
I promised my assistant I wouldn’t pick fights with the world in general on Tuesdays and Fridays, as she’s very busy elsewhere and doesn’t have time to comb through the comments.
Cracks knuckles, uses carnival barker voice: Welcome to the rumbl— er… Monday!
Smiles sharkilly.*
Let’s talk about the new, new thing and how terrible it is and fraught with trouble.
Which new thing? Well, sweetlings, we live in an era of rapid change. Real change, not the social from the top down bs, but change driven by technology which alters the way we do things because it exists. That in turn drives other change. (And I suspect if Trump can get things going the way he wants to, things will get changing faster.) So, new thing? We’re spoiled for choice.
I’m going to leave aside AI (which ain’t. No, I don’t care how much it throws shadows or how much it SAYS it hates/loves someone. If you guys think it hasn’t fed on every single story about AI rebelling/falling in love with/ruling the human race? You’re nuts. It’s an LLM.) simply because ce n’est pas mon metier.
Neither are self-driving or drive assist cars. I have experience as being not only a nervous driver, as one whose vision is going specifically on the “contrast” property. As in, I’m having trouble finding things that get lost against the background. I first realized this at the zoo, where they were trying to make the enclosures looking natural and the result is I didn’t see the animals at all.
I’ve never used full self-drive. I’ve used drive-assist, and found it perfectly safe except you can’t not be in the driver’s seat because there’s things that make it not “sense” right. (Like LLMS it has holes. It’s not human.) The weirdest one was a car with a HIGHLY polished back. For some reason this caused the car to start accelerating insanely towards the truck. But I was behind the wheel, I felt it, and I stopped it. I honestly don’t know why it was “light reflected on front, go very fast”, but there must have been a reason. Definitely needs adult supervision.
Anyway, so we’re not going to discuss that. We’re going to discuss things that I’m conversant with, granted at two or three remote in one case.
That case is remote work. The other case is indie publishing and ebooks.
Years ago, my friend Charlie Martin who sometimes writes posts for this blog told me something that I’ve never forgotten “ebooks win out in the end, because ebooks are the most economically efficient way to deliver story which is what the cstuumer is buying.” (Now that’s not all the custumer is buying with a traditional book. We’ll talk about that later.)
And the fact is that despite many, many surveys, polls, public chest beating to the intent that people loved paper will always love paper, that reading is a sensory experience and blah blah blah… ebooks outsell paper books ten to one. EVERY MONTH.
One of the problems with the ebooks is specifically Amazon’s outsized footprint. And their KU program which probably is violating some kind of restriction of trade regulation, but who is going to beard the gorilla.
I get less from KU now than I did for years, as a percentage of my work. But– It’s still almost half of my income from Amazon, and let’s talk about it: Amazon is where the money comes from. You might tell me you don’t buy from amazon, and I believe you, but 90% of people do. Because you get 2k from Amazon, you get $200 from B & N. You get change from EVERY OTHER SOURCE.
(But I’m about to make an experiment. I’ve taken the DST books from KU and once they roll off, I’m starting my own shoppify store, and also put it on all the other sites.)
However, revealed preference and what it forces on me or not, I’m open to the inconveniences and downsides of electronic books: mainly electronic books CAN be changed. And while the charge of “Amazon reached into my kindle” while it was bad publicity is also bs because they had to do it, for copyright reasons (THEY HAD TO. (And were probably set up.)) that’s not the big change danger. The big change danger are the things publishers are doing to books, and the reason I have Agatha Christie on paper, in case of grandkids. (I’ll note we’re a bit nutty, here on this side of the pond, as the the rest of the world has been on an “updating books so they connect to the current generation’s tastes” kick for 50 years at least.)
There is also, yes, that you can’t store it and all the DRM makes “own” it iffy. (Though honestly most of what I read on Kindle I’ll never want to read again.)
So, yeah, I do realize Amazon’s quasi-monopoly (even if a lot of it was acquired by being better) is a problem. A serious problem. Partly because companies with that commanding presence get sloppy and Amazon’s customer-service has already gone downhill.
BUT for now most people are voting for ebooks and Amazon with their money. It is what it is.
Also, the technology is very young. The kinks will get ironed. They get ironed by running into them and figuring them out. There are always problems. Someday we’ll discuss the jungle of paper backs back in the day. From violated copyrights to writers not getting paid, to– bah.
Also a lot of the complaints you have about ebooks — the changing of texts — you can complain about paperbooks too. Try getting an original Joy of Cooking. And I have a problem finding non-screwed-up Enid Blytons, though that is a problem that won’t affect most people here. But Europe is bad about this stuff, and I’m on the side of we “I want the book the author wrote” nuts.
The unfortunate problem is that you can keep a lot of books on paper, but not all of them. (And a lot …. well, check the bracings on your foundation.) You can keep a lot more electronic, if you can have a clean copy to archive.
No, I see no reason to doubt Charlie in this. The cheapest most efficient delivery method wins. Pretty much always.
This doesn’t mean paper books will go away, they’re just a different animal.
I used to buy popcorn books on paper — because there was no other way to buy them — popcorn books defined as books you read like you eat popcorn and don’t even remember very well after. Mostly mysteries, but also fantasy and SF. I bought them, I read them, sometimes I donated, more often they came unstuck (I bought books used. So I was often last stop) or I simply forgot to sell them and they cluttered the house for years and years.
I still buy books on paper. But I only buy those I wish to keep. The books I’m keeping now on paper, and I suspect most people are keeping, are special ones. Signed books. Books that had a profound effect on me. Books that remind me of an experience, like meeting the author.
People still buy books on paper, just a lot fewer, because now they are souvenirs, or experiences or — listen to me — for a certain kind of book, display items. if you’re not like us, and don’t read to read, but read to show off, and keep them around to display their erudition or their political opinions.
So no, paper books aren’t disappearing, but they are already a rump market, and my guess is they’ll become more so. And in the process, we’ll find each wrinkle with our nose. And then fix it.
Which brings us to another innovation: remote work.
Oh, the screaming and the belly aching. “But what if people aren’t working at all?”
And then there is this brilliant bit: Nail salon employee pleads guilty after netting nearly a million bucks by outsourcing U.S. government tech jobs to China and North KoreaNail salon employee pleads guilty after netting nearly a million bucks by outsourcing U.S. government tech jobs to China and North Korea. And more on that: here. (Side question, is “Maryland Man the criminal brother of Florida Man?”)
This immediately causes people to go “oh, no. Bring them to the office. This is not trustworthy.”
Let me interject that there are jobs that should never be done from home. Even desk jobs. And there are jobs — most of them involving national security — that should — if done remote now — be tightly controlled and watched. And most of them probably should not be done remote.
But your average job? Well, we’re back to the thing: Lowest expense for the delivery of work.
But Sarah, you’ll say, didn’t you read that thing above?
Oh, you think that’s new? Because I’ve seen things like that done in companies my husband worked for since mid oughts. You know, internet exists. You can supposedly work in an office and offload all your remote work to several people even in other countries, and then, well, you’re working very hard, late and early and here’s the work.
I’d like to tell you that all these bright boys were caught, but not even. Most of them even though we figured out what was going on… well, the bosses wouldn’t believe it even if we told them. These were golden boys, and they kept advancing, etc.
So, it’s not a new scam. Is it easier remote? Well, yes. To an extent. But if you read the stuff above, they were criminally negligent in both hiring and management. You interview in person, where it’s harder to fake. If it’s at all a sensitive position, you have them work in the office until you KNOW him/are sure of him. Administer a test, by all means. (Now they can.) Oh, yeah, and if you hire him for anything vaguely sensitive, by all means give him a dedicated laptop, and keep your own spyware on it that tells you what he’s up to. What are you, stupid?
In fact that entire sh*tshow was so badly managed that one wonders if the management was in on it and this was their way to sell secrets to China. Because I’m not stupid. And neither are you.
But are there problems with remote work? Well, let’s start with “how do we know if they’re working?” My husband (buffs nails) figured that out managing a remote team in the 90s: make it task dependent.
But what if people are working three or four part time jobs and cheeeeaaaaaating?
Get over the idea you’re buying time. Buying time for tech, creative or other brain labor NEVER made much sense. It’s a holdover form factory line work, when you bought time to buy a certain amount of work. It’s not real.
In tech work, or writing, or planning, or frankly just about anything you can do remote without issues? You’re paying for the task, not the hours. The hours are irrelevant.
Remote work is just underlining this fact, but it was always true. I know the readership of this blog. You guys know you’re faster than most people out there on the same task, right?
Say I pay someone (I’m about to) for managing a release and publicity? She actually gave me her price per hour, but I’m calculating that for what I’m willing to pay how many hours that would take. if she does it faster? I don’t actually care. Why would I?
If I wanted her to work exclusively for me, I would do so. I don’t. I would also have pay her more. Maybe someday. IF I have a dozen books coming out at once or something.
If the person is doing the job, why do you want them to work for you only if you don’t pay for exclusive. Is it a power thing?
It shouldn’t matter at all. Again, you’re not buying hours, but a completed task.
The other stuff? A lot of it are already solved problems that don’t inhere to distance work. A lot of them people know how to fix.
But there are bound to be some we haven’t thought about.
And there is, of course, the fact we need to start thinking of things another way. Jobs as tasks, just like we need to think of “books” as stories, not paper bricks.
What needs to stop is the freakout about everything that goes wrong with new tech. All the “ZOMG that changes everything!” “Ditch the new tech!”
New tech and new ways of doing things have bugs. Of course they do. They weren’t delivered from on high fully formed. They will have problems. The problems will work themselves out.
Chill. Most of these changes are taking power from centralized information and technology control. We know where the centralized modes are going: Europe for some reason just won’t make these changes. So they’re going hyper-controlled and hyper authoritarian.
The changes work in favor of decentralization and decentralization works in favor of liberty.
Why do you think all the orchestrated freakouts?
Chill. This too shall pass. And if we need to, we’ll find new solutions for the (few) new problems.
Keep driving.
*It’s totally a word. I just made it up.











































































































































































