Author: Sarah A. Hoyt

I need to stop being surprised at how bizarrely naive people are. I was going to say I don’t think I was ever that innocent, but of course I was. I mean, I know this isn’t entirely believable to most of you (as Bradbury demonstrated, the old were never children) but I was once a little baby, a toddler, a little girl. And I can still on occasion be startlingly naive and well meaning, particularly when I have some reason to like the person selling me the swamp land in Florida. … And since I generally like people (they’re fascinating) this leaves me open to a lot of bs.

But let me put this way: I was never happily and stupidly credulous. When someone tried to tell me to do something for my own good or worse for a bunch of other people who weren’t asking me to do it, I always wondered what was in it for the person. Always as far back as I remember.

Which is why I sometimes hit my desk so hard with my forehead that it leaves big dents, and I wonder “How can adults not see the trap in giving a lot of power to the government? Precisely?” Particularly a bunch of power over your ability to express yourself on the internet?

Yeah. Increasingly I’m coming across articles on the right lauding the kind of Self-Doxing that Europe is requiring of people on the net. Because, you know you should prove your age before you access stuff. And also we really should “clean up” the net. For the children.

When I come across this nonsense I’m neither child nor work safe for about ten minutes. And I’m fairly sure I invented some new German swear words.

Look, yes, there is horrible stuff out there. Arguably there always was. Not just the internet but everywhere. My parents kept a tight rein on me and we lived in a village. Most of the books I read had been stored by some ancestor or other. Apparently some of them liked spicier stuff? I mean– weird, but– Look, Victorian porn was bizarre, okay. Anyway, moving right along, there was also Roman myth available because I sneaked the books from a friend’s father’s library.

If you’re laughing, don’t be. It gave me a very weird idea of what went on between men and women. And the livestock manuals didn’t help. Not even slightly.

The point being that a child who is curious and will read everything could stumble on bizarrely inappropriate stuff even in the “safe” mid sixties in a country known for ALMOST keeping its women in purdah.

And I raised kids in the age when the internet was a wild frontier. You could — and sometimes hilariously did, at a con, in front of a bunch of people, type something innocent in, and get page upon page of outright gross porn opening up on your screen. Add to this that my kids each had their own computer, kept in their rooms from age three, and had internet connections from age 8 and 12.

So, how come they didn’t get catfished by pedos, or get a porn addiction or– Well, like with houseproofing the house, we didn’t internet proof the house. We internet proofed the kids. We explained all the possibilities, the pitfalls, why things weren’t good for them, until it came out their eyes, I think. We still dealt with an addiction issue, but it was to neopets, not porn. And we talked to and with them. A lot. Some would say endlessly. So we knew what they — even super-secretive younger son — were thinking and doing. And they were aware that Dan could — and did, about once a month — look at their history and see what they were up to.

We were very hands on, very active parents. And when they read something that had mention of adult relationships (usually not terribly explicit) they were comfortable enough to talk to us about it.

Oh, and we raised them in a church that gives a strong moral foundation.

Did it work? Seems to have. They’re in their thirties and seem like decent human beings.

Was it a lot of work? Oh, heck yes. I refer to days and weeks of getting up each day with a longer to-do list and never getting to sleep 8 hours a night, and–

Was it worth it? Absolutely.

Because it was tailored to our kids, whom we understood, we could keep them out of danger without nerfing everything around them. When they came of age, they were prepared because they’d never been over protected.

As I tell people: The Spanish royal family tied pillows around very tree in their park to protect their hemophilliac sons, who still got injured and died young. Because nerfing the world doesn’t work. Preparing the kids does.

Are there misfires? There are always misfires. Even in the tiny village where I grew up, girls got persuaded away by traffickers, and kids found out things they shouldn’t be exposed to, and child abuse is a human failing. BUT I was okay, despite my bizarre reading and some very weird ideas, because my parent shad made me suspicious of strangers bearing gifts. Perhaps a little too suspicious but that’s better than the alternative.

Unfortunately telling people “The solution to keeping kids out of trouble is to watch them, to talk to them, to discuss things with them, and to know your own kids” is not popular. “Let’s give the government the ability to see that everyone is on the internet under their own real name and address and says only things that are safe for the kids” is. Because it involves no personal work.

It does however open the door to a lot of horrible stuff and to totalitarian control, that has nothing to do with the children. And don’t come back at me with “if you’ve done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about” because you’re not an infant or a mental defective and you KNOW better.

For one because every one of us who is on the internet publicly and on the right has a passel of stalkers. They’re mostly annoying and probably harmless. Maybe. Looks at Charlie Kirk’s death. MAYBE. Yeah, people can find addresses for us. If we’re smart enough, those are decoys (not counting some bizarre internet confabulations that link me to people I’ve never met, too. And the fact that Dan and I have apparently to body doubles running around who are married to each other. For a while we lived in the same neighborhood in Colorado Springs. Never managed to meet. Now we’ve both diaspored away. I usually find out because someone tells me they went to my talk. It’s not mine. Or for a while that they saw a house I’m selling. The other Sarah Hoyt is a real estate agent. Their sons have the same names as ours. I have a head story that they’re us from other universes.) Anyway…. we all have people who’d like to kill us for things we say. And some of them don’t even work for the government.

If I were doing this again, from the beginning, I’d fly under a nom de internet. Heck, I did for a while, I just dropped it because it was so much effort. Because you really don’t need your net life to bite you in the *ss in real life, because you didn’t do anything wrong, just said some thing that someone else didn’t like. Or even didn’t say it, but they spun it up in their heads to where you said it.

To clarify: I’ve had people furious at me for writing a post about my own struggles with awards and whether to campaign for them, that someone else convinced them was about THEM. (Hint to anyone wondering: I NEVER WRITE THINGS TO GIVE HINTS. If I think you’re doing something assholish, I’ll name you by name. You’ll KNOW if I’m talking about you. The exceptions are close friends I don’t want to call out, just say “well, they’re good people, but they’re wrong on this” because they’re friends. And I don’t name writers and books when I find a book horrible, because I don’t need total strangers googling themselves and coming over to yell. I have trouble enough.) I’ve had people have a confrontation on this blog and decide I was the devil and go on multi-year revenge quests, at least three of them ongoing (and crazy. Did I mention crazy?) I’ve had people develop a crush on me sight unseen and try to move INTO MY HOUSE (which was fortunately not my house, but our drop address. But still.)

Forcing me to dox myself would materially endanger me and mine. My husband, my kids, my cats. Yes, the kids are grown and moved out, and fully able to defend themselves, but they have their own social lives and careers that don’t need my public life hanging over them.

And this is me: I do nothing more wrong, ever, than writing some things that upset people for reasons that often are in their own heads. And for questioning orthodoxy because it makes people uncomfortable.

Then there is the governmental decisions of what you’re not ready to see. Yeah, yeah, it was supposed to be stuff like porn. Guess what? It took them zero seconds in the UK to decide kids needed to be protected from knowing about the rape gangs. Or the Israeli hostages. Or….

Yes, yes, all that is strong material for young minds, but guess what? It can happen to kids, so kids should know about it.

The government can in fact take something as simple as “protect kids from porn” to “Protect” kids and adults from the truth. And will. As soon as some bureaucrat with an ax to grind gets hold of it.

I’d think after the gaslighting of COVID you wouldn’t be so eager to give the government the power to control what you see and what you read, and to come down like a ton of bricks on anyone who says something they don’t like.

And don’t give me “The US is different”. Yeah, until we aren’t. We’re still living with FDR’s bs. And this would just make it a lot worse and postpone getting rid of it.

We’ve been fighting back, to the extent we have, because the internet gives us the ability to talk freely and to talk back at the barrage of mass media propaganda. To codify some “internet safety act” would be to tie us hand and foot and deliver us bound to our foe.

You can take your little horse out of the rain. And not wait with sandwiches by the phone. Because we’re not — repeat not — going to let you do that. Particularly not after the last 5 years. We’ve seen what y’all want for us. And we don’t want it. Bleating “For the children” is not persuasive anymore.

“BUT SARAH! CHILDREN WILL SEE BAD THINGS!” Oh, yeah? And they won’t in schools? This article is horribly written, but the point is the books this school carries. Click through. The ones I’ve read are appalling for eighteen year olds, and I wouldn’t want anyone younger getting them. And yet, they’re fighting back against the mom trying to remove them from the school library where kids are supposed to roam free.

Nerfing the internet will do nothing if you let your kids go to public school. Nerfing the internet will do nothing, if your kids have friends whose family situation might not be ideal.

Look, the truth is nerfing the internet will do NOTHING. Yes, there is bilge out there. There has always been, there will always be. Don’t delude yourself the situation was better pre-internet. It wasn’t. It was just different.

The solution to keeping your kids safe and introducing them to this fallen world at a safe and sane pace is to WORK WITH YOUR KIDS. There is no other solution. There is only blood, sweat and tears, day in and day out. And yes, sometimes it will fail, because horrible things happen to good people. But it is still the only solution.

I don’t remember who said that it makes no sense to prevent adults from eating steak because children cannot chew it. However, it’s even worse to prevent the children from seeing the inappropriate by blindfolding every single person, and giving the government the chance to say what is inappropriate.

Don’t be naive. The government is not your friend, even when it is, temporarily sort of kind of on your side. People in government are there because they like power. And the more power they get, the more they’ll take.

The solution to raising moral, sane kids is for PARENTS to raise them.

Not to nerf the world with injurious laws.

No, I don’t mean aliens who are like us lot, though that’s a strange idea. Maybe all the people who talk about aliens disguised among us are really talking about Alien Odds, coming here because they don’t fit elsewhere. But I’m so for sure not going there.

There’s been a lively discussion in the comments about the nature of aliens and whether it’s plausible that we are in fact alone in comments.

First I must say as Drak said that I hate and despise the idea of all aliens being more advanced and/or somehow standing in moral judgement over us. Yeah, maybe that’s possible, but it’s certainly not guaranteed, nor would be universal.

And then 11B-Mailclerk posted the following comment, which makes it actually plausible we’re the most advanced, or close to: Link.

Quote:
11B-Mailclerksays:

February 18, 2026 at 12:05 pm

The prior two generations of stars lack sufficient “metals”, basically anything heavier than Lithium. Stellar Thermonuclear Synthesis forms elements up to Iron. When the stars flare up in their end states, they scatter elements for later accumulation in subsequent stars. The supergiant stars go supernova, producing further heavy elements that are net endothermic in fusion reaction, and scattering all the produced stuff vigorously for later re-accumulation. Further heavies are formed from less well understood processes, including, apparently, pulsar collisions in dual-star systems. I suspect black hole accretion areas eject a significant fraction of stuff that fell in and bounced off other stuff, more condensate and scatter for re-use.

Our Sol System is about a gen3 -3.5, so rather rich in metals. Earth, particularly rich in heavy elements. Thus lots of current state comments.

Hard to build an industrial civilization if one’s planet doesn’t have large surface deposits of metals. The “black iron ore” / “banded iron deposits” of Earth are hypothesized to be biological residue, from our earliest ocean of iron-saturated water. That ore is cheap to process, and yields relatively high-quality resultant metal.

You need that cheap Iron to get to cheap electricity, whereupon Aluminum goes from rare precious metal to cheap commodity. Thus to aircraft and spacecraft, thence other supermetals.

You also need huge deposits of easy to burn fuel. Wood works, but you run out of trees way too fast. Coal solves the problem. Almost as if someone knew we would need a 3000-5000 year pile of cheap fuel, and spent a billion-ish years growing vast swamps only to fold them under mountain ranges, heat for eons, and cook up solid-carbon-rocks. Also some choice liquid stuff for lubricants and fuels.

Kinda amazing the right stuff for civilization and its advance was just there all along for us to find and figure out.

And then some clever monkey looked at Uranium anew and said “thats odd”…..

Back to that early primordial H/He/Li mix. It is -very- difficult to initiate H-H fusion. A star has to be supermassive/hypergiant to light a pure H or H/He core. If there is even a small trace of Lithium, even a very small star lights early. We found this property out when one of our early Thermonuke tests went 3.5x yield. We thought only one isotope of Lithium would be fuel for fusion. Turns out, the other major isotope is also pretty good if you first superheat and compress it, like in an H Bomb or Star. The predicted primordial soup has -just- enough to get stars going easy enough and fast enough to get metals at Sol/Earth levels in the 13-14 billion years.

Another just-right “Goldilocks” value that makes or breaks a universe with Us in it, right about now.

(Omitting Goldilocks comments on gravity, the weak and strong nuclear forces, C, and a number of other phenomena that are oddly, coincidentally, -just- right for everything to work as needed to get to what is.)

Is this accurate? I don’t know, but it’s plausible. And it makes it entirely plausible that we’re the first to travel in space and/or the most advanced.

If you just recoiled at that idea, that says more about the culture of science fiction than it says about the odds this is true.

Which brings us to “the great white alien” (Pardon me!) in the style that natives in the 20th century referred to either the American president or the British King as “the great white father.” Beyond all probability of lack thereof, there is the fact that this cliche in fiction has become SO PERVASIVE as to make it ridiculous and boring. Just through repetition. As I said, Pratchett skewered it beautifully in Good Omens. If for no other reason than “booring” I’m going to oppose it. Just on the basis of being me and reading scifi.

It was new and refreshing when Heinlein did it — though note even his superior aliens aren’t MORAL or at least not moral by human standards! He was saner than that. Try for the same– but now it’s old and busted. Come up with something else.

In fact the idea that aliens are more advanced MORALLY is a complete non-sequitor. Surely morals are different depending on the species/world? What is life enhancing and improving for sharks isn’t the same as for humans. And we’re both children of the same world. How much more different would aliens be?

I will confess to a great now no longer secret love for “Humans are the old ones of the Galaxy” i.e. we were once the Lords of it all, carrying the Human Burden, as it were, until the colonies/satrapies/protectorates rebelled, and confined us to Earth. And everyone out there is terrified of our return.

I’m not a fool, I know the reason I love that so much I could eat it with a spoon is because it’s very flattering to us humans. And being a human I like us being flattered. But it’s also so countercultural in this culture of human-hatred that it is very cheering. If you do that, it might be as improbable as the “Great White Alien” but I will not chide you for it, because I’m too busy nom nom nom nomming it with a spoon.

The truth though is that if we have alien visitors of encounter aliens, we’ll likely never know. Why? Well, because aliens will be aliens. We have recently done studies on the cognitive abilities of things like octopi and elephants. And elephants at least might be close to our level. Just so alien and along such different lines that we’d never know how to communicate, not really. Or even how to evaluate their intelligence. Not really.

Now, I know Trump has promised to release anything about UFOs.

I could be wrong, but I expect it to be a giant nothingburger. There might be stuff about orbs and other unexplained stuff, but no aliens. I mean we know that Orbs occur. They occur in ghost hunting too. And that they often react as though sentient. What they are we don’t know. But they’re probably no alien. And I doubt they’re sentient as such. However we shall see.

Ultimately how we see aliens are a reflection of how we see ourselves as humans. And frankly I’m tired of us beating up on ourselves. And all in on us building ourselves up for a change.

It might be bad — both for Western Civ and Humans — to have too much self regard. It might mean we trample other ways of doing things for no other reason than being different. Maybe.

But it’s not nearly as dangerous as too little self-regard or oikophobia. THAT is deadly and will kill those who engage in it.

It’s time we stop it.

Yes Humans (And western civ) have flaws. But they are the greatest thing of its kind, from our own perspctive. i.e. if humans are destroyed, we will be too. And self-murder is repugnant. As for Western civ, again judging on the principle of fewest dead babies and long, healthy old age, it’s winning. And again, as a human I must support that.

Try not to live for the approval of some imaginary alien, and instead to support that which is good for yourself and your own species.

Aliens, if they exist, will take care of their own. They don’t need you to be their Great Human Savior.

Be for humans because you are human. What enhances humans enhances you. Anything else is nihilistic hubris.

Yesterday I was kidnapped by Witch’s Daughter to attempt a big push to finish. Which was odd, since I thought I’d have to finish editing the first 9/10 before the last three chapters consented to be written. Anyway, they’re done for a value of done that includes a lot of square brackets with “They resolve the thing with the griffins” — and by the way, who in living heck allowed me to write a story with a mythological species that has at least four valid spellings? To which I add, of course, my plethora of invalid. my poor copyeditor. She’s getting white hairs — which I hope to fix today, so it can go to the structural editor, while I keep pounding on the wording itself, and resolving tiny discrepancies like “What happened to her magical stones” from front to back.

Good news, the end is near. No, not that end but getting this novel written, which considering it was started almost 15 years ago is something. (Yes, Rogue magic will be done too. I HEAR you. Trust me.)

However the side effect of my sitting at my desk — actually since it was the weekend, I sat on the recliner on the family room, while my husband watched stuff, but never mind — all day is that I did not do any dishes. I’d put dishes in the dishwasher Saturday night which I — naively — thought were done. But because I still had to feed us on Sunday, and because we found a bunch of dishes that were supposedly done, but weren’t (look, I was unloading late at night, okay?) means there’s a pile on the counter.

Two things to add to this: the dishwasher is practically brand new. It might be a year old, or a year and a couple of months, but not much more than that. And it’s top of the line, because we didn’t want problems because they interfere with my work. And it’s been washing badly for about two weeks. Which …. I figure I would need to deal with but not yet. Actually I specifically meant to deal with it next week, since this week was ‘fun with doctors.’

Now I have a pile — and I mean a pile — a dishes to do this morning, while I also have to finish Witch’s Daughter, sort out the books and set up for Confinement, where I have a sales table (The Little Pickle will sit at it most of the time, honestly. But–) and do all the laundry so we don’t attend the con naked. (NO ONE WANTS TO SEE THAT.) And also the inevitable stuff that will come up (It’s this month, I swear. It’s been a month of years.)

One of those would normally be a day, but I’ll do as much as I can, and try to do more tomorrow….

But I have one question: What happened to things that just work?

I realize I might have a force field around me that does things to machines. Perhaps mom was right discouraging me from becoming a mechanical engineer but REALLY!

The washer and dryer are speed queen — again, we didn’t want problems, so we paid more… — and we’ve already had a repair call a few months ago, because something went wrong with the timing and the washer loads were taking longer and longer and longer. What did we do wrong? Nothing. “It’s something that happens to this model.”

I suspect what it is is a bunch of stupid “environmental” regulations under the Autopen. Because their ideal is to have the machines work not at all, so only the self-proclaimed elites who have servants can afford not to stink or spend half their lives at the kitchen sink.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’ve had it up to here — indicates a point well above her head — with stupid environmental rules that nerf the functioning of our household appliances.

I grew up where no one had household appliances and let me tell you housekeeping even for our little family of four was a full time job. Even with a girl who came to wash dishes after dinner and a cleaning lady doing dust-and-vacuum on the weekend, mom did so much on the house, just to keep it functioning that I’m still in awe she also managed to run her own business, and a successful one too.

And the worst part of all this is that there is no point. No, I don’t mean the climate scam, that everyone suddenly is actually admitting was a scam. I mean if it weren’t a scam none of this would still make any sense.

Look, the low-flush toilets — which I see a point for in say Colorado or Idaho, or Arizona or other states with low water — are now better, yeah, (but they’re not so low anymore) but for years what low flush actually meant was “either fill a bucket and throw it in with force, or stand by the toilet, flushing, and flushing, and flushing” Which in the end, I’d bet you amounted to more water.

And the last few dishwashers we’ve had — a reason we went with this one, which actually doesn’t have that problem — had so much insulation to save electricity on heating the water that we ended up having to do three or four loads for a normal dinner for our family. (Yes, I cook from scratch, but I’m not older son. I don’t use that many pots and pans.) In the end, of course, it took five hours to do the dishes, and used a lot more electricity.

So the supposed point of it was never served. It just “sounded good.” That’s it. Which to be fair, is the way of things done for and by the government.

If the Earth really needed saving — no, it doesn’t. Your soul might need it. The Earth doesn’t. Stop confusing geology with religion — the government would be the absolutely wrong way to do it.

Besides the pervasive “do it so it looks good” which actually hurts things, I swear there is a spirit of hatred for everything human and for the masses they supposedly serve.

They want us smelly and busy at our kitchens, which they’ll soon declare need to be a fire in the middle of the room, with a hole in the roof above, and swishing the dishes in the nearest river, once they ban soaps and detergents.

And I’ve had just about enough of it. If feminism and women liberation meant anything, instead of trying to shove us into male dominated professions whether we want to be there or have a talent for it or not, they’d stop the bureaucracy’s attempt to shove us — and a lot of men — into the role of medieval serfs, tied to homestead and field, unable to do anything else.

Bah.

I’m going to go do the pile of dishes, and swear a bit to clear my head now!

If you wish to send us books for next week’s promo, please email to bookpimping at outlook dot com. If you feel a need to re-promo the same book do so no more than once every six months (unless you’re me or my relative. Deal.) One book per author per week. Amazon links only. Oh, yeah, by clicking through and buying (anything, actually) through one of the links below, you will at no cost to you be giving a portion of your purchase to support ATH through our associates number. A COMMISSION IS EARNED FROM EACH PURCHASE.*Note that I haven’t read most of these books (my reading is eclectic and “craving led”,) and apply the usual cautions to buying. I reserve the right not to run any submission, if cover, blurb or anything else made me decide not to, at my sole discretion.– SAH

FROM JENNICA POUNDS (DATA REPUBLICAN) ON PRE-ORDER: Unelected.

How the NGO-Administrative Complex Seized Power—And How to Get It Back

$200 billion for Ukraine. $50 billion a year for USAID. $9 billion for resettling refugees. Meanwhile, Americans struggle to earn a living, buy a home, and start a family. The welfare state works for everyone but employed citizens trying their best to make ends meet and pay their taxes on time. Why are the world’s most generous people financially abused by their own government?

As one scandal after another breaks, there is one question that becomes harder and harder to ignore: How did the American government and a vast network of NGOs become the vehicle for funneling American middle-class wealth to the rest of the world? The surprising answer is not financial, but philosophical, the little-known yet centuries-old ideology called supranationalism. From George Soros through George W. Bush, from the 17th century Treaty of Westphalia through the rise of President Donald Trump, a clear timeline emerges for how everyday Americans became the number-one mark for a global ruling class intent on redistributing their resources. Barricading its backroom dealmaking behind federal departments, nonprofits and NGOs, and charitable foundations whose names we all know yet whose operations will still shock and horrify, this NGO-Administrative Complex has perfected the art of converting U.S. taxpayer money into instant-access welfare for the rest of the world.

This is the story of how this machine was built, how it runs, and how it can finally be dismantled.

Drawing on Jennica Pounds’ receipt-backed analysis trusted by millions on X at @DataRepublican, together with page-turning narratives of New York Times best-selling author Joshua Lisec, Unelected maps the money, names the gatekeepers, and rug-pulls the unelected networks running the show from behind dated logos and sappy slogans to impoverish us all and usher in a new world order in which every American city is destined to become another Minneapolis.

FROM PAM UPHOFF: Ruin and Redemption (Chronicles of the Fall Book 21)

A collection of six related stories

The Orgy Drug was just a snickery rumor . . . until an afternoon garden party when someone spiked the punch.

In a society divided by class, and ruled by the Mentalist Elite, who even keep their wives controlled with brain chips . . . Six upper class young ladies and their maids are faced with the ruination of their reputations—and the reactions of friends and family—and they’re going to deal with it, each in their own way.
Using the cultural changes forced by the loss of Zhivvyy Provoda, the Power Plague attacks, the illegal Orgy Drug circulating widely . . . and contact with other dimensionally-able civilizations, they’re all going to make it, one way or another.

FROM RACONTEUR PRESS: Pogue Too.

Most military fiction regales the reader with fast-paced tales of strong men with sexy weapons who close with, engage, and destroy the enemy with lethal precision. What it tends to ignore, though, is the supply clerk who issues him the body armor that protects him in the fight, the intelligence shop that arms him with information, or the maintenance troops who keep the vehicles running (ideally). Because there are so many ways in which POGs (I served in the early 2000’s) support the fight, one anthology was simply not enough to convey it all, so we had to do another one.
This time, Ted Begley takes us along for the ride with a shuttle driver who has an eye for a bargain. Addison Reid shows us that sometimes a logistics officer knows what troops on the frontline really need, even better than they do, however inexplicable it may seem. An FNG (Freakin’ New Guy) and his first-line leader learn a valuable lesson about an ancient tradition in Jason Hobbs’ “Snipe Hunt.” B. K. Gibson reminds us that even if you don’t expect the unexpected, you’d better be prepared to adapt to it. Rounding out the collection, Malory demonstrates that a POG’s most underappreciated, yet critical skills are, as always, ingenuity and resourcefulness.
The authors all do a fantastic job of capturing different facets of a POG’s life, from the professionalism to the competence to the humor and everything in between. As a former Air Defense Artillery officer, many of the stories in the following pages remind me of my own troops at different times, and I sincerely hope you enjoy reading them as much as I did.

FROM M. C. A. HOGARTH: Clays Upon the Sands (The Stone Moon Trilogy

The treasured anadi who must learn what it means to choose… the mysterious chenji whose magic comes at a terrible price… the jeweler who finds that love requires facing the unknowable future… and the Claw of the empire who discovers that loyalty has limits. Clays Upon the Sands, volume 2 in the Jokka Clays series, collects seven more stories of the Jokka of Ke Bakil, an alien species with two chances to change sexes: female, neuter or male… a species where destiny and biology intertwine in ways both beautiful and heartbreaking. Whether it’s accepting an unwanted Turning, defying an empire’s cruelty, or learning that some truths can only be spoken in the dark, each Jokkad must navigate the complex currents of identity, duty, and desire.

Seven voices. Seven transformations. A world where nothing is certain but change itself. Come explore.

FROM JACOB SHARP: A Boy Against the Boxers

In the sweltering summer of 1900, fourteen-year-old Eddie Donahue calls the walled International Legation Quarter in Peking, China, his home. While his father runs a bustling silk trade, Eddie watches in awe as soldiers from America, Europe, and beyond march the streets, guarding against growing unrest outside the gates.
Dreaming of adventure beyond his errands, Eddie encounters rough-and-ready U.S. Marines and glimpses the enigmatic threat of the ‘Boxers’ – warriors bent on driving out all foreigners from China. As tensions boil over into conflict, Eddie must summon his wits and bravery to face dangers that test his family, his friendships, and his resolve.

This gripping historical novel captures the Boxer Rebellion through a young boy’s eyes, blending real events with tales of courage and discovery.

FROM VAN LEDYARD: Legion of Liberty: Making Bank for Freedom!

End the Fed! — anonymous INR donor

Jesse Lomax is salvaging a news career with a temp gig shooting video at an obscure, corrupt third-tier think tank in Washington called the Institute for National Renewal. What do the rag-tag band of INR pseudo-scholars say when it’s suggested that they accept tainted money? “Tain’t enough!” they cry in unison.

INR is staffed with a collection of cynical Ph.D.-level grifters, experts in political dirty tricks, and a fundraiser cougar. The “research organization” is led by the narcissistic bully R. Morrison Dixon whose patriotic posture belies his hidden, unsavory past.

Jesse, a valedictorian-level high school drop out from Erie, Pa., tells himself he can rise above the moral slime, put together a nest egg for his documentary production start-up, and blow this hated capital. He turns down a lucrative invitation to join the Fellowship of Obscure Men, INR’s skunk works for political dirty tricks and extreme partying. Jesse’s last day at INR is circled on the calendar.

But events draw him in deeper. A fundraising email minus personalized salutations but carrying the placeholder “Dear Rich Idiot,” goes out to INR’s top donors. Geneva Duke, the “luscious peach” of an intern, is scapegoated and loses her job — much to Jesse’s dismay.

Pastor Hadwin “Bud” Garnsey, INR’s director of faith outreach, goes on the lam from the law for an “indiscretion” at the Folger Library. Garnsey has the receipts on Dixon’s shady past. He shares these with investigative reporter Alan Faberman who is working on an expose of INR’s founders and connections to illegal lobbying for a Mideast pipeline. And Gladys Strumpf, a pistol-packing, wheelchair-bound board member incensed by the “Rich Idiot” email, threatens to tear up her lavish bequest to INR.

Jesse’s posture of neutrality and indifference is tested when Elmar, the thuggish pipeline executive, confronts him. Elmar is convinced that Jesse is secretly working with Faberman on the INR expose.

Geneva Duke wants her revenge. She begs Jesse to help her take down “the evil, the lies, the greed” at the heart of INR. She knows what evil looks like from her own experience, which she only hints at. When Jesse refuses to join her crusade, she goes it alone.

But Jesse can’t quite let her go. As much as he wanted to disentangle from INR, what he wants much more is Geneva.

Dixon and his insiders are criminal goons who play rough. The “luscious peach” is headed for some real trouble. Jesse joins her crusade against evil doers at the 11th hour. But is he too late?

FROM NATHAN C. BRINDLE: A Fox in the Henhouse (Timelines Universe Book 2)

Delaney Wolff Fox is a spy. A cute spy. A deadly spy.

A spy you want at your back when stuff gets real.

From a palatial office in Johannesburg, to a fancy whisky bar in Sydney, Australia, to a beautiful private beach in southwest Florida, to the great and wild city of New Orleans, Captain Delaney Fox, United States Space Force Marines (Intelligence Division) finds herself beset by assassins at every turn, while first saving an alien government’s valuable artifact from the South African cartel that’s stolen it, and then being assigned to guard said artifact while it completes a world tour, on loan from that same alien government.

But like the proverbial fox in the proverbial henhouse, you can count on Delaney to complete the mission and come out with the prize, intact and in hand – even if the “farmer” isn’t all that keen about her doing so.

FROM JOHN BAILEY: The Geometry of Smoke: Archimedes, the Eastern Exchange, and the Powder That Almost Was (Not Quite Accurate, You Know…)

What if history almost changed—and no one noticed?
In this imagined rediscovered manuscript, Archimedes of Syracuse undertakes a secret journey eastward to exchange knowledge with scholars of the Qin realm. Geometry meets administration, philosophy meets engineering, and curiosity bridges civilizations separated by distance but united by mathematics.
Together, Greek and Qin thinkers approach a discovery centuries ahead of its time: the controlled power of explosive chemistry.
The knowledge is lost in a storm near Malta.
Preserved only through damaged scrolls, argumentative footnotes, missing diagrams, and a long-suffering modern translator, The Geometry of Smoke blends historical fiction, scientific imagination, and dry scholarly humor into a tale about discovery, accident, and the fragile path of human progress.
Featuring:

• Faux academic commentary
• Disappearing diagrams
• Scholars arguing across centuries
• And alien observers quietly relieved by a shipwreck

A novel for readers who enjoy history, science, and the comedy of intellect.

FROM HOLLY CHISM: Sleigh Bells and Wedding Bells (Building a Life Book 2)

Amaryllis and Chris have been in love since…forever. Even if Amaryllis didn’t realize it until Chris fell off a ladder. A year later, they’re working and planning toward a wedding. Eventually. When they get enough money built up, and can take the time to do it.

Unfortunately, Amaryllis forgot Thanksgiving. Her mother decided that since she forgot it, she could make it. And that would have been fine, if the turkey hadn’t suddenly been the worst thing ever.

Now, she’s got three weeks to plan her own wedding, and only four hundred dollars to pay for it. But she’ll manage. It’ll work.

It just has to.

BY CHARLES ALDEN SELTZER REVIVED BY D. JASON FLEMING: 3 Ways of Lead (Annotated): A Pulp Western Omnibus

Charles Alden Seltzer was one of the first crop of western authors, a contemporary of Zane Grey and William MacLeod Raine. But he *really* hit his stride in 1921, and these three post-1921 novels prove it!

Brass Commandments

“He’s man’s size, goin’ an’ comin’. No show, no fuss; likes to play a lone hand. Cool an’ easy an’ dangerous. Two-gun. Throws ’em so fast that you can’t see ’em. Lightnin’s slow when Lannon moves his gun-hand. Dead shot; cold as an iceberg under fire.”

Such was the opinion in Bozzam City of Flash Lannon. Five years of getting an education back East might have tamed him, some, but when rustlers target his cattle, and the local law doesn’t care, Lannon nails a new law to the wall of the local post office: his brass commandments naming the five men who must leave the country — or die.

Five named men… and “one other.”

FROM C. CHANCY: Pearl of Fire

Bombs, fire, and murder….Caldera City. Stronghold and refuge, built by faith and elemental power in the heart of a volcano; surviving through magic, tactics, and a daring alliance with dragons. For Allen Helleson, Caldera was an escape from the lives ruined by his family’s hardline traditions; now he walks the streets as an Inspector for the Caldera Watch, defending the city other nations see as a pit of hell. For Shane Redstone, Caldera was the home she risked life and soul to defend as a Flame – until enemy curses blinded her, sending her away from the front lines forever.The war has come home again….Together they survive the first bomb. But Caldera’s enemies never stop with just one. Now a scarred yet deadly ex-soldier and a spirit-reading Inspector have to find and stop the bombers… before Wards fall, dragons die, and the caldera erupts in flame. One wrong move, and the city burns.

FROM MOE LANE: Frozen Dreams (Tom Vargas Mysteries Book 1)

This is going to be the best post-apocalyptic high urban fantasy pulp detective novel you will read today!

Cin City. The tinsel crown of the magical Kingdom of New California – and Tom Vargas’s favorite place in the whole, wide world. Sure, as a Shamus he has to Clear a lot of Cases, listen to a lot of lies, and get battered and bruised in the process, but it’s worth it. Cin City is worth it.

But when trouble shows up as a dead mage at the Castle, he’s got to work fast and smart to save his city. New California doesn’t have mages, you see. And Cin City is safe for just as long as nobody can prove otherwise.

(Note: this book has a sequel, but it is not part of an epic fantasy trilogy.)

FROM SARAH A. HOYT: Done With Mirrors.

DONE WITH MIRRORS

From Prometheus Award winner Sarah A. Hoyt comes a dazzling collection that showcases why her work has appeared in Analog, Asimov’s, and Weird Tales—and why readers can’t get enough.

Magic-soaked noir in 1920s Denver. Mirror-hopping time lords fleeing across infinite universes. Survival in John Ringo’s zombie apocalypse. Murder and mystery in the world of Darkships and Rhodes. Each story in this collection pulls you into a different world—and refuses to let go.

Previously published in acclaimed anthologies from Baen and Chris Kennedy Publishing, these nine tales span Hoyt’s most beloved universes alongside standalone adventures. Whether she’s writing in Ringo’s Black Tide Rising series, exploring her own Darkships and Rhodes worlds, or crafting speculative noir that defies categorization, Hoyt delivers the vivid storytelling and emotional resonance that has earned her a devoted following.

From rain-slicked streets where magic and murder collide to the far reaches of space-time itself, Done With Mirrors demonstrates the genre-hopping brilliance of one of speculative fiction’s most versatile voices.

Nine stories. Nine worlds. One unforgettable collection.

Contains the short stories: Honey Fall; Scrubbing Clean; Last Chance; Great Reckoning in a Small Room; Horse’s Heart; Do No Harm; Dead End Rhodes; Knights of Time; Done with Mirrors.

With an introduction by Holly Chism.

AND YOU KNOW I’M CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED TO DO THIS. I’LL STOP WHEN THE NEXT BOOK IN SERIES COMES OUT:

FROM SARAH A. HOYT: No Man’s Land: Volume 1 (Chronicles of Lost Elly)

Sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic.

On a lost colony world, mad geneticists thought they could eliminate inequality by making everyone hermaphrodite. They were wrong. Catastrophically wrong.
Now technology indistinguishable from magic courses through the veins of the inhabitants, making their barbaric civilization survivable—and Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus Kayel Hayden, Viscount Webson, Envoy of the Star Empire—Skip to his friends— has just crash-landed through a time-space rift into the middle of it all.
Dodging assassins and plummeting from high windows was just the beginning. With a desperate king and an archmagician as his only allies, Scipio must outrun death itself while battling beasts, traitors, and infiltrators bent on finishing what the founders started: total destruction.
Two worlds. One chance. No time to lose.

Volume 1
The Ambassador Corps has rules: you cannot know everything, don’t get horizontal with the natives, don’t make promises you can’t keep.
They’re a lot harder to follow when assassins are hunting you, your barbarian allies could kill you for the wrong word, and death lurks around every corner.
The unwritten rule? Never identify with the natives.
Skip’s already broken that one.
Now he’s racing against time to save his new friends from slavery—or worse—while dodging energy blasts and political intrigue. One crash-landed diplomat. A world of deadly secrets. And absolutely no backup.

Some rules are meant to be broken. Others will get you killed.

Vignettes by Luke, Mary Catelli and ‘Nother Mike.

So what’s a vignette? You might know them as flash fiction, or even just sketches. We will provide a prompt each Sunday that you can use directly (including it in your work) or just as an inspiration. You, in turn, will write about 50 words (yes, we are going for short shorts! Not even a Drabble 100 words, just half that!). Then post it! For an additional challenge, you can aim to make it exactly 50 words, if you like.

We recommend that if you have an original vignette, you post that as a new reply. If you are commenting on someone’s vignette, then post that as a reply to the vignette. Comments — this is writing practice, so comments should be aimed at helping someone be a better writer, not at crushing them. And since these are likely to be drafts, don’t jump up and down too hard on typos and grammar.

If you have questions, feel free to ask.

Your writing prompt this week is: Launch

The two other songs. The first is a mild spoiler.

And this one is about yet another “swearing to each other” which is the closest they have to marriage.

I finally had half an hour (No, seriously. This week has been all doctors. GAH) to upload the first clanker song. There’s two more to deal with.

Also the Little Pickle (Younger DIL) had her add taken down from face book for…. selling weapons. It’s candy sprinkle pocket knives. I had a more dangerous one by 8 and I still have all my arms and fingers and eyes, and keep in mind that I’m nature’s own klutz. So she’s very down hearted. Give her some love. Like her business page on FB or Instagram, or of course, buy something sharp from: Shiny, Sharp, and Stylish… Welcome! To Morrigan’s Mercantile!

This is number 18 in the sound track of No Man’s Land. If you’ve read the book, you know exactly when.

Real honor, as distinct from the fake honor of “face” or of being proud of your ancestors, your education, or some other honor that was mostly bestowed on you, is a harsh mistress.

It is particularly a harsh task mistress when you live in a civilization where the other kind of honor is emphasized and revered. I know because I watched my dad — a natural born paladin — carry his honor like Christ carried his cross. Rationally speaking it was a stupid thing to do, at least at first glance. Not only didn’t being incredibly honorable, having pride in his work, giving full measure packed down every day, not earn him any glory or praise, but it made the people he worked with and for assume he was stupid. After all, why couldn’t he be “smart” and cut corners, he must be stupid.

And yet he persisted, day after day, year after year, under the weight of being an honorable man, who followed his beliefs in the dignity of others and the duty he owed G-d, family and country. He’s still doing it, even though retired.

It is men and women like that who keep civilization going, even in sick cultures, even in those that are falling apart, even in places where everyday functioning is difficult.

If you think on it, you know those people.

They are not the “activists”; they don’t bang the drum for giving government money to people; they don’t talk about how much they speak for the voiceless or help the helpless.

They just get up in the middle of the night, put their pants on and drive across town with their daughter to pick up the daughter’s friend who was stranded by her boyfriend at a party for refusing to put out. They get up in the middle of the night, put their pants on, and go donated blood because they’re part of the rare blood club and someone had an accident and needs that blood type. And if you’re not the one who brought him the emergency, and you’re not in on it, you don’t know anything about it when you get up in the morning and he’s making breakfast (and giving you a bit of his apple, because that’s the tradition) just as cheerful and calm as ever. And you don’t know all the things he did for people until you’re much older: the money he gave from the little he had to help a young couple who’d got in trouble; standing with the girl marrying someone of another race when some of her family wouldn’t; writing stuff out for friends who were inarticulate. And working. Never taking time when he was needed. Sometimes working through the summer when everyone else was on vacation, because there was no backup and he had to keep things going.

This is not an eulogy for my dad — Thank G-d. I don’t think I could take his death right now — but just what I learned about real honor from him.

Honor is not comfortable. It forces you to do things you don’t want to do, like admit it’s your fault. Like make reparation. Like help people even when you’re mad at them and it’s the last thing in the world you want to do. Like pay it forward. Like sacrifice for the future. Like do the little thankless tasks as though every little thing were the most important ever, all adding up to doing your work the best you absolutely can, even when no one else does.

So why do people do it?

I think because it’s a deep set evolutionary valuable trait. And I’m not — NOT — going to argue if it’s inherited genetically of through example. I know that I do a lot of things I’d much rather not do — I’m not a paladin, me — because I don’t want to let dad down. Even if it’s things he’d never hear of, or wouldn’t care about if he did.

Like coming out of the political closet when the requirements of keeping in the political closet went from just “Keep your mouth shut” to “you must vocally proclaim pernicious bs that will hurt others.” That was a doozy. But if dad were in that situation and understood what I was being asked to do, that’s what he’d do, so that’s what I had to do too.

It’s uncomfortable, and it certainly isn’t natural to me. I’m not the “yes, they wronged me, but this is their due, and I must help them” I’m the “tooth for a tooth, eye for an eye” and an extra kick to the groin, kind of person. And yet, he looks over my shoulder metaphorically speaking and so– Instead of getting down in the mud and raining vengeance, I — heaven help me — try to do what dad would do. And when I would give the first draft a cursory look and a spell check and send it in, or when I’ve sent in a story and realize it’s not right, even if I know it would be accepted, I remember dad, and I pull back the story and spend three days on a rewrite and send it in. Or I spend three months — glares at Witch’s Daughter — making the it the best I can even though I know most people won’t notice.

I’m not naturally honorable, but I have a man of honor looking over my shoulder.

I think people with real honor, people who keep up that real honor, the standards of civilization, the pride in their work, in the end are the only thing keeping us from flying apart, from breaking down under the incompetence and the cheating of the “smart guys.”

They rarely get the thanks they deserve. They never get the payment or the glory they deserve.

G-d bless them.

Do try to make them proud.

First I wish to apologize for this being so late. I normally don’t mention it, since a lot of you come to the blog late anyway, but today was special, and I don’t want you to think I’m ill again. I’m actually doing a lot better, compared to the last month and a half. It’s just that normally I write my blog post at night (Yesterday was late because I misscheduled or WPDE.) but yesterday I had one of the immune-desensitization shots. These make so tired, I couldn’t write a blog at night and just kind of collapsed. And this morning was the sort of day Murphy smiles on. I set the filter wrong in the coffee maker, which resulted in an entire 12 cups of coffee being distributed atop the coffee-nook table, the floor and…. the cat food under it. As you can imagine this had to be cleaned immediately. AND Indy kept trying to lap up the coffee from the floor so it was fight-cleaning. Caffeine can kill cats, but besides that I’m sure the rest of you understand the nightmare a Caffeine Enhanced Engineer cat would be, right?

Anyway– I was going to go on a rant about the possibility of aliens, but I think it is one of those posts I can’t do more than once a week, since my politics fans are somewhat concerned by my sudden and enthusiastic descent into science fiction inside baseball. So, next week.

Fortunately the close-in fan group served me up a theme on a platter by linking me on an x link. The link and the x-cancel link.

First, I would like to correct the honorable Simon Helberg. I have no idea if he’s American or Northern European, but really SPAIN IS NOT THIRD WORLD. And Spain, when it comes to work ethic, following the rules and exactness is one step up from Portugal WHICH IS ALSO NOT THIRD WORLD.

I joke, often, by saying that Portugal is at least a second and half world country. I know that third world didn’t come from that but from the spheres of influence of the US and the USSR, but people use it as a gradation, and as such, Portugal is somewhere between Spain and … Um…. Greece. Not in politics, mind, but–

What we’re measuring here is “Ability to deal with a tech society, maintain it and keep it running.” Let me assure you, ladies, gentlemen and paramecium, there are depths and depths below Portugal. And in fact Portugal is — solidly — ahead of most of South America and all of Africa.

There is reliable — if low powered — electricity. The hospitals might not be up to the US standards, but they’re a good way there to the point that is son had trained there, he could have had a successful residency here with less effort than say someone from India or China. The drinking water is potable. And people by and large try to do their jobs. It’s just how they approach their jobs that is different. And that’s cultural.

So the reason to go into this is important. I’m not beating up on my country of origin. I’m not even beating up on Spain (is still salty about large Spanish genetic contribution according to 23 and me) or on Europe in general (fun as that is.) What I’d like to do is explain why mass immigration is bad, in the sense that it degrades the US’s ability to maintain (or expand on) a tech society.

If I need to explain why this is important: Technology and the industrial revolution have lifted more people out of poverty than anything else in the history of mankind. It made us capable of living in such a way that most children survive and people don’t die of old age at forty.

So an industrial, technical, technological society is desirable.

Off the top of my head the ability to create and maintain such varies (there is a reason the future comes from America) and the qualities needed for it are (by and large, and missing some): an educated population with work ethic and pride in their labor; rule of law that applies equally to everyone; a civil culture that allows individuals to join in groups to solve a problem.

Those three combined allow for people to work and navigate the day to day without all of it being a slalom of trying to get over glitches caused by other people not following the rules or following the rules in their own way. It also allows for a certain level of innovation without the whole thing falling apart.

As you can imagine, in that index, the problems in the US have been growing. And a lot of it is through unrestrained immigration, particularly illegal “just walk over the border” immigration which immediately comes with law breaking from the get go.

Look, we already have problems of that kind, due to our spectacularly non-functional education and the last few generations being raised by (minimum wage) wolves, we don’t need to add people who are going to have real trouble adapting to the the country and who, if imported in vast undisgestible numbers will make the US as unable to cope with modernity and a tech society as the example above.

So, let me lay some things out. I get very irritated to the people who attribute the cluster f*ck that is Africa or the Americas south of the border to “race” because it’s nonsense. Africa by itself, ignore skin color, has dozens of “races”. It has the highest genetic variety in the world, after all. This means real variations, independent of skin color. And the world is full of places where the people look indistinguishable from the ones on the other side of the border, but the culture means that one side is high-functioning and the other heaven help them. Even if the high functioning is relative like the Dominican Republic versus Haiti, say. (Or Israel versus Palestine. Yes, there is shared blood, partly because of the Hamass’s rapey ways. But the living is night and day.)

It’s difficult for people who haven’t been in the scrum, in countries so small that you need a passport to swing anything larger than a week old kitten, that it is not race. Because in the US “races” (largely self-defined. You guys have no clue how much race in the US is “only another person born and raised in America can even TELL. I mean, seriously, Megan Markle being “black” is ridiculous. Send her to Africa and everyone will tell you she’s the whitest person who ever whited. And even in most of Europe she’d pass for “tanned white.”)

So, it is NOT race, but culture. And since each country has an individual and almost ineradicable culture, it is “race” if you’re willing to consider each country a race. Which people like my parents do. And it’s absurdly wrong for genetics, but dear Lord so right for results.

The good news is that this means we don’t need to engage in the repulsive business of eugenics. How well people function in technological society or how well a group of people can sustain a technological society is not going to cause us to have to start killing babies in batch lots. (I’m so sorry if this disappoints the left side of the isle. C’est domage.) But on the other hand we have almost as bad as problem, because culture is almost impossible to change at the group level. An individual can with a lot of effort and isolating him/herself from his/her native culture acculturate. It won’t ever be complete, I’d judge I have about 10% left of my original culture, but if they’re lucky what remains isn’t very important. In my case it’s mostly what I call “performative dance” i.e. the outward stuff: food taste and cooking, a certain way of moving and a basic temperament (at the level that maybe it’s genetic, maybe not) which I curb when needed. Look, it’s stuff like younger son and his wife visiting at late-dinnertime hours to pick up something, and I immediately ask if they ate and my primary priority becomes cooking for my son. There’s things you can’t even bother to fight, okay?

Anyway, as I said, in that index Spain and Portugal are not anywhere near the bottom. I actually have a ranking of countries in the index in the back of my mind, because of years growing up and listening to people complain that where they moved is “too regimented” or “a madhouse and yucky.” I can tell you for instance that Ireland is above Portugal in that index, but not unreachable levels above like, say, England or heaven forbid Germany. But Greece is below. Italy is above, I think. Etc.

What do I mean by the index? Well, of the habits of mind, for lack of a better term, that allow you to sustain civilized high tech society. The work ethic, the seriousness, the respect for the rule of law. Portuguese term for this is “organized.” And the Portuguese are actually proud of being unorganized. Though also proud of being strangely legalistic. (At the bureaucratic, annoying, petty-fogging Karen level. I figure they get it from Rome and confuse that with civilization.) No, don’t ask. Being proud of your culture regardless is big everywhere except weirdly the US, where we tend to assume we ain’t got no culture (And we’re wrong.)

If the story above appalled you…. Part of this is the personal sense of…. pundonor. That is a Spanish word, but one doesn’t exist in English that I know. Pundonor means for lack of a better term “personal face” in the sense of “honor”. Gah… How do I explain this? Obama bowing to the Emperor of Japan was a complete violation of his pundonor (if he had it.) In fact, it impugned all of America’s pundonor.

Or a more homely and perhaps more poignant personal example: When I first came to the US and before I acculturated my first job was retail at a mall. It makes perfect sense, right? I had no work history in the US and my credentials were not wholly understandable. I couldn’t really apply for jobs commensurate with my education until I had A work history. Also we were incredibly tight money wise. So shortly after we bought a house, I got a retail job at the nearby mall. HOWEVER this distressed me immensely and neither my husband nor my co-workers understood it. My family in Portugal, on the other hand, absolutely GOT it and were even more distressed than I was. You see, for me, a college graduate with an advanced degree working retail for minimum wage was a violation of my pundonor. I was lowering myself and making myself a lower class by doing that.

Now the problem is that in countries with pundonor almost everyone considers themselves the highest class even if it’s because their grandmother’s second cousin by marriage was a landowner. So getting a job, any job, is a violation of anyone’s pundonor. Which means that people try to do it with as little effort and as much “getting away with things” as they can to preserve their pundonor.

I’m only half joking when I say in Portugal the highest, unacknowledged virtue is getting away with something. If you can do the minimal of your job with a minimum of effort you are winning at life. You are smart.

This leads to a lot of shady performance and shady deals, which I think work well enough in a pre-industrial society, but … well, the circuits and wires are unforgiving, so it also leads to a lot of failure and disruption in every day life.

Um…. so to explain: When I was trying to break into publishing, my family in Portugal was very shocked that editors were judging my submission on the basis of spelling and punctuation and that this was in fact the first cut. (Only mentioned, because I had to have Dan proof everything.) After all, I was college-educated, and I was the talent, or applying to be the talent. Couldn’t I just do the words kind of closely and let someone with fewer qualifications do the donkey work of punctuating?

No, I have no idea how THAT would work, but I can guarantee it would add an hellish layer to reading submissions for magazines or anthos. And that, in fact, it would probably lead to the Portuguese system, where you get published if you’re related to someone and therefore the general quality of writing (with exceptions) is… uh…. not great. Which is why it doesn’t pay and it’s a prestige thing, and most people read foreign books in translation.

In the same imagine everyone from assembly line worker on trying to get away with something, to perserve their pundonor. That works exactly as you’d expect, and daily life is a continuous stream of little frustrations, break downs and slip ups, much as described above.

Note that Portuguese when they immigrate tend to do very very well. My opinion of this is that the ones who immigrate are already highly motivated, and when they’re freed of the demands of pundonor they can succeed with one tenth the work required to navigate the continuous daily breakdowns of life AND their own pundonor.

Of course, to do that, the ideal situation is mine: alone, with a husband in the American culture, and no one even remotely Portuguese around, except for a weekly call to mom to give her proof of life. BUT it can be done with the occasional couple and their children. It just takes longer. From observation about 3 generations, though it can be one more or one less, depending on motivation and circumstances.

If you bring a group over, they’re still bound by the exact same imperatives and assimilation and acculturation are almost imperceptible.

And if you bring a massive group…. well, they influence the host culture instead. I don’t think there’s a better example of the effects of pundonor and Latin culture than the recent “all by illegals” construction. The last house we lived in in Colorado was also our newest house, and the one with the MOST problems that had to be solved because they were a danger.

And trust me, again, neither Spain or Portugal are third world countries. For those you have to add layers like not really believing in the germ theory of disease. And various gradations of class and caste that would make your head spin. And the complexities of tribal and family obligation.

People in the third world might be not as bright — who knows? I mean, who knows if it’s genetic? you can’t judge IQ tests when the population is malnourished AND has next to no basic education in things like sitting down, reading and using a pencil — or they might be just as bright as the ones in the West. We’ll never know. Because their culture is incompatible with fully creating (or re-creating, since they’re not inventing it) an industrial civilization.

It’s not just performative dance. It’s not clothes and food and expressions. Culture is bone deep at a level you don’t even see it until you have acculturated elsewhere and look back. In fact I fully expect an angry email from my brother, if he stumbles on this post, telling me he has no pundonor. But he does. It’s just at such a gut level he DOESN’T KNOW IT. But it’s there. It’s necessary to survive in this culture. And it accidentally borks everything required for tech and law and modernity to work properly.

The leftists who crow about the conquest of the West by the “global South” are idiots who think about humans as widgets. But humans aren’t. Beyond all sorts of individual capabilities, humans get cultural software imprinted at birth (or maybe in the womb) which influences everything they do at every level.

If we really were to be conquered by the “global South” we’d go down for the long count, and have to wait for a country to reinvent modernity and colonize everyone else to teach it. At which point it would take in various degrees.

I think America is miraculous — I express this as The Future Comes From America — because people got dumped here in groups and had to learn to live with each other isolated from their native cultures. Yes, the largest group was anglo-saxon, but that was early enough that dealing with nature and the local barbarians (bah. They were. And I do realize I’m speaking of ancestors of my husband and sons. They were barbaric humans) changed them enough that they weren’t — as our founding fathers knew — quite English.

But there were others that accreted and most of them slowly or fast adapted to leaving the old world behind. And if you manage to do what, what remains is proving yourself through hard work and results. Which most of us try to.

There might be a component that humans willing to immigrate and leave all the old stuff behind, and try to change their own cultural software are already a pretty weird breed.

A combination of this created a country that can in fact create the future and hopefully take humanity to the stars.

If we go down for the long count, I don’t know when or if it will come back again.

So — for the sake of humanity, we must stop mass immigration and fix our culture so that each person’s measure is the quality of his or her work (yes, there’s more to life than work, but as any human knows, marriage and raising kids is also work. Even housekeeping) and giving good measure for their compensation.

It’s going to be very very hard, but as the close-in-fan who goes by T. G. Sunshine put it (she says it’s from and OLD Superb Owl commercial): We’re Americans. We dream with our sleeves rolled up.

Hard work never killed no one. … Lack of hard work and shoddy work on the other hand can.

So, roll up those sleeves, and let’s do it.

Some years ago — about thirty, because I was pregnant with younger son — some woman wrote a “sequel” to Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca. I grabbed it off the sale bin at Barnes and Noble, then figured out why it was on discount. And it didn’t seem to do very well.

For those who don’t know the book, I’m going to leave most of the set up and motivation alone — at some point I’m going to write a crossover with Pride & Prejudice, and you can read it then. It won’t be the same, but still closer in spirit than this “sequel.” Anyway, on one point — if you don’t want spoilers skip two paragraphs: the man main character killed his former wife for what, if you read the book seems like good and sufficient reason. (Counting that she baited him into killing her, on purpose, at a point of extreme weakness and threatened to destroy his entire life and public image.) You can have moral qualms over his killing her and still understand. In any fair court of law it would count, at most as manslaughter particularly when you discover the murder occurred at the end, when you know the character who is not vicious or scheming. (Though at times he’s thick as two planks put together, in the way of introverted people.)

The author of the “sequel” decided that the fact he had killed his first wife, who was a thoroughly despicable character, meant his second wife couldn’t trust him, because he was going to kill her sooner or later; that he was a wife abuser; and that she should have the most soppy, “sisterhood” solidarity with the dead woman she never met and has reason — not just her husband’s testimony — to think was a rotter, while being “scared” of the man she loves and who never even raised his voice to her.

The bizarre — lack of — though process annoyed me so much that I think I threw the book in the trash. Look, there are ways to sell that ending to the story, but to do it you should give indications the husband is a psychopath — which negates the setup in the original book, but obviously they didn’t care — and that the dead woman was secretly a saint. But this actually wasn’t at all about the characters or the actual story. it was all in the author’s head, and for her it was self evident.

I ran into this yesterday night late — during a minor episode of insomnia — reading a mystery. I’m not going to name it because I like both the author and the series. But this one — an older one, I don’t remember reading — made me see red. It was exactly the same category error as in the “sequel” to Rebecca. And it is important to know the author is female.

In the mystery, the murdered woman has been revealed as more and more despicable, and in the end it is revealed that the man who killed her did so in service of his country, and in an act that saved millions.

And yet, the woman he loves above everything doesn’t want to ever see him, because he killed a woman. And the author obviously low key sympathizes with her and has the main investigator arrange a way so that the “murderer” — who is beyond the reach of the law because he did it in the service of his country and to prevent deaths — killed. Because, even though he’s an obviously decent soul and a young and sensitive man, he murdered a woman, so he must die.

I feel the need to pause here and point out that no, thank you so much, I do not in fact approve of murder. However we all know — all of us who aren’t crazy — there are murders that are justified to defend yourself or those who depend on you. Either because they are part of your family or because you are in a position to defend your country.

However, a thought experiment: say the victims in these particular books were men. Still venal, evil, and one threatening to destroy a good man whom he’s been torturing for years; the other one plotting something that will kill a vast number of inhabitants of a country. He’s plotting with the enemies of the country and also plotting to kill his spouse — who is also a secret agent, but on the side of the country that doesn’t want to be murdered — and he’s generally of low moral character. These men get killed: one by the man he’s been tormenting and whom he promises to destroy (and if following the book, whom he’s intentionally baiting to kill him as his final act of evil); the other by a young man in the service of his country.

Would anyone in their right mind assume the men who did the killings are vicious murderers or deserve to die? No? Yeah, thought so. And for the record, I don’t think the writers of these books would either.

So what is causing them to make these bizarre errors of character and plot?

Well, you see, the writers are women — both of whom consider themselves feminist — and the characters who deservedly get murdered are also women.

And, apparently, killing a woman no matter how deserved, is the forbidden thing. Anyone who kills a woman, no matter which woman, is ipso facto horrible and will murder all women given a chance. And particularly women characters will identify with the victim, even if there’s no resemblance whatsoever.

WTF, out?

Oh, I know the — lack of — thought behind this. It’s something like “Sisterhood of Women” and “If a man killed a woman, he killed all of us.”

It is in fact not only complete stupidity and moral absurdity, but also — very importantly — a betrayal of what they CLAIM to believe. Because feminists claim to believe that men and women are exactly alike and can fulfill the same roles in the exact same way. And yet when a woman does things that would get a man killed justifiably, we’re supposed to be horrified if she’s killed and to wish revenge for her death and destroy those who killed her.

Look, I completely understand the taboo on men hurting women. I think it’s the beginning of civilization. If there isn’t something moral, something in the head, preventing men from utterly obliterating women, what you have is barbarism, because no woman can physically defend herself from 99% of the men.

However, even in that there are begs. Even though a man isn’t supposed to hurt a woman, the self defense exception remains, as does protecting a lot of defenseless people when it’s your job to protect them. And I find it bizarre and illuminating that so called “feminists” who advocate for a level of equality that is frankly absurd and against biology in the end default to “Oh, no. you’re a man who hurt a woman. You should be destroyed.”

Illuminating?

Oh, yeah. Because, you know, I suspect some amount of this is the purest instinct. Women have trained, from the dawn of time, to avoid men who might hurt them. This means btw that outsized, powerful men are often on the receiving end of unwarranted female anger.

But mostly, mostly? It’s the Marxist rats in head. It starts with the idea that women everywhere in every culture are a disadvantaged “class.”

Now it is true that women throughout history and most of the world are indeed disadvantaged. Because women not being disadvantage requires a high level of culture and civilization.

However no woman in the West (unless a recent immigrant or being abused by recent, unassimilated immigrants. Sorry but it’s true) is at a disadvantage FOR BEING A WOMAN. Now, of course, there are women in horrible situations, but that’s personal stuff, not civilization. Our society has bent itself into pretzels trying to equalize things and has gone far too far to try to make women and men “equal.”

But in Marxist thought, women are a disadvantaged class, and the fact they’re disadvantaged means any member who doesn’t side with other women is a traitor siding with the “oppressor.” Even if the oppressor isn’t but is only identified as “oppressor class” because he has a penis.

Which is the utter insanity of “classes” bunched together on a single physical characteristic. Women can be completely different, but they all have a vagina, and therefore they are all, ultimately the same thing. Widgets in a group with “WOMEN” stamped on them. And the fact they have a vagina is supposed to override every other consideration, of worth, of individual character, even of simple human affinity.

To understand how stark raving mad this is, take two of my friends: I have a lot in common with M. C. A. Hogarth, in that we come from relatively similar cultures, we’re both mothers, we’re both writers. And neither of us is 100% in control of our writing and sometimes write books that make people headtilt at us. I also have a lot in common with Dave Freer, who has been a writing friend and companion for years. We have both have been ground down by the gears of trad pub, our kids are at similar life stages. And for two people born half a world apart with different cultures, we have a lot of the same principles and animating will.

Do I immediately love Maggie because she also has a vagina? EW. No. Like I am interested in my friends’ private parts!

Now take Dave Freer, my friend, my brother in ink, who sometimes kept me anchored in reality through our morning talks, (well, morning for him, evening for me. He lives in strange time zones) during the dark years. Say that I’m required to pick between him and say, AOC. WHO DO YOU THINK I OWE FRIENDSHIP, LOYALTY and PROTECTION TO?

“But Sarah, she has a vagina.” Yeah. Probably. Though EW I certainly don’t want to see it.

“If you don’t stand with her, you’re a gender traitor, a traitor to all womanhood.”

Yeah, yeah — lifts middle finger aloft — this for being a traitor to something I never swore allegiance to, to something that says nothing about the intelligence, knowledge, or moral character of the individual. Therefore I can’t betray it. Yes, I am female, but that cannot and does not mean I will love every female and despise every male.

I like, love and extend loyalty and friendship to individuals, not sex organs.

And I bet the authors mentioned above do the same. It’s just that when it comes to writing, the rats get in their heads and tell them that no no no they must side with the victim class!

Marxism is such a tiresome anti-reality brain short circuit! It’s not just wrong, evil and frankly completely divorced from reality, it’s also predictable and boring.

It’s time no one paid any attention to it, except to wave a middle finger at it when it demands attention.