Author: Sarah A. Hoyt

*For those of you who have been around for a while and who get flash-backs.  This is a blast from the past post, written originally in May 16 2011.  Largely I still stand by it.  I will note that since then what I’ve seen more of is the younger generations convinced of the old boomer idea that sex solves all ills, and pushing it at older people as though they think older people never heard of it.  It’s like “Oh, you’re depressed?  you need more indiscriminate sex and fewer inhibitions.”  Mind you, I’m not running down sex.  I’m a fan.  But like fire it’s a powerful force and sometimes inhibitions and considerations are what keeps us from burning our house down.  Also, anyone under thirty who thinks they know everything about sex to the point of preaching to older people needs to take a really deep breath and then go sit in the corner, because that’s where ridiculous brats belong.*

I became conscious of this when reading comments on a blog yesterday, where people seemed to be under the impression that fifty years ago most kids didn’t know sex EXISTED or what it consisted of. This is something I run into over and over again. For instance, in my (and Sofie Skapski’s) take on Pride and Prejudice (now with more dragons)  A Touch Of Night people were shocked, shocked that Lizzie would believe Bingley and Darcy were having an affair, because “how would she know about such things?”

This is very silly. Heinlein said that each generation thought they’d invented sex. He’s probably right, just like every generation thinks the next one is going to h*ll in a handbasket ever since the old testament was written and possibly before. (At some point we’ll decipher the scrawls in caves and come up with “things aren’t as they used to be. New generation can’t hunt, can barely gather. This newfangled agri thing will be the death of us. By next winter, no humans.)

It is however fostered by rule two of sex “everyone lies about sex.”

This is perfectly understandable, heck, acceptable to us today when we can look at surveys that say most boys are active and most girls aren’t and roll our eyes and go “and all of them lie.” BUT we tend to go misty eyed and think the past is another country where everyone tells the truth. And since what tends to survive puts their best foot forward, we assume we invented sex. We are the wicked generation and now our kids will pay…

Some reality checks: first, until our current generation where we are isolated from the animal kingdom and nature in general (but have the internet as a compensation.) kids couldn’t avoid seeing sex. Someone in that same blog yesterday was outraged that we thought “children in the past stood around watching animals have sex.” Look, even if they weren’t in farms, they had pets. They didn’t castrate their pets. It was inevitable they’d see something. And no, they’re not stupid enough not to know what it was. Plus, kids listen to adults talk and who knows? Perhaps there is such a thing as instinct.

The chances of a girl of Lizzy’s intelligence not knowing about sex and its “usual” variations are zilch. (And before you tell me that household pets aren’t homosexual, yes they are. Okay, not exclusively, and usually it’s a dominance thing, but she’d have seen it or heard of it.) Oh, she might have no idea of the exact mechanics between humans, but the concept would be there.

Okay, there are always un-really innocent people. Perhaps it’s a gift or a grace or they just lack instincts. However, growing up in a very traditional society and not paying much attention to what animals do, I’d worked out the basics of sex by the time I was eight. Not in practice of course, and I’d gotten some things laughably wrong (one or two of them didn’t get corrected until I got married and I think my husband still chuckles about them) but they weren’t in the essentials. Mostly they had to do with details of male anatomy and such. Still, I did have a friend who in the last year of highschool was COMPLETELY puzzled as to why a neighbor wanted to borrow her parents’ siamese cat “so that their cat could have kittens.” It wasn’t a put on, she really was flabbergasted and no, I don’t understand HOW, since she wasn’t stupid. Not the brightest bulb, perhaps, but she’s now an MD, so she couldn’t be completely dim. I suspect her mom, a very pious woman, just blocked off her intent to even inquire.

But this is not normal. This is not sane. Most sane kids, no matter what class and era, work out what happens by adolescence. It’s impossible to be that oblivious to one of the central preoccupations of mankind. And if you care to dig into Victorian biographies (or earlier. The regency was far more daring) you’ll find out that the lives of people were often as complex as they’re now, they just kept a better facade.

So, why does it matter? Well it matters for two reasons: one is that if we think we (or in the case of our generation the boomers who came just before us, because it’s impossible to ignore the fact that they claim to have invented it. They’re so intent on telling everyone) invented sex we tend to give the discovery way more importance than it deserves.

The boomers fell into this trap. All the ills of the past were due to that evil thing “repression.” If only one destroyed traditional marriage and screwed around everything would be fine, great, hunky dory. Even more interesting, most neurosis and problems were because one didn’t screw around enough and if one JUST did it, everything would be fine.

Since most of civilization consists of putting the appetites we share with dogs to a useful social purpose, or at least put a good face on them, this view leads to dismantling civilization at its base. (Note here that I’m not advocating pushing gays back into the closet. Our treatment of homosexuality is as insane as anything else since the beginning of time, but as homosexuality has persisted and existed from the beginning of man, and as it exists in all the great primates, I don’t think just shoving our fingers in our ears and saying “lalalalalala” will take us back to where it didn’t. That too is part of believing that homosexuality was invented – with sex – yesterday. I do believe in gay marriage. No, I’m not going to debate it here. If you feel up to my opinions – and they’re profoundly traditional, not to say moralistic in base, even if I arrive at a very unique conclusion – look here. I don’t see any reason why all the appetites we share with dogs shouldn’t be socialized and made civilized.)

It also leads to thinking of sex as a cure all. If I had a dime for every time an adult informed me during my messed up teen years that if I just had sex I’d be fine, I’d be a very rich woman. You know what? They were wrong. I needed self-confidence. I needed knowledge of the world. More importantly, perhaps, I needed to know that I was normal (in ways other than sex.) Introducing sex to that equation would just have screwed me up more because sex brings instinctive feelings of attachment with it, and no man needed the ball of instability I was at the time. And no boy would be able to deal with it. Splendor in The Grass is not only a fairy tale, but one that deals with humans as they never existed.

Next, it causes us to give up hope in our time, and to view the generation after us as even more wicked. I mean, lookit, sex was invented yesterday, and look what they’re ALREADY up to.

So, let’s admit sex was not invented yesterday. It is not a cure all. We don’t need to evangelize the older generations with it. It won’t solve all our ills. [And just a year after this post I read about a woman giving her devout Catholic mother a dildo for Christmas even though her mother had asked her not to, because her mother needed to “loosen up” and “learn to enjoy pleasure.” This is exactly what this article is talking about.  Leave people alone.  Chances are they know more about sex than you do, and have learned to cope with it in their own way.]  It should never be the center and fulcrum of anyone’s life, unless their life is very poor of other interests.

It is also not the end of the world that young people are fumbling around and having sex too early. Some percentage always did. We can guide them. We SHOULD tell them that it is not a cure all or the solution to all their problems. Most of them will figure it out, mind you, anyway. We can stop pushing the weirder stuff at them.

But in the end sex is part of the human condition. It’s one of those friction points between man and beast. One of the bits that is not like onto the angels. Shoulder it as one more of the burdens of all too mortal flesh, make it sublime with love, repress it and turn the drive to something else, or indulge in it to clear the mind BUT don’t think you’re the first to do any of it. Or that you’ll be the last.

Oh, yeah and GRUMBLE let’s stop writing books where everything turns on sex and where the climax (eh eh eh eh eh – what? I never said I wasn’t juvenile) is when someone realizes someone else is really good in bed and therefore the plot is resolved. Unless you’re writing a porno (if you are, how does it pay?) this is just stupid and boring. Sex is just one of the primary colors, and not even a very good one. All you’re doing when you’re only writing with it is imitating pre-schoolers who finger paint an entire sheet in black because it’s the most visible color. Stop that, wash your hands (eh eh eh eh eh eh eh) and bring out the other paint pots. Love, charity, tenderness, hope, or even intellectual curiosity are far more satisfying as plot motors.

Is there anything government can’t do?

Oh, yeah, pretty much all the things they are supposed to do.  Yet, here is the UK government trying to be a Nanny to married (or living together) couples.

The Prime Minister said that nine out of ten households will soon be required by the companies that provide their internet to turn off a pre-set parental control filter if they want to access online pornography in their homes.

Earlier on Monday Google vowed to block child pornography, with David Cameron welcoming the move to tackle illegal images as a “significant step forward”.

If you think the Earth is hot now, try wearing plate armor in the Middle Ages.

A Swedish study found that the planet was warmer in ancient Roman times and the Middle Ages than today, challenging the mainstream idea that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are the main drivers of global warming.

The study, by scientist Leif Kullman, analyzed 455 “radiocarbon-dated mega-fossils” in the Scandes mountains and found that tree lines for different species of trees were higher during the Roman and Medieval times than they are today. Not only that, but the temperatures were higher as well.

*Crossposted from Mad Genius Club, where I figure my colleagues also need some promotion*

Have you considered buying mad for the holidays?  Now, we don’t mean spending mad money – I mean who has that these days? – but if you have enjoyed this blog, and the tips and mini workshops, you might wish to reward the mad ones by putting a little money in our pockets.  I mean, we writers are insubstantial creatures of thought and imagination and… no, wait, we’re not, and we need to eat.  Also, you wouldn’t believe the wear and tear on the straight jackets, around here.

We don’t have a tip jar up, but we make our living from writing — and if you want to make us happy, you’ll throw a few shekels our way.  We are d*mn good value in entertainment too.  So, below, there’s a list of books you might want to buy.

Say your fancy lightly turns to light fantasy.  Okay, I lie, my (Sarah’s) first books are about as light as that fruitcake that your aunt Minnie used to make, all soaked in rum and stuff.  Yeah, that one.  With that, Jerry Pournelle once said they were the most charming of the Hoyt body of work, so who knows, it might be up your alley.

Ill Met By Moonlight

When Will Shakespeare comes over to find his new wife and his just-born daughter missing, little does he know that it will plunge him into an adventure involving the Byzantine intrigues of the descendants of Titania and Oberon or that it will change his life forever.

“Will stopped at the entrance to the garden, his hand on the rickety wooden gate.  A feeling of doom came over him like the presage of some evil thing. ”

On the other hand, let’s say that what you want is … more… Noir Fantasy.  You could do worse than

ConVent

A vampire, a werewolf, an undercover angel and his succubus squeeze. Whoever picked this team to save the world wasn’t thinking of sending the very best. But then, since this particular threat to the universe and everything good is being staged in science fiction conventions, amid people in costume, misfits and creative geniuses, any conventional hero would have stood out. Now Jim, the vampire, and his unlikely sidekicks have to beat the clock to find out who’s sacrificing con goers before all hell breaks loose — literally.

ConVent is proof that Kate Paulk’s brain works in wonderfully mysterious ways. A sarcastic vampire, his werewolf best buddy, an undercover angel and his succubus squeeze. The “Save the world” department really messed it up this time.

You prefer something more… solid?  Well, you can try Amanda Green’s fantasy/police procedural:

Nocturnal Origins

Some things can never be forgotten, no matter how hard you try.Detective Sergeant Mackenzie Santos knows that bitter lesson all too well. The day she died changed her life and her perception of the world forever.It doesn’t matter that everyone, even her doctors, believe a miracle occurred when she awoke in the hospital morgue. Mac knows better. It hadn’t been a miracle, at least not a holy one. As far as she’s concerned, that’s the day the dogs of Hell came for her.Investigating one of the most horrendous murders in recent Dallas history, Mac also has to break in a new partner and deal with nosy reporters who follow her every move and who publish confidential details of the investigation without a qualm.Complicating matters even more, Mac learns the truth about her family and herself, a truth that forces her to deal with the monster within, as well as those on the outside.But none of this matters as much as discovering the identity of the murderer before he can kill again. Still not happy?  How about Kate Paulk’s POINTED historical fantasy?

Impaler

Impaler by Kate Paulk revisits the tale of Vlad Dracul, also known as Vlad Tepes and Vlad the Impaler. This is the tale of historical fact mixed with fiction and a touch of fantasy. But this is most definitely not the tired tale of vampires skulking in the night, lying in wait for innocent victims. Impaler tells the tale of a man devoted to family and country, cursed and looking for redemption.

December, 1476. The only man feared by the all-conquering Ottoman Sultan battles to reclaim his throne. If he falls all of Europe lies open to the Ottoman armies. If he succeeds…

His army is outnumbered and outclassed, his country is tiny, and he is haunted by a terrible curse. But Vlad Draculea will risk everything on one almost impossible chance to free his people from the hated Ottoman Empire.

Or how about a bit of mystery, a bit of humor, an urban fantasy as it should be done:

Bolg, PI: Vampire Bride

A humorous, satirical noir detective urban fantasy, set in a small city in flyover country, which has an unusually high population of Trolls, werewolves, fairies and a dwarf.

Private Investigator Bolg, a Pictish gentleman who happens to be vertically challenging, a self-proclaimed dwarf and tattooed so heavily he appears blue, finds himself called on undertake paranormal cases: in this case tracing the Vampire bride’s absconded or kidnapped groom.

The groom should have been a troll by the name of Billy Gruff, the manager and owner of the Ricketty-Racketty Club – a topless bar and nightclub. Bolg finds himself, and his client embroiled in murder, extortion and a Celtic wizard. The latter is supposedly helping him, but wizard’s help is not always what it you think it will be.

No?  Science Fiction, then?

The Forlorn

Across the one human colony world, a place technologically regressed to near medieval, possibly the last place humans still survive, a desperate search continues. Scattered across the deserts, tangled jungles, and alien fortresses, lie the core sections of the matter transmitter.

These sections hold the key to vast wealth, power, or… the fulfilment of the colony’s purpose: to help humankind survive the rabidly xenophobic alien Morkth who will tolerate no other intelligent species. The Morkth managed to follow the colony ship, and, despite their mothership being shot down and their queen being killed, they continue their relentless struggle to destroy humankind… and to reconstruct that incredibly valuable matter transmitter. If they succeed, they’ll be able to return to the hive with the location of the colony of vile humans, and have a new world to occupy. If they fail, they’ll destroy the planet.

The search has gone on for centuries, and it is all reaching an end point. The future hangs in the balance.

The Morkth have lasers, aircraft, nukes. Those who want the core sections for their own ends… have vast armies. Against them are three unlikely reluctant heroes: A street child thief, a dispossessed spoiled brat of a princess, and a confused, amoral Morkth-raised human, armed only with 14th century weapons and their own wits.

It’s a lost cause, a forlorn hope.

But it’s all humans have.

*Remember this is a raw bit, and I haven’t yet had the opportunity to reconcile it.  Besides, I’m dealing with a lot of unreliable narrators.  So, if I contradict previous chapters, roll with it.  I do have a feeling this is the truth at last, though.  Witchfinder now has a cover and is waiting only my going over the copyedited manuscript before I remove it from the blog and send out e-arcs to those who have subscribed.  (I’ll also send them the very final when it’s officially released around February.) I really hope to do it in the next month.  Meanwhile, if you subscribe to Rogue Magic for $6 you shall get copies when it’s done.*

NOTICE: For those unsure about copyright law and because there was a particularly weird case, just because I’m making the pre-first draft of my novel available to blog readers, it doesn’t mean that this isn’t copyrighted to me.  Rogue Magic as all the contents of this blog is © Sarah A. Hoyt 2013.  Do not copy, alter, distribute or resell without permission.  Exceptions made for ATTRIBUTED quotes as critique or linking to this blog. Credit for the cover image is © Ateliersommerland | Dreamstime.com

For previous chapters, read here

Seraphim Ainsling, Duke of Darkwater and Lord Witchfinder:

There is a point a man attains when he’s been hit on the head once too many times.  While I had yet to suffer a physical blow, it felt very much like I’d been under a rain of concussive hits.

First, Jonathan’s arrival.  The Earl of Savage, certainly, always had the effect of making me feel like the more drunk he acted, the more I must have been drinking.  No, that’s not exactly it.  It was more like there was a field of drunkenness that extended all around him in a wide dispersal pattern and made everyone around him dazed and unable to think clearly.

I’d come to believe it was part of his magic, some sort of power that made everyone around him susceptible to what was undoubtedly a cunning mind and a great power of deception.  In fact, if you mentioned Jonathan Blythe in most circles, you’d get a shrug and a sigh and sometimes a smirk.  That would have been Seraphim’s own reaction just months ago.  It was a very useful way to present himself, Seraphim judged.  After all, who else could get away with having his father commit suicide while alone in the house with him, and ascending to the honors and dignity without the slightest suspicion of foul play attaching to him.

That Jonathan had come in just as Seraphim thought he was about to crack Miss Ginevra Mythborn, whatever she might TRULY turn out to be was only part of the annoyance.  The fact that he’d brought with him some sort of magical bomb that had reduced Richard the Lion Heart, in his dual form, to pebble size rubble that covered Palace square and caused a traffic hazard was only an additional annoyance.  In fact, I’d fully come to expect that where Jonathan went real or metaphorical explosions followed.

But in the name of all that was holy, what had I done to deserve having Marlon, earl of Sydell and my brother Gabriel’s… cher ami descending on me talking apocalyptic nonsense, and claiming that Gabriel had split asunder, all in a voice that sounded like he’d either been reading the gloomier prophets or had drunk rather deep of blue ruin, or probably both.

Then there was Caroline, my scapegrace younger sister, and Akakios, the centaur prince she’d got betrothed to.  And he was really a centaur in centaur form, something that shouldn’t be possible in this earth, with our amount of magic.  In fact, it was because of that, that we’d taken steps to have him taught how to act like a human among humans, though from the reports from his masters about his sullen and solitary rumbles, that hadn’t been going all that well.  Still, you didn’t expect him to escape with Caroline, yet, and descend on me in this fashion, also talking about Gabriel and something dreadful happening to Gabriel and by extension all of fairyland.

Of course, if I’d had Jonathan handy, I’d have resurrected the iron maiden, which I’m sure is somewhere in the depths of the palace of my father in law the king, and got him to tell me the truth for once.  I did not doubt for a moment that he knew it.  Deep files, like Jonathan, always know these things, they just play it close to the vest for their own purposes, which are usually so deep that even they, themselves might not understand them.  But Jonathan had vanished with the redheaded siren, and if I knew Jonathan – and I did – was even now performing the act he tended to refer to as “tuping” with her.

So I was left with the option of either pulling all my hair out – and it would look very odd at the next royal affair to have the prince consort exhibit bald patches and raw flesh on his scalp.  It would lead to rumors that I was diseased and would doubtlessly cause my wife and future son to die.  The other option was to run to my apartments in the royal palace, kidnap my wife, and take her back to the world in which she’d been concealed from our magicians while growing up.  Earth, she called it, which was nonsense, since there are dozens of earths.  Perhaps hundreds.  Of course, she didn’t know that growing up, because her earth is quite devoid of magic, and therefore they can’t walk between the universes.  But that same characteristic seemed very reposeful now.  I’d take Nell back to her adopted grandmother, and we’d settle in to look after their farm there, and we would never again cross between the worlds, nor have anything to do with magical worlds attacking each other nor, for that matter, with magic, nor…

The dream lasted about three seconds, and burst like a soap bubble.  The problem is that Nell is not just the heir to the crown of Avalon.  She is that, and descended, in unbroken line, from Richard the Lion Hearted and beyond that probably from Arthur, though a great disruption occurred with Merlin was encased in his prison, and we can’t be sure of any history before that.

But Avalon being a highly magical world, kingship is more than that – possibly part of the reason we’d never gone in for more democratic and people-driven forms of government as Nell’s Earth had.  It is a mystical bond between king and land.

When Nell had been missing, even though her father was yet the monarch regnant, we’d been fractured and at great risk, and the magic hadn’t worked quite right.

Of course, at this point I was willing to take that over staying here and enduring the madness, but Nell wouldn’t.  She’d tell me about her duty and how she belonged here.  She’d tell me that all the more convincingly because she felt a great temptation to go back to being Nell Felix, on earth, and forget her real origins.

Worse, she was carrying our child, the next royal heir.  She would not leave and take the child with her, but worse, she would not deprive her parents of their grandson.  Too long, they’d missed and mourned their missing daughter, and now they were to be rewarded by seeing their grandson grow before their eyes.

No.  That was a bust.  I could not remove Nell from Avalon.

Which left me only one option.

“In,” I screamed.  “In to my office this very instant.”

They had been arguing with each other, Akakios, Marlon and Caroline.  Akakios maintained that Gabriel was dead, Marlon screamed back at him that no, he wasn’t, and Caroline… Heaven only knows what she found to add to the discussion, except that I could hear her shrill voice over both of them.  It’s possible she was telling Marlon her fiancé was a prince, though surely that was too strange even for Caroline?

At my scream – you must understand I was properly trained and I very rarely even raise my voice – they looked surprised.  For a moment I thought they’d argue with me.

They thought so too, but they didn’t.  Instead, they scrambled over the pebble-strewn ground into the building.

When I followed them, I found Marlon pacing in front of my desk, Caroline primly seated in a chair, and Akakios standing behind her, with his hands on her shoulders.  I will point out that despite the straits we were in and the fact that it was taking me all my will power not to tear my hair out, they presented a very odd picture.  I didn’t know whether to be grateful or worried that Akakios had taken the time to dress in a coat and shirt which made his human half look entirely incongruous atop the horse body.

As I went around behind my desk, they all talked at the same time.  I held up my hand.  “No, let Marlon speak.  I must hear this.”  I thought feelings or no feelings, a juvenile centaur could not know as much as the most learned taumathurgic mathematician of the century.

“Gabriel,” he said, looking at me, “Has splintered.  It is possible, you know, for a creature like him—” he paused.  “I suppose like me too, half human and half elf.  He’s torn in two, a human half and an elf half.  I think it happened a month ago, because he’s been…”  He frowned.  “He’s been all like them.  I thought it was just that he was adapting.  He does that, become all elf, then al human for a time, then… But I don’t think so.  I think this is more serious.  I think…  I think something has happened.  He’s been encouraged to split.”

“But why?” I asked.

Marlon sighed and flung himself on a chair.  “Because like this, he is not a strong enough elf to hold the throne of fairyland.  Strangely, his human half lends the other half power.  But this… this will lead to civil war in fairyland.  It might be a local conspiracy, but I think… I think it is an attack by the mythworld.  You see, they’d need to go through fairyland to absorb us.”

There are times when it feels like I’ve fallen down the Twilight Zone version of the rabbit hole. Those days used to be the exception, not the rule. Unfortunately, the opposite seems to be true these days. Maybe it’s just because we’ve had ice on the ground for almost a week — something we rarely have in this part of Texas. Or maybe it’s something else. All I know for sure is that I’m ready for some sense of sanity to return before everything implodes.

It’s bad enough to open the paper or turn on the news and see our president taking a “selfie” at the funeral for Nelson Mandela. Funny how his backers have taken to the airwaves and social media to tell those of us who were more than a bit taken aback by this lack of decorum — not to mention bad taste or giving the rest of the world yet another reason to laugh at us as a country — that we really ought not worry about what was happening. They’ve used this breach of etiquette to gloss over the fact that he shook hands with Raul Castro (with Obama grinning like he was greeting a long lost friend in the image I saw) as well as the fact he avoided the media on the plane while former President Bush spent time with them.

Now, Obama isn’t the first president to shake the hand of either Castro brother. Also, the unwritten rules of behavior would make it almost impossible for him not to greet the Cuban leader at the tribute for Mandela. But the selfie is something else. I don’t care whether or not Michelle looked like she disapproved. I don’t give a flying leap that another world leader might have been in the picture. The fact that the President of the United States was engaging in behavior normally reserved for teens or spoiled celebrities and that the picture of him doing so has been plastered all over social media and news reports does bother me. Unfortunately, it doesn’t surprise me because I’ve known for a long time that Obama is a spoiled kid in a man’s body who pouts when he doesn’t get his way and who uses his position to act as a bully as he tries to push through legislation that is aimed at tearing down too many of our rights under the Constitution.

But that isn’t the only “WTF” moment to take place during the Mandela memorial and involving Obama. There’s the issue of the so-called interpreter for the deaf who was within feet of Obama and other heads of state. You know the one I’m talking about. The one who’s “signing” didn’t resemble anything we’d seen before. The one who didn’t know the sign for “Mandela”. The one the Secret Service, nor any other security service it seems, vetted before letting him so close to their charges. The one who now claims he does know sign language but that, at the time, he was suffering a schizophrenic break. The one who was hired by a company hired by the South African government, a company no one can find the owners of now.

Can anyone say “recipe for disaster”?

Perhaps the problem is that Obama is too much a product of the Chicago political machine. After all, Chief of Police Garry McCarthy has shown he has absolutely no respect or regard for the Second Amendment. McCarthy doesn’t think anyone (except, I assume, cops and possibly the military) should have guns. He’s said he is going to train his officers to shoot first if they see someone with a gun and ask questions later. The situation doesn’t matter, apparently. If a person has a gun in their hands, they must be doing something wrong. After all, according to him, “Carrying a loaded firearm is the gateway crime to committing a murder.”

But if all that isn’t a sign that we’ve fallen down a warped version of the rabbit hole, there’s more. There’s the “article” that came across my desk yesterday in support of State Senator Wendy Davis in her run for governor. For those of you not familiar with Senator Davis, she hit the “big time” when she tried to filibuster a proposed Texas abortion law. I say “tried to filibuster” because she failed to remember the rules and failed. But the fact she fought the bill and did so in her tennis shoes got her on the front page of a number of papers, especially outside of Texas, and she is now the darling of the Democratic Party down here.

The so-called article was slamming Texas conservatives because of the new voter ID law. You know the one I mean: you have to show a valid photo ID when you go in to vote. If you don’t, you can file a provisional vote (something critics always seem to conveniently forget just as they also forget you can get a free ID for voting purposes from the Texas DPS).

What surprised me with the article wasn’t that it was so much a criticism of the law itself as much as the fact the article claimed the law was an attempt to disenfranchise liberal women. The reason for this criticism is because some women have a different name listed on their voter’s registration card than is on their ID.

Now, let’s throw a little water on their argument. First, the name on your registration is supposed to be your legal name — just as it is supposed to be on your ID. If you change your name on one, you surely can take a moment to change it on the other. It isn’t that difficult. Besides, voting isn’t the only time you have to show ID to do something. If you are cashing a check, you have to show ID and your name had better be the same. If you are flying anywhere, you have to show ID and, guess what, your name has to be the same on your ticket as it is on your ID. But, following the same “logic” the Davis supporters use, these are also acts meant to disenfranchise liberal women.

Sigh.

Unfortunately this , hopefully temporary, lapse of sanity isn’t confined to politics. Our judicial system has also seemed to take leave of the common sense a flea has. A local judge just sentenced a defendant to 10 years probation and mandatory rehab after he killed 4 people and injured a number of others while driving impaired. The facts aren’t really in dispute. This young man was something like three times over the legal definition of “intoxicated”. He’d been drinking and, if I remember correctly, was also high. This wasn’t his first problem with alcohol, just the one with the most long-lasting repercussions.

When the case went to court, the prosecutors asked the judge to throw the book at the kid. His attorney used the “affluenza” defense. In other words, he argued that the kid was too rich, too pampered and too spoiled without any sense of responsibility to be held responsible for his actions. You see, it was all his parents’ fault. They’d never made poor Johnny take responsibility for his actions before and it was cruel and unusual punishment to do so now. The judge bought that argument. Now the poor little rich kid is going to spend some time in a California rehab facility and he isn’t supposed to see his evil parents for two years. And the families of those he killed will never again see their loved ones.

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. After all, our education system has turned into anything but that. There are districts that don’t allow for homework. Or, if they have homework, it can’t be graded. Others let kids take tests over and over until they get the grade they want. Discipline is a thing of the past as is creative lesson planning (on a whole. I know there are exceptions but they are few and far between). The current system is putting out graduates who don’t know how to engage in critical thinking and who have no idea what it feels like to fail and who, as a result, will crumble when they get into the real world and find out they really aren’t as special as they’ve been told for years. Worse, we are dumbing down our country and will have at least one or two generations of mediocrity. Heaven help us.

There has to come a point where we stop accepting this new status quo. We have to hold our leaders accountable for their actions and behavior. We have to teach our kids how to be responsible and productive members of society. We are not a society of automatons and we shouldn’t try to become one. Being equal under the law doesn’t mean we are all the same and should march in lock step, shoulder to shoulder as we give homage to being politically correct.

The United States was founded by individuals with their own codes of honor who happened to believe in a few fundamental rights. We should value those rights as much, if not more, than did they. It is time to let our voices be heard. It is time to pull this country out of the Twilight Zone version of the rabbit hole that its fallen through. Let’s find ways to return common sense and accountability to our lives, to our judiciary and, most of all, to our government.

Back when I was growing up in Portugal, in the sixties and seventies, leftists were very fond of saying that America was a paper tiger.  They were almost right.

America, more than any other country is founded on paper — on words.  Oh, sure other countries have broken with established order, and other countries have founded their government on words.

But with us the seminal act, the one that brought us to life as a country started with words, in this case the words of the declaration of independence.

Before those words echoed, we were just British subjects, albeit in a far flung territory.  And there were those among us who were loyal to other countries, too, the ones they’d come from.

Heinlein captures this beautifully in The Moon is A Harsh Mistress with (I’m paraphrasing from memory) “… and there was many a Frenchman among us whose heart belonged to la belle patrie.  But patriotism to Luna?  The moon was rock, was place of punishment.”

While the territory of the US was not a place of punishment, not a prison colony, it partook somewhat of that. [And it wasn’t totally NOT a place of punishment.  Before/beyond Australia, the British always had the charming habit of exporting their trouble makers.  (I do mean that and not ironically.  Beat hanging them by the neck.)  The US got a lot of indigents and petty criminals.  (If some of the histories are true, so did my region of Portugal, before Britain had an empire.  It explains much.)]

I come from a country of emigrants, and I know how emigrants are viewed, and the lands to which they go.  They go over there to make their fortune or to achieve what, for whatever reason (Monetary or social) is denied to them in their own lands.  And they long to come back “home” and to come back wealthy.

Of course, most people living in the Americas of the time didn’t intend to go back (though the wealthy sent their children back, sometimes, for education or social exposure) but they were still mentally Englishmen.  They aped English fashions, they bought English furniture and the motherland was the heart of the far flung empire, without which the distant parts would perish.

Then came the rolling language of the Declaration of Independence:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

And the list of their endurance, their just grievances.

Was it achieved with those words, that separation?  Their Safety and Happiness?  Of course not.  There was war and a butcher’s bill, and there was quibbling too, and internal fighting.

But that was the moment, just as the creation of the world is supposed to have started with “Let there be light” before the seven days of creation.

We were born in words and we were founded in words.  In blood we parted from the parent entity, and somehow we became one: this new thing “Americans.”

Then came the constitution which united us into a single national entity.  That made us the United States. Our constitution established a wall of words between us and would be tyrants.  A wall that kept government small, starved and quibbling internally.  Our separation of powers, our tripartite system is supposed to harness the very ambition of those who would rule us so they spend themselves in fighting each other.

But more importantly, most important, are those powers that are reserved to the states and to the people.

Since the civil war it has become unfashionable to talk to state rights.  Maybe it was a stalking horse under which to hide the repulsive institution of slavery.  I don’t know.  I came afterwards.  Smarter people than I have argued it back and forth.

But it seems to me that we’ve thrown out the baby with the bathwater.  Perhaps the civil war was a high price to pay for those state rights, but perhaps also making the states utterly subjected to the federal government wasn’t the brightest of ideas – because we are a very large country and what does DC know of my life?  Or care for that matter?  I have lived in four states in this great country and I can assure you that the culture in each of them is as different, as strange to each other as the culture of any two European countries.  (And thinking about it, there’s more commonality than that between Spain and Portugal.)

Government works best when it’s small and local.  Oh, yes, there will be blinkered abuses locally.  We have only to think of Detroit and Chicago, and for that matter, California.  But those abuses affect only the locals who, last I checked, were to glued to the spot, and could fly, ride, or run away from intolerable abuses.

When the intolerable abuses come from the federal government though there is nowhere to run.  And by its very nature, being very large, it attracts more of the people who live for power only. People who will act only in the interest of extending their power.

The “commerce clause” has been used to render state powers meaningless for at least seventy five years.

But that is not enough.  People on the left, and our president among them, want to ditch the constitution altogether.  Tattered and bloodied though its, and as much as our president ignores all portions of it, that document bothers them.

They know many of us believe in it, and in the oaths we swore to protect it against all enemies foreign and domestic.

They ridicule it as “old” as though, somehow, being newer were a virtue in and of itself.  (Which one would you prefer, tovarish? The Three Musketeers or Fifty Shades of Gray?  Remember, The Three Musketeers is OLD.)

More importantly they compare it to other countries’ constitutions and they come away disappointed.  You see, our constitution, they say, is a list of “negative liberties.”  It is a list of everything that the government can’t do to you.  It can’t establish a state religion, it can’t take away your guns, it can’t quarter troops in your property, it can’t enslave you…

These are “negative” liberties, which to their minds stop everything nice that the government SHOULD do you for you.  So called positive liberties – granting you food or medical care, or a job.

Of course not all of these people are well intentioned.  I’m not stupid enough to pretend they are – and neither should you be.  The twentieth century filled mass graves with millions of people who followed pied pipers singing that song “we want to take care of you.  We’re doing it all for the people.” – but even if they were well intentioned and honest, and really wanted to make sure that everyone under their administration had the “basics” from which they could struggle forth or not.  Let’s suppose they wanted to make sure that everyone had enough to eat and a good place to sleep, and medical care when they needed it.

It would still be foolish to put that in a document that encodes the powers of government.  Because government CAN’T provide any of those things to anyone.  Government produces nothing.  It doesn’t grow food, it doesn’t keep houses, and it certainly doesn’t provide you health care.  And when it tries to do any of those things, we’re treated to wretched crosses between the DMV and public schools.  Because government has to compel the services of people who know how to do things — and one thing we’ve learned is that slave labor is never efficient.  And bureaucrats and functionaries can push paper, but not do anything that needs done.  TRUST me, you don’t want the health care government functionaries can provide. It is not their job to be innovative, or to take risks.  Their job is to fill forms and cover their asses, with a side excursion into empire building which happens in the bowels of any large bureaucracy. (Corporate bureaucracy as well.)

Government can do only one thing and do it well.  Government is force.  Whether it’s an elected government ruling minimally and justly, and therefore requiring minimal force because it has the consent of the governed; or a dictatorial power ruling with a rod of iron – government makes laws and trusts them to be obeyed, because if they’re not, they’ll send their police; their army; their occupying force to stop you disobeying.

When their enforcement arm stops working, governments fall.  The end of the USSR came when the soldiers sent to pacify Moscow accepted flowers and apples from the old women instead of firing on them.  The rest was prologue.  That was the point when the wheels came off.

Any food, any health care, any living space – ANYTHING – the government “gives” is exacted from your fellow citizens by force.

The question is not “do you want a minimum guaranteed income?”  (Who doesn’t?  I’m a freelancer scratching next month’s livelihood from uncertainty every day.  My husband is an employee and in these uncertain times, the continued survival of his employer is always a question. Guaranteed would be nice.)  The question is “do you want a minimum guaranteed income that’s secured for you by stealing it from other people?”  More poignantly it’s “from other people who might need it more?”  (No tax code can take in account the fine gradations of human need/obligations.  I have friends who make far less than we do but have more disposable income.)  and “from other people who might have used it to start a new enterprise that would make your entire region prosperous?”

The question is – always – not “what do you want the government to do for you?” but “what do you want the government to do TO you?”  Because one can’t exist without the other.

If the government does something FOR you, it does it by doing something TO someone else.  And tomorrow it could be you who gets your religious observance curtailed, your food shorted, or your health care terminated “for the good of all.”

The question is – do you want the decision to be yours, or that of some faceless bureaucrat in the bowels of an inexorable bureaucracy?

Oh, sure, the free market for all these goods isn’t perfect.  For years now, for instance, “hunger” statistics in America have been compiled by asking people (particularly children) whether they’d eaten everything they wanted to, and the kinds of things they wanted to on any given day.  Unsurprisingly this yields very high results.  Even if you exclude the dieters, how many of us eat as much and the kinds of things we want to every day?  Even from a monetary point of view.  I know I spent five years living on rice and vegetables.  When there was money, it went to buy meat for the kids.  (Yes, we gained weight.  Rice.)

And of course people can’t have all the health care they wish.  Let alone money and, yes, that limits things, there is location.  I can’t – if I get sick – go to the top specialist in my field, even if I could pay for it.  He’s likely to be in the East or West coast.

So, yes, there will be injustices.

It’s just that the injustices of freedom are the result of a broken human nature.  They’re not systematic.  And usually they can be got around.  I have friends who have got top care, with no insurance and not much money.  Heck, I did.  (Okay, not top.  In fact, we probably had reason for a lawsuit, but hey the kid and I are here and alive.) And paid for it over those five years.  (If you’re going to have a complicated birth, chilluns, don’t have it on COBRA.)  You figure out what you can do.  You do it.  And you work towards it.  Success is not guaranteed – you won’t necessarily eat the finest foods, or have the finest care, or live in a million dollar home – but you can try.  You have the right to pursue your happiness.

Meanwhile when it’s guaranteed…  someone who doesn’t know you decides what your happiness is.  Or if you’re likely to survive.  Or, more insidious of all, whether your “value” to society is enough to justify the expense.  In fact, when government guarantees your basic needs, it has the right to determine what you’re worth.  You become a thing.  A figure in a spreadsheet.

I don’t know about you – your mileage may vary, and if it does, man, are there countries in the world you should live in – but I’d rather fail under my own power and still trying to claw my way to where I THINK I should be, than “succeed” at receiving what the government thinks someone like me “deserves.”

That is the difference between the negative liberties our constitution enshrines – the government shouldn’t have the right to do much to you – and the positive liberties of other governmental organizations… those same organizations that filled mass graves and sent people to Siberia.

It doesn’t matter if our particular proponents of governmental power THINK they’re doing it for our own good and to “take care” of us.

He who pays the piper calls the tune, and the tune called by central governments run by the numbers and “efficiently” always ends up being a sort of Danse Macabre.

The people who are doing their best to tear through the wall of paper that protects American rights and liberties, might be well-intentioned.  They might think they want to establish utopia.

We must protect and restore our constitution, because it stands between us and a chase for “Utopia”.

As we all know, utopia is a Greek word.  It means “no place.”

For my sins, our host (I use the gender neutral form because Hostess makes Twinkies and Sarah Hoyt’s too busy for Twinkies) has tasked me with another post.

We need…something to dream on.
History that feeds the soul.
It’s time to gather the pieces and rebuild.
– Sarah A. Hoyt,
Narratives

I want to talk about picking up the pieces and rebuilding. Not just putting it back together, but building it better.

If you’ve got your eyes open, you know the days are getting dark. There’s more than a little adversity facing us, from all sides. While we’ve been getting on with our lives the opposition’s been creeping into position and they’ve corrupted our story. They’re getting to us, bit by bit. Catching us while we’re young and undermining the essential context of our lives. Hemming us in when we take the stage into adulthood. And dropping stumbling blocks in our path as we move through life. It’s in the schools, the universities and the increasing regulatory burden hanging above us all. It’s in the corrupted institutions of our various governments and the perverse incentives that foster a stifling bureaucracy. I’d say it’s in the air, but I don’t want the EPA to get any ideas.

We all know the new story, right? Humanity is corrupted; we’re a disease and a problem. Our history is one of strife and despoilment. America is not a great nation. We’re a country established by arrogant, flawed people. We have dark stains on our history, and it will bleed through to everything we do. Most people are a drain, a burden on the country and a blight on the planet. In this world people get ahead by stepping on the faces of the people around them. Countries get ahead by grinding other nations into the mud. Success is greed and theft. If you’re up somebody else has got to be down. It’s the story of ‘Privilege.’ Know it, own it, regret it. You’re not what you’ve made of yourself; you’re the accumulated advantage taken from others.

We know the next bit, too. The only way to expiate our guilt is to surrender to the collective. Our successes are not our own, they can’t be, we owe someone else for every step. And we must pay that debt, hand our work back and appreciate the opportunity to lessen the weight of history. Oh, yeah, and make ourselves available to be sacrificed to the greater worker’s paradise.

~~~

Except, that’s not the America I know. That’s not even the humanity I know.

Were our founders flawed? Sure, they were as human as the rest of us. Doesn’t matter. Our great men aren’t “Great Men.” They’re regular folks that had great moments. We have no need for a myth of superiority and infallible decision. We don’t want, wouldn’t believe in, and couldn’t follow a ruler ‘anointed by G-d.’ Not only is it not in our mythology, it’s not in our history. Do we have dark spots in our history? Never doubt it. Does it inevitably bleed through? Well, no. We don’t trace our blood and heritage to define our destiny. A fair enough portion of the time we don’t let yesterday’s fumbles interfere with today. Why would we let dead history tie the living down? As to most people being a drain: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” How about stepping on faces, grinding into the mud, greed and theft? That’s why our wealthiest citizens are descended from the most powerful families of the first colonies, right? And why our enemies have been utterly destroyed and lost to history. We knew so well that to get ahead we had to hold somebody else back that at the close of the last world war we crippled our enemies and ensured they would never again hinder our progress. Not the way you remember it? Hm. So where does that leave Privilege? Where d’ya think?

But you know all this, right? Preacher – meet Choir. So, what’s next? We do what we do. We walk into the smoking ruin they’re making of our story, our history and culture, and we pick up the pieces.

~~~

I can look around, like the rest of you, and see where this country’s going. I don’t have any illusions (Okay, I’ve got a few, but they’re precious. And delicate, keep your paws to yourself, I’m keeping ‘em.), the country I grew up in is gone. We’re not getting it back. And no amount of raging against the tide is going to fix that. Irrevocable change has been wrought.

So? Listen, I don’t have any more desire to go back to 1986 or 1976 than I do 1776. The American story, big and small, has been about moving forward. Ours is the story of change, growth and learning. Our destiny is not written in yesterdays, but in tomorrows. How can it be otherwise? We’re a land of immigrants, refugees from every spot on the globe. On top of that, we’re a land that values individuality, character and passion. When somedude from someplace lands on our shores, and sets out to do his thing knowing full well he can get it done, this thing he knows, it’s the secret his momma whispered to him as a babe… We don’t tell him he can’t do it. We don’t start talking about how that’s not how it’s done. We get out the lawn chairs, drag out the coolers, pass the beers around and get ready to watch the show. And if he stumbles a bit along the way, we all do, one of us sets our beer under the chair (don’t be eyeing it, I’m gonna finish it) and gets up to lend a steadying hand. We’re inclined to cheer his successes and jeer the obstacles, celebrate the triumphs and commiserate the set-backs. After he’s done and something new is built and change has been wrought to our way of life, we get out of our chairs and go buy some of what he’s selling. Do you have any notion of how rare and precious that is?

This new guy, this guy that just revolutionized that thing with his stuff, you know he talks kinda funny? And have you seen the food he likes?
He doesn’t talk any funnier than those folks up in Boston. Seen his food? I’ve eaten his food! (He’s not kidding about the peppers) I’m still trying to get the recipe from him.

We embrace change and the people who bring it. We take it and build the next chapter of the American story. We don’t step on anybody’s face to do it, we lift them to our shoulders so they can reach their goals, and they pull us up behind them. Other countries, other times? Not so much.

This is our strength, and a bit of our weakness. It’s how we got where we are today. We’re willing to give anybody a listen, and see what they can do. And that’s been used against us. The opposition has done a little preparation, sowed some ideas and undermined some foundations. Then they stepped up and said Lemme show you what I can do! And by and large we’ve let them try their experiment. Our willingness to adapt new cultural ideas and explore new ways of getting things done, our ability to take people as they come, has been used to introduce a bit of corruption into our culture and lead some of us astray.

But back to that strength: They haven’t solidified our essential nature despite their attempts. Our people, ALL of our people, are as fluid and susceptible to new ideas, better ways, change and progress as they were before. Skeptical, sure, but ultimately receptive. We just have to tell ‘em a story they can believe in.

~~~

Let’s talk about the Human Wave. This is what rebuilding looks like, American style. We’ve got some general guidelines, and we’ve got a goal, why you still sitting about? Make it happen! From that original idea, that manifesto Sarah put forth, I think the Human Wave concept has grown, and will continue to grow, and yeah, change. She staked out ground to build a new idea of SF/F, and a lot of us aspire to pitch in on that project. Behind that, though, the subsequent waves are the broader ideas of the story of America and where we go from here.

Some of us are storytellers and are trying to build that narrative in the very literal sense. We’ve got folks around here working on reclaiming the history, some working to define the present, and a gaggle or so looking to the future. And we’ve got job lots of folks who are actually building things. Their narrative is the life they’re putting out there and the product of their hands and minds. The task we have in the Human Wave is to bring all this to the front. To put these ideas and this work on the table and call attention to it. Lemme show you what we can do, what we have done, what we will do!

We can start by telling the truth about American ‘leaders.’ This massive, heterogeneous society built from the people and cultures and religions of the world, who’s going to stand at our head and lead us into the future? *Snort*

We don’t really have leaders, not the way other folks mean it. We’ve got some folks we send up to Washington to do the scut work. The President, the ‘leader of the free world?’ At best, he’s the CEO of the administrative function of government. He’s the kid we voted to stay after class and straighten the desks, and clean the boards, and make sure the trash gets taken out. In short, he’s supposed to make sure everything is ready for us to get back to doing what we do. Whatever we decide that is. Congress? Supply clerks, the lot of ‘em. Keep an eye on the budget, make sure the executive has what he needs to clean up (but not enough to start ‘fixing’ things, we’ll see to that, thanks.), do your best to stay out of the way. That leaves the Judiciary. Here’s the keys, and a checklist, make sure everybody follows the list, and keep the place locked up so the hoodlums don’t get in and wreck things.

An American politician stepping up to lead the way will have a few folks following along behind to see where he’s going, and a ton of folks standing along the route to critique the route, his stride, his attire, how he fixes his hair, heckle him about where he’s going, and frequently poke a farm implement or flag pole in his path to trip him up. But he’s not likely to look over his shoulder and find 314 million people behind him. Unless they’re dogging his heels as he runs out of town…

We’re as likely to listen to what somebody’s got to say, and respond, “That thing you said, right there at the end? I liked that. The rest of it, you can stick that back in the bull, he’s got more use for it than I.” (You think the Lightbringer’s any different? Look around; look at what the MSM isn’t telling you. Ignore the cheerleaders, they make money pasting those smiles on.)

Well, who’s going to lead the Human Wave? Nobody. We’re going to handle this like we handle everything else. Recovery doesn’t come from the center; it’s not coordinated from the top. It can’t be. Nobody can know enough to sit in the center and coordinate the recovery, when they try vast resources are inevitably wasted. This country wasn’t built by grand visionaries leading the way to the future, but by individuals with great ideas building on their patch to make it better. Human wave at its best should be the same. Building things back up from the bottom, making it better, stronger than before. Restoring belief in American exceptionalism, which is really the belief that an individual, regardless of origin, regardless of yesterday, can put a shoulder to the task, dig in their heels and build a better future. For themselves, their families, and for all of us.

Once the news trucks are gone, and the politicians are done posturing and spouting sound bites, American recoveries are always dispersed recoveries. Individual people, free to associate as they see fit, go about setting things back in place. They call their friends and neighbors, they check with somebody who ‘knows a guy,’ they hire some strong backs and willing hands, and they build their little patch of the future. And they build the next chapter of American history along the way.

~~~

Some folks are looking at the wreckage right now, and frowning. This isn’t a little mess; this is a pile of broken structures and detritus. It’s dangerous and unstable and I don’t know enough people like me to even start digging this out, much less rebuild it. Where do we even start?

Grab the first piece you can get your hands on, pull it out of the way. Get your back into it, your friends’ll be along. Somebody’s going to show up with some extra gloves you can use. Somebody around here knows a guy that’s got a big loader; they’ll call him and get him over here. He’s got some buddies, they like big machines and know where the keys are, give ‘em a bit and we’ll really start moving this mess. You know there’s some obsessive types wandering around here, they’ll set to sorting out the wreckage and making piles of what to keep, what to recycle and what needs to be burned. Bit by bit, one by one, we’ll start to come together and sort this mess. And when the ground is clear, we’ve got builders aplenty. There’s a couple of engineers over there sitting on a chunk of concrete sketching right now. We can start putting this thing back up. We can rebuild, and build new, roll with the changes and make it better.

I’m not Pollyanna, you know. This is gonna suck. No way around it. A lot of sweat and tears are going to go into this. We’re going to smear a little of our blood on the wreckage, digging it out. We’re going to sink a lot of time into it. Not days, or months. Years. Some of us may not make it to the end. All of us are going to have to take a breather. Waves crash. They come tumbling down and come apart and slide back into the whole. That’s okay. Because no sooner than the first wave breaks, another is rolling in behind taking up the cause. In that wave, and the next, are those we’ve influenced and those we’ve brought up after us and those we’ve called to our shore to be of us.

So take a deep breath, gather it into your tissues. Feel the swell building around you. Embrace the suck and let’s catch this next wave into the next chapter. We can ride the Human Wave back into the heart and glory of America, wash it clean, pick up the pieces and build anew.

I’ve got this piece. You wanna grab that one?

So, as you guys know I’ve been doing some detective work to figure out why and wherefore this year was as sucky as it was so we can avoid it next year.

We’ll forego the “have to fix cars” at the worst possible moment, and the HVAC follies.  Those didn’t help, but neither are they something I can control unless I get mechanical and HVAC training.  (Hey, look, at the rate things are going there will be a market for people who can keep cars going on improvised parts.  I’d just rather write stories.)

Instead, I’m looking at what I do and my process.  To be perfectly blunt, 13 was a disaster in terms of fiction words written and of being able to start a project and finish in time.  This is a problem, because I want to continue working.  (As I said, I’d rather write stories.)

The problem is this – and it makes me laugh that I dare write about other people’s lives, considering – that I have no clue what the texture of my own life is or how it came about.

What I mean is I start doing things, and other things accrete, and then a year later I look back and go “uh, I haven’t broken out the pastels in a year, but I’ve been doing sewing and egg carving?”  This is the hobby side, natch (and the reason pastels got put away was open eczema wounds on my hands) but the writing side can get as puzzling.

Here is the evidence, and if I were from the outside, I’d be puzzled: in 2013 I finished a book and did about seven short stories.  BUT somehow I managed to always feel overworked and suffer the symptoms of exhaustion, like during the year I wrote six books and homeschooled Marshall and took Greek and Latin courses.  In fact, it was exactly like that.  I was okay a week, then got sick again, rinse, lather, repeat.

It wasn’t until yesterday that I thought to add up all the words.  Forget the other stuff I’m doing that’s not writing: learning to do covers, editing, interior work, etc.  Just the words, ma’am.  Nothing but the words.

I calculated what I’m on the hook for every week, just in blog posts, my work at PJM, etc…

And I came up with a minimum of 10k words a day.  That’s 70k a week, which adds up to something like a pulp novel.

Suddenly my eyes were opened.  The problem is that I do another 10k a day on fiction (and I do that much because I’m afraid of falling further behind) and next thing you know, I’m doing five or six 20k words days and I collapse.  Which, let me tell you, is perfectly normal.  When I did the novel in three days, I couldn’t even think afterwards.

Worse – after about a year of this, the fatigue became cumulative.  I never quite recover, and each time I feel LESS creative.

So, is this the announcement I’m closing the blog?

No.  The blog …  I am one of those people who needs a social life, even if online.  Yes, I have a social life here too – sometimes I think the occasional drinks night with Mr. and Mrs. Vodkapundit (yes, I am totally name dropping.  Deal) saved my life this year – but I like this community and I’m not killing it, nor shuttering it.

I have been part of communities that became too much of a strain for the bloggers, and I still mourn them and I’m not doing that.

However, I’d like to cut my non fic writing, here and PJM to about 10 to 15k a week.  For PJM that’s easy.  They want short blogs, with links, and quotes.  I can totally do that.  Other than my weakly patter for the Friday book plug and my blogs on publishing, and those can be kept manageable.  So, that I can do.

And here – there’s gonna be some changes around these parts.  Not as terrifying as you think.  I’ll be doing the style blog post you guys are used to 3 times a week or so.  For the rest, I’ll have a rotating guest blogger once a week, and I think I’ll do an aggregaty thing on the weekends.  (You know strange follies from the world of politics or art or something, with linking pithy commentary.)  I’ll also take occasional blog posts, if it’s something that interests me and you guys send me.  If you take in account that one of my blog days is a free chapter, (though that will probably move to Saturdays, frankly, leaving the aggregaty thing on Sundays) that should cut things down to “manageable.”

So I can keep this blog and make a living.  What do you guys think?

However – and before you guys get disgusted, I still have to catch up.  So, for the next two weeks, I’ll be running A LOT of guest posts.  I’ll still do my normal ones, but not every day.  This is by the way of letting me get back into writing and turn in novels before Christmas and also hopefully get my subscribers their freebies.

I will pick interesting guest posts, I promise, and if any of you want to send me stuff, you know my email.

I don’t want you to look at those two weeks and think I’ve abandoned the blog.  I haven’t.  Again, every other post will still be mine.  I just need to concentrate on writing for now, so be patient with me.

And now, I’ll go do fiction words.  If you guys have suggestions on formats for the blog, where I can cut down on how many words I’m producing, that’s fine.

I just had no clue I was writing that much till I counted.  I think THAT more than anything else is at the root of the illnesses this year.  And that can’t go on.

BUT the blog is important to me and I want to keep it going.

When I first read Heinlein’s judgment that Cassandra didn’t get half the beating she deserved, I thought he was unusually harsh.  Now… Well.

This week one of my colleagues over at PJM decided to do another of those posts that goes something like “they have the press, and they have the education, and they have the vote fraud machine, they have executive orders, game over, man, game over.”  He didn’t say they would have a thousand year reign but it was strongly implied in his article.

I hate this sort of thing because it makes me roll my eyes so hard they fall on the floor and then I have to find them by touch.

I’m the first to tell you – even if it really displeases one or two my commenters (sorry guys, I’ll still believe my lying eyes, over your assurances) – that the vote fraud is … epic.  I wouldn’t have believed it myself, if I hadn’t poll watched.  Forget the made up jobs in the job reports (btw are they still doing that?  Is there any reason to continue paying any attention to any numbers coming out of DC?) and the IRS suppression of tea party and patriot groups (and the first cartoon character who comes out in the comments, much less on my face book page, to tell me that both sides of the political spectrum were suppressed gets kicked.  We’ve been looking for progressive groups that were suppressed/delayed.  Not a one came forward.  Yes they supposedly were on the “watch-for” list… to be sped forward), unless my district is unusually corrupt (unlikely.  And what I heard from others was worse) this “president” is “president” as well as “president”*.

Even given that – vote fraud isn’t universal.  What I mean is, you won’t get to the polls on the morning in November, and find the doors locked, and get told that your vote has been cast for you.

Their vote fraud mechanism was just as strong when they got a drubbing in 2010.

Also, the idea that they will hold power forever and ever is based on the idea that they will be minimally competent.

What is that you say?  Well, the Nazis and the communists were in a different position.  The Nazis were minimally competent, and the communists moved in on people’s who were used to being pushed around.  (And we’re only going to consider Russia here, and maybe China, because after that they had Russia and China to help and their “takeovers” partook the characteristics of an invasion more than a revolution.)

More both had something that our gang doesn’t have: total control of the means of communication.

Yes, yes, it’s fashionable to hang your head and look sorrowful and say something like “their advantage in propaganda is overwhelming.”

I’ll give you their advantage in propaganda is very great particularly over the very, very dumb – how on Earth could a man saying that he gave preference to women’s resumes become the “binders full of women” attack the left made it?  Easy.  Chickies – and yes, these creatures are chickies, not women – want to go along with the flock and chip chip chip in chorus – but even there it has limits.

Communists and Nazis kept power (and can keep power) only by having iron control over all means of communication, including person to person.

For instance, yesterday I noted that there were the usual trolls out saying that the reason labor force participation is falling is that “the boomers are retiring.”  Let alone the fact that no boomer I know – and this includes some in NYC who really, really, really want to, before the publishing houses they work for collapse under them – is retiring. They can’t afford to.  I think at the rate our labor force participation is falling, boomers would need to be retiring at an unprecedented rate, and it would need to include my cohort who are NOT boomers and who will be aggregated to the boomers ONLY under total anesthesia.  Who also aren’t old enough to retire let alone not being able to afford it.

Again, the numbers coming out are lovely, but you’d have to believe them over the phone call from uncle Vinnie who has been unemployed for three years, despite his top skills.  You’d need to believe them over your Monster.com job search.

They can say the unemployment rate is falling like a stone, and it’s not that bad for college educated, but salaries are at best holding steady, if you browse the job adds (a good way to get the zeitgeist) for professions where you know what they pay, you see pay falling, and you know – because you’re not as dumb as a cabbage – that it’s a buyer’s market out there.

Which means you’re being lied to.

Most people might not be able to put that together, but most people know that it’s “bad all over.”  In fact that’s penetrating popular culture, despite their attempts to hold it at bay.

Because for a totalitarian government to succeed, it not only has to control the news – and it has to control the news, not just the main ones – it has to extend its power to person-to-person communications and of course, the internet.

China doesn’t have all those controls on the internet because it’s afraid its youth will get exposed to cat memes.  It has those controls because it doesn’t want people over its vast expanse to be able to communicate with each other and KNOW that what is going on in their area is universal.

As for what is going on in their area…

The Nazis started a war, which brought in spoils.  This was a marked improvement right off the bat for people who’d been taking a wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread.  There was some improvement before the last bitter years of the war when it all went down down down

In Russia, the gestalt of “kill those who have more than you and take the spoils” gave the worst off something to crow about.  There is a story somewhere on line from a survivor about a village descending on the house of the wealthiest peasant and taking the spoils.

It lasted very little, of course, but there was that initial burst of pillage and then seventy years of strictly controlled peer to peer communications.  There is a reason the typewriter – the TYPEWRITER – was controlled.  Because it allowed the fast dissemination of news and thoughts.  It didn’t avail them.  They still fell.

Look at what the internet in a controlled form, even, is doing to Chinese communism.  It’s sort of like putting a blender into a basket of eggs.

Our current clowns didn’t take over a country in such dire straights that their fumble-footed rule is an improvement.  Yes, they did what they could through the eight years of GW Bush (and well, he didn’t help much) to make it seem like we were back in dustbowl years.  But again, people know what they lived through and what their neighbors lived through.

These days most of the people on the net going “it was worse under Booosh” are either obviously mentally ill or paid to say so. (And there aren’t as many of them as there used to be.)

Worse, while all the initial successful totalitarians of the twentieth century came from what could be termed the “middle class” these precious flowers ain’t.  In fact, they are so far off the middle class, they think it’s a rethoric flourish “And the middle class.”

They are in fact from the uptiest (totally a word) of the upper crust (yes, do tell me about Obama’s impoverished ghetto childhood living with a bank manager.  Pfui.) and so out of touch with the middle class it might be a foreign land.

Their plan for temporarily – it has to be temporary.  Think about it.  It has a limited life before it all implodes – boosting the living conditions of the middle class and the poor is to print reams and reams of money, which artificially boosts the stock market.

Well, all their friends and their friends’ friends and relatives make substantial money off the stocks, so this will buy the loyalty of the people, right?

(Oh, excuse me.  My eyes rolled right out and I was finding them to put them back in their sockets.)

Oh, and their plan to buy us all with free – free! – health insurance was predicated on the idea that words are magic and that if you say something will happen, it will.  That is third-generation-level stupid for a communist country.

And that’s the other part of it.  What we’re faced with here is that most of their ranks are “third generation stupid.”  This always happens in a totalitarian system, which leftism has been in the US in all the fields they took over.  It comes from the fact that they select not for competency, intelligence or innovation, but for ideological purity.

This is how we get a Hollywood establishment that is unable to make anything new and is now mining thirty year old comic books for their best work.

In politics… well… their “stars” are all old.  Harry Reid is cunning, but he’s OLD.  The new generation is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz-dumb and Obama-pot-sure.  (And Harry Reid, to believe Heinlein, is already second generation.)

It’s all more and more incompetence all the way down.

Now, this is not saying it’s going to be easy.  It’s not.  It’s not saying that the executive orders imperial presidency doesn’t scare me.  I’m not saying the level to which they suppressed things like Benghazi doesn’t shock me.  I’m not saying the ballot box isn’t corrupt – I know it is.

What I’m saying is if they are at least smart enough to walk and chew gum at the same time, they will – before 2016 – realize the level of fraud needed means that they’ll have to give themselves away.  And if they’re smart enough they’ll let it go.

Now, it’s quite possible they’re not smart enough.  Which means it will be worse for them, because they will be inviting armed revolution.

And don’t you moan at me we’ll never do that.  Communism fell in Russia not because they were loving kind but because the game was up.  There is a level of dissonance when people know the piss down their neck isn’t rain.  And they had almost fully controlled media and much harder person-to-person communications.

Now, I’m not saying that those who want power for power’s sake don’t have more gambits up their sleeve, including and not limited to using the press to convince the Republican establishment (who I swear are the only people who still believe the press) to nominate someone that even I won’t vote for (they’re trying.  Really hard.) and to stampede the rubes away from anyone who can get the votes.  That will buy them another election cycle, maybe, but it has the same risks as fraud so massive that it’s obvious.  The reason both sides of the isle hate the tea party is that it shocked them, and it would behoove them to remember it came about because neither side was listening to the people, and the gulf was wide enough people could see it with their eyes closed.  Do that again and invite worse.

The left thinks that “immigration reform” will get them this permanent advantage, but look… not unless they’re importing Somalis by the container full.  La grande salida is not a myth.  I’ve told you before my local poky supermarket went from having Spanish magazines on every check out to having none, but more importantly, our local Walmart went from “must speak Spanish to shop” (and it was that way when my mom visited fifteen years ago.  She speaks Spanish, and was much more help than I was about asking for things)  to “nothing in Spanish except the printed bilingual signs that come from headquarters.

As long as they manage the economy with their stellar brilliance, that great influx of immigrants who will vote for them is just another sign they’re drinking their own ink.

There is… War.  War is in fact, right now, their best hope to distract people/keep enough control/keep (they think) the economy moving enough to hold on to power.  But war is proving mighty hard to engineer and there’s a good – very good – chance that if we get hit it will have the effect of turning us even more against them.  I don’t think they realize that.  However in the past war gained leaders’ security because they had at least a minimal illusion of competency (again the full control of communications.)  Once that illusion was lost, so was the war.  (See Hitler.)  I don’t think these guys have that illusion going in.  Oh, they don’t know that, but I don’t think it will go well for them if they do invite an attack on us.  (And they’re trying.)  The “let’s just go to war without provocation” didn’t work too well, either.  (See Syria.)

This is not the thirties, not even the seventies.  The tragedy of the left is that when their long march was completed, so were the technologies to defeat it.

It’s not going to be easy, but what does playing the Cassandra do?  Let’s suppose it was even true and you were cursed by the gods with seeing the inevitable fall.  What would chirping on and on about it do?  Other than make everyone as miserable as you are? Or making you feel morally superior because “you see” it?

Bah.

And it’s not a dubious gift of the gods.  It’s trying to stake the claim of “I see the perils better than you.”

No, you don’t.  I see the perils very clearly.  But I also see the good signs.  I have to.  I am by nature a depressive and I’ve learned to compensate by forcing myself to see both signs.  When you live with depression every day you learn to do that, or you die.

The people who try to sound intelligent by saying the things my demons whisper to me every day make me very angry.

Yes, we’re in a devil of a fix.  Yes, it’s going to take a lot of luck to turn the corner without massive spillage of American blood one way or another.  It could still happen, but we’ll have to be very very lucky.  And if we’re not, we’re going to have to pay the oldest price of all – blood, sweat and tears.

But it’s not over.  It’s not even begun yet.

Despair is a sin.

In the end, we win, they lose.  Be not afraid.

Cassandra didn’t get half the kicking she deserved.

*Crossposted from Mad Genius Club.  [I actually want to make a post about Cassandras and how tired I am of them, but I woke up late and devoted time to cuddles and talk with husband, so… so… I’m not up to writing it now, and it would take the rest of the morning.  So I’m stealing Cedar’s post. And since she’s drawing a lot of idiots at MGC, ya’ll can go over there if you feel a need for troll chew toys – Sarah]

I said earlier this week I’m not naturally snarky. That doesn’t mean that things don’t rub me wrong and get me angry. And I am very angry right now. I have been watching a swelling tide of articles about people who are attempting to use language as a weapon. They have grasped the old saying “the pen is mightier than the sword” wrong way round and they don’t have a clue about what they are doing with it.

It starts with this. A professor is accused of racism for correcting student’s papers. The students, unhappy with this relatively mild critique of their work, staged a sit-in, even recruiting a nationally-known author to partake with them. One wonders if she read their papers and was tempted to whip out a red pen, or if she just saw the red flag of racism and charged. I have heard of students crying when confronted with a poor grade, but this is ridiculous. Suck it up, kids, we all make mistakes. You’re supposed to learn from them, though, not throw temper tantrums. Oh, and the papers? These are graduate students in an education program, writing proposals for dissertations. I would think spelling corrections on your life’s work would be a kindness.

Then this article hit me in the face like a cold, week-dead fish. I had kind of ignored the person who commented on an article I wrote a while back (The Genderless Mind) who told me he thought gender was a social construct. Sorry, no. You are born one thing, or another, and it’s not a choice. Biology is inescapable, my dear child. Stop trying to manipulate the language to fit what you want it to say. You can be a special snowflake in your own writing, while the rest of us try not to giggle out loud at your pretensions. Surely you don’t think you are the first rebel generation?

Another case of manipulation came to my attention gradually. I’ve known for most of my life that the uses of “man,” “mankind,” and “he” were falling out of favor for what they were intended, as general words for humanity. Unlike many other languages, English hasn’t got feminine and masculine endings to words, so we compromised on those, which now, it is said, means that we are promoting men over women. Oh, grow up. Anyone who isn’t looking for a reason to be offended knows what they mean, and it’s a fifty-fifty split between men and women on this planet. But now, there’s another word I keep seeing, and I finally had to look it up. “Cismale” is, evidently, a guy who was born that way, likes it, and stays that way. Often linked with gendernormative, another nonsense word, and fascist, when used by internet trolls.

This is where the double-edged sword comes in, and starts to cut those who are so enthusiastically grabbing onto these concepts. You see, normal people think of themselves as male, or female. People who opt to change their bodies to match how they see themselves in their own head don’t want to be called abnormal, they too are working for “male or female” and by creating all the odd terms, the perpetually peeved are othering them, as well. Division only creates barriers, fear, and suspicion. There’s enough of that already.

All this is confusing to everyday people, who all shake their heads and back away slowly when you come near them, and now you know why. You’re making those who want to live normal lives suffer, so you can throw your temper-tantrums. I really liked this from a recent discussion of cismale, “we offered a class called digital photography. What do they call it today? Photography. When something becomes normative, the adjectives, modifiers and prefixes disappear. At least they should. Its a matter of clarity. It is obvious that heterosexual behavior is normative. When you add a modifier to a normative word, you are not adding clarity, you are destroying it, intentionally.” So if you are confused what to call someone, try male, or female. Anything else is a cultural construct, and useless for any intelligent discussion.

Coming back around to the first article, the little boy who cried wolf is obviously no longer read aloud to children. Perhaps it has been replaced with a little girl who embraces her hairy moon-howling brother (and does he sparkle in the sun? Oh, mixing my metaphors). Those who decry racism with such vigor are not only diluting any real issues, they are often committing the very act they accuse. Whenever I see the term “person of color” I cringe. When I look at a person, I see a person, not a color. This, I believe, is the idea. If we are all equal, then why do people like this persist in twisting language to suit what they want to say, which is that the poor people of color can’t fend for themselves, they must have assistance to get that equality? That blog post is so wrong on so many levels it isn’t even funny. It’s like one of those comedy movies that is so stupid I have to hide my face and plug my ears if I’m not allowed to leave the room.

Writing needs to be about understanding language at a level that enables our readers to understand it as well. I enjoy learning new words as much as the next person. I don’t enjoy watching language become a vehicle for the agenda du jour, driven by ignorant people who are doing more harm to their own causes than they can possibly comprehend. It’s obvious to the rest of us that they are, like Winnie the Pooh, “of very little brain,” and it is time to put our foot down and say no. The tantrums need to stop, and until you have learned what that word really means, please don’t use it.