Slow Sunday

Sorry this post is late, but I have the sort of headache that just won’t quit. As some of you know – I whine about it enough – I’m prone to headaches anyway and I suspect this is just stress, but I’ve been having a headache and extremely painful throat for several days.

As most of you know, I’m about to fly to Portugal this next Friday. It’s always an emotionally complex endeavor to visit, because well… it’s theoretically my native land, but I’ve been away for twenty five years and twenty five years of more rapid change there than here.

When my husband and I visited Charlotte, NC, which we left 19 years ago, yeah, the neighborhood we left behind was now an old established neighborhood and the little peach tree in the front yard, which I planted the year we moved is now a big, overspreading tree. BUT we could still understand how things worked and by and large we could still find our way around. Portugal has changed so much I can get lost in the village where I was born and raised. New streets and a batch of stack a proll apartments, as it gets swallowed by the growth of the city of Porto (it’s now considered part of Greater Porto) makes it a foreign land. When they say you can’t go back again, they’re deadly serious.

To make things worse, I was never an adult in Portugal. Oh, okay, so I got married at 22, but I had just finished college and still lived with my parents. I simply have no idea how certain things are done… like dealing with a bank, or buying a toothbrush.

This causes a weird mental disconnect as I feel I SHOULD know how to do this stuff, but I don’t.

This year, it’s all complicated by having to go without my husband (money, mostly) which after twenty five years is a very difficult thing to do, particularly since the visit will last two weeks.

Because of all that, I’ve not been able to finish Darkship Renegade. The good news is that I JUST bought extra batteries for the laptop and there will be all this time in the air to work. The bad news is that… I haven’t finished it.

It will be done by the time I return, I promise, and I’ll have news on the subscription: Costs, dates, etc and a mailbox to send checks to for those of you who don’t use paypal.

Meanwhile today I stayed late in bed, reading, trying to de stress. Now I’ll finish the overdue short story. And then maybe I’ll finally get to the novel.

And I Feel Fine

I’m not going to talk about the end of the world, except sideways and stiltedly. Of course I don’t expect the world to end today. I don’t expect the world to end ANY day.

One day the world will end for me, of course. One day the world will end for each of us. But despite all the planet killing events that are possible, I don’t really expect an end to everyone at the same time. Or perhaps it would be more true to say I don’t want to the world to end for everyone at the same time.

Honestly, even in times when I wish otherwise, I’m a woman of very little faith. I hope there is life after death, I don’t see any reason not to believe there isn’t – just like I see no proof there is, though there are a couple of borderline experiences that prove it sufficiently for ME personally, but not enough to prove to anyone else. I have a vague idea of what might be on the other side – if anything – but wouldn’t be surprised if I’ve got it completely wrong. Sooner or later I’ll find out. I try to live in a way that if what’s on the other side is an eternity alone with my thoughts, I won’t have too many regrets. (Some are inevitable in the human condition.)

But I believe in life after death – firmly. Need to – in the sense that I believe life will go on after my death. You see, it might be a failing, but I like people. Most people. The vast majority of them who are fairly decent and mind their own business and try to do what they can with what they have. And I’d like to think that millenia from now, when my remains would qualify as an archeological find, there will be families living on Earth, kids laughing, elders complaining, human individuals going after their lawful business.

I do realize that the Earth too will eventually have an end, and I hope we have managed to go to another world, another star by then. I know most species have ends, like individuals do, but I hope if we must end it will be because our descendants have mutated and are better than us, but still us in a way.

It’s weird that I need to believe these things, that I WANT to believe these things, because it was not how I was raised. I grew up believing not only that there would be an end of the world (NOT Christian theology, though disguised that way, because the insertion of “our lady” doesn’t make any sense in those stories. I suspect it was ORIGINALLY “Our Lady” Ballaat, in Phoenician, but I don’t have proof of that either, just the fact that their footprints are all through the area I grew up in. But at any rate, the stories made no reference to the Bible, except to mention the deluge which appears in almost all western legends.) but that the world had already ended several times. “World” understood of course as most of humanity except for a family or two, and world as “civilization.”

My grandmother raised me in the first belief I would live through the next end of the world. She rather pitied me for this, but the wisdom that she’d received from her grandmother indicated it would happen in my generation.

You see, when the Lord created the world THIS time – understood I think as the grand clean up after the last end, though I don’t know I got the impression this was a new planet too. Gee, no wonder I write science fiction and fantasy – He set it in spin and said “Till the year two thousand you shall last, and over two thousand you shall not go.” (Shut up now. I assume omniscience and all, he referred to the year 2000 of the current date. Or at least my grandmother did. I don’t remember giving it much thought, and yes, even at four or so I KNEW the world was more than two thousand years old, because I liked stories of Greece and Rome.) And then Our Lady (See what I mean about it not being a Christian story?) Got a handful of dirt (cosmic dirt?) And threw it over the earth and said “I add these many years.”

Now, maybe she had very dainty hands, because my grandmother didn’t thing it would be more than a couple of decades.

I know this sounds insane to people not raised this way, but I used to spend hours planning what to do and how to survive when the end of the world came – in fire, this time, of course, because Our Lady was distressed by seeing so many drowned babies floating on the waves after the deluge.

I can’t tell you when I stopped assuming the world would have a very definite end for everyone at the same time. The corollary for the other “doesn’t accord to facts” idea I grew up with, that “there have been many civilizations before ours and some more advanced” I’ve never quite managed to shake. Oh, I try. I know it’s not rational. But it’s there all the time at the back of my mind, and I keep trying to figure out the type of story that would “explain” or justify this feeling.

By ten I definitely no longer believed in an “end of the world” – but then we were in the seventies and, oh, my, other people did. End of the world and UFOs and… the silly season in full bloom. (I almost spelled that fool bloom.)

So what is this in the service of? Nothing. Just noting that predictions of the end of the world have always been with us, and some cult or sect is always proclaiming it. Remember the Heaven Gate cult? The world ended for them.

I find it unusual that this time the prophecy is receiving so much air play. Part of it is that I think it’s oddly escapist. “If the world ends, I don’t need to worry about my mortgage being upside down anymore” kind of escapist – just like the inanities of the seventies. (For the record, I’m even willing to endure elephant bells to escape the end of the world, but please refrain.) I think there’s an hysteria to it, an air of “Save us, end of the world, you’re our only hope.” The other part of it is that the stories are fun, in the middle of distressing news about the world and our economy.

It’s of course, entirely possible the world will end today – or any day — but I rather doubt it. A world-wide Earthquake seems a difficult thing to achieve.

But I hope it doesn’t. I hope the world and humanity goes on for a long time after I’m gone – World Without End.

*Crossposted at Classical Values*

A Flaw In Her Magic

*coming this Summer from Naked Reader press, and set in the same world as A Touch of Night*
A Flaw In Her Magic

Sarah A. Hoyt
Based On the Novel Mansfield Park by Jane Austen
I

About thirty years ago, Miss Maria Ward, of Huntington, with only seven thousand pounds and meager magic to her lot – her being no more than a half blood – astounded her acquaintances by capturing Sir Thomas Bertram, of Mansfield Park, in Northampton. The baronet, despite his family’s ancient magic, one of the purest magical lines in the country, was so captivated by Miss Maria’s beauty that no one else would do for him.

All Huntingdon exclaimed at the greatness of the match and predicted that her two sisters – not mean looking themselves – would surely benefit from her elevation. In fact, it was widely expected that Miss Frances and Miss Ward , quite as handsome as their sister, should marry to equal advantage.

Alas, they were wrong. There weren’t enough men of large fortune and clean magic to marry every girl beautiful enough to attract them. At the end of half a dozen years, Miss Ward found herself obliged to accept the proposal of the reverend Norris, a friend of her brother-in-law. Though he had hardly any private fortune, he had received from Sir Thomas the living of Mansfield, which made him the possessor of a thousand a year.

Miss Frances, however, made a runaway marriage. Before her family or either of her sisters had any idea of her intention, she vanished from her room in the dark of night. Despite all searches, no trace of a rope ladder was found and the pursuit that attempted to stop the couple before reaching Gretna Green found themselves, inexplicably, three days behind and the couple married and lodging together at an inn for more than a night.

Thus, Miss Frances became Mrs. Price.

Not only the manner of her marriage, but her refusal to divulge anything about how it had taken place, drove a wedge between herself and her family, which subsisted for eleven years, when the mysteries attaching to the connection were all solved.

Because the connection between the families had been nearly cut, it is perhaps not surprising that these news were brought not by common acquaintances or friendly messengers, but by the London Post, which Sir Bertram had discarded upon the breakfast table, after reading the financial news necessary to manage his financial empire of carpetships, magical manufactories and various other interests around the world.

Mrs. Norris, having come to the great house to inform her sister of what charity was needed in the village – a duty she maintained was hers as the reverend’s wife – picked up the discarded paper and read through it.

Her exclamation, highly improper for a clergyman’s wife, made Lady Bertram look up from her embroidery. “What has happened, my dear?” the good, if indolent, lady roused herself to ask. “Is anything amiss?”

Mrs. Norris, who had gone the color of the paper in her hands, dropped nervelessly onto a dining room chair and commenced fanning herself with the printed leaves.

Though Nurse was sent for the smelling salts, it was some time before Mrs. Norris could speak, and she would only consent to do so when Nurse had left the room and no other servant was visible. “I don’t think we can keep it quiet much longer,” she said, still fanning herself. “For I daresay it is one of those secrets that will out.”

“What secret?” Lady Bertram asked almost fully awake to the possibility something very wrong was toward. “What can you be speaking of, my dear?”

“Well!” Mrs. Norris said. “If it isn’t just like our sister Fanny, always so headstrong as she was, and given to distempered freaks.”

“Fanny? Our sister Fanny?” Lady Bertram asked, now fully alive to impending disaster. “What can our sister Fanny have done that is talked about in the paper?”

“Not Fanny,” Mrs. Norris answered in a thread of voice. “But rather that luckless husband of hers.” She tried to extend the paper in her sister’s direction and failing – because Lady Bertram made no move to receive it – exclaimed. “He has been apprehended for being a were-dragon and forthwith executed in the public square.”

This revelation being of more than anticipated horror made Lady Bertram stare in speechless shock at her sister. At long last she managed no more than ,“But… But the children. I am sure that she has children… And she… herself.”

“She,” Mrs. Norris said, in something that might have been spite. “Escaped persecution because both she and Mr. Price maintained that she knew nothing of the matter. While you know that can’t possibly be true.”

“How can I know that isn’t true?” Lady Bertram asked, in some wonder. Having been a celebrated beauty in her day, the lady had never found much reason to employ her mind.

“The dragon. The flight to Gretna Green,” Mrs. Norris said, snorting. “Flight indeed. No wonder the pursuers were three days behind.”

“Oh,” Lady Bertram said. “Oh, but we shouldn’t–”

“No, of course we shouldn’t denounce our own sister,” Mrs. Norris said. “What can you be thinking of, my dear? Not only would it be excessively cruel, but think of what it would mean for us to be tainted with having an executed aider and abetter of weres in our family. For you know very well that death is dictated for the offense for those who hide weres as well for those who shift form. And if our sister were executed, depend upon it that soon the rumor would go out that she herself was a were. And then… Well, think what people might assume of the blood of your two sons and your lovely daughters, all of whom will have to find spouses and make their way in the world. And poor Mr. Norris, as a clergyman surely can’t afford such a blot upon our name!”

“I wasn’t thinking of denouncing her,” Lady Bertram said, as she absentmindedly petted the little pug dog by her side. “Only what is to become of her children? For I seem to recall not that long ago getting word that she had been brought to bed with her eighth child. Or was it the ninth?”
ab

It wasn’t something they would wish to keep secret from Lord Bertram and, in fact, they immediately applied to him in the belief that his superior understanding and judgement would make it possible for him to discover what was best to be done.

He’d taken refuge in his office, where they found him. After the whole matter had been expounded to him, as he sat on the chair by the fireplace and looked as though he’d been struck by a lightening bolt, Mrs. Norris upheld the opinion that, “Perhaps it would be best to do nothing, for I believe there are legal arrangements in place to look after the children of those discovered as weres, are there not?”

Lord Bertram nodded. “Well, they are supposed to be taken to special houses. Were-orphans they’re called,” he said. “They are taken to special houses, where they are raised in the most strict virtue and discipline, in the hopes that by upbringing any flaw in their blood might be mitigated. They are not, of course, allowed to stay with their parent, even should the parent, as your sister did, survive, because they are believed best removed from such evil influences.”

“There, you see, my dear Maria,” Mrs. Norris said. “The children will be well taken care of, and thus we will not be involved in the whole sorry affair.”

But Lord Bertram was stroking his red beard, absently, a gesture he employed when deep in thought. “Mind you,” he said. “I’ve always heard of those houses as being terrible places and the lot of the children placed there far worse than the lot of children thrown on the parish or sent to work houses. One hears … rumors… of beatings and cold water baths and… and of other abuses,” he said coloring a little. “I would not wish any of my nephews of nieces to be subjected to such. And there’s no doubt the court would allow them to live with us, given our probity and respectability as well as the ancient and pure nature of my magic.”

“Well,” Mrs. Norris said. “I’m sure such rumors are unfounded and that–”

“On the other hand the upbringing of orphans – even those whose blood is not tainted – is an expensive affair, and what with the Chinese pirates attacking two of my carpetships only last week, my affairs aren’t going as famously as I’d like them to. It would be best, perhaps, to find them a good and honest farm wife, who would take them all in and raise them. I can then apply to the home for their release. I believe farm wives are willing to raise children for a quite modest sum.”

The endeavor proved more complicated than at first anticipated. The children, it appeared, had not only been taken over by the vast apparatus that his majesty’s government employed to suppress dangerous weres – they had been dispersed throughout the country to various institutions designated for the upbringing of were- orphans. And the majority of them appeared to have vanished as thoroughly as though they’d been turned invisible.

Lord Bertram, worried, had contracted with a man to investigate their probable whereabouts, and had followed a presumption that perhaps their name had been misspelled. However, two orphans under the name of Brice bore no resemblance to any of the missing children; three young men by the name of Prince were far too old to be Mrs. Price’s brood. In the end, only two were found – the eldest, William, aged 12 and Fanny, aged 10. They had been sent to a home in Wales under the surname Prize, but they were old enough to know their own name and how to write it, and so were discovered.

Removing them from the home involved another bit of work, starting with determining whether they wanted to remove them at all.

“Well,” Mrs. Norris said, doubtfully, as she and her sister Bertram and Lord Bertram gathered in the sitting room after the children had gone to bed. “At those ages, perhaps they could be of some use around the house. But I do not see that there’s any great urgency in removing them from the home, is there? I mean, they are not helpless babes who might–”

“I believe,” Lord Bertram interrupted. “That the investigator who saw both the children considers our niece, Fanny, to be prettyish.”

“Well… well… so much the better,” Mrs. Norris said. “Doubtless, given a strict education, she will emerge with enough poise and grace to attract a good marriage. Well, not what would be considered a good marriage for your daughters, Lord Bertram, of course. With no dowry and tainted magic in her blood, the poor mite can’t be expected to marry into any of the good orders of society. Why, I doubt even half-bloods with only a little bit of magic would consent to ally themselves with her. But it is quite possible that a farmer–”

“Mrs. Norris, you are a clergyman’s wife,” Lord Bertram said, sternly. “As such, I don’t doubt that you know what terrible things men can do to prettyish young ladies with no protection, particularly in such a setting as a home that employs… less than the most elevated elements of society.”

Mrs. Norris seemed so unsettled by this that she couldn’t find words.

“No,” Sir Bertram said. “We will have to get her out. At least her. Though the investigator also tells me that William is clever and good at his maths and mad to go on the carpetships.” He sighed. “That is easy enough to manage, since I can arrange for him to start as a cabin boy on one of my Caribbean line carpetships. But Fanny…” He shook his head. “If we take her under our protection, something will have to be done for her. I can’t raise her here and expect her to have nothing upon her marriage. Perhaps if you and Mr. Norris could contribute something and Lady Bertram and I–”

“But she would have something,” Mrs. Norris said. She snorted. “Why any girl given the privilege of consorting with your daughters, and acquiring such conduct and being brought into fashion, cannot fail to make a good marriage. She should consider herself fortunate.”

Lord Bertram looked doubtful, and yet undertook the long process of bringing the children out of the home.
ab

When Fanny Price was collected from the were-orphans home, she was given no idea where she would be going, nor who was to be in charge of her.

Just as suddenly as she’d been removed from her home to the were-orphans home, given no time to collect her things or even to make sure that her siblings stayed together, given an ugly grey uniform and dark, flat shoes, so now she was removed from the dormitory and brought up front, where she was relieved to find William was also upfront, ready to be picked up by a kind man with a pony trap, which delivered them to the post house, which in due time allowed them to board the express and delivered them to the grand gates of Mansfield park.

She was less sanguine about finding that her brother William would be leaving the very next morning to join the crew of Lord Bertram’s carpetship, The Favorable Winds.

Though William had always wanted to go aboard one of the grand palaces built atop flying carpets and visit the four corners of the world, though he’d long dreamed of eventually becoming Air Captain Price, the supreme authority aboard one of those, Fanny had hoped to have his company yet a while longer.

His leaving meant she stayed behind marooned with a lot of strangers. Less than a year ago, she’d been the eldest daughter of a hopeful family– not wealthy but certainly not starving, and cheerful with it. Now she was bereft of mother and siblings and as to poor papa she’d been warned never to mention him nor the manner of his demise to anyone.

Everyone in the household intimidated her, from her kind but stern uncle Bertram, to her indolent aunt to their two boys who were so grown as to appear as adults to her. Even the girls, who were closer to her age, scared her.

A day in the schoolroom with their governess was enough to allow Fanny to understand she’d not been taught any of the genteel magical arts that her cousins were conversant with.

“Mama, Fanny is so stupid,” Julia said. “She can’t even light a mage light.”

“Yes, Mama,” Maria said. “She’s like a half blood. She can’t even make a show of lights, or a display of colors.”

But the most alarming report came from the governess herself to Sir Bertram, one evening after dinner. “I am afraid, sir, that she’s not so much stupid as unable.”

The gentleman looked up in confusion. “Well, I know the magic in my wife’s side is not very strong. They’ve married in trade a few times and diluted its potency. But yet, she’s not a commoner. She ought to be able to do something. I mean, at the very least the pretty light shows and things that any well-bred young damsel ought to command.”

The governess had looked worried. “Yes, I know she should, sir, but I’m very much afraid that she can’t. It’s as though there is…” She looked down at her feet, as if afraid to face him with the bad news. “A flaw in her magic.”

“A flaw in her magic?” Lord Bertram asked. “Surely you’re not implying she is… a were? Ridiculous. Surely it would have manifested by now?” But in his heart of hearts, Lord Bertram wondered what he’d brought into his home and family.

Shards Of Weird

The other day while setting off for a walk early morning, I came across something unexplained – though not unexplainable. On the sidewalk, near an apartment building, were a jacket and a tie.

Now, this might be understandable, since we live in one of those urban neighborhoods that’s fine during the day but you really wouldn’t want to go traipsing around at night unaccompanied. Probably still safe at night, but a bit seedy. (Think Tom and Kyrie’s neighborhood in the Shifter series.)

It would make perfect sense if the jacket looked dirty and worn and the tie were in a position where someone might have discarded it in, say, an ardent fit of sidewalk love.

BUT the jacket was new and good quality and it lay exactly as if someone had shrugged it off while facing the building. Only there was nowhere for anyone to stand while doing so, much less to walk away from after shrugging it off. It lay maybe three inches from a low brick wall with an iron fence embedded on top. The tie was even odder, because it was on a hanger – not as if it had just come from the cleaners, but as my younger son keeps his. He’s not very good at tying ties, yet, and so he keeps one or two loosened and wrapped around the stem of the hanger. The hanger in turn was hooked into the top of the cast iron fence at about my knee level. And it too was good quality, silk, and I suspect expensive.

Now, is it possible someone was carrying a basket of laundry and these things slipped off the top? Of course it is. Only, they’d have to be walking on top of the brick wall, with feet on either side of the iron fence. Possible. There are a lot of college students around here… just not likely.

Being who I am, I tried to take a picture of it, but my phone is new and I didn’t manage to. When I came back the jacket and tie were gone, either reclaimed by their owner or possibly picked up by some transient whose sartorial stock just went up markedly.

Oh the other hand, I can’t rid my mind of the image and the idea that what those clothes looked like was someone not particularly neat – say a young man – undressed in his own bedroom, and sort of threw the jacket over and hung the tie on his bedroom door.

Needless to say scenarios for that sort of thing range from the one in Simak’s Out of Their Minds where the character, under the illusion of being in a house, undresses and lies down in a rattler-infested cave; to some sort of very small time/space portal in someone’s bedroom, in another universe. (In which case the owner had one of those mornings that happen to all of us sometimes “but where could it have gone?”) Either of these would also serve as explanation for the strangely high incidence of shoes by the side of the railroad tracks in Portugal or the highway in the US. (The alternative is sudden footwear phobia syndrome so widespread and prevalent it appears in every culture. Or that shoes choose to commit suicide when faced with more efficient modes of transport than feet – that latter might explain why often it’s only left or right shoes. If you posit shoes as a dual entity perhaps it’s not so much bipolar as bilateral and one shoe is always more depressed than the other. [Oh, all right, I’ll behave].)

Is the mundane explanation likely right? Well, yes, I’m not completely insane yet. On the other hand there are events (some much crazier than this) where the mundane explanation is likely right, but it’s not the EASIEST one. And anyway, I imagine this little shard of weird will surface sometime in a story.

I wonder if everyone else is afflicted with this type of mind and only writers give vent to it, or if other people don’t even wonder about the surreal intrusions in their lives.

Mine is the mind that will now go through life thinking “It’s seven am. Do you know where your clothes are?”

The Books of Our Lives

All of us want to write something that matters.

I don’t know a single person who wakes up in the morning and says “I’m going to write an urban fantasy, just like all the other urban fantasies.”

Over the years of knowing a lot of writers, I’ve heard them talk about “this cool idea” more than once. I’ve never – okay, once, but that writer still isn’t published – heard the “cool idea” being something like “It will illuminate the injustice inherent in the human condition.”

In fact, when writers get together, either online, at cons, or in the case of my family at the dinner table, what we get is something like this “I was thinking of writing a story in this parallel world where street lights are sentient” then come details of characters, the beginning and usually something like “And then they find out they’re aliens.”

Does the street light world reflect the alien illumination cast by an invasive culture? Search me. (Use gloves.) That’s not how writers work. It simply isn’t.

Or rather, it’s not how genre writers work. For all I know there are people who DO sit around (probably in trendy coffee shops) saying something like “Zenith, my friend, I just ache to write a book about the heartbreak of psoriasis. ACHE I tell you!” However, those aren’t the sort of people I’d talk to, and I suspect they’re not the sort of people who write books, you know, with words in them. They just drink coffee and cry into their berets.

So, what point am I trying to make here?

My friend Mike Kabongo, who for his sins is a literary agent, did a post on this subject. I suspect – though he doesn’t say it – he did a post on this subject, because editors want to publish “significant” books and so he has to sell them to publishers as such.

I don’t envy him his job. In the past I’ve had to sell books to agents (who refused to send them out otherwise) as mind-changing, different, paradigm exploding. For science fiction that’s even more interesting because you can’t say “it’s a space opera and the twist is really in the plot, where it’s revealed that…” For fifteen years no agents would send out my science fiction because “you don’t have any brilliant new scientific idea.”

Okay – deep breath – it’s not that we want to write forgettable books, but most of us don’t get books in a form that we know what the “message” is. I’d argue when books come in that form they tend to end up as screeds and very boring. Beyond that, Mike makes a cogent argument that very few books, ever, change a person’s mind, and that they’re more likely to do so when the person is very young.

Heck, even Heinlein didn’t change my mind on anything with one book. He had a profound influence on my beliefs over time, but each of his books I read just for fun. Yes, they had a central idea. Yes, sometimes I even saw it. But while reading I didn’t care, I just knew it was a rip-roaring adventure I enjoyed. In re-reading I might pick up on the other ideas. And I reread him a lot, because it was a rip roaring adventure I enjoyed. (And my favorite Heinleins don’t have a “breakthrough science idea.” I’m sure other people had done alien mind-controlling invaders and sentient computers before he did.)

The second and more important thing is what I call “publishers thinking they’re Universities.” I.e. they think they can claim critical respectability and significance for genre by claiming the high ground of “message.” But that’s not how it works. Oh, a few of our number will make it over the hill – Umberto Ecco, who not coincidentally, is a philology professor and a few others – but most of the time the moment someone gets to that summit they’re not considered genre. Genre can’t be made respectable, because if it’s respectable it ceases being genre.

So, what to do? I don’t know. It’s one of those cases where it seems to me the publishers want something completely different from what the public wants. And the public doesn’t like the slow-message-laden, “serious” works that get the most push (hence the fall in circulation across the board.)

What do you guys think? Do you want each book you read to “blow your mind”? And do you want it to be in a life altering sort of way or just “Oh, I liked that” and “I never thought of magical jelly fish before”?

*Crossposted at Mad Genius Club.*

We Didn’t Invent Sex

(I write this fully conscious of the fact that it will bring a lot of very interesting spam to this post, but it has to be said.)

I became conscious of this when reading comments on a blog yesterday, where people seemed to be under the impression that fifty years ago most kids didn’t know sex EXISTED or what it consisted of. This is something I run into over and over again. For instance, in A Touch Of Night people were shocked, shocked that Lizzie would believe Bingley and Darcy were having an affair, because “how would she know about such things?”

This is very silly. Heinlein said that each generation thought they’d invented sex. He’s probably right, just like every generation thinks the next one is going to h*ll in a handbasket ever since the old testament was written and possibly before. (At some point we’ll decipher the scrawls in caves and come up with “things aren’t as they used to be. New generation can’t hunt, can barely gather. This newfangled agri thing will be the death of us. By next winter, no humans.)

It is however fostered by rule two of sex “everyone lies about sex.”

This is perfectly understandable, heck, acceptable to us today when we can look at surveys that say most boys are active and most girls aren’t and roll our eyes and go “and all of them lie.” BUT we tend to go misty eyed and think the past is another country where everyone tells the truth. And since what tends to survive puts their best foot forward, we assume we invented sex. We are the wicked generation and now our kids will pay…

Some reality checks: first, until our current generation where we are isolated from the animal kingdom and nature in general (but have the internet as a compensation.) Someone in that same blog yesterday was outraged that we thought “children in the past stood around watching animals have sex.” Look, even if they weren’t in farms, they had pets. They didn’t castrate their pets. It was inevitable they’d see something. And no, they’re not stupid enough not to know what it was. Plus, kids listen to adults talk and who knows? Perhaps there is such a thing as instinct.

The chances of a girl of Lizzy’s intelligence not knowing about sex and its “usual” variations are zilch. (And before you tell me that household pets aren’t homosexual, yes they are. Okay, not exclusively, and usually it’s a dominance thing, but she’d have seen it or heard of it.) Oh, she might have no idea of the exact mechanics between humans, but the concept would be there.

Okay, there are always unreally innocent people. Perhaps it’s a gift or a grace or they just lack instincts. However, growing up in a very traditional society and not paying much attention to what animals do, I’d worked out the basics of sex by the time I was eight. Not in practice of course, and I’d gotten some things laughably wrong (one or two of them didn’t get corrected until I got married and I think my husband still chuckles about them) but they weren’t in the essentials. Mostly they had to do with details of male anatomy and such. Still, I did have a friend who in the last year of highschool was COMPLETELY puzzled as to why a neighbor wanted to borrow her parents’ siamese cat “so that their cat could have kittens.” It wasn’t a put on, she really was flabbergasted and no, I don’t understand HOW, since she wasn’t stupid. Not the brightest bulb, perhaps, but she’s now an MD, so she couldn’t be completely dim. I suspect her mom, a very pious woman, just blocked off her intent to even enquire.

But this is not normal. This is not sane. Most sane kids, no matter what class and era, work out what happens by adolescence. It’s impossible to be that oblivious to one of the central preoccupations of mankind. And if you care to dig into Victorian biographies (or earlier. The regency was far more daring) you’ll find out that the lives of people were often as complex as they’re now, they just kept a better facade.

So, why does it matter? Well it matters for two reasons: one is that if we think we (or in the case of our generation the boomers, because it’s impossible to ignore the fact that they claim to have invented it. They’re so intent on telling everyone) invented sex we tend to give the discovery way more importance than it deserves.

The boomers fell into this trap. All the ills of the past were due to that evil thing “repression.” If only one destroyed traditional marriage and screwed around everything would be fine, great, hunky dory. Even more interesting, most neurosis and problems were because one didn’t screw around enough and if one JUST did it, everything would be fine.

Since most of civilization consists of putting the appetites we share with dogs to a useful social purpose, or at least put a good face on them, this view leads to dismantling civilization at its base. (Note here that I’m not advocating pushing gays back into the closet. Our treatment of homosexuality is as insane as anything else since the beginning of time, but as homosexuality has persisted and existed from the beginning of man, and as it exists in all the great primates, I don’t think just shoving our fingers in our ears and saying “lalalalalala” will take us back to where it didn’t. That too is part of believing that homosexuality was invented – with sex – yesterday. I do believe in gay marriage. No, I’m not going to debate it here. If you feel up to my opinions – and they’re profoundly traditional, not to say moralistic in base, even if I arrive at a very unique conclusion – look here. I don’t see any reason why all the appetites we share with dogs shouldn’t be socialized and made civilized.)

It also leads to thinking of sex as a cure all. If I had a dime for every time an adult informed me during my messed up teen years that if I just had sex I’d be fine, I’d be a very rich woman. You know what? They were wrong. I needed self-confidence. I needed knowledge of the world. More importantly, perhaps, I needed to know that I was normal (in ways other than sex.) Introducing sex to that equation would just have screwed me up more because sex brings instinctive feelings of attachment with it, and no man needed the ball of instability I was at the time. And no boy would be able to deal with it. Splendor in The Grass is not only a fairy tale, but one that deals with humans as they never existed.

Next, it causes us to give up hope in our time, and to view the generation after us as even more wicked. I mean, lookit, sex was invented yesterday, and look what they’re ALREADY up to.

So, let’s admit sex was not invented yesterday. It is not a cure all. We don’t need to evangelize the older generations with it. It won’t solve all our ills. It should never be the center and fulcrum of anyone’s life, unless their life is very poor of other interests.

It is also not the end of the world that young people are fumbling around and having sex too early. Some percentage always did. We can guide them. We SHOULD tell them that it is not a cure all or the solution to all their problems. Most of them will figure it out, mind you, anyway. We can stop pushing the weirder stuff at them.

But in the end sex is part of the human condition. It’s one of those friction points between man and beast. One of the bits that is not like onto the angels. Shoulder it as one more of the burdens of all too mortal flesh, make it sublime with love, repress it and turn the drive to something else, or indulge in it to clear the mind BUT don’t think you’re the first to do any of it. Or that you’ll be the last.

Oh, yeah and GRUMBLE let’s stop writing books where everything turns on sex and where the climax (eh eh eh eh eh – what, I never said I wasn’t juvenile) is when someone realizes someone else is really good in bed and therefore the plot is resolved. Unless you’re writing a porno (if you are, how does it pay?) this is just stupid and boring. Sex is just one of the primary colors, and not even a very good one. All you’re doing when you’re only writing with it is imitating pre-schoolers who finger paint an entire sheet in black because it’s the most visible color. Stop that, wash your hands (eh eh eh eh eh eh eh) and bring out the other paint pots. Love, charity, tenderness, hope, or even intellectual curiosity are far more satisfying as plot motors.

Everything I know of life I learned from Disney Comics

I don’t know exactly when I learned to read, but it was sometime around four, and mostly I seem to have learned by

following the action in Disney comic books and relating it to the words. If I could con an older relative (my brother, ten years older and my cousin Natalia, fourteen years older were the prime targets) into reading the books allowed to me, I’d memorize the sounds of the words, then compare those to other words with same letters… anyway, you get the point.

Years later, when my younger son was having trouble learning to read (he was six, ferheaven’s sake) and didn’t seem inclined to – as his brother did – just plunge right into Roman History texts, I thought “I wonder if he’d learn from comic books.”

Of course, the problem at that point was that most comic books nowadays have material not suitable for elementary schoolers… or middle schoolers… and you should be careful about the high schoolers.

Unlike Europe, where Disney comics are ubiquitous and can be found everywhere on newsstands, and read by everyone including adults (several characters and series exist that don’t here, and anthologies come out all the time that contain, you know “all Junior Woodchuck” stories), I’d never seen Disney comics in the states. This was before the full hit of the new comic craze, too, so I didn’t even know where the next comic bookstore was. So I searched online.

After some brief and bizarre encounters – do you guys know there’s Uncle Scrooge/Donald slash? I mean, let alone the sheer wrongness (they’re DUCKS) there’s the incest. Never mind – I found the company currently publishing Disney comics… Or rather, just about to quit publishing them.

They were trying to get rid of stock and for $500 you could purchase something like 1000 comics of the Donald and Mickey lines. I had $500 and did – though in retrospect, I regret not having spent the $2000 and got everything they’d ever printed – and got this HUGE box of comics.

On the one hand they worked for the kid. On the other hand, I found that a lot of what they had were reprints of comics dating back to the depression era, stuff I’d never seen. In comics as in most other such stuff, Europe JUST does not reprint and therefore has a much “shallower” memory than the US in many ways (which sounds counterintuitive.)

I found out that I could learn a lot more about the texture of daily life from comics of the thirties and forties than from books about those time periods. For instance, I’d never heard of Victory gardens before, in all my copious reading. I also didn’t fully understand how people felt… Like, there is a contest where the prize is a job as a hotel bell hop. Think about it. The prize is a … job. (Yeah, we’re getting there.) But there were also a lot more revelations – like the fact that Mickey used to go around with a gun almost his size. Which makes sense, I guess. If you’re a small mouse in a man’s world you’d best be armed. Or what was considered a really good meal. Or the fact that when Donald needs to track his nephews, he puts radioactive buttons on their hats.

But possibly the most important revelations were those that are hard to state explicitly. The way courting couples treat each other, for instance (it’s not as chauvinistic as we’ve been led to believe, but it IS different.) Or the way kids were expected to act – in comparison to even bratty kids today, Donald’s nephews could only be qualified as demonic. (How did they go all goody two shoes these days? There’s an entire sociology and education thesis on that alone.) Mickey’s nephews are not much better. And it’s clear that this was not considered out of the ordinary.

Some of it I had reason to suspect, like that animals were a lot more “disposable” than today. Try doing a comic today with a hero just kicking an animal out permanently for misbehaving.

Anyway, there’s an education in them there comics. Even accounting for the exaggeration of the medium (and of course there is some. Distortion, too) it shows an almost completely alien way of life, one that’s foreign to us and that is hard to intuit from scholarly works.

By the way, you can get sort of the same sort of feel from mysteries written and published in the first half of the 20th century. A feel for a life that was completely different in ways that more serious studies won’t allow you to see and that movies often don’t show. For that matter, mysteries are better than main stream novels simply because in mysteries, clues and circumstances are built of the quotidian. So, “normal life” holds center stage.

The past is another country, but comics – and sometimes mysteries – give you a visa to visit

Contrary to rumor I’m alive

Unfortuantely I spent the entire morning following the pukeomatic — Havey — and mopping up after him.

Meanwhile, I said posting would be weird for a while, and it will be as I absolutely have to finish this novel before the end of the month.

Yesterday I transferred my stuff to the new kindle, so I can actually access the web while in Portugal without having to go to my brother’s.  I’m now organizing it all into collections — you’d think they’d have an easy way to do that on the web, but no, you have to do it step by step like Juan Valdez.  So, it’s happening a little at a time.

So, now I go to get more coffee and then I write.  Send working thoughts my way.

It’s Already One Of Those Days

I and my friends at Mad Genius Club are dealing with the move from blogspot to WordPress, which I think we left a day too late, as bloger is still down and has now lost posts :/ 

The cats went on a rampage last night, pulling pictures off the wall.

I have a doctor’s appointment in ten minutes.

I’ve been trying to think of something to blog about, but can’t form any coherent ideas, so you’ll just have to take the above as my note to teacher as to why dog ate my homework.  I’ll post more later, if I’m up to it.

To The Pain

Yesterday my friend Kate Paulk talked to me about a discussion in a newsgroup about whether or not pain was needed to be able to create. She writes about it here: http://www.katepaulk.com/writing/brave-new-world/

At first I thought we were talking about the old romantic chestnut that you have to be a “haunted being” or live in a garret to write. Turned out no. The discussion centered on brave new world and whether one could medicate the “pain” of being human and still create.

Guys… I studied psychology. (It’s a long time ago, and I was much younger, and besides that wench is as good as dead.) I remember from adolescent psychology that what brings about growth is coming to a crisis point, which then causes one “evolve” into a higher plane.

There have always been two views of Man, and pedagogical philosophy seems to lurch between the two like a drunkard on an uneven street hitting first one wall and then the other.

There is the camp that believes humans are born angels and then society corrupts them. And then the second one believes humans are born evil and you have to beat them into being human.

Need I tell you that not only are both of them wrong, they both produce untold amounts of suffering? The first one, perhaps most propagated by Jean Jacques Rosseau (and Doctor Spock!) has spread suffering around wondrously for the last forty years, by giving us a few generations of “no frustration children” who were taught the world revolved around their belly buttons.

The second one gives us neurotic people, often very high achieving, but also very often self-doubting and suffering.

Of course most parents never bother with either camp, and just love their kid and try to keep the kid in a modicum of good social behavior. In fact, I’d blame a lot of problems with education on “how to raise your child” books, since kids are distinctly individual and tend not to respond to “unified theories of child raising.” Just with my two – one of them needed to be restrained from doing the world’s craziest things and the other has to be continuously encouraged to have faith in himself. I suspect there are all sorts of variations in between. The first thought time outs were for sissies. The younger one would actually stay in time out. Etc. Mostly I used books on how to raise kids as kindling for which I’m glad to report they’re excellent. However, a lot of parents turned to these books in the last two decades and I see the results every day. I prefer the kids whose parents just took them as they were and tried to make them into adults that would be able to function.

BUT whichever method of education you use, there seems to be only one way for humans to grow. I honestly have no idea if humans will get potty trained if you never convince them to. I have heard horror stories of nine year olds in adult diapers, because the parents refused to “pressure” them, but those might be urban legends. I know one of my sons refused to be potty trained until I pointed out no potty training, no third birthday party, and then he was perfectly potty trained within a week.

The point is that even if you assume kids won’t be potty trained till forced to, the time will come when their classmates or, heaven forbid, co-workers will make fun of them and taunt them – i.e. inflict pain – until they are. It is pretty much the same with every other thing humans need to learn to be civilized. If your parents don’t do you the favor of housebreaking you (and I don’t mean just literally) then society will do it for you.

You see, humans are not born as angels or demons. They’re born as… Animals. This is a function of having a body and sharing the basic functions of life and the basic appetites of life with other animals (certainly with other mammals.) To live in a civilization, be it Western or the furthest, deepest, most isolated hunter-gathering tribe in the depths of the rain forest, that animal nature needs to be “tamed.” The extent to which it is tamed and the way the taming manifests itself will depend on the physical environment and the social rules of the group the human is growing up in.

To put this in other terms, this is like every kitten is born a kitten. To live with humans, they have to be socialized. Some basic rules will apply wherever that kitten will live – no biting. No scratching your human. Now, whether the cat shares the sleeping mat of a tribesman in deepest, greenest rain forest or the studio apartment of an editor in NYC dictates other rules: don’t pee on the carpet, vs pee everywhere but on the human. Or don’t stray off to hunt mice in the undergrowth vs. any mouse that comes into the apartment is yours. Or…

But one thing is the same, kitten or human. The animal will continue doing what comes naturally unless it becomes unpleasant. Changing your behavior is TROUBLE. Unless there’s greater trouble in not changing it, you just won’t. This is part of the animal nature. Part of having a body. This applies whether you’re a human, a cat, a dog or a three-toed sloth.

This means that in the broad sense, that you have to be thwarted – either by your parents, or more cruelly, later, by society – to change enough to live and be happy – let alone creative – in society, because in society, by definition, you’re not always going to get your way. (And those who think this is an evil side effect of civilization are invited to read about primate organization or watch a mother cat discipline her kittens.) And you need to know how to deal with that. In fact, you need to preemptively learn to restrain your impulses/behavior so that others can live around you.

Now, most of the things you have to learn are stuff like… don’t eat from other people’s plates. Of course, the correctives, physical or not are not going to be very severe on this, right? You don’t think of the burning heartache of not eating from other people’s plates. (At least I hope not.)

But sooner or later, on your way to being an adult you’re going to be thwarted in a major way – unable to get something you really want – either someone’s love, or entrance to a school or the grade you wanted or even the job you wanted. And then you’re going to have to change your goal and learn and grow. This is usually the type of suffering that leaves scars. And the scar makes you better. To those I would add the pain of not being as you want to be. For instance, I learned early that I am almost bizarrely uncoordinated (not unusual for children born very premature) which meant while I loved sports sports don’t love me.

I don’t know any human who reaches adulthood without pain. The Princess Bride quote applies here: Life IS pain, Highness. Anyone who tells you different is trying to sell you something.

Now, it is possible to raise a child with minimal pain. You potty train them and such, but you never, ever, ever let them suffer disappointment or failure.

Apparently a lot of parents have attempted this led, of course, by their love for their children, because we are hearing about people who go to pieces the first time they fail at something, in their late twenties and thirties.

Again, this is another of those things where you have to cruel to be kind. You have to let your children experience little failures and little pains, so they may learn to experience the inevitable big ones. (And yeah, I understand the desire to protect them. How many times, holding my kid who was crying because a toy broke, I thought “let this be your worst grief”?) Because pain is unavoidable. See above LIFE IS PAIN. No one lives in a permanent state of bliss. Nor would it be desirable.

So, let’s suppose people are drugged into being happy all the time, regardless of what happens? (This seems to be the goal of some of our medical professionals that I’ve encountered. Or rather, they think we should be neither happy nor unhappy but “even” – never, I think, having met a bipolar person and therefore assuming it’s the normal fluctuations that are a “disease.” Who knows?)

Well, then people are drugged all the time. Depending on what you use, they might still be experiencing pain just not aware of it. You might even erase the memory of the little pains of becoming “tamed”. Would people like this, who have, in their memory experienced only bliss be able to create great art?

Honeys, I don’t think they’d be able to get up off the sofa or hold a coherent conversation – they’d be missing one of the basic experiences of being human. I don’t know what they’d be. Perhaps very messy house plants? But human where in counts – internally – never.

For a writer, particularly, whose tool boxes are emotions, the more emotions you use and learn how to apply, the better. I think if you’ve never been happy, you’ll not be a wonderful writer, either.

As in drawing you first lay down the darkest tints and the brightest ones, then fill in the middles in relation to those —  you need to know real pain and real happiness before your work can hit all the mid tints.

If you avoid pain, you avoid life.