.
No, this is not the obligatory ecological post. Today, in the car on the way from dinner (not cooking at Thanksgiving is logical when you have only four people – five with our friend/honorary uncle to the kids) I was talking to the kids about a book I read when I was maybe 12/13.
This book – whose name I (unfortunately) can’t remember – came amid a trio of “fairytale books.” At twelve or so, I decided that I hadn’t read enough fairytales and was trying to round out my education. This one looked like a nineteenth century book with woodcuts, was written by some unknown Portuguese author and the title was something like “the foundling.”
It started with a baby girl found abandoned in a forest. She’s taken in by an older woman who gathers wood and who makes a good – if unloving – foster mother.
Half-bored, I felt I knew where this was going, but continued reading, expecting the more or less obligatory hidden princess story.
I was wrong. Though I no longer remember the details of the book – yes, I read it a good hundred times, as it became one of my favorites, but it was a long time ago and memory gets blunted – I know that the parentage of the girl is never revealed. The old woman dies, the girl is turned out of the house, she ends up working as a maid and some other menial jobs. Her work ethic and (what my friend Dave Freer calls) battler spirit get her through. She helps an old lady who is dying and whom no one looks after and, in return, is given an old book of recipes.
She starts her own little business selling cakes and pastries at fairs and meets a young man of very good family who – however – does not marry her because of course, she’s a foundling of unknown parentage. Eventually her little business becomes a successful pastry shop and later she meets another young man, a pastry chef, and this time it all works out and they marry and have a happy family and a successful business.
If you’d asked me at twelve, I’d have told you I had no idea why the story charmed me as it did. I only knew I liked re-reading it and it became one of my favorite books. It felt good and somehow “right” in a way that fairytales and romances didn’t.
Today, when I telling the kids about it, I realized why. It was because the character was a strong woman. Born with the ultimate disadvantage, the ultimate lack of support, she doesn’t – like fairytale princesses – either get rescued by a strong knight nor even by fate that reveals her to be a hidden princess. Also, she never complains; she never repines – she takes the situation she finds herself in and makes the best out of it, all the while looking out for those who are weaker or in more need than her. This last characteristic nets her the all-important recipe book (supposedly created by a medieval convent, which rings true for Portugal, and lost for centuries.) When her romance doesn’t work because her very conventional suitor wants a girl of suitable family, she doesn’t go into a decline, she just goes on with life.
She is, in fact, what editors so often say they want “a strong woman heroine, self sufficient, a good role model for growing girls.” Only, from my observation and reading, by this they usually mean mouthy, aggressive, foolhardy and complains a lot about men till one wonders if said character has an issue with being born female. There are exceptions, of course, but complaining about fate and men and being bitter seems to be obligatory.
And yet, it is true that this type of character is not only a great role model for young women, she is the type of role model we do need. Earth needs women (yes, and men, but we’re talking women here) who take care of the weak and helpless. Earth needs women who don’t whine. Earth needs women who cheerfully shoulder the burden of what needs to be done.
Earth does not need women who complain about men all the while neurotically obsessing on clothes and jewelry to attract said men and pursuing the highest-status males they can possibly get. There is nothing wrong with these activities, in moderation, but when they become the focus of existence they create a generation of infantile harpies. Now, I don’t think any women in real life are as bad as that, but almost all women characters in books and movies are just like that.
Young women who read/watch these characters end up feeling they must APPEAR like them or they’ll be thought weak. And this is wrong. Strength in women – and men – can be defined not as throwing weight around but in doing what must be done for oneself and those who depend on one.
Earth needs grown up women.
I very much hate to tell people what to do, much less what to be, but I wish we could set about writing – and living – role models for the women Earth needs.
Since I presume the “no politics” light is still lit I will of course say NOTHING other than to agree with you in that YES, we very much need strong women.
LikeLike
also following the rule I read about in the above comment, I agree and I think it is happening. I would love to read that book.. I think that is why I liked the Little House books. Came here from instapundit. loved this post. Thanks!
LikeLike
Sarah Darling — this is what a lot of my friends call me ;) — welcome. The politics rule isn’t hard and fast, but it’s something I keep around to keep my fans from killing each other. (It’s unsightly and the ground is too frozen for that many graves.)
I try very hard to write women who do for themselves and not just whine about stuff. I’ve found even when the worlds I write in are very, very bad the survivors I write about make the whole thing uplifting.
And instapundit is one of my regular reads…
LikeLike
Sarah, first, how nice to find your blog, especially since I enjoy your work. Thanks for your post! Your heroine’s actions exemplify what the science of positive psychology is discovering about the surest routes to increased well-being, thriving, or happiness — pick your word. Persistence, resilience, character strengths, competence, autonomy, relatedness: it’s all there. I’ll be looking for the story also as I could use it in my teaching. If I find it, I will send it along. Thanks again!
LikeLike
I know I’m stopping by late, but you just posted the link on LJ today…
Have you tried to find the story again?
LikeLike
Yes, but I think it was published sometime in the nineteenth century (probably late nineteenth) and exclusively in Portuguese — also was equivalent to mid-list today. Trying to find it is sort of the equivalent of the people that keep bugging my friend who works at the used book store: “I read this book twenty years ago. It was a about a poney. It had a green cover. Do you have it?” It’s perhaps more important for me to wonder if I can write a similar book for kids today. OTOH bet you dollars to doughnuts it would never sell to the gatekeepers. Possibly not to the kids, either — who knows? (Though Harry Potter was a recasting of the old English school adventures, which everyone would have bet would never sell today, so…)
LikeLike
Go ahead and write it! I’ll bet the editors are just as sick of the whiny heroines as you are, if not more so.
LikeLike