When I started out, like 90% of you, I did what newby writers do – I wrote a good time for my characters.
Look, most of us – unless there’s something seriously wrong with us – don’t like hurting people. Very few writers I know would consider going up to a total stranger and kicking him or her where it hurts. We just don’t have it in us. Much less would most of us go up to our kids or cats and hit them really hard for no reason.
Characters are somewhere between total strangers and kids or cats. In a way, you feel like they’re independent adults, but in another way they’re created by you and at your mercy.
Now, I was a little better than the average bear because I’d read so much. I was aware that characters had to be put through the wringer and twisted at some point. I just reserved the right to do this for two pages, then spend the next hundred pages letting them have fun and get nice things because, duh, they suffered.
It wasn’t very good. I once told a rape in half a page, and the word clothes let alone the word rape or even assault were NEVER used.
So I had to learn to write the hurty parts out. And this particular book, I’m stuck with characters who are in a world of hurt and trying to fix it for almost the entire novel – it just let up a little on the emotional pain fifty pages from the end, and it feels like a weight was lifted off me, even though they still have to fight for their lives and their world.
And here’s what I’ve learned about writing pain and putting your characters through a tough time (I learned this both from doing it and from reading other people who do it – particularly their mistakes. And yes, some of the ‘mistakes’ were published, just not very good):
1 – Your characters got to hurt. No, I don’t like hurting mine, but if I’m reading a book by someone else where all the characters do is get nice surprises, get patted on the back, pick clothes and have breakfast, I’m going to get bored REALLY fast. Even if these people truly are the bestest in any world. The only books I’ve read that fail at this are not published. The only authors I’ve read who don’t understand this rule will never be published. Study the perennial models for stories. I know Cinderella got to laugh and sing with cute woodland characters in the Disney version, but read the real thing. She gets to suffer quite a bit before the triumph. It’s what gives the triumph meaning. (And no, having all the hurt be in the past, so you get to write the triumph part doesn’t work.)
2- Particularly if you hate writing these bits, be aware that your faculty for sensing “enough is enough” or even “ew” will be blunted. You truly don’t need to give us a 10 page description of how the wounds infected after your character got beaten. Most readers aren’t sadists. They want to read enough to know there was damage (not just be told) but they don’t want to be DRAGGED through it. (I’ll grant you most books that do this are horror.) There is a balance. It’s hard as hell to strike, but you can learn it from reading other people who do this well.
3 – Do NOT have your character “magically healed” or some other dodge after some hellish physical torture or some massive fight. Well, not unless it’s part of the setup. My characters in Shifters DO heal very fast. However I make sure they still feel their hurts. It’s just I can get them hurt to where a human would be dead. Particularly do NOT have your character magically healed by forgetting they’re hurt. (The early Laurell Hamilton did this regularly. She only got away with it because the pace of her action was so fast.) Let us see the character coming up from the bottom slowly. The fact he’s vulnerable for a few chapters will keep us on the edge of our seats, too.
4 – DO NOT have your character make some terrible mistake (and create emotional suffering) and then be told “oh, it’s nothing. No, darling, no one suffered because of your faux pas.” This is the emotional/psychological equivalent of instant magical healing.
5- DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES have all your other characters be extra nice to your main character because “he’s suffered so much.” Oh, sure, if your main character is elderly and his sufferings kept his city free or saved a bunch of kids or whatever. Or if your character is a young lady who just got raped. For a chapter or two these get the “poor thing” exemption from SOME of the rest of the cast. But all of them? Forever? And if they’re not in these positions. No. Look, if one of your friends had gone through hell would you cut them slack forever? Or do you at some point say “well, you know, it’s time to put your behind in the past”? (Okay, I like some Disney movies.) And how does an entire city/civilization know about someone’s private suffering, anyway? And why does everyone care? And no one gets jealous? What? Suffice to say I’ve read books like this published, but it’s usually the last thing I read by the author. It’s a newby mistake, where the author is trying to soothe the characters and compensate him for having to hurt him.
6- KEEP PERSPECTIVE. A good test is “if I had a friend this happened to, would it be such a horrible thing?” If you do that, you probably won’t have characters talk about their “great suffering” because they sprained an ankle last year. (Okay, most of this is in romances, but still.) Remember from the ouside the readers don’t care if your baby’s toe is pinching. Imagining you read it in someone else’s book and/or that it happened to a friend of yours will help you figure out how to treat it.
I’m going to get back to my novel. It just feels good to have the characters out of the emotional iron maiden, even if I’m still handling them with brass knuckles…
I often make the comment that writers almost have to be closet sadists. They create these nice, likeable people (the kind I like to read about–I rapidly lose interest in the other) and torture them unmercifully.
That’s been a hard point for me in my writing but then most of my writing has been “idea focused” rather than “character focused” (which is fine when writing for Analog and their particular audience, not so good for other venues). Since I’m trying to expand my “writerly muscles” this is something I wrestle with.
LikeLike
I think such writers confuse their job with that of “host.”
I’m having a party of local writers at my house next week. And the last thing I’d want is a fistfight to break out, or someone to pull a gun. It would make the guests uncomfortable and a good host wants to make all his guests feel relaxed and to enjoy a pleasant time. But if I’m writing a scene in a novel, a fistfight or gun play is always (almost) a good thing.
In any scene I want to look at the people involved and ask how I can introduce conflict, friction, misunderstanding between them and maintain a fitting level of tension. In real life, this is the opposite of how I live as I try to minimize all these things.
There is a sense in which every writer should be a devil devising unpleasantness for his characters to go through en route to their goal. One should hardly aspire to this in real life.
LikeLike
I was blogging about this myself recently. I still am on the wrong side of my first million words, I guess. I am ok with making my characters suffer and with putting obstacles in their path that would daunt Heracles. But I have a hard time being the sadist I apparently need to be.
Thanks for the note about magical healing, that is something I have in my current novel. It makes sense for the characters and culture and, since there’s a ticking clock, I can’t afford for the MC to spend six months healing realistically from a sword cut. I will go back and make sure they’re suffering during the healing process though.
Again, thanks and good luck on your latest Darkship book
LikeLike
A motto from -I have no idea which book on writing- anymore:
Make them nice,
Make them bleed,
Make them hurt,
Make them grow.
Or don’t bother making them. {unless they’re scenery}
You’ve said it so much more eloquently than I, but that’s what I got out of it.
And yeah, David, closet sadists indeed.
LikeLike
The best writing advice I’ve heard is, “Find out what your character loves the most, and take it away. Find out what your character fears the most, and make it happen. How that gets delt with is your story.
LikeLike
Mark said: “I can’t afford for the MC to spend six months healing realistically from a sword cut.”
I think you’ve got the right idea about making the magic healing hurt the protagonist, but be creative about it. How about the magic requires his lover’s arm to become disfigured, withered and crippled? He gets to fight the baddies, but he’s got to carry around this guilt of having hurt a loved-one.
LikeLike
I agree. You can’t treat your character like they are wrapped in cotton candy.
At the same time you’ve got to keep it realistic. I can’t remember the book now, but the main character should have been dead after the first chapter, he had taken so much damage. This kept up through the second chapter, and I stopped reading. It just wasn’t believable.
You have to walk the edge of a knife. You can’t be too nice to your character. You can’t be too nasty to your character. There’s a fine line where there’s enough conflict to make it interesting, but not too much to make it unbelievable.
The good writers are those who can pull this off believably, time after time. The bad writers are those who make a mess of it.
Wayne
LikeLike
Oh, let me assure you, I can find many other ways of being a bad writer (and have.) Weirdly, some people can pull this off. Recently I tried to re-read the first three Laurel Hamilton’s Anita Blake books, which pull this off. Weirdly the descriptions of men put me off re-reading — I think because my sons are approaching that age? If I were more politically correct I’d call it an “objectification of men” and I can’t even tell you why. I read romances that don’t make me feel that way — but I remember the first time I read to the end, past points in which the character should have been dead because of the pacing.
In the book I’m still micro-editing I actually had to ask a medical school professor to vet it (and he will again when finished) to ensure I don’t go too far.
LikeLike