When The Frogs Come Up

My husband has acquired a new and strange habit of listening to podcasts while working. I completely understand this, as his work is mostly numbers and patterns and words don’t intrude. Yes, it plays havoc with my writing, which is why I have headphones and Sabaton.

Sometimes, occasionally, when I’m doing visual or animation work, though, I will listen to what he’s listening to. Not because of interest but by sheer inertial. If it’s not bothering me, I passively-listen, the same way I passively watch TV by catching bits of whatever he’s watching in between work and such.

One of the podcasts I thus consume was an interview with a figure on the right who is a Trump supporter, but almost exactly in the opposite way of how I look at Trump and his administration. This person is enthusiastic about everything the administration does, but horrified, appalled and even shocked at Trump’s “uncouth behavior.” Meanwhile, I look at a lot of things the administration does with a weather eye even when I agree with the objectives, because I can see doors being opened that terrify me. (And yet, I also don’t see a way around it.) On the other hand Trump’s oh, so rude, terrifyingly crass behavior? Meh. I think he’s a little salty and a tad-bit mouthy at times. So what?

Perhaps this comes from having grown up in a Latin culture, where you can call your best friend a mother lover at the top of your voice, and accuse him of having raped and murdered his own grandmother, and it’s all taken to mean “I’m really mad at you” and no more. By evening, you’ll be having dinner together in the best of moods.

Or perhaps it’s because I understand the dynamic between “Trump Mouth Eruptions” and sympathize.

Look, yes, a lot of what he says that sounds absolutely crazy is intentional. And a lot of it is clear to anyone who read The Art of the Deal. And a lot of the times when he’s rude it’s also intentional, to distract you — or at least the main stream media — from something he’s doing or working on.

BUT–

There’s more going on there, because some of his outbursts don’t help him, and in fact might hurt him. Or at least horrify a number of the more delicate flowers on the right.

Which brings us to why they happen, and how I understand him.

To begin with I’m going to quote Mike Resnick of blessed memory, at the beginning of the indie possibilities. Mike Resnick, a gentleman in every sense of the word, said, “If this works out, I’m going to be very rude to a lot of people.” Why would a gentleman say that?

To understand it, you have to understand the regimen of frogs that traditionally published writers lived under.

Traditionally publishing houses were — literally — the only game in town, if you wanted to bring your book in front of enough readers to make even “underpaid secretary” money. The. Only. Game. In. Town.

Staying employed over the long run, meant swallowing a lot of frogs even if you weren’t from a “cancelled” political persuasion, like me, which had other difficulties, like keeping your mouth shut while the editor you worked for kindly informed you that libertarians wanted to abolish the internal combustion engine. (No, of course not Baen. DUH.)

You had to, for instance, shut up when they told you the book hadn’t sold, which was of course your fault, or at best “genre isn’t selling” even though you knew they’d done the florid stupid with cover or release date or whatever. You had to stay quiet while you watched them do the florid stupid. After six or seven of these, you had to accept their verdict that you just didn’t have potential and were stuck as a low level scribbler. Etc. etc. etc. You had to see them ignore contacts from movie producers who contacted you first, and shut up because it wouldn’t get you the movie deal (the house controlled the right to negotiate that) but it would destroy your ability to publish anything ever again and not just with that house, because it’s a small incestuous field. You had to accept being sent to a conference for middle school teachers to promote your book that wasn’t remotely suitable for middle school. And accept being sent over your 40th birthday. And keep your mouth shut and not blow up when you came home to a notice that this book was being taken out of circulation, a decision made before the print. And through all this, you had to meet these people at cons, and act like they were your best friends. Because as a friend whom I won’t out, though he too is beyond their reach told me, “They see your expressions. They watch how you react and what you laugh at. And what you DON’T laugh at.”

I refer to it as a regime of eating live frogs. You swallowed a frog a day as a minimum condition of being employed, of practicing the craft you wanted to work at since you were cognizant it existed.

And before you say “Sarah, everyone has to do that.” Sure. Sure. BUT there are degrees. Of course the overworked retail worker doesn’t tell his boss to shove it. BUT if he/she did, all it would take at worst is a move to another town to find work again. While if you ran your mouth in trad pub, you were done. Because it was a small field and they all talked to each other. And you couldn’t go down the street and find a similar job. You were done-done. (In fact a lot of us tended to assume some favorite writer had died, when he/she had been cancelled for a minor offense, not even saying what they thought.)

But it was more than that. Recently someone commented that No Man’s Land has more “life” than all my other work, and why didn’t I do stuff like that while I was publishing with trad pub?

Well, because trad pub is the art of the possible. And No Man’s Land and the world it explores is weird. So weird that the only hope for it would be Baen AND EVEN THEN they wouldn’t have much clue what to do with it. Because they would have to sell it to distributors and stores and…. there was a good chance their own reps would think it was weird. (This is what pushed the conformity trend in SF/F, where changes and originality had to be in tiny dosages.)

So your very mind got invaded. Not just explicitly by the publisher saying “No. Ew. We won’t publish that.” But by your perception of what they would or would not take and were or were not interested in/hot for. All while keeping your mouth shut on the bad things.

It was tough. I mean, really tough. And you really had to act as though agents, editors, etc. were your besties. (I did like one of my editors/publishers. Well, and a couple of people in the house. Yes, you guys know which house. BUT I had to act like it for ALL houses, even the ones that I was actively becoming blocked on projects because the people were so hard to deal with.) How much did we have to “act” — well, recently while at dinner with younger son, he asked if he could taste my dessert. And I said “Why not. EVERY ONE of my agents and editors reached over and took food from my plate without asking, at a work dinner.” That much.

Am I salty about this? Weirdly, not that much. I have the temperament that blows up on very little, but then forgives and forgets. I mean, I’m describing how bad it was, so you understand what it might do to other people.

I don’t know if other people who ran to indie are ‘being very rude.’ I don’t have much interest in most of the field at this point, except “books I enjoy reading.” To me writing has become an intensely personal/freeing thing, where I work at what I’m passionate about, promote it as best I can, and that’s it. (Weirdly, for the first time in my life that’s pay. Still slightly underpaid secretary, but will improve once the move is done and I work more.)

The thing I want to show is: you eat a lot of frogs, the frogs eventually come up. You become …. very rude. Because you can be.

Trump’s working life, most of it, required being self-abashingly-subservient to a lot of leftists in the one-party rule of NYC. Worse, over his lifetime he probably saw the left become more narrow, more totalitarian, more incapable of leaving anyone alone, even in the privacy of their own thoughts/words. And he had to act like he was their besty.

Which explains why he hit the political stage saying the things that most of the public was afraid of saying.

And btw, the public being afraid to say things? That’s a sign everyone is eating at least one small tadpole every morning. And the pressure builds.

And then he endured four years, after what was obviously to anyone with the mathematical intuition of a tadpole (which is about my level) a stolen election, of being persecuted for whatever crime the left establishment could dream up, some of them improbable enough to give this fiction writer pause. Granted, he wasn’t as much swallowing the live frog as having it force fed at that point since they slapped various gag orders on him that would ruin him if he spoke.

So — Trump is rude. And sometimes thoughtlessly says things that sound weird or hurt people who don’t deserve to be hurt.

That’s fine. I don’t care. The frogs come up. The more you force people to swallow, the more they come up.

There are things to worry about with the administration, like the offer of 5k (just let us keep the 5k dudes!) and other weirdness.

BUT the “rudeness”? Stop clutching your fricking pearls. If you force people to swallow live frogs, sooner or later they have a belly full and the frogs come up.

Ribbit!

18 thoughts on “When The Frogs Come Up”

  1. ribbit, ribbit
    For the record, I did not eat the frog I pulled from a stack of pallets this morning.
    And I’ve been called rude, and blunt. Every time Trump’s said something that made me wince a little, I see who really takes issue with it and I’m like “You know what? This is fine.”

    Liked by 3 people

  2. I think the latest one is the claim that Trump wants Iran to nuke two of our cities.

    I’m utterly certain they’re taking something massively out of context, since that’s SOP for the progs.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. They are. He actually said something along the lines of if he hadn’t taken action to take out the Iranian nuke program we could have easily had two of our cites nuked, and taking out that program was a good thing. That was edited to say taking out two CA cities would be a good thing.

      You really, really don’t hate the media enough.

      Liked by 6 people

      1. Trump would not be impolitic enough to say taking out two U.S. cities is a good thing.

        I, on the other hand, have days when I would say, “Which cities are we talking about, precisely?”

        Liked by 2 people

        1. “Why would they do us such a favor?” is the proper response when the possibility of someone nuking D.C. is broached. That and, “We’ll attach a thank-you post-it note to the responding missile.” :imitates Dirty Harry: “Go ahead. Make my day.”

          Like

        2. I’d go for LA and San Fran or Seattle, but their own Laws are doing that for them anyway, so I don’t care about those cities other than to laugh at the idiots left their. Simply put once the money leaves, and it is leaving, their perceived power goes with it. May the Left coast go gloriously broke and their own liberals hang the bastards in the streets.

          Like

    2. It’s just another case of pretending not to understand to annoy people into silence. No one misunderstood him saying this was a risk if we didn’t stop Iran, but they’re intentionally pretending otherewise.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. If the Left and Media thought it would work, they would sodomize their own parents and children to death and blame Trump. They are thoroughly without any redeeming qualities and we don’t hate them enough.

        Like

  3. like keeping your mouth shut while the editor you worked for kindly informed you that libertarians wanted to abolish the internal combustion engine

    Huh? I mean I’ve heard some pretty crazy “libertarians/conservatives want to get rid of $FOO” claims for a lot of values of $FOO. But those I could at least contort myself into enough of a pretzel where if I assume I had leftist brain damage I could see them up to and including “libertarians want to bring back slavery” and “libertarians don’t understand Swift was engaging in humor” but I can’t figure this one out.

    As for that feeling about eating frogs, I think that’s where my real anger at all the “You have to vote Republican or you get communism” this cycle is coming from. It’s nothing new and I’ve done it a lot. Prior to Trump it was the only reason I planned to vote post 2012. I’m not angry about the idea. I’m angry about the reminders.

    And the reason I’m angry about them is they are the same things as “teach men not to rape”. The people who are the problem aren’t the people it is aimed at. If we lose the Texas senate seat to the Democrat (to pick the biggest ticket example) isn’t Trump voters mad about Iran/Israel/etc (and I’m on record questioning the wisdom of “2026 is finally time to deal with Iran). It’s going to be Cornyn supporters having a tantrum over their RINO losing a primary. Of course, how their RINO won they’d be yelling at me about “Vote Republican or communist”.

    The worst part is when we lose because they stayed home they’ll run around screaming it was our fault for staying home (when we didn’t) and being too radical (because Paxton is more radical than his “God is trans” opponent).

    In politics, at least, Trump isn’t just him getting fed up but a lot of people. And the people who should learn from that seem impervious.

    Like

  4. Please excuse my being rather too direct here.  Trump was able to get his buildings built and serviced by the Teamsters in NY and NJ.  The Saudis honored him with their sword dance.  Xicut off shipping money and missiles to Iran.  And more.  The dainty little check-pants nancy-boys who gripe are just sore because they couldn’t do what he does under any circumstances.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. I got over Trump’s “rudeness” by…oh, 2017? Maybe 2018. At some point in there, I stopped paying attention to the pearl-clutching because it was all misquotes turned into accusations. If I hear “TRUMP SAID X” at this point, I assume someone, somewhere, is either repeating a misquote or has deliberately misquoted him. This has made life much, much happier for me and left me free to only dig into what he said when it actually matters.

    As for Trump “wishing” Iran would nuke two of our cities – if he had actually said that, ALL of the media would be screaming it. Not even half of them are. Meh. Geese are going to honk, donkeys will bray, and the media will shriek to get their newspapers bought. Moving on….

    Like

  6. I could not care less what the left and liberal traitors feel, because we know the bastards don’t think. I am more concerned with living day to day than worrying what comes out of Trumps mouth. To the pearl clutching wimps out there, my only hope is that they don’t strangle themselves while clutching those pearls. To the Liberals, may God have Mercy on your souls. Personally I wouldn’t walk across a sidewalk and urinate on you if you were on fire. Pass the marshmallows please. While listening to We Didn’t start the Fire by Billy Joel. maybe Fire by the Ohio Players, Can’t do Burning for You by BOC, that’s about sacrifice, which the left never does. The only sacrifice the left wants to make is of you for them, you know where to shove that.

    Like

Leave a comment