No, I’m not about to announce I have burnout. On the contrary. I’m about to analyze why I don’t have it.
Burnout is the reason I don’t have anything coming out in 2011. But the burnout occurred in 08/09.
For those of you who are not acquainted with the inner mechanics of a writers life (at least as it was, even as it’s passing from this world) for me at least things worked like this: send out proposals. Hear about them over the next six months (year. Two.)
Proposals are normally an outline and the first three chapters. The problem with this for me is that once I hear the character in my head – once I’ve done the preliminary work to have him/her be that real to me – then getting the rest of the book written is just a matter of time.
But let’s take me in 03, when the Shakespeare series had tanked spectacularly and I didn’t have anything else sold. We were paying on two mortgages, I had kids in elementary and I needed to sell. (Yes, I could have found a job, but the only job I’m qualified to do – free lance translator – takes as much time establishing yourself as writing. Sometimes more. Then there’s secretarial, and technology hit THEIR job before it hit writing. When every executive keyboards, secretaries are few and not particularly well paid. In fact, they’re barely above retail, which was my other option. Both of those would require me to leave the kids with someone and neither job pays enough to cover that.)
Particularly because my name was burned, I couldn’t count on selling everything I sent out. There was no point just writing a new book and sending it out. Chances were very high it wouldn’t sell.
So in the space of six months, I wrote seventeen proposals. And it almost killed me. Because I’d just got INTERESTED in writing a book, when I had to drop it and write the next proposal. And the next. And the next. And all the while I was perfectly conscious that I might never sell any of these – that these characters might die being born; that it was quite possible no one would ever see my clever world building.
Then the books sold. They sold as series, and they sold in such a manner that I was “locked” doing four to six books a year. And of course, I still had to do the occasional outline. It was around this time – I think 07 – that an older friend in the field took me gently to task for writing too many books a year, which was seen as a sign I didn’t care enough about any. But I really didn’t have much choice. By 07 the field was crazy enough that if I didn’t stay on the treadmill, if I said “No” to any given contract, it could very easily be my last.
I’ve said before I can write six books a year. I can. It’s different though when I have to, and when I have to regardless of what else – illness, kids issues, etc – is going on in my life at the time. It’s also different when the book is not necessarily the book I’m burning to write, but simply the one that’s due next.
I could recognize the symptoms, including the frequent illnesses. When you don’t give yourself any way to escape the unbearable, your body gives them to you. What I didn’t know was what to do about it.
It got so bad while writing book five of the musketeer mysteries (at a time I suspected they were going to cancel the series anyway) that I had trouble keeping in mind where I’d left the characters two chapters back. I’d flip back to see what I’d done, and by the time I came back to the current page I didn’t remember it, again. Super betas had to step in to help with that edit.
Being able to recognize burnout, I bought a book called something like “overcoming burnout.” It identified three main causes to burnout. Any of them could induce that “smoky” feeling, but if you put the three together, it because a perfect storm.
They were:
Poor pay – this entire time, I was working weekends and holidays, trying to keep up with obligations, writing 4 to 6 books a year for… around thirty thousand dollars in the good years, twenty thousand in the bad ones. For those outside the US, twenty thousand is a “retail salary”, not beginner but not spectacular. How is that possible at four to six books a year? Well, to begin with the mysteries never paid more than 6.5k (And the last one paid less.) Also, books get paid in three “bits” – one for contract, one for delivery and one for publication. Contract is usually the biggest chunk, so the next two payments will not give you a great annual income. And of course you don’t sell new series every year.
Overwork – again, while I might choose to write four to six books a year, and while I CAN technically write a book in three days, there is a world of difference between writing it because I’m burning to do it, and writing it because its number is up. Particularly when the proposal was written years ago and the world has gone “dead.”
Lack of Control Over Career – once the books left my hands, that was it. I had no more control. My contribution was only one and perhaps in many ways the least important of the factors determining whether that book would sell and the series would go on. Arguably more important was the cover – over which I had no say – the “position” of the book in the “scale of push” the house determined to make. I really couldn’t tell them “you will push my book, so that there are at least three in every store.” And don’t tell me that’s related to the quality of what I turned in. It’s not. How much push/how much they’ll work on the cover/etc is determined when they give you the advance. I.e. on proposal, which as any writer knows is but a pallid image of the real book. (At least for me it is.) You could turn in spun gold, and no one would know. I know of at least one friend’s book whom no one in the house read (though the copyeditor did, of course) after turn in. I had to watch in mute horror as the third musketeer was given a cover that spine-out was indistinguishable from the first, and cover-out, because of the cover design, made you look really close to make sure, for instance. As a mystery reader I knew this would kill the series. There was nothing I could do.
So I realized I was headed for the perfect burnout, if I wasn’t there already. The problem is the solutions the book advocated “get another job” or “work for someone else” or… Were all impractical… or all required me to walk away from writing. And I couldn’t do that.
But all the same, I let my contracts taper out in 09, without sending any proposals out. I couldn’t bring myself to write coherent proposals. (I tried for Toni, who’d asked, but they didn’t make much sense. In fact, Darkship Renegades is as different from the proposal it sold under as any book I’ve ever written.)
And if the above is taken as a whine – it’s not. I was lucky to have a job and to keep writing. Most of my midlist friends weren’t so lucky. BUT the job I was lucky to have was grinding me to bits.
In 10 I wrote one book on spec and that because I wanted to. Weirdly that helped, even though that book has sold unspectacularly and heaven knows how it will do in marketing. And now I’m under contract again, and under contract for a lot of books. But it feels different.
First because I can take breaks between those to write indie short stories (and soon a novel) to put up. This means I can do something where I do have control over my career. Second, I can see next year from here, and next year will probably be half and half indie and not. Which means I get a lot more control back.
The burnout book was right. Changing one of the factors helps. Now, mind you, it’s entirely possible I can’t figure out how to make money in the new model. But I think I’ll figure it out. Yes, I could have done without this upheaval at this time in my life, otoh without the upheaval how long could I have kept it up?
So it’s all for the best, in the best of all possible worlds. And lest we feel like the lone ranger, secretaries got their field upended before we did. For most of them it has meant lower pay, but for some it’s meant much higher pay as they’ve learned new specialties: accounting programs; research; marketing. Secretaries should have been run out of jobs in the hundreds, but they weren’t. They stayed. They changed. They found a way to continue making a living out of things that if you squint still look “secretaryish” but are a lot more complicated – and possibly rewarding – than just sitting at a machine, clean-typing copy after copy of documents. (And when I said there were few openings above, I meant for someone like me, who doesn’t know specialized software or have another side-specialty.)
Am I rah rah about indie? About half and half. The other half is terrified that I’ll never find my footing in this new world. But others have gone ahead of me, and I intend to learn from them.
However, the commenter who told me on my blog that indie I’d have no excuses for any failure got it upside down. Will I fail? Oh, once or twice, at least (probably more) my books will be duds (and probably not the ones I expect.) BUT at least I’ll know I failed at my own hands. I can’t explain why but this feels much, much more bearable than watching a series be killed by a decision I didn’t make and to which no one seemed to pay much attention.
Beyond that, indie allows me to do stuff to keep some control of my other series. For instance, because of that lag above, Darkship Renegade will come out almost two and a half years after Darkship Thieves. In the old market place that was a killing lag. So I’m going to try to do a couple of novellas not with Athena, but in the same universe, and get them out there between now and the summer of twelve. That I can is an enormous innovation. (Before, I might have tried to, but the lag time in getting things published in magazines, even if accepted right away ranged from a year to two.)
The refinishing mysteries will be at least as late, and then I’ll have to figure out if I can continue the series on my own. But until then, and before the fans kill me, I will do a series of self published mysteries set in the same town, with the characters of Daring Finds as secondary characters.
And so, I’m no longer crispy on the outside. I might still be flakey on the inside. Am I sure this will all work out wonderfully? Well… no. But let’s put it this way – I couldn’t go on much longer the way I was. My health – physical and mental – wouldn’t allow it. So, I have one more chance. I intend to take it. I intend to grab it with both hands, and hang little bells to its feet.
Wish me luck.
*Crossposted at Mad Genius Club*
Hey Sarah, help me out here. I’m one of those guys that have to move their lips to read. What is “indie?” GRIN
Ron
LikeLike
Independent — straight through smash words, Amazon, etc.
LikeLike
Actually, Sarah and Ron, it depends on who you ask. The general agreement is that an indie is an author who self-publishes as Sarah said. However, there is another definition which includes small and micro e-publishers as well because they don’t always have the same access to e-tailers as the big publishers do, so they have to go the same route as the individual author..
LikeLike
Sarah, I think once you get out from under the huge rocks of non-Baen publishers, you’ll be a rocket!
LikeLike
Thank you mucho.
Ron
LikeLike
Good luck. I really admire your boldness and I think you made the right decision for the right reasons.
LikeLike
Hi Erin. I’m getting to this via your Twitterfeed. I recognize this crisis that so many authors are talking about these day. I’m just getting into the game and wondering if I should bother with legacy publishing at all. At least you can point to your published novels and say: “I’ve got it.” What would you say to the unpublished author of several kid’s plays who is just finishing up a mystery for kids?
LikeLike
Sarah, not Erin, so… not sure. BUT what I’d say is qualified. I’m not sure how ebooks for kids are doing. Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I don’t think many kids have readers? At any rate, YA is still going great guns traditional, so I’d encourage trying there first. BUT this is qualified because this is NOT my field, so I have no clue.
LikeLike
Oops. I think the Erin name was from a retweet or something. Sorry.
Thanks for the advice.
LikeLike
Upheaval Happens – except it is usually spelled with four letters.
In spite of what some argue, and as you recognize with your comments about the changing waters of the secretarial pool, you are not alone, nor unique in this experience. One real benefit of knowing History (aside from the ability to swipe plots a la David Drake) is the advantages of perspective. When the dot com boomed and busted anybody with a reasonable knowledge of History should have been able to recognize the pattern; the railroads did it in the 19th Cent and the automobiles did it in the first half of the 20th. Dot Com merely went through the experience at warp speed. I have been considering the parallels between what is happening in Publishing and the demise of the Hollywood Studio System.
In each case we had a system in which certain participants — “talent” — were taken in and nurtured by a production system. Success within that system depended only somewhat on the qualities and abilities of that talent and rather overly much on the beneficence of the producers; actors cast nearly as much for who liked (or disliked: see John Gilbert) them as for acting ability; authors get promoted less for the quality of their work than for some publisher’s idea they have potential. And both systems produced great works of art and provided a comfortable haven for those who succeeded at fitting in.
But neither the Studios nor Publishing could persist forever. Enormously profitable systems sow the seeds of their own demise for a vast variety of reasons, most of them inherent to the fact that vast profits are indication of an imbalanced system. Upheavals happen, but as Harry Lime said: “You know what the fellow said: In Italy for 30 years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love – they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.”
LikeLike
Maaja — not a problem, except the the funny thing is I have a character named Erin in the back burner. So there was this terrible moment of disorientation…
LikeLike
Amanda
Yes, that too. Also small and micro usually leave the author more free. And as you know, I plan to use both…
LikeLike
I’m frightened at how fast you can write if you can finish a book in three days. At 1000 words/hr, that’s still only 72,000 words. And that’s with no sleep! I think the fastest it would be possible for me to write a book would be something like 7K/day, so 12 or so days.
LikeLike
actually I CAN (and have) done 2k words an hour if I’m in the “zone”. No, I can’t explain it. If I want to do it, I find myself plodding along at 1k words every four hours. IF I’m just scared and it has to be done it flies. No idea why.
LikeLike