Waiter, There’s Soup In My Novel
Yes, it is possible to write an interesting – even riveting – book and make it feel boring or at least “blah” when you reach the end.
The most difficult of these to cure is when you turn your book into soup.
What do I mean by soup? I mean you throw everything in but the kitchen sink and that only because it’s attached and you can’t find the crow bar. It starts out to be a book about gnomes, but by the time you’re done you’ve got the entire fairy kingdom in there, and dragons, and spaceships, and aliens, and perhaps a three-legged hedgehog. I’d call it stew, except that this “adding on” effect actually dilutes the result, so it’s more like soup.
This is a bad tendency of mine. It started, I think, from my being young and an idiot and wanting to make books “real” by throwing in elements that weren’t directly related to the plot. I learned the folly of that, but I’ve never lost the tendency to overcomplicate things. It might be innate. Look, I used to fail the easy tests because I thought “It can’t be that simple” and then credited my teachers with far more cunning than they ever had.
So I have trouble keeping books simple. In fact, the longer I spend working at a novel, the more complex it becomes. If I do more than three revisions, you can guarantee it will be soup.
How do you fix that?
The way I use most often is the “run to the finish.” If I leave myself very little time, I can’t throw in everything. The faster my books are written, the cleaner they feel.
But you already wrote the book, and there’s ham and beets and a bit of radish floating in it, and none of it works together. Well, you’re in luck. A book is only like soup to a point. If you haven’t put it out yet, it’s not “cooked” and you can remove elements the readers will NEVER know about.
My suggestion is that you start by deciding what the dish – er – novel is. If you have time, set it aside and let it rest, then come back at it in a month or three. You’ll be amazed how the original plan stands out clear and the rest as accretions. It’s then very easy to prune.
Failing that, decide what the novel will be about. You’re either writing beets or radishes. Make a decision and stick to it, then carefully and rationally remove everything that sticks out. The result won’t be heart’s blood, but it will coherent.
The more difficult part of this is “How To Finish With A Bang” which I’ll do tomorrow, because it requires more concentration than I can muster on the last day of vacation.
I’m going to write a bit, put up a few stories, then go for a walk. Hopefully I finish this series tomorrow and can then edit it, convert it, and put it somewhere for ya’ll to download.
“[D]ecide what the novel will be about”?
I thought a novel was about 40,000 words, plot optional (unless you’re one of those strange writers who cares what the general public thinks.)
LikeLike
LOL. Actually this is not not having the novel be about something, but having the novel be about too much
LikeLike
I always find out what the plot is when I try to write a blurb. Try creating a short, punchy hook when there’s dozens of strange vegetables, including the one from the old Chinese take-out container, in your stew. Or pot-au-feu. Or minestrone.
LikeLike
Does that mean that I can’t have both aliens and dragons? Well, one dragon, sorta, and the aliens do use magic…
About mixing genres, I thought Weber’s ‘Out of the dark’ worked pretty well. Apart from the fact that one of the important characters was properly introduced only towards the end, that did feel a bit like that deus ex machina thing people keep talking about. I suppose the purpose was to have a big reveal for the ending, but there wasn’t, perhaps, enough foreshadowing before the reveal so it felt kind of abrupt.
LikeLike
It wasn’t literal. It’s always more like me trying to throw EVERYTHING in. Of course you can mix genres.
LikeLike
Can NOT! Look at those Butcher books, the Dressden Files: mixing magic and hard-boiled detective genres and a compleat critical and commercial bollocks. Or that senile English git, Terry Whusname and his “Nacht Watch” stories — utter codswallop!!!
BTW – congrats to the proprietor for employing a spellchecker that doesn’t blink at codswallop.
LikeLike
We always wallop cods around here. Spare the rod spoil the cod, I say.
(No, I’m NOT going to examine the double meanings there. I’m pure, remember. PURE.)
LikeLike
I haven’t had good codswallop in years. My mother used to make it with any elder abominations that would come up the drains.
(Ha! how’s that for mixing genres–Betty Crocker with Lovecraft. . . and why does the spellchecker choke on Betty Crocker but not Lovecraft?)
LikeLike
Kali! This is an sf/f writer’s blog… ;)
LikeLike