
By now, if you’re not looking suspicioustly at all the “scientific” experiments of the twentieth century that proved that communism was scientific and the left’s ideas about humans were right, you are a beautiful soul, full of trust and the milk of human kindness.
Also you should seek help for that massive concussion and the attendant mental confusion.
Look, in the nineteenth century, science as defined mostly by engineering brought an amazing improvement on the general quality of life, etc. (And if you’re going to weeb about the “dark Satanic mills” I really am going to demand you get a brain scan. At this point if you’re not in doubt about that stuff, concussion really is likely.) Yes, there were critiques, mostly of it being inhumane, mostly from the deposed elites that lost out to the improvements, or from power-starved people. (BIRM. Here I should point out most of the “romantic” and socialist complaints about industrial progress were an aristocratic opinion. Most Americans don’t know that. And yet it was true.)
And then in the twentieth the people who hated industrial progress or improvement in human life that was bringing out true equality of odds and meritocracy fought back with “science.”
Suddenly a bunch of studies “proved” that humans, in general were horrible and that we’d extinguish ourselves, destroy the world, etc. unless taken in hand by our betters. Our betters in that case and by that time were largely defined by the people doing these “studies” and they promised to usher in an era of complete justice, utter equality, and of course safety under their absolute enlightened rule. In other words, our betters in this case were largely communists by any other name.
So — How do you know the Earth is overpopulated? I mean, other than UN statistics? (And if you believe the UN on ANYTHING I really, really, really must demand that you get a catscan for that massive concussion.)
Do you really believe that somewhere, in an African country known for tribal strife, someone is going out and hand-counting everyone? That most people are born in the hospital? That accurate vital statistics are kept? Do you believe any of this for a random third world country? (The only ones where population is “increasing”.) Do you truly, as someone or other put it (I really can’t remember who) Arab countries send someone into the desert to not only count every Bedouin, but also to make sure they’re not counted more than once?
My sweet Summer child, we, the mighty United States of America, arguably (or undoubtedly) the most organized, best equipped country in this sorry sobbing world can’t tell how many people live here. Heck, we can’t tell how many people live in any given city.
This is because people largely lie. They lie enthusiastically, happily and often randomly. Which is a good thing as it prevents the hungry for power from getting a handle on us. The appropriate answer to “What are you doing?” from a stranger is “None of your business.”
In the US the sources of confusion are people who receive government help per capita “inventing” more children (Often by physically borrowing the neighbors) to get the “more help.”
Globally, I suggest, it’s much the same.
So, we don’t know how many people there are in the world.
More importantly, we don’t know how many people are too many. The more we plunge into the statements of Paul Ehrlich the more we realize their deciding a-priori and then making up stuff to “prove’ we have a population bomb going came from an emotion response to “lots of people” + “poverty”. In Ehrlich’s case, the benighted masses in some Indian cities. The fact that we can have the same population density and absolutely no bad effects in prosperous Western towns just baffles them.
I was shocked when P. J. O’Rourke pointed out that at NYC population densities, we could have the entire population of the world in a US state, and leave the rest of the Earth pristine. (BTW bad idea to make those analogies near the left. They take it as an instruction. It’s an image, not a serious proposition for cultural and other reasons. So the WEF can take its fifteen minute cities and its open borders, fold them all in corners and stick them where the sun don’t shine.)
And yet, everyone knows that overpopulation is terrible and means the end of humanity. (And that it must be combated by an all-powerful government, of course.) And really we must all stop reproducing before we destroy the world.
Also, overpopulation will render us extinct, anyway, or at least cause such behaviors that will destroy civilization.
AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT: Humans can’t help themselves and will keep reproducing till they become extinct.
How do we know? Well it’s scientific. It’s from Calhoun’s 1960s Mouse Utopia experiment, of course!
And …. and you should really follow that link.
Turns out like most such studies the mouse utopia is not only irreproducible, it might never have been managed, even once.
Mouse Utopia is almost completely unpublished. Despite working on it and similar experiments with NIMH funding for decades (he “continued to work on his research results until his death on September 7, 1995”), Calhoun appears to have published almost nothing substantive about his research, limited to a handful of short summary articles or passing references. (Calhoun’s 1963 book The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat describes only his “quarter-acre” experiments which ended in June 1949, before the NIH experiments on overcrowding.) The major citation for his Mouse Utopia experiments is the aforementioned 1962 Scientific American article (published 33 years before his death), which consists of 9 pages of popular writing, of which about half is generic illustrations of mice (rather than data-based figures or plots or tables). Calhoun 1963, “The Social Use of Space” touches briefly on behavioral sinks & mortality in some of the earlier experiments. Calhoun 1971, “Space and the Strategy of Life” presents a brief display of data from “Universe 14” and “Universe 15” but goes into more detail about 25 unspecified universes done to followup the Kessler 1966 thesis and mentions that they are following Universe 25, still waiting for it to actually collapse.7 The article Calhoun1 973, “Death Squared: The Explosive Growth and Demise of a Mouse Population”, begins with an extended analogy to the Book of Revelation, and presents some limited information on Universe 25, which has only halved in population at this point.
His 1970 article, for example, is just a redaction of the 1962 one, and despite apparently consulting Calhoun’s manuscripts at the NLM, Ramsden & Adams 2009 shed little light on Calhoun’s research or cite much beyond the 1962 article. (Considering how little he published, it’s surprising that NIMH funded Calhoun until 1983, leading to what describe as a “forced retirement” in 1986—apparently Calhoun was unable to get funding anywhere else. One wonders why NIMH dropped Calhoun, and why he was unable to get further funding given how high-profile and important his results are.)
This causes considerable confusion in reading since it’s unclear what papers refer to what. The 1962 article describes high infant mortality (infanticide is common in rodents) but not collapse in unidentified ‘universes’, which are not the famous Universe 25, which was started later; Calhoun 1971 had not yet seen a collapse in Universe 25; Marsden 1972 describes a population in slight decline and extrapolates out to possible collapse in a single unspecified universe; while Calhoun 1973 article shows a graph of a universe’s population definitely decreasing and apparently doomed by sterility & aging, which is identified as Universe 25. Are these all the same population, and if not, how many different ‘series’ or ‘universes’ are being described? How many exhibited the ‘senescence’ phase, much less population collapse? (Indeed, how many were done in total?)
So, at the basis of the certainty there are too many humans and that human overpopulation is a terrible thing; at the heart of things like Extinction Rebellion, the push for unfettered abortion; the certainty that women’s higher purpose is NEVER to be wives and mothers? At the heart of all of it is a giant lie perpetrated for self-aggrandizement by a man who couldn’t even prove that over-population is bad FOR MICE who are kept in a completely controlled environment and messed with over and over and over again.
I told a friend last night that if anything the Mouse Utopia proved that having someone mess with your society to try to make it fail was a bad idea. His answer was “And it could only work because mice don’t have the second amendment.”
Of course, neither does most of the world. We do. But it is of limited use if we believe the lies and let them get into our head.
Which is how we’ve come to the verge of a demographic collapse, if I’m reading economic and other signals right.
It’s time to stop believing the well-propagandized liars. And to reclaim our humanity.
It’s time to reproduce and create more humans. Not only because this is what humans were designed to do, and there’s an inescapable rightness in generation succeeding generation, no. But because we are humans and the measure of everything for us is human. The striped tri winged butterfly might be very pretty, but if you wouldn’t sacrifice all of them for a single human, you really should have that concussion looked into.
It’s time to start valuing more humans, not fewer. Because without humans, humanity quite literally has no meaning and no future.
So, How is the According To Hoyt Annual fundraiser going?
Frankly not well. After a promising and actually amazing first day, it’s been limping along, largely ignored. Honestly, I think this is because I’m not doing enough of a song and dance about it.
HOWEVER I must plead (alms for the writer) that this change because OTHERWISE I’m going to get pushed into doing a winter one again. And frankly? I don’t wanna.
It’s bad enough this will go on till 7/18.
Anyway, so some dancing:
This is the reason for doing a fundraiser. THIS IS NOT AN EMERGENCY. Don’t hurt yourself.
If you read this blog a few times a week and feel like donating, I’m tremendously grateful.
The Give Send Go is still active. Lately I’ve gotten more disenchanted with them, though. Not only have they hosted fundraisers for the kid who stabbed the track star through the heart, but there was some appearance of encouraging racialist bs. True or not? Don’t know. Haven’t looked that closely. Still, that and the fact they calculate how much of the raised money you actually get in some weird way makes them less than shiny.
So, what else is there? Well, there is paypal. Yes, I removed the button from the side (though I’ll return it) because they were threatening to fine people for badthink. Whether that was entirely organic or part of the Autopen administration it’s open to debate. They were being very enthusiastic about forcing everything from social media to everything else including debanking. At any rate, I think it is safe to use a paypal link for the next four years. Give or take. (Look none of these services are pure. We use what we can and seems safe at the time.)
So, here’s the paypal link.
While on that, yes, the address in Las Vegas is still available:
Sarah A. Hoyt
Goldport Press
304 S Jones Blvd #6771
Las Vegas, NV 89107
(Note this is a drop box. Please don’t send perishables that will be damaged by heat. If you want to send something out of the ordinary, contact me first. I’ll figure out another place to send it where things won’t be damaged and I can retrieve it. And if you want to give me something perishable or bulky, it might be best to catch me at a con. (Younger DIL says I have do do more cons. Sigh.)
Please, please, please do not send Indy a multi-tool. I realize this is probably futile pleading, but he’s enough trouble as it is. No, seriously. If you want me to have time to write, don’t send Indy a multitool.
And that’s it for now. A heartfelt thank you to anyone who contributes, thinks about contributing or (“merely”) leaves a nice review on one of my books.
You are all appreciated, and I hope you know it.

































































