The Collective

Guys, for those of you out there who aren’t female, women, people of vaginitude I bring you strange and wild news: We’re not a collective. We don’t share a brain. there isn’t a central brain sending signals through the nervous system. We don’t know when some woman somewhere is doing something utterly stupid. And we can’t stop the pudding heads, let alone the outright criminals from doing whatever the hell they want.

My reaction to the feminists calling me a gender traitor was to hold my middle fingers aloft, because i never swore allegiance to my vagina, or promised to support all women. My reaction to the people (and mostly AIs, though there is a large component of foreigners too) claiming that somehow, by being born with a vagina I AM loyal to other women above all, and therefore unfit for a free society is precisely the same. These are my middle fingers. Behold, they are a matched set.

And yes, before you ask, I said the same thing to the feminist idiots when they were demanding that — somehow — men control feral rapists who attack women. I pointed out men aren’t a collective being and the decent have no power to control the scum.

Guys… I’m tired. I haven’t fallen down the stairs — again — and I actually pseudo-took the day off today. Pseudo? Well, yes. You see, tomorrow I have to go back and finish packing the rest of the other house. We brought essential functions only over here, and Dan stays here, because he has a regular job (le 9 to 5 as the French say) but I got back tomorrow morning very early (taking the laptop, yes) and spend the rest of the week packing up stuff we didn’t get to. Mostly the (still half packed) library, but also the office closet (supplies) and the kitchen machines (waffle maker and the like) and … stuff like that. I didn’t go back today very early, because if I didn’t take a day “off” I was going to crash and burn. Except that I need to pack clothes for the week, and I was all out, so I had to unpack my dresser and closet. Still less than I’ve one, and not to the “my back hurts so much I can’t stand” point.

When I hit twitter and facebook, the last thing I want to see is the usual “right wing” people falling for the psy-ops yet again.

What psy-ops you ask as if you had just landed here from another planet.

Has any of you — any single one of you — asked why the Clancy murder got big on national news right now? Has anyone seen if her supporters in front of the courthouse are even local? Or if they’re being paid? Has anyone actually paid attention to how wide spread even awareness of her crime is far from the area? Among the not terminally on line? Because I hate to tell you, but even in office-water-cooler chat, women might appear to support her who simply know nothing of the situation and just heard that “some mom who was depressed killed her kids, and now evil people want her killed/condemned.”

Because most people are NOT terminally on line like the rest of us. And some of the ones who aren’t get pablum from their MSM.

All of which boils down to: Don’t you think the talk about removing women’s right to vote, or basically every civil liberty and sticking us back in harems or worse is… a little premature?

Don’t you think it’s weird that this trial is nationalized just when the left has lost heart and doesn’t know if their new bold socialism will fly? Don’t you think it might be just slightly psy-ops? (… psssst. It’s a psy-ops.)

The left knows people are scared of the socialists (a lot of them Arabs) and want the right to start behaving like they are sure the right actually is. They want people on the right to post things so stupid and so anti-female that the undecided normies go “Oh, it’s true, they’re all anti woman” and line up to vote for the socialists. And Muslims. And Muslim socialists.

And some number of dumb bunnies fall for the online screeching and pointing, and start repeating the talking points the psy-ops hands them.

<Pinches bridge of nose. No. Not every “civilized society” restricted women and treated them as subhuman. Unless you consider that most forms of “civilization” before the existence of the United States were in fact the type of thing where EVERYONE save for a small minority was held in horrible conditions, had no rights and was treated as subhuman. Which is true. So, yeah, they restricted women. And men. And people who had to look under their tunic to remember what they were. And small children. And large children.

And there is no correlation between how repressed/held in subhuman status women are and civilization. No, wait, there is no POSITIVE relation. The best place to study this would probably be Africa, first because more cultures, due to tribes, and second because if I remember my readings correctly the status of women runs the gamut. OTOH we can all agree that Africa should always be written, in Mike Resnick’s evocative phrase “poor fucked up Africa” so, let’s leave that alone, okay?

That gone, what do we have? Well, beyond the US, until recently Great Britain was — after the US — a beacon of progress and decent lifestyle. At their peak, too, they had some of the most freedom for women in the world (whatever the die away feminists tell you in their gothic romances.) And yet, they were innovating, creating, and massively wealthy compared to everyone else.

At the other end we have Muslim countries. I don’t want to hear peep one about how women want to be covered up in bad slip covers and be forbidden from participating in any public life, and how if they get raped you have to kill them because it’s somehow their fault. Muslim countries, by and large, have a horrible record on human rights in general and their treatment of women in particular. If the screamers online were right that women are the cause of the downfall of civilizations, well, hell, Islam would be charging into the future at speed, wouldn’t it? And everyone would be happy and joyous there. They would be a model for us, in the West.

No, they aren’t. Though I bet if you challenge some of the accounts demanding we cancel the 19th ammendment, they will tell you they are because… tada, any number of them are Muslims, foreign and domestic, longing for the “beauty” of Sharia law.

You know their motives, and the language tics and behavior of 95% of them give it away if you look at what else they post. (Kind of like if someone is screaming bloody anti-Semitism nine times out of ten they are from Russia.)

Look, this is a problem of social media. it’s global. And other places bring their rats in the head and display it for us.

There are also any number of AI adding to the screeching. Because Russia would really really like it if the left were in power and appeasing them again. Heck, for all I know Mexican cartels are throwing money at this because they’d prefer the anti-American left in power and letting them move in. For all I know gay-Bolivian-opera singers are in on this, looking for the sweet USaid money again!

What we don’t need are local pudding heads and idiots adding tot he clamor.

Are women more leftist than men? I don’t know. And neither do you. Our statistical sampling is shit. So is our voting. All we know is how SOME women answer the polls and you know what, some of us have fun with that. Wait. We don’t even know that, since I garandamntee that some of those respondents are made up out of whole cloth.

Dear Bob (Heinlein) we don’t even know how many women there are, not really, since a favorite trick of illegals is to have a woman borrow kids and collect welfare for a bunch of kids that don’t exist, some number of which are female. And that’s without counting how many women come in illegally and leave. Or whatever. We don’t know how many PEOPLE there are or how many of those are women.

The perception that all women are liberal comes from the fact that for the last 50? 60? years it’s been dangerous to declare yourself non-leftist in public. Because the left will straight up hurt you in every way they can. Women are more vulnerable and weaker. Not only aren’t they going to declare they’re not leftist, they might mask and claim to be leftist. Hell, I did for years because it was a condition of being employed, and I was socially sensitive enough to intuit that.

How many women think child murder is acceptable? Probably some number, because women are individuals and law of averages, some individuals will be criminal, evil or just plain crazy. But you have no way of figuring out how many women, in possession of the facts actually support a familial murderess. There might be some number that think they support Clancy because they’re misinformed. And some that SAY they support Clancy because the MSM and psy ops on social media have created the impression this is what “everyone” is doing. And women, again, are afraid to step out on their own.

Add to it that the last three generations of women have been heavily propagandized that “you have to support all women” and that we’re some kind of bizarre sisterhood, and yeah, some women, who apparently were born unable to just hold their middle fingers aloft, will cave to the pressure.

But the way out of that is to point out again and again that we’re not a collective being. This horrible person who did horrible things might have a vagina (presumably, since she had kids) and I have a vagina, but I suspect that’s all we ever had in common. I don’t support child murderers.

It’s not to pile on with the Sharia-lovers and bots and claim that for the sake of civilization women must be reduced to the status of domestic animals.

Because a) psyops are never for your own good. b) falling for this psy ops will scare the idiots into thinking the right is REALLY wanting to bring about Handmaid’s tail tale. (G-d, I know it’s a lot to ask, but can they please read another book?) c) because you’re pissing me off, and I’m exhausted, and so are my middle fingers.

This psy-ops is so obvious, so blatant, that I can’t believe some of you fell for it. And yet, there it is, on social media.

Didn’t you learn anything from the last six years?

Buckle up. The mid term elections are going to be a straight up bitch, and we only win them by the grace of G-d, even thought drooling idiots scaring away half the voters.

Why do I need to point out it’s a psy-ops? Again and again, learn the signs. You won’t have me around forever. If the other kids were screaming and pushing and saying we needed to burn the Constitution, would you do the same? Why? Because you forgot your brain in your other jacket?

And if you didn’t fall for it, good on you. Now go fan out through the net and the real world and point out it’s a psy-ops and also that it makes no sense. And also that the person posting the same thing again and again might not be… precisely alive, but just a bunch of electrons somewhere. And also that some of these names have a … foreign quality to them. And also that psy-ops orchestrators are not our friends. They don’t wish us well. And we should not help them.

Get out there and spread the truth. And may the Lord have mercy on us all.