealthy as we are” they won’t be violent. Letting the “refugees” come in by the bucket load, is ultimately “If they come in here, we’ll look after them, and they won’t be criminals.”

Add to this a belief that all the people who are crazy and can’t function are so because they have been mistreated by “capitalism” and you have all the homeless everywhere, who can’t be punished for anything, because somehow nothing is their fault.

The amazing thing is not that we are breaking down as a civilization, running as we do on a belief that not only hasn’t been proven, but which has been disproved over and over and over again.

What’s amazing is that we still function at all.

And yet, the chasm between the assumption that “People do bad things because bad things were done to them” and reality is a dangerous one.

Take the matter of what the Gazans did in Israel in 10/7. Those horrific actions, to the west, must only mean that these poor people are so horribly oppressed.

In fact, they wouldn’t be completely wrong. These poor people are horribly oppressed by their violent, hateful culture which has institutionalized envy and entitlement to a level even the Marxists can’t conceptualize. Which is why none of their Arab (or Persian) brethren has offered them asylum and instead will do everything to keep them out of their own countries.

Because their culture is evil and broken, and like the mind of a psychopath, urges them to take “revenge” for wrongs that were never committed. In the end what they are taking revenge for is other people’s ability to live sane and productive lives. They are consumed with envy at this and hate everyone who is more productive or happier than them. Which, btw, is not only the Israelis, but all of us. Heck, it’s most of the Arab countries, and most of the East, and probably vast portions of Africa.

They are indeed a vast open air prison, but not through lack of opportunity, or Israeli “oppression.” If you want to weep read up on the aid that has been poured into that hell hole. It could have been used for all sorts of things, including starting industry, educating children to do something, anything other than monomaniacally hate everyone not of them.

However, regardless of money pouring in, regardless of what they’re given, themselves — their unjust wardens over themselves — keep the population focused only on envy and hatred, and have children’s programs glorifying suicide bombing. Which is why all the money goes to weapons and terror tunnels.

I don’t know how that can be solved, short of taking away every child under three and distributing them to sane, civilized families the world over. And thus ending the problem in a generation.

But I know it can’t be solved by giving in and giving them more money, and stopping the retribution for their horrific actions. Because what we have taught that culture is that the more horrific their actions, the more the west will give them and treat them as victims.

And that is destroying them further, and making them a gun pointed at the world’s head.

Envy is a sin for reason. Whether or not you believe in punishment after death, envy destroys people and their ability to live now. Both those who envy and those they envy.

(This is by the way why the deranged leftist fight against inequality is deranged. There is no way of making a society perfectly equal, short of killing everyone. The root of the problem is envy, not inequality.)

I see the Bidenmites, that cursed tribe, have used their sock puppet to call for cease fire. This is ridiculous. No cease fire without total surrender. And the punishment at that needs to be hard enough their grandchildren know about it.

A total ceasing of Western support and cutting off their sources of aid from their terror sponsors would do it. Starvation and lack of modern conveniences has a way of concentrating the mind and making a culture change. And change fast. Oh, not to sweetness and light, maybe, but definitely towards “Will not attack, because that hurts.”

The burned hand teaches best. No, it doesn’t make those who burned their hand go and stick it in the fire because they’re mad. Or if it does, well, maybe the eugenicists have a point there. Such a short circuit in the brain would definitely make survival impossible, and perhaps should be allowed to perish. (Yes, I know that’s not what it means.)

The problem is convincing the Rosseaunians that this is needed.

Their wrong model of reality will kill us all, otherwise.

This ain’t no paradise. This ain’t no garden of Earthly delights. And you can’t get there from here.

Time and again when reading history, we come across some horrible act of violence, some terrible event, and historians from the safety of their offices and the height of their theories ask how this was possible? How could humans do this beastly thing? How is it even possible that civilized man, civilized, I say, could do this or that or the other.

The truth is that humans, despite all our striving to do better, are creatures where our violence and the ability to dream up and execute horrible atrocities are as much part of us are our dreams, our moral thinking, our thirst for knowledge and our theories.

I will admit the events of October 7 in Israel shocked me. Which is a measure of how soft and “civilized” I’ve become, how convinced of the predictability of the world and my fellow man. which is stupid.

Because this ain’t no paradise. And we can’t get there from here.

And because Israel has always been under attack, since it was founded, and because its neighbors are vile savages, marinated in hatred. (Fight me!)

But that is part of it. Humans have, with great effort, with discipline, with careful raising of their children and with philosophies that value life — be they Judeo Christianity or our national creed — raised themselves above the petty cruelty, the wanton sadism of the not-so-noble savage. We can, in places, in times, given enough abundance, enough time, enough luck, and enough investment in certain ways of living, raise ourselves above creatures that kill innocent women and children. We can even rise above creatures that make the bodies of horses and young men into art installations.

The beast inside isn’t gone. It’s not vanquished. It’s quiet. And kept quiet by ideals and thoughts, by our front brain repressing the impulses of beast.

However, this is never universal. This is never everywhere.

The silly people who think humans can be made perfect with ‘education’ — by which they mean only information — and that humans will never behave like beasts, unless they have been given reason are wrong.

Their cries of ‘teach man not to rape’ are no less silly, but perhaps slightly less infuriating than their belief that the uncivilized are a sort of innocent children, who will only strike out if they’re “oppressed” and they have “Suffered.”

Teaching men not to rape is of course the aim of every civilized society — in uncivilized ones, women don’t have the power to say yes or no to sex — but there will always be men who refuse to learn. It’s not a lack of knowing that rape is wrong. It’s that they enjoy raping, and they’re going to do it as long as they can get away with it. They will lie and tell a sob story of what drove them to it if it will allow them to continue doing what pleases them with no punishment.

And of course, there are entire civilizations of this type, by either self-selection or culture.

The point is that those poisonous cultures kill because they believe they are entitled to kill. They enjoy it, and they will continue doing it, and lying to avoid punishment, so long as there’s no punishment coming.

It is important to understand this.

Humans aren’t born innocent and perfect. There doesn’t need to be evil committed against them to teach them to commit evil.

Humans are born wishing to do whatever brings them pleasure. And if what brings them pleasure hurts others, they’ll still do it as long as they can get away with it.

Yes, temperaments vary, and evil tendencies can be trained out of some. Others will never have the tendency with that strength. I can honestly say I never wanted power over others. It strikes me as scary and somewhat tiresome to have to make decisions for adults. (I wasn’t that happy making them for children. In fact making decisions is something I had to learn and force myself to do.) Other people obviously are driven to getting it.

However, we all have things we really like to do, and will do if we can get away with it, even if we know it’s not good for us or others. And that’s us, people who were trained fairly early on in a society that values respecting others.

But when the culture goes sour, when savagery is encouraged and when it’s believed a source of strength, and mindless violence against others is treated as proof of worthiness and power, be it in the Gaza strip or amid our ante-fa, it must be met.

There must be no excuses. There must be no “more sinned against than sinning.” There must be no excuses.

Because if the civilized won’t stand for civilization, savagery wins.

And when savagery wins, all men must perforce become savages. there is no safe refuge for the weak, the meek, the small or the old. There is only blood and death, and paradise, or even that little counterfeit you can find in an historian’s office, recedes a bit further.

The problem of course, is that to stand for civilization, civilized man must eschew its illusions, be it the idea of dialectical oppression, the idea of the noble savage, or the idea that it can all be solved with information.

Humans must, in final instance, defend civilization in the only language the uncivilized understand: by making it hurt, and making it hurt badly enough that the savage stops doing that which brings it pleasure. It won’t be reformed. It won’t love you. You won’t win hearts and minds. But it will stop savagery. And given enough generations, the savagery recedes, and it might come to accept your rules.

The illusion that violence begets violence; that making the savage hurt makes him more savage; all of it is part of the false gospel of Marx, who among his other many charming characteristics, had a complete and utter inability to understand humans.

Hence, his having re-feralized civilized man, and unleashed unparalleled savagery upon the world.

It’s time to shed Marxism, that illusion of fools. And it’s time to shed Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s stupidity. Savages are savages. They live a miserable life, and create misery and death. But they will do it, as long as they’re allowed to.

We need again the confidence of our ancestors, and the certainty that the West — the civilization that fed and healed most of the humans in the world, and lifted them from vile and dread need — is best. We have our civilization. And there’s nothing the howling savages who kill defenseless women and children and howl for the blood of those who never hurt them can teach us.

Except that it is sometimes needed to unleash our inner savage to defend civilization. And then to chain him again, so that our children don’t need to know his horrors.

We have lived too long with our illusions, and our safety. Among us there are those who think we are now in paradise, with a new man and a new woman (and a new fifty flavors of sexes unknown) and that they can, with their minds will everyone’s happiness forever.

And they will do very horrible things, and empower very horrible savages because of this delusion.

Like their pets, they won’t stop until and unless they’re made to.

It is our duty, our honor, and our tragedy to be the generation that must stop them.

May G-d have mercy on our souls.

Thoughts on the Gaza Situation by Frank Hood

I’m a historian, and I have a hard time seeing a good way out of this situation. How many innocents are there in Gaza? I don’t know. History does not say much for their innocence. Islamic conquests have always been brutal with no regard for what they consider inhuman life–that is anyone who doesn’t submit to Allah. Unlike the voices you hear in the streets of the West, the Geneva Conventions allow for self-defense in kind. Use mustard gas on the US, the Geneva Conventions would allow the US to use mustard gas in return. Any other policy would be martyrdom.

World War II was waged against civilians more than soldiers and armies. The American forces tried “precision strategic bombing” and found it was not only ineffective but self-destructive, losing up to 40% of their bombers and personnel on every mission with little effect on war production by Germany. The Germans had already tried to wipe London off the face of the earth, by targeting civilians by late 1940. By summer of 1942 they had also methodically followed a policy of executing Jews and sometimes Ukranians for the crime of existing. They did it enthusiastically just as Hamas machine-gunned, raped, and beheaded unarmed civilians.

After WWII, America spent a lot of money and effort at writing propaganda to deprogram both Germans and Japanese, transforming their societies in the process, because it was only a minority in both countries who refused to believe the lies, boasts, and grievances of their own leaders. Could the Israelis do that to the Gazans? Hamas has controlled life in Gaza for decades, inculcating hatred and dehumanization of Jews (and also Americans–remember Iran considers us the Great Satan to Israel’s Little Satan). Does anyone believe “world opinion” would stand for such a thing from Israel? Israel has been publicly accused of genocide for decades in the streets and the halls of governments. Why wouldn’t they be tempted to adopt a policy of the only good Palestinian is a dead Palestinian if that is already what everyone tells them they have done since 1948?

Don’t be lulled into Hannah Arendt’s delusion of “the banality of evil”. Eichmann lied his ass off, and she fell for it. Read any account of the death camps and massacres from survivors and witnesses. People have to be taught to hate, the song says, but, trust me, they have been taught very well throughout history.

Do you want peace? The historical path to peace from ape tribes to Genghis Khan has been, kill all the men, rape all the women, so their loyalty to their former nation/race is mollified by their loyalty to their progeny, or salt the earth, and carry away anyone left alive to a far country to be slaves.

If you refuse to allow Israel to take full control of Gaza, and its schools for decades to deprogram the hatred Gazans have been taught, then why would you not expect the Israelis to eventually live up to the reputation you have saddled them with?

As I said at the beginning, I see no good way out of this. We are now left with the least bad of possible choices whatever that may be. In Mein Kampf, Hitler was not shy about his goals, so when you hear crowds chant, “From the river to the sea,” you’d best take those people at their word, and decide what to do about those who want you to die.

****

A Jewish friend of mine wrote his own essay about Gaza that caused me to reflect on more of what I wrote above. Regarding strategic vs. population bombing, he noted that bombing civilians has the opposite of the claimed effect on civilian morale and support for the war effort. That has proven true, but what population bombing, when applied effectively as it was in Dresden and Tokyo, did do was target the workforce rather than the factories themselves since the factories, refineries, etc. were easier to protect. In Germany and Japan, population bombing had a marked effect on those countries’ ability to keep producing arms at scale.

As to the issue of antisemitism, it’s rather ironic that Germany was actually the most open country in Europe for opportunity for the Jews before the rise of the Nazis. There’s a reason most American Jewish surnames are Germanic, although many are also Eastern European and Russian. The French and Spaniards did a very thorough job of eliminating their Jews albeit by ‘somewhat’ less horrific means. “Unexpectedly”, expelling the Jews from a country seems to always lead to a decline in that country’s science, technology, and literature. Gee, who’da thunk?

My fellow baby boomers and I actually grew up in a golden age for American Jews, so perhaps our perspective is skewed. Before WWII, those same Ivy League universities that are now being solicitous of those who hate Israel deliberately discriminated against Jews in their admission policies. The East Coast upper-crust did not want to have their ‘anointed’ heirs have to compete on an even playing field with ‘those Jews’. Many Jews who became members of the ruling class (cough, Alan Dershowitz, Chuck Schumer) were/are secular Jews, who venerate their culture but not the religion that built it, the equivalent of what we Christians call Easter & Christmas Christians. It’s important to ‘show the flag’ at the High Holy Days, but little else.

“People of the Book” is indeed an accurate way to describe the Jews, in my opinion. In fact some time ago, I remember reading that South Korea had instituted teaching the Torah and Talmud because they wanted to copy the Jewish advantage and teach their people to learn to think and reason as the Jews have always taught their children. Although I only have second-hand knowledge, I understand that a big part of the bar/bat mitzvah ceremony is the candidate’s (I don’t know what the about-to-be adult is called.) not only learning the law but being able to give a discourse on part of the law to explain it.

When I first got into the software business in the early 80’s, I used to joke that 90% of us were either Jews or Catholics, because education and reasoning were considered as important a part of our religious tradition as faith. (That’s a separate subject to expound upon another time.) Now of course, it’s more Asians because they also culturally revere learning, and consider it the path to success for their children. (Insert Jewish mother joke here.)

When Russia invaded Ukraine, I of course, sided with the Ukranians as the unjustly injured party, but was made quite uncomfortable by the very enthusiastic, unanimous agreement of ‘all the right people’. I had the feeling that the word had gone out JournoList style, and, like most Americans, I only had a dim view of the realities in Ukraine and Russia. Similarly, the word has gone out about Gaza that Zionists/Israelis/Jews must be destroyed for their ‘evil’ deeds. I hope that is proving quite a shock for leftist Jews.

Reading the section of a biography of Reagan about his presidency of SAG gave me some insight, but reading Witness by Whitaker Chambers gave me a much deeper understanding of how these things work. Ask me about Dalton Trumbo sometime. The power of the Communist/True Believer is that they never compromise. They take the received position and follow it totally. Others in our culture, like the naive academics of our youth, believe in compromise. To a Communist/True Believer compromise can only be strategic when circumstances place them in too weak of a position. They compromise on the surface, only to work to undermine that compromise with all their might by less open means.

One more thing before I close is that I was puzzled by the concept of Hamas thugs videoing and broadcasting their cruel atrocities. It seemed to me to be irrational and counter-productive. A writer I follow explained the strategic goal. He contends it’s a practice that has been ongoing in the Balkans since the Kosovo war. You spread word of your vile brutality in order to scare the mothers of your enemy, convincing them they and their children will be at risk of such atrocities if they move to the territory that the enemy wants to claim, thus essentially surrendering it to the perpetrators of those atrocities.

I apologize for not making this post more cohesive, but my thoughts are still very disordered. Still I feel compelled to share post, hoping that what I have said might help others learn facts that they were unaware of.

Yesterday, I linked one of Sargent Mom’s posts at Chicago Boyz (I still find it funny that my friend who is neither a boy nor from Chicago posts there) and on my reading it, and the comments before linking, I found that the very first comment was tediously familiar.

Note I’m not saying the commenter if a troll or ill intentioned. I’ve known him “from the blogs” for long before I started using my own name, and/or came out politically. I just think he’s not thinking things through. As aren’t all the people who make that same comment.

They are also hopelessly provincial, historically blinkered or, yes, both. It pains me to say so, but I can’t for the life of me figure out how people convince themselves of this nonsense otherwise. Though I will admit there might be a strong contention of “kids these days” and “get off my lawn” in there. In which case — at sixty — I’d like to point out that getting old is no reason to convince yourself of a bunch of nonsense. There’s much you can shake your fist at the younger generations for without swallowing old Soviet propaganda (spit it out. It’s been up Stanlin’s dead ass) or spreading pernicious lies that blackpill or worse the rest of the people still fighting.

The comment goes like this in its most commonly found form “The Republic is gone. Within its earstwhile boundaries, there are just a bunch of disparate people, who have nothing in common. It’s time to break it all apart and go our separate ways.”

My normal response to that would be “Poppycock on stilts” and throwing the nearest dictionary in the general direction of your head.

But because it keeps surfacing, it is obvious most people have swallowed this nonsense without having any clue where it came from, how it contradicts history or how utterly stupid it is. So I’ll unpack.

First, its origins: Perhaps it is unfair to call it Soviet Propaganda. I suspect it is, because of how deeply laid-in it is with a certain generation, but I know for a fact it started being widely circulated in the mid nineties, when the Soviet Union had fallen apart. Though it was mostly spread by old Soviets indulging revenge-fantasies, and by their friendly useful idiots in the US singing along with their old mentors.

All of a sudden, when my kids were little, the idea was everywhere, served up by every single leftist “The US will now fall apart like the Soviet Union fell apart. The only thing that held each together was the need to fight the other.”

It persisted till the mid two thousands, everywhere. I even remember a giggle-worthy pseudo-scholarly paper by some Russian about how the US would fall apart and in what lines, which made it blindly clear the poor dear only knew the US from Hollywood movies.

Do I need to unpack why it is utterly insane?

Yes. The Soviet Empire was mostly held together by the cold war. Let’s put it more bluntly: by the US helping them maintain it locked tight, because due to the cold war and Soviet propaganda, we were terrified Russia might get mad and bomb us all with its superior (largely imaginary) weapons.

(And Russia finally had a beginning on the empire of their dreams, which ideally for them would compass the entire Earth. Paranoiacs are like that.)

However Russia, with its very old culture, its crazy new Communist cult, and its even older tendency to want to invade and subdue everyone else so they don’t attack her is not the US, and never was. Because the Soviet Union fell apart, it didn’t nor does it follow that the Us should also. This is sort of like saying “Because you can beat egg whites into a firm froth, you should also be able to beat egg yolks into a firm froth.” Er…. what?

Neither of these things is like the other, and because the Soviets resented losing their empire and wanted the US to fall apart, it doesn’t oblige us to do so to make them happy in their revenge fantasies, okay.

Alright, Sarah, you’ll say, but just because the USSR’s bitter remnants believed it, it doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Do you see all our divisions and all our blah blah blah?

Yeah I see them. I also — as an outsider who became an insider — am here to tell you that all of those, save the divisions between Americans and those new imports brought over the border these last few years or those imports who are consciously staying foreign, are very small.

No, seriously.

Look: I’ve lived all over this great land. Even during my 30 years in Colorado, we made extensive trips elsewhere to visit and because we have friends/colleagues everywhere. This not counting the fact both our boys dated girls from all over. (Odds, you know?)

There are differences. Sometimes deep differences, in how you interact, where you shop, how you shop, and such. However, if you dropped me blindfolded into various cities in succession, I’d be able to tell you which ones were in America from the way we …. move, the way we look, and the way we hold ourselves.

I’ll never forget when, ten years after moving here, I visited Portugal and my mom had a melt down because having passed me on the street, she didn’t recognize me, just thought I was “some tourist.” This was capped by “You have become American.” (I’m not older son. I didn’t rub it in and say “Why, thank you, ma’am.” BUT I thought it.)

Go to the area where most of your local recent arriveds are and look at them. You’ll see the difference without much effort. I can’t fully explain it, but to me the rest of the world holds itself like a dog expecting the foot to come out and kick them at any minute. We don’t. In fact, that look in an American is a sign of profound trauma.

More importantly, when we had to suddenly function for a month in another state without help, while the national brands and chains helped, mostly we’d have found our way easily enough, just because it’s America. There are commonalities.

Having real-estate shopped across states just recently, you can suss out a neighborhood, evaluate your neighbors, and choose an area which you might or might not love, but you can live in easily enough in a week or so.

What I’m trying to say is despite all the regional differences, there is an overculture which is “American” and one that makes it easier for an American to fit in another area of America. Now, part of that overculture is of course believing them guys ain’t like us y’all. But that’s something completely different.

The only places with truly different and often hostile cultures are fractured, purposely held apart places, including ghettos/inner cities and college campuses.

Which brings us to the whole “We just found out there are enemies in our midst!’ Did you? Really? JUST found out? Well, you must have been covering your ears and shutting your eyes pretty tight.

Colleges have been embeds of anti-Americanism since I’ve come here. The joke about the student who comes home and lectures the parents on not celebrating thanksgiving has been a joke forever. (And not funny, because true.) The other innovations? One day in 2000 I was working in my yard and by a trick of acoustics heard my neighbor across the street discuss his son, who had brought a boy as his SO to Thanksgiving last year, and this year was bringing a girl, and they didn’t even care what the girl was, wasn’t it great? The vice-versa is not that rare, either. Any direction. Now of course, it would be his son thinks he’s a girl.

In fact, the only thing that has happened since I have been here is that the anti-Americanism has moved explicitly down to Kindergarten and up. (Implicitly it was already in my 12th grade history book in 1981 when I was an exchange student. It already was clear enough to make me fume.) It has done so because they are “educated” and think everyone MUST agree with them. But in doing so, it has become visible for everyone, and the counter-attack is everywhere and truly ferocious, because people might tolerate their young adult children becoming idiots, but you don’t mess with their babies.

On that, btw, note that my generation already was heavily indoctrinated anti-American. I remember that none of my classmates would admit to America’s good qualities. It was so…. gauche. And yet, unless I mistake it, my generation formed the core of the Tea Parties. And we’re still here. Because those of us — even those of us with graduate degrees. Even those of us with graduate degrees from Europe! — who grew up, married and have kids know what reality is. Those with experience abroad, know how rare it is what we have here. And we want to keep it.

One additional point, here: the culture used to be WAY more diverse. WAY more. Pre-expressways and TV, them guys over there not only talked funny, but they had other strange habits. I know because I met with remnants of that in my inlaws’ generation. (In fact, I loved my FIL’s Connecticut accent (I’m an accent-loving person, except for my own) and was shocked and startled to hear it come out of my husband’s mouth when awakened in the middle of the night by a would-be-intruder this summer. Suddenly my relatively accentless husband was gone, and a Connecticut patrician was there. And he wasn’t amused.)

In fact, it might have been impossible for a continent-sized nation to have a common culture and way of being in the world absent fast-travel and fast means of communication. And it might be impossible for us not to with that.

Going further back in history, and when the fe(de)ral government was a less powerful polity and states could get their freak on with nobody bothering them, I remember reading a biography of someone shortly after the revolution (Well, you see, there’s this mystery series with a ghost that I want to write. Might involve going to Connecticut for a six month stay, heaven help me. We’ll see if the story shuts up) where this person was in Maryland, escaping the crazy puritans of New England, and then had to get away from there, because Maryland was full of crazy Catholic laws, etc.

We were more desunited in the past. In culture. And it was by region. We were still the United States, where it counted.

“But Sarah, it’s all gone. It’s all vanished. We’re not respecting the laws of the Republic, or the Constitution!”

Ah yup. And I’d agree with you there. However, just because we’re behaving very badly it doesn’t mean the laws are gone. Just that we’re ignoring them. And you know, to an extent we’ve been violating the Constitution, more or less, since we adopted it. Like our flag, it is still there. And we often come back to it. Sideways. Upside down. Kicking and screaming, but we do.

Look, there were worse — far — violations under Woodrow Wilson, FDR and frankly a lot of others in the 20th century. It’s just you didn’t hear about them, because the press didn’t tell you. So you had this idea that everything was hunky dory.

Part of the impression that everything is falling apart and the center cannot hold is that Mass Media can no longer hold the uber-narrative, and those of us who see cracks in it and would rather believe our lying eyes can find each other and create our own spaces. That doesn’t mean things on the ground are worse. Only that it looks that way, because you hear more voices, not one over-arching, all-singing-together-narrative.

Now, are there many among us who are frankly repulsive in their disdain for the land and the law that gave them everything? A-yup. And the pro-Hamas demonstrations are only a small show of that.

But here’s the thing, there always were. And if you say that it’s particularly bad now, I’m going to laugh in “I remember the seventies.”

And if you are going to scream in unassimilated immigrants, I’m going to say “Drives me bonkers too, and I think we need closed borders and a decade or so of mass deportations and of very limited legal immigration while we sort ourselves out.” And? Every period of mass migration did this. Mass migrations are a very bad thing. Combined with a welfare state and a victimhood ethos, they’re horrendous.

Doesn’t mean they’re lethal. Though remedy best come fast-ish within the next decade. As frankly, I suspect it will.

But you have to remember that’s not “Americans.” Americans are those who were born and raised here, or those who bothered to do the work to be more American than not. Those who haven’t are “people living here.” Not “Americans.”

And btw, my kids had a lot of friends who had one foreign-born parent. The kids were Americans. Often annoyingly so. (Note one foreign parent, not both, and none of them lived in an embedded foreign enclave.) In fact, those with one-foreign-born parent were more likely to believe in America as a credal nation.

Speaking of: America is a credal nation. Yes, it’s a land mass (and no, we’re not giving an inch of it to the idiot commies. For one, it would be like what Israel did when it pulled out of Gaza. We don’t need an enemy that close) and yes, it’s an history, a culture, and a way of living. Also a certain genetic heritage, and trust me, it’s still present in America. My kids might be second generation Americans (first born) on my side, but on the other side they’ve been here since before America was independent (and ancestors fought in the revolutionary side), are related to several presidents, and have a considerable contingent that greeted the pilgrims from the shore, okay? My ah…. new and impure blood (snort giggle. I’m just a mutt, y’all) didn’t erase that history. And both of my boys are very proud of it. It’s just good every once in a while to import a bit of DNA, less everyone have twenty toes and play banjo really well.

BUT those saying The Republic is Dead are mostly referring to it in the credal sense.

Nations don’t die because they go through a period of lawlessness. Almost every older (almost all of them) nation has gone through this. They go through periods of lawlessness, or even being outright occupied, and then come back.

But for a credal nation held together by “this we hold to be true” it can feel like it’s all gone.

Go read your Bible, kindly. No, I mean it, even if you are not a believer. Find an old testament. Steal it from a hotel room, if you must, and read the story of Israel.

Credal nations don’t go away. They just don’t. Look at all the foes of the Israelites. The Persian empire is gone, whatever the Iranians think. So are the others, including the mighty Romans. That little credal nation of Israel, though? Well, it went a long time without land, but it is still a people and a creed. And it will be.

I suspect should we be so unfortunate as to lose our land and our common links to each other, and our living together, Americans will yet persist. We might become even more genetically dilute (for us it will take effort) but 100 yeas from now or 500 there will be people claiming to be Americans (Or as some very strange sf writer made it, turning an insult on the boards into a point of pride, as we do, Usaians) even if they really can’t prove an ancestor ever set foot on the continent. And even if some of them are blue skinned and have tentacles.

And as long as the creed is there, we will come back, as an idea at some point.

Not that our falling apart is anywhere near. No, stop that. We are not Rome. The idea that we were is another Soviet idiocy. We used some of the forms, but dear Lord, not the …. history, the feel, the genetics. And if we were, that horrible Rome of the decadence continued for a thousand years or so.

If I had to guess we probably have that long. Maybe more.

Oh, granted, we’ll go through periods much, much worse than this. And periods much better. Nations are things of humans, and that means they’re not…. pure ideas, that live in the purity of being themselves. Every nation goes through very bad times. And comes back. Often seeming decadence, or occupation, or attack, teaches the nation what it SHOULD be.

This doesn’t excuse you from fighting for America to be what it should be.

“But Sarah, wouldn’t it be better to divide?”

HOW? Do you see any “cut on the dotted line” lines on the map? Because I don’t.

And the American feeling and beliefs aren’t quietly divided into states or even regions. The first civil war happened the way it did because the South had common economic and cultural interests the North was unwilling to tolerate. (I’m not going to dip my toe anymore into that. And remember, it’s a forbidden topic for good and sufficient reason. BUT:) There was a clear geographic demarcation, even if the borders were fuzzy.

Now? Oh, for the love of Bob. Yes, there are baked in blue states. But if you think they’re that way because it’s what the population wants, let’s talk. I saw my state flipped from under me by massive fraud securing a tiny margin then going vote-by-mail.

Almost every state that’s baked in blue has some procedural trick (CA) or vote-by-mail holding it that way. What is the will of the people? What do the people believe? I don’t know. And neither do you. If you’re trusting the press, you need help of the mental kind.

I have had three very different people, in/from very different circles tell me they think NYC went Trump in 2020 and that’s why the occupiers are determined to destroy and punish it. Is it true? I don’t know. I found their reasons compelling. So. Why are all big cities hard left? Well, darlings, because vote fraud is hellofeasy in a big city. All you need is well organized vote fraud groups that control the polls. And one side that refuses to fight it. (Trust me. 2012 drove me nuts. And Colorado Springs was not that large.)

Now there is another thing, which is that in the big cities a lot of people work for colleges and big corporations. Judging by the number of you flying under false names and telling me for the love of heaven not to out you, there is a substantial legion that confesses progressivism from the lips out, while hating it in their breast. And the more they’re forced to confess it the more they hate it. But they can speak progressivism very very well (I’ve seen some of you under your real names, yes) and pass. The problem being that in those areas people overestimate the number of the true lefty believers and anti-Americans around them, because they are not allowed to tell the truth or appear as they are in public. It’s poison.

I have a strong feeling I can’t substantiate but is based on the amount of fraud needed and obvious even in supposed bastions of the left, that this is not a 50/50 country. It is at the very worst a 75/25 country, with the 25 being the “progressives.” But even then, I expect about half of that are true believers, and the rest are sleep walkers, who are convinced of the media narrative and that they have to vote for the left because the right are “racissss sexisss homophobes, and WORSE uneducated hicks.”

A lot of that narrative broke badly with the events in Israel and the displays in this country. I’ve been more sleep walkers awake than at any time since 9/11.

And the rest of the left are either very young and indoctrinated, or well…. the same old Soviet-lovers who never woke up and never will. But by themselves they’re not a reason to break up this great country.

Even if we could break up. Even if there were clear regions, instead of each of us knowing friends or relatives who are enmeshed in the left’s narrative, and who live next door, it would be inadvisable. The left can’t build. Only envy. And that means if we separate, we will prosper and they will hate us.

I refer you to October 7 in Israel as what would happen with neighbors whose whole purpose is hating us and taking us down.

So let’s eschew and bury that foolishness once and for all. This is our land. The Republic isn’t dead or close to it, though it’s occupied by an implacable enemy. Which we should each fight, overtly and covertly in every inventive and relentless way possible.

Because after this, comes a revival. They can’t win. And in many ways we already have. But because the defeat took a hundred years, the revival will be slow.

I might not see it, but others will. (Yeah, probably not others of my blood. And? They will be Americans. Even if they’re polka dotted with tentacles.)

And it will be all worth it.

Book promo

If you wish to send us books for next week’s promo, please email to bookpimping at outlook dot com. If you feel a need to re-promo the same book do so no more than once every six months (unless you’re me or my relative. Deal.) One book per author per week. Amazon links only. Oh, yeah, by clicking through and buying (anything, actually) through one of the links below, you will at no cost to you be giving a portion of your purchase to support ATH through our associates number. A COMMISSION IS EARNED FROM EACH PURCHASE.*Note that I haven’t read most of these books (my reading is eclectic and “craving led”,) and apply the usual cautions to buying. I reserve the right not to run any submission, if cover, blurb or anything else made me decide not to, at my sole discretion.– SAH

FROM RACONTEUR PRESS, WITH STORIES BY M. C. A. HOGARTH AND DAVID BOCK: Moggies Back in Space (Raconteur Press Anthologies Book 14)

Cats go where they want. Moggies even more so. When humans go to space, obviously cats will come along to make sure their staff are doing what they’re supposed to.

Join these 10 authors as they explore what cats can do in space.

FROM DUSTIN BALLARD: Dueling Wizards: The Sellsword Saga

In the gritty fantasy world of Galhadria, a down on his luck mercenary limps into a dangerous border town.

Sellsword Cas is broke and battered, but he senses opportunity.

Three rival wizards vie for control of town and are paying good coin for mercenaries. Cas plays one faction against another, meaning to gather enough gold to escape – but as blood is shed and employers betrayed, he finds himself with fewer and fewer options to get out of this town alive.

FROM CAROLINE FURLONG: Debris (The Rise of the Discarded Series Book 1)

Lost in thought, Ayar’s mind was on his invention that would allow premature griffin cubs to survive. He had no inkling he would rescue a creature that he suspected might be rational. Who would put one of their own out to die like that?

Rhys Callahan wanted to avoid a point of known pirate activity. Then he flew directly into one, and his ship was shot out of the sky. He managed a terrifying crash-landing on the nearest planet only to find himself among regressed humans who thought he was a god. When they realized he wasn’t, they became angry. Then they chained him to an upthrust boulder as a sacrifice to their local deity.

Neither Ayar nor Rhys ever expected to meet one another. But now that they have, maybe together they can fight for both their kinds. First, though, they need to learn how to communicate – and hope that neither of them is killed before they can get their enterprise off the ground!

Welcome to the first book in the Rise of the Discarded series!

FROM DANIEL ZEIDLER: Sarbotel Rising

Sarbotel Rising contains the complete Sarbotel Rising Duology (Book 1: The Standard Bearer’s Oath and Book 2: Ilse’s Game) in one volume.

When Ilse was five, the army of a mad alien mage known only as the Tyrant captured the capitol of the kingdom of Sarbotel, trapping all who were within its walls. Fourteen years later, she is the only surviving member of her resistance cell and free of the city, but rather than returning to the safety of her homeland, she has sworn an oath to kill the Tyrant and avenge the deaths of her family and comrades. The Tyrant is more dangerous than Ilse knows, and not all of her new allies can be trusted, but Ilse has teamed up with one of the Guardians…

Heldron, an immortal Guardian, has returned to the world of Seuthes on a mission to disable a powerful magical artifact that has kept the rest of the Guardians away from their homeworld for a millennium. He quickly discovers that, with a lost princess in need of assistance, a kingdom fighting to be free, and an anxious alien war machine considering destroying the planet, his mission is not a straightforward as it seemed…

FROM SABRINA ROSEN: The Sorceress Unbound: Chloe Delis Book 1

Chloe Delis has a new job as the Sorceress
for the city of West Rhodes.
But her spells are behaving unpredictably,
And she has a terrible case of imposter syndrome

The murder of the priestess who might have given her
Some insights into her new abilities plunges her in over her head.

Officer Skylos Whiterock isn’t sure the new Sorceress is all
the city council was hoping for, but he’s willing to keep silent about her quirks
as long as he’s sure she’s not a danger to the people he’s responsible for.

If only she didn’t look so much like his first love.

Then a beastial starts eating its victim’s internal organs
And it’s like nothing Chloe’s been trained for.

Can she find the creature and kill it before it takes another life?

FROM AURORA DAWN: Hallowing Eve: A Billionaire Boss Romance

Billionaire boss Lucas Danvers keeps his assistant, Evelyn Fontana, very close and very busy. He values her efficiency and intelligence and needs it available to him at all times. It certainly isn’t because he’s in love with her and wants to keep her away from other men. It’s simply a question of respecting her abilities.

That is, until she breaks their tradition of couples’ costumes for the company Halloween party, for which she is solely responsible. When she shows up to the shindig as Eve to his Executive Vice-President Nick Wilbright’s Adam, he has no choice but to disrupt their Edenic date plans dressed as Lucifer. Even if he wants to change the traditional story just a bit.

Nick Wilbright’s been in love with his best friend since college, but Lucas’ procession of supermodels, starlets, and superhot women of all sorts have kept him from making his feelings known. Not to mention that it’s obvious he’s in love with his assistant. Then Evelyn comes to him with a proposition: attend the company Halloween party with her, in matching costumes meant to provoke Lucas to finally pick one of them. Or both.
Will Lucas re-enact the scene in the Garden, or can he tempt both Adam and Eve into sin?

FROM RICHARD MEREDITH: The Crow’s Nest

Winner of 2021 Silver Falchion Award for Best Action-Adventure Novel at the Killer Nashville Mystery, Thriller, and Suspense Writers Conference
 
Submerged in a crude submarine hundreds of miles from shore and ten tons of cocaine stolen from a ruthless drug lord, Chase Brenner’s only chance to save his family rests with a drug addled smuggler and a desperate gambit to outwit the cartel.
 
Chase Brewer, a crewman on a commercial tuna seiner, barely escapes death after his boat and its crew are destroyed by el Hermandad—a sinister cartel hell-bent on eliminating all witnesses to its unique smuggling operation. After surviving an arduous voyage in a flimsy boat, he seeks answers and a little retribution. Hot on the trail for clues, Chase rescues Jonny LeBeau, a Louisiana shrimper forced into smuggling by the cartel but now on its hit list after skimming drugs. When the cartel realizes Chase survived and a witness is on the loose, both men are now in its crosshairs.
 
In a desperate gambit to bargain for their lives, Chase and Jonny hijack a narco-submarine with ten tons of cocaine. The secrecy of the cartel’s billion-dollar enterprise hinges on silencing this dubious pair of extortionists. Jonny, though, proves he’s as cunning as the cartel’s most savage sicario. But the cartel plays its trump card and Jonny faces the moral dilemma of his life—ditch Chase, the man who saved him from death, and escape with riches beyond his wildest dreams or lose it all and, maybe, his life to ransom Chase’s wife and children after they’re kidnapped by the cartel.

FROM KAREN MYERS: Mistress of Animals: A Lost Wizard’s Tale (The Chained Adept Book 2)

AN ERRANT CHILD WITH DISASTROUS POWERS AND NO ONE TO STAND IN HER WAY.

Penrys, the wizard with a chain and an unknown past, is drafted to find out what has happened to an entire clan of the nomadic Zannib. Nothing but their empty tents remain, abandoned on the autumn steppe with their herds.

This wasn’t a detour she’d planned on making, but there’s little choice. Winter is coming, and hundreds are missing.

The locals don’t trust her, but that’s nothing new. The question is, can she trust herself, when she discovers what her life might have been? Assuming, of course, that the price of so many dead was worth paying for it.

FROM LEIGH KIMMEL: The Wolf and the Well-Tempered Clavier

With the coronation fast approaching, the Cathedral of St. George the Dragonslayer cannot afford trouble. But come it does, while the cathedral choir director is at the Dragon’s Breath Organ, practicing the anthem he wrote at King William’s own request. While explaining some technical terms to his understudy, the choir director decides to show off a little.

In the process, he releases an ancient menace from long before humanity came through the worldgate to this place. An entity that strikes him blind, and threatens further harm to anyone who tries to play the Dragon’s Breath Organ.

However, they dare not disappoint His Majesty, not on the most momentous day of his reign. Someone must cleanse the Dragon’s Breath Organ of this malicious entity, and the choir director cannot. So the task falls to Miss Anne Teesdale, understudy organist.

Now she must delve into the history of the cathedral, and the mysterious ancient magic that fills the organ’s windchest. A secret that may well cost this young woman her life.

Or worse, her sanity.

An Ixilon story.

FROM M. C. A. HOGARTH: Sleigh Bells and Starships: A Peltedverse Holiday Collection.

At last, all the Peltedverse holiday stories in one place… plus a whole new novella!

• Precious Things
• Season’s Meaning
• Christmas Lullaby
• The Snow Maiden: or the Case with the Holiday Blues
• Case Study: The Tree
• Longest Night
• Silver and Gold
• …and the bonus story TBA!

Indulge your holiday cheer!

Vignettes by Luke, Mary Catelli and ‘Nother Mike.

So what’s a vignette? You might know them as flash fiction, or even just sketches. We will provide a prompt each Sunday that you can use directly (including it in your work) or just as an inspiration. You, in turn, will write about 50 words (yes, we are going for short shorts! Not even a Drabble 100 words, just half that!). Then post it! For an additional challenge, you can aim to make it exactly 50 words, if you like.

We recommend that if you have an original vignette, you post that as a new reply. If you are commenting on someone’s vignette, then post that as a reply to the vignette. Comments — this is writing practice, so comments should be aimed at helping someone be a better writer, not at crushing them. And since these are likely to be drafts, don’t jump up and down too hard on typos and grammar.

If you have questions, feel free to ask.

Your writing prompt this week is: REFLECTIVE

One of the funniest conceit of our age has to be the idea that the sophisticated and “bien pensant” are “citizens of the world.”

I was profoundly amused that Alvin Toffler fell for his in his last book I read sometime in the 90s. Keep in mind that, despite everything else, I believe his Future Shock is brilliant and explains a lot of life in the US in the last fifty years. (Note in the US. I’m not sure about the rest of the world. And I could explain why, but it would sidetrack us a lot more than this.) However the book about how the most powerful were the ones who had the most information (arguable) also pushed the “citizens of the world, not a country” thing as being the one for most powerful people.

I was amused because, though I agree this is the CONCEIT of most self-styled international elites, it is also in practicality, a load of stinking Hooey. (Or as we call it around here, #2son’s pre-school teacher. Yes, that really was her last name.)

Part of the reason the “elites” believe themselves multinational or “citizens of the world” is oikophobia. They believe themselves to have risen above their co-citizens in their lands of origin, who are …. well, in their minds, stupid and uneducated, which is a way to say “less rich” than the “elites.”

Therefore, in the same way that the nobility of old had more in common with other nobility from other lands than with their own country, they think they are a caste set aside and by reason of existing or having money inherently superior to all those who are loyal in and interested in their homelands.

Part of it is the belief that “nationalism” is bad and it led to WWI and WWII. Having been taught that (at this point it, drank it with mother’s milk) the richest and “best” (Most expensively) educated want to get as far away from that as possible, and be at a level when they’re free from that irrational passion, since it’s their conceit that they can rule “impartially” and from above for the good of all.

The problem with it is that not only is none of it true, but they are in fact both more provincial and less well educated than their countrymen. And also that what they aspire to is not only impossible, but really easy to manipulate.

So, the long war of the 20th century was not because of nationalism. In fact, the only explanation I have found for its being assumed to be so is that the international socialists who dominated intellectual discourse for the rest of the century despised the fact that, against their theory, workers of the world didn’t unite, but rather rallied to defend their homeland.

However, if you do a deep dive into the reasons for the first war, ignoring the opinions of those writing about it — which I did, because I was profoundly unsatisfied with the reasons given and none of it made sense — the war’s causation was attempts at internationalism. yes, the interantionalism wasn’t of the “supra-national, pseudo worldwide” type (Actually the mask worn by Russian national imperialism) but of the ‘extended noble family trying to grab the entire world’ type. But it was still internationalism, with all the problems of internationalism. (More on that later.)

And the current elites are not “better educated” and don’t rise above much of anything. In fact the world-renowned establishments most of them attend take so many “legacy” and “endowed an entire specialty” students, not to mention “admitted because diversity of skin color or origin” that their meritocratic requirements (I.E. knows or gives a damn about the subject), might be lower than your average state university. Also, once admitted, these people are guaranteed to graduate. Or at least will, barring some particularly egregious violation of code or “everybody knows.”

Look, guys, we’ve all Michelle Obama’s Harvard paper. I’ve taught high school kids. I wouldn’t let one of them skate by on something that vapid, much less an ivy league college student. But she, and her distinctly non-intellectual husband, graduated.

I have no idea where Chelsea Clinton graduated from, but I have a vague idea that she has a law degree, and let’s face it, she was too stupid to keep a talk show going. And the very fact that Kamala Harris couldn’t enter the college her parents attended (An ivy and I THINK Harvard) should be a fire alarm. However, she too has a law degree, despite the word salad betraying an IQ that wouldn’t rival my cat Havey, who has the brain of a peanut.

Heck, because these days the people chosen for financial and political (that they’re linked betrays that the fascists did indeed win, at least in the century-long run) advancement are chosen mostly on the basis or how well they chugged the Marxist koolaid, most of them aren’t so much educated as Marxist-indoctrinated.

Which both explains their belief they were made/educated to rule us all — the Intellectuals, leading the working class to socialist paradise, sing it with me! — and their utter, abject inability to see the problems with that.

This was brought home to me this morning, when I came across a discussion on X where a hapless gun-control advocate said he was tired of the government doing nothing, and they should just go door to door and confiscate all guns and arrest all gun owners.

Let alone that guns don’t kill people, people kill people, and mentally ill people kill people in vast numbers. I think still the largest mass murder in American history was a bomb set in a school at the turn of the twentieth century. (If you don’t count 9/11 because act of war, though you know? Could be counted.) And you can’t confiscate all the means to make bombs, not if you want people to be able to function at all. Heck, Great Britain’s attempts to stop murder are getting to the point of confiscating butter knives, and yet the murders continue. (Partly because criminals don’t obey laws, but also because if you want to kill someone, you’ll find a way. I find it darkly amusing that the same people who think teaching abstinence doesn’t work in sexual matters, think rules will stop humans killing humans. Their approach to stop violence, if applied to sex, would require a license to buy a condom, careful mental examination of any woman wishing to take the pill, and probably forbidding diaphragms and implants. And they’d be astonished that people are still sleeping together.)

However, what betrayed the person posting that comment as a part of the imagined “citizens of the world” was his (or hers. The name could go either way. So using “his” because that’s what the English language prescribed before people went nuts) utter and complete certainty that going door to door in the US would work, and that people would meekly hand over their guns.

First, let’s talk about “who is going to do that?” Because I can tell you, having known a lot of policemen and sheriff’s over the years, I happen to know all of them have people they will not approach even to say “good morning” because “that crazy summabitch will shoot me if he sees my car.”And in fact, they won’t go anywhere near those people, unless there is a major crime reason to. Or what do you think all the “people of interest” who are left alone are? Tell your average policeman or sheriff dept deputy to go door to door and confiscate his neighbor’s guns, and they will find that they’re really sick that day. It’s probably Covid. They don’t want to spread it, you know? And it will last as long as the order is operative. Because they’re not stupid. And even leaving aside the known crazies, they know the rest of the population will at best lie about whether they have guns. And if they force the issue, it will get ugly fast.

But more importantly, these “Citizens of the world” have no clue how their country is constituted, nor how many miles of miles and miles with the occasional house there are in this country. Or that each state has a different culture. Or–

In fact, these people who by and large don’t mix with local populations have a vague idea that the country has a lot more cities/apartments than it does, and that people act more compliant than they do. Because like Europeans, what they know about America is what they see in movies, not realizing movies are made by people like them and are feeding their assumptions back to them.

They also have a vague idea most of the country is easily led, because of course the only reason to disagree with them is that we’re being lied to by extremely persuasive evil people. (that it never occurs to them this might be happening to them, is a measure of lack of self awareness.) Hence their reason to try to get Trump. Because without his evil persuasion, we’d be fully on board with their crazy-cakes insanity.

As for the European elites, I don’t know. I used to hobnob with them, in the sense that I tended to hobnob with the over-educated which were, definitionally, better off than I, but it’s been a minute. However, judging from that and what I see now, my belief is they’re not really “citizens of the world” so much as citizens of their homeland which they secretly believe should rule all nations due to the “nationality”-race/breed being obviously superior.

What I do know is that there is no such a thing as a citizen of the world, no matter the level of self delusion that induces people to believe they are such.

We are all members of our culture. While we can believe everything about our culture is bad and evil, we still project it on everything else we see. Therefore, you know, well to do Americans keep believing criminals and terrorists don’t really exist, and must be decent people driven to extremes by need or oppression. (The results of these beliefs would be hilarious, if they didn’t more or less break everything.) Heck, they keep believing the LAZY or lacking ambition don’t exist, and if people aren’t working hard to succeed it must be because of a terrible condition. (Look up “Bee sting” theory of poverty sometime.)

When the various international elites meet abroad, they each read in the other what they themselves would do, but don’t actually understand each other beyond vague fashion sense, and spending money like water.

Ultimately their entire attempt to be “international” seems to consist of an idea that if they just become the people of the song “Imagine” and don’t believe in or care about anything, they can lead people better.

They are wrong because it’s not only impossible to divest yourself of all passion and interest (well, without offing yourself or doing a lot of drugs) but also because it’s impossible to totally divest yourself of your basic culture. (You can acculturate, but that involves a lot of work, and ACQUIRING another culture, which defeats their purpose. The “citizen of the world” culture doesn’t exist, beyond some shibboleths like “humans are killing the Earth” and “The proles are really stupid, eh?”). MORE IMPORTANTLY, even if they managed it, that wouldn’t make them impartial or able to lead anyone to utopia. What it would make them is very, very people-stupid and unable to realize why certain people do certain things, and others don’t. Or why certain countries are the way they are.

In fact, to the extent they’ve managed to shed their culture and replace it with Marxism, all they’ve done is become an unreasoning cult, unable to realize the population isn’t in fact exploding — because people lie in census, and so do nations — but also that there is not only no necessity but no benefit in “eating bugs.”

What they’ve managed in fact is to become rulers completely detached from the nations/locales they’re supposed to read, and completely unable to conceptualize individual freedom and will.

In that they completely replicate the “nobility” and “elites” pre WWI.

And so, there is it. “Citizens of the world” leading us into chaos and war for a hundred years.

There are modes of failure for control of human society that most of us don’t think of. We don’t think of them because they’re rarely if ever shown in movies, and certainly not recently.

Let me explain: I’ve been cycling very fast between thinking swallowing the blackpill is a lack of information; and thinking the blackpilled aren’t blackpilled enough. And the sad thing? Both are right. It’s just which one I think is stronger that day.

Oh, I stand by “We’ll win this.” In fact we’ve already won this. We’ve turned the corner. It’s just the amount of destruction laying between now and when we obviously won is immense.

Before you rush off to learn hand sewing, or mining or whatever: I don’t think we’ll lose tech, no. Or not to 19th century level. Or even mid-twentieth. Lack of resources might make things slightly cranky and slow for a while and might take us to the level of… Europe in providing creature comforts and care and luxuries to our people. But that’s about it.

It’s more that we’re going to lose people. We’re going to lose trust which is needed for prosperity. We’re going to lose institutions we actually need (most of those are extremely corrupted right now, but still sort of functioning. Soon they won’t.) And we’re going to lose a generation or two. Oh, not in the sense they’ll die. Honestly, most of them will never be born. It’s not even abortion. It’s that most of a generation is extremely gun shy about even marrying. Part is economics. Part is the extreme rifts the illusions of the left have created between male and female. And we’re going to lose people to grinding poverty and unhappiness, both because alone/isolated and because well…. they’re going to have to work very hard to rebuild. And hence we’ll lose LIVES that could have been great, but never get a chance.

Oh, we’ll also lose people to violence, to the left’s bizarre idea of compassion, to the left’s bizarre idea of immigration, to despair, to lack of meds…. To a lot of things.

Since ultimately individual humans are the only true wealth for the world, (because humans can create wealth) that one is going to hurt badly.

But the failure mode that is destroying the left is also the reason the blackpillers take them by the fistfull. And the reason the fall is going to hurt like a mother.

Look, how many times have you heard one nominally on our side (nominally, because fear and despondency aids the enemy. IOW think, for the love of Bob!) say something like “They control the schools, and they control the media, and they control the arts and history. Game over, man, game over.”

I can adduce various reasons it’s not game over, starting with “They’ve done that for almost a century, and almost all of come out of school leftist, or at least unwilling to admit we have doubts about the received wisdom, and then we…. change.

But we still don’t control the means of mass communication, and most people still think what they hear on TV is “the truth” so, of course, they assume the left is still gaining. Even when they resort to portraying my generation as my grandmother’s to claim they’re gaining adherents. (Bah.)

However, what they fail to realize is how much the left is impaired by controlling all the means of narrative. And yes, I do mean impaired. Particularly in these days when they really aren’t the ONLY means of narrative, and more and more people are escaping the thrall of said narrative, sideways, and by way of blogs, or way of mouth, or random confronting the truth with their own eyes.

At this point the left — true credulous left — is confined to that number of people who are either absurdly respecting of authority — they need to know their source of knowledge is “certified good” by all the “right people” which are usually people like politicians and college professors — or to people who are so busy with other things (which unfortunately includes any number of executives and high-producing artists and the like ) that they never look closely at the news. They have the one news outlet their parents watched, and they still watch it and piously believe it. I peg it at about 25% of the public, on nothing but a gut feel. (Which I could unpack for you, but seriously. Let’s just say if they really were 50% of the country, they wouldn’t need to fraud and defend means of fraud so much.)

Since the outlets — and official entertainment — pretty much are composed of those people, this means that they believe the narrative, and keep pushing on it, further and further. Which means they get further and further from any glimmer of observed reality. Which in turn, yes, causes more and more of the still mildly sane people in their midst to wake up, but also causes the people who don’t and base policies (A lot of them are in government at various levels) or corporate decisions on “the news” and “the entertainment” and the narrative of “everyone knows” and “settled science” to make increasingly more disastrous and bizarre decisions, entirely disconnected from reality.

So, the reason they are failing is because their decisions are causing even those mildly convinced of the nonsense to snap out of it. But they are also taking the country down a bizarre, suicidal path that is going to hurt all of us in the short run. (And short can be a couple of generations in this case.)

To illustrate, take the open borders: At least some number of the idiots on the left are convinced that we have to keep our borders open, to accommodate refugees of the “Climate catastrophe” that they think is turning every land to the South of us sterile.

No, seriously. They really believe this. They believe we have to let people in, because to do otherwise would be to condemn them to death.

Think about it, it’s generations of bandaid, and climate propaganda, and you’d be surprised how many of them really believe the world will end in 10 or 5 or however many years. Because they believe the “authorities.”

They’re the same people still convinced it was a miracle they survived the “pandemic.” Because they trust the authorities, and/or don’t have brain space to question.

In addition, they believe because they were told, that humans are infinitely plastic. Therefore, people coming in will just ‘of course’ become Americans. The only reason you could object to bringing them in is that they’re in general darker skinned than you, you racist.

In addition, they believe wealth can’t be created. So if the US is richer is because we stole the “natural resources” from everyone else. Bringing them here, to enjoy those natural resources we stole is just ETHICAL. This btw results in idiots saying things like “We don’t need to live this well. We’re really living too well. We can share.”

Because wealth can’t be created or destroyed, so it’s all a matter of a giant kindergarten class nicely sharing the cookies around, see?

They also don’t really believe in culture. They talk about culture, but what they mean by that is interesting foods and nice clothes. AND those are genetic. As is language. Which is why they both get furious when you “appropriate culture” because somehow inexplicably, the language, the food, the clothes, is all genetic, and all genetically linked. So only people with the right genetics can enjoy such things, or you’re stealing it AND call you a racist when you object to cultural practices like throwing gay people off roofs. Because, you know, it’s genetic, so if you object you’re racist. Also requiring people to learn English is racist. Don’t you know that poor brown people can’t? This is when my fist itches to punch their faces. BUT the point is they really really really believe this.

When they kept putting my kids in Spanish-only classes, they weren’t trying to sabotage them or hold them back. The kids looked Latin and I had an accent. And language is of course genetic. So if they put them in Spanish, then the kids, who were doing pretty well in English, would suddenly be really super-intelligent geniuses, because they wouldn’t be fighting their genetics.

The person who has got the closest to describing this phenomenon is Scott Adams with the “Different films in the heads.”

But that’s not even it. It’s more: the people controlling the narrative, once there were alternatives, were the same ones who refused to leave it. And they kept piling on more bits of narrative, all of which — because they long ago made a practice of running off all dissent. And got far more picky about dissent as time went on — create a bubble of virtual reality.

So when they do things like open the borders and accept everyone as “refugees” they really think they are doing what’s needful and indeed decent, and if you oppose them it can only be rank bigotry.

When they try to stop the use of fossil fuels, only a few of them do it because “it will stop people traveling.” There are a few, but not most people. To most of them that’s an incidental inconvenience/convenience. Mostly they just don’t want to burn up, and they really think this will happen tomorrow. They also think scientific progress can be wished into existence so if we don’t have perfect renewable energy yet it’s because you — yes you — uneducated bigot are clinging to unsafe alternatives like nuclear. If they take that way too, then you’ll have no choice but turn to renewables, and then we’ll have paradise.

Or take the horrors committed by Hamas. The lefties are terrified that the Israelis will go too far and “commit genocide” in punishing them. The pieces for this that fit into the reality bubble they live in are: in general the Palestinians are darker than the Jews they know (Not necessarily those in Israel, mind.) Therefore they are obviously oppressors, because whiter people are always oppressors. (So saith Gramsci and their college professors.) The state of Israel is new and therefore a “colonizing” entity. They heard that the Israelis are an apartheid state and therefore evil. (This is unexamined as to what it means. No. it’s not an apartheid state.) Also they don’t understand Israel is more or less under constant attack. The news rarely mentions it after all. Also Israel wants to take military action, and the military is chauvinistic, fascistic and too masculine. Also, of course, Israelis are more competent than Palestinians therefore evil. (No, this really seems to be an underlying, though unspoken belief.) Also of course, the Israelis live better, so they must have stolen the “natural resources” from the Palestinians.

BUT most of all, they can’t conceptualize violence. I know this sounds hilarious from the side that deployed antifa and BLM. However remember they think antifa is composed of poor people and BLM of black people. (No, neither is true, but that’s what the media says.) And the left really truly is incapable of conceptualizing people who do violence, evil and mayhem for their own sake.

The fault is partly of fiction, which demands that villains be as understandable as heroes and have a reason they went sour. But the reason fiction demands that is that it’s mostly composed of leftists in the upper publishing reaches, so it might be a chicken and egg situation.

And these people apparently managed to go through elementary without ever being kicked and bitten by a classmate who just didn’t like the look of them. This means they either were teachers’ pets or very very wealthy, btw.

So they think humans ONLY ever commit violence after being extensively sinned against. The very horror of the attack perpetrated on Israel, to people who don’t really understand culture or history or anything outside their bubble, means they must have suffered horribly.

And there you have the incentive for all the Jew hatred in this country and the rest of the west, and for the manifestations in favor of sparing genocidal monsters. Note that none of these idiots seems to realize Gaza has NOT surrendered and given up either the hostages or the perpetrators and planners of the attack. Which in any sane dispute would be condition zero for peace negotiations.

No, they just look at their virtual reality bubble, and the weight of the outrage means to them that it must be justified. And now we (the west in general) are going to hit the poor abused critters more, and that will make them hate us more. The idea that their hatred of Israel — and lest we forget us — is ex nihilo and can only be appeased if everyone else stops EXISTING never occurs to the left, because it’s not part of their bubble of virtual reality.

The problem with all this is that the inhabitants of the bubble feel justified and VIRTUOUS. The general attitude about vote fraud is that they’re not doing enough to alter the elections, even when they’re self-obviously doing so. But even if they were, what they’re frauding in is for our own good, and will lead to paradise on Earth, which we’re obviously too stupid to see.

Yep, they’re silencing us for our own good. For the good of humanity.

Again, the crazier the bubble gets, the more they expel anyone who even has a clue as to reality. And the more they expel even the marginally sane, the crazier the bubble gets.

The more out of touch the bubble is, the more people escape it.

But on the other hand, the more deep-bubble the decisions made by the people who stay within — which are, almost all, circumstantially, hereditarily, and by reason of personality, people with the most power over both the bubble and the institutions it long ago captured — the less they fit with reality.

Objectively the deep bubble “the criminals are just hurting and we need to help them be happier” and “the homeless are just people who lack houses, so let them live on the sidewalks” has destroyed most great American cities in three years. And yet smaller cities, controlled by the same bubble are still following suit. Because within the bubble those decisions make sense. And they can’t imagine the bubble being wrong, because they never experienced anything else.

And our large corporations seem to think most of the country is the bubble. So the products they create and try to sell are to the bubble. Which means they fall flat, and they can’t figure out why, and get very angry and decide the rest of the country are racist and evil.

It just keeps spinning. What power they have in controlling the narrative, only serves to poison them.

The problem of course being we’re linked, and being dragged down the same crazy path.

And the bubble can’t completely implode. The time is coming — trust me, you can see it — when the people in the bubble have less and less power, though they might not realize that, and can’t understand why or how, and just turn outright vindictive.

After which…. I don’t know.

But whether it’s radical withdrawal of the consent of the governed or a Romanian Christmas, what comes next will damage civil society and culture deeply.

It is already becoming damaged, as we can’t trust any “experts” or institutions. But it still sort of works in extremis, when absolutely needed.

We’re going to lose that. And it’s going to hurt like a mother.

Their clever fool plan, in the end will destroy them. But it’s going to hurt us a lot too.

I’m convinced the reaction will be a healthier society. Maybe my grandkids, if I have any, will see it. Or their kids.

But till then, we’re stuck here, trying to stop the people living in virtual reality from destroying the real-reality. Where the rest of us live.

If I were to become incredibly rich — okay, this means winning the lottery — there would be an enormous temptation to leave my descendants a trust fund. And I probably would, but I’d make sure that there was something they must do before they got the money. What? I don’t know. Live independently and earn their own money for 10 years, maybe.

I don’t know if I’d go so far as to say they must amass a fortune before letting them inherit. I see the point of that, but my family is weird about making money. We seem to only be able to make it when we don’t need it, but would like it. I suspect this comes from being as neurotic as a shaved cat. If stressed we utterly freeze.

But the point is if you just drop a bunch of cash on someone the moment they become a legal adult, they tend to — not always but tend to — do nothing with their lives. They trust — eh — they’ll be taken care of, and so are. They are likely to become interested in utterly unproductive things, or just — if ADD AF — serially chase different stuff, never doing anything.

Knowing me, if many times when “baby needs shoes” I didn’t have to turn to the one thing I knew how to do, I’d have walked off writing probably after my first three books. For sure after the first six. Now, I know what I do is probably not something for posterity, but if you enjoy my books, you’d never have those, if I’d become incredibly rich via trust fund at … 18 or 22 or even 35. TBF if I’d become very rich at 18, I probably would never have written. Yes, yes, I’d mean to. I mean, I’m driven. But the entire process of making stuff publishable, often resembles scrabbling up a sheer wall by my fingertips. And said wall has been entirely covered in lemon juice. I’d have written a lot of … well, art pieces that not even my husband would want to read. (And he reads some very silly stuff.)

Anyway what does this have to do with a larger point? Well…

Ours is a high trust society. Not just in the sense that we trust each other (and that’s changing. But still high trust compared to the world) and can leave out tools or say rolls of plastic you mean to swathe all over your flowerbeds, or such, but one in which you contract someone to replace your roof and/or paint your house and don’t expect them to run off with the materials, you can hire an accountant and not be immediately scammed, you can hire a stranger and not have him take everything from your store and disappear, you can pay a stranger to clean your house, mind your baby, feed your cat.

Yes, that is changing. And some of us are less trusting than others.

But everything that allows us to live very well indeed by world and historical standards is based on that trust.

Recently a friend told of her husband going back to his native land, and finding that his parents’ house was choked with big bins filled with water. You see, the public utilities are iffy. Having lived very long in America, and this being a rainy clime, he offered to build his parents a rooftop cistern. The response was horror. “Then the neighbors would know we have money for that. We’d be robbed.”

I laughed (while crying) because though we’re from completely different regions, I could see it playing exactly like that with my family back in Portugal. in fact, Portuguese mount satellite dishes in the attic, often. (Seems to work, but yeah.) And the entire house is surrounded with high wall, so no one knows what you have. Only utterly trusted friends are allowed in.

I understand from a friend whose job took her to our ghettos and hoods that the same rules are starting to apply there. But not to the rest of our society yet.

Which is why we can have nice things.

But things are changing and breaking down.

Part of it is the importing of a vast number of people from the third world and not demanding or giving time for acculturation. The other part is the idiocy of not punishing evil.

Why this is is important: I absolutely agree with David yesterday: While you can’t change the whole world — something I learned painfully in 2020, when I spent the year screaming in the desert — you can save/fix/improve your little area.

I don’t know if I’d call it charity, at least not in my case. I just like to do nice things for people if I can. People I like, sure, but also completely strangers. And I prefer it to be anonymous, which isn’t always possible.

It’s part of “I’d like this to happen to me, so I’ll do it for someone else.” (Which means if I ever won the lottery I’d spend a lot of it just doing nice things for strangers, eh.)

It’s not so much charity as a hobby.

BUT I do try to do it. I try to improve and help others’ lives. Self interest? Well, I want to live in the kind of world where that happens, so yeah, I do it for me.

OTOH this is possible, and I can do it, because there’s a certain fundamental stability and trust in society. I can give away money, quietly, because there are ways to do that that don’t JUST enable theft. I can make cute things for friends, because society is prosperous enough I have time and money for materials. I can drive around and see people I love, because we can afford a private car and gas for it. Etc. etc. etc.

All the nice things we have depend on a fund of trust. A fund so vast that though the left is depleting it at a record clip, it’s still there to a higher degree than any other time in history, any other place in the world.

But they’re determined to destroy it. They are themselves indoctrinated paranoids who see only classes, and those classes perpetually at war.

There is no trust in such land.

So they’re convinced it’s all a ruse, and are determined to destroy it, to make us “face the truth” that is actually their nasty delusions and hatred.

Might they succeed? Yeah.

I suspect that they’ll succeed mostly in getting everyone so pissed off at them we stop them. But it’s a race between that and everything falling apart.

Thing is: you can have that happen and rebuild trust. It just takes blood, sweat and tears, and a lot of things none of us want to do, and will never forgive ourselves for doing.

And this is why the crazy paranoid Marxists should stop with their micro-aggressions and their “systemic” (And therefore invisible) oppression before all the trust is gone.

It’s not just that they won’t like us when we’re angry.

They and us, and the rest of the world, like trust fund kids endowed with great wealth, have no idea what losing the underlying fund of trust in US society will mean.

For us, for the Republic, for the world.

Let us hope they never find out.

Improving The World By David Bock

A few years ago I read an article about an interaction that an experienced shooter had with a novice at the range. While I don’t know if this story is true in all details, it still contains an important lesson.

The experienced shooter, let’s call him Bob, noticed that the new shooter I’ll call Jane, had a lower priced, lower quality, firearm and was obviously nervous and inexperienced.

Instead of ignoring this person or dismissing them out of hand because of their “lesser” firearm choice, Bob struck up a conversation and found out that this handgun was all Jane could afford at the time.

Jane had bought her handgun at the suggestion of a police officer because Jane’s ex had made threats of violence against her and Jane refused to allow him to victimize her or her children any more.

Jane had a strong impression that her ex was going to come back sometime over the next few days to make good on his threats.  Therefore, she had little time to become proficient.

Bob took her under his wing and spent *his* range time helping her learn the manual of arms for her pistol as well as basic shooting skills.

He taught her the usual stuff.  Loading, reloading, stance, grip, sight alignment and sight picture, trigger control, breath control, and follow through.

In addition Bob taught her the basics on how to clear a jam and how to disassemble her pistol for cleaning.

Bob urged Jane to practice as much as possible and pointed her towards some additional resources.

At the end of their range time, Bob had not done any shooting himself.  He and Jane had only exchanged first names and were unlikely to meet again.

How many of us can honestly say that we would behave the same way in those circumstances?

For myself, I can say that I’ve done *some* of the same things as Bob.  However, I’m a firearms instructor and work at a shooting range.  When I’m acting in my capacity as a Range Safety Officer I often give people pointers or tips on how to improve their shooting.

This does not rise to the level of being a random person at the range helping a complete stranger to the exclusion of your own shooting practice.

I hold Bob in high regard for what he did that day.

Reading this article also reminded me of the concept behind Operation Blazing Sword.  An organization started by Erin Palette following the Pulse Nightclub massacre to help bring together knowledgeable shooters who wanted to help and members of the LGBT community who wanted to learn.

The biggest difference here is that Jane didn’t seek Bob out for training.

Bob saw her need and reached out in the moment.

In Judaism there is a concept known as Tikun Olam which is generally defined as an activity that improves the world.  Bob, though probably not Jewish, demonstrated the true spirit of Tikun Olam at the range that day.

A stranger anonymously offering help to another stranger is also one of the highest forms of charity (called tzedakah in Hebrew) according to Maimonides, a twelfth century Jewish Scholar.

This form of giving is viewed as especially beneficial since you are doing so purely for the sake of helping.  Not to be seen as giving by others or to create an obligation from those to whom you give.

These are things that all of us need to do more of, not just in regards to firearm training, but overall.

We need to keep our eyes open for those in need and offer assistance.  Not because we might benefit in some way, but in order to improve the world.

Tikun Olam

Maimonides

Eight levels of charitable giving

Tzedakah

Brena Bock Author Page

David Bock Author Page

Team And More